Secondary cancers after breast-conserving therapy in Tokyo database.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
Kenshiro Shiraishi ◽  
Keiichi Nakagawa ◽  
Jiro Kawamori ◽  
Kenji Ibukuro ◽  
Atsushi Fukuuchi ◽  
...  

139 Background: The more patients overcome early breast cancer and become cancer survivors as a result of modern sophisticated approach, the more secondary cancers inevitably arise. The second malignancies after breast conserving therapy (BCT) are well-known sticky dilemma because of additional anxiety and need for medical care for longer-time. However, it is unclear whether secondary cancers negatively affect prognosis of breast cancer survivors. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of long-term cancer survivors after BCT for locoregional invasive or noninvasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1982 and mid-2012. Actuarial rates of overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. We compared between-group differences using the log-rank test. Results: Eight hundred sixty patients (32%) were followed-up for more than 10 years. At a median follow-up of 90 months, 146 patients had developed a second malignancy. The greatest increases in risk were for leukemia (Standardized incidence ratio (SIR): 4.24 (1.52–8.31)), ovarian cancer (SIR: 4.12 (2.40–6.31)), reno-ureteral cancer (SIR: 3.18 (1.14–6.23)), endometrial cancer (SIR: 2.48 (1.27–4.08)), and pancreatic cancer (SIR: 2.32 (1.11–3.99)). No increased risk was observed for other gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancer, malignant melanoma, lymphoma, thyroid or head and neck cancer. Overall 10-year cumulative incidence of OS without secondary cancer was 93.3%, and 10-year cumulative incidence of OS with secondary cancer was 81.5%. (p<0.001)Overall 10-year cumulative incidence of CSS without secondary cancer was 94.2%, and 10-year cumulative incidence of CSS with secondary cancer was 92.8%. (p=0.749). This likelihood of survival disadvantage is similar to that with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrecnce. Conclusions: Secondary cancers after BCT negatively impact on OS. Given the life-threatening nature to cancer survivors, lifetime caution such as smoking cessation, alcohol intake abstention, weight control, physical activity, and other healthy lifestyle must be paid.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina M. Dieli-Conwright ◽  
Nathalie Sami ◽  
Mary K. Norris ◽  
Junxiang Wan ◽  
Hiroshi Kumagai ◽  
...  

AbstractMOTS-c is a mitochondrial derived peptide with exercise mimetic activity that elicits beneficial effects on metabolism and exercise capacity. Furthermore, MOTS-c effects in humans are affected by race, potentially via ethnic-specific mtDNA variations. Women treated for breast cancer are at an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, due to side effects of cancer-treatments. We conducted a secondary analysis of the effects of a 16-week aerobic and resistance exercise intervention on MOTS-c in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors (BCS). BCS (Stage I–III) were randomized to exercise or standard care. The intervention promoted aerobic and resistance exercise for 16 weeks. MOTS-c was analyzed in fasting plasma using an in-house ELISA. Within and between group differences were assessed by paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA. Pearson’s correlation was computed to assess the association between MOTS-c and metabolic biomarkers at baseline and post-exercise. Twenty-five Hispanic-BCS and 24 non-Hispanic White BCS were included. Hispanic BCS were younger, of greater adiposity, had higher stage cancers, and had worse metabolic profiles at baseline compared to non-Hispanic White BCS (p < 0.001). Post-exercise, MOTS-c levels significantly increased when compared to baseline and the usual care group among non-Hispanic White BCS (p < 0.01) but not among Hispanic breast cancer survivors (p > 0.01). Post-exercise levels of MOTS-c among non-Hispanic White BCS were significantly associated with reductions in fat mass, body weight, HOMA-IR, CRP, and an increase in lean mass (p < 0.01). A 16-week aerobic and resistance intervention increased MOTS-c levels among non-Hispanic White BCS. Trial registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01140282 as of June 9, 2010. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01140282.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1885-1902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda B. Piacentine ◽  
Karen M. Robinson ◽  
Leslie J. Waltke ◽  
Judy A. Tjoe ◽  
Alexander V. Ng

Physical activity benefits the health and well-being of breast cancer survivors (BCS). Yet, many African American survivors do not routinely exercise and have increased risk of poor outcomes. The purpose of this mixed-method study was to identify motivational factors compelling African American BCS to participate in a 14-week team walking program and to intend to continue exercise after the intervention concluded. Focus groups were held with participants ( n = 12) before and after training. Content analysis discovered themes before the intervention: Not wanting to go at it alone, exercise not a life or treatment priority, cancer treatment affected activity, advocates to exercise, and can exercise really help? Four themes postintervention themes included: In the same boat, changed mind-set, improved weight and activity, and overcoming barriers. Physical data verified improvements. Results suggest that a team-based exercise training program may assist in overcoming a sedentary behavior tendency and subsequently improve health among survivors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2061-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rola Hamood ◽  
Hatem Hamood ◽  
Ilya Merhasin ◽  
Lital Keinan-Boker

Purpose Breast cancer treatments have been associated with an increased risk of multiple health-related adverse outcomes, but the relationship with diabetes remains unclear. This study investigated the association between hormone therapy and diabetes risk in breast cancer survivors. Patients and Methods We performed a case-cohort study of 2,246 female survivors recruited from the Leumit health care fund who were diagnosed with primary nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer in 2002 through 2012. A 20% random subcohort was sampled at baseline, and all diabetes cases were identified. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Of 2,246 breast cancer survivors, 324 developed diabetes over a mean follow-up of 5.9 years. The crude cumulative incidence of diabetes that accounted for death as a competing risk was 20.9% (95% CI, 18.3% to 23.7%). In multivariable-adjusted models, hormone therapy was associated with increased diabetes risk (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.55; P = .008). The hazard for tamoxifen use (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.26; P = .013) was less pronounced than the use of aromatase inhibitors (HR, 4.27, 95% CI, 1.42 to 12.84; P = .010). Conclusion Active hormone therapy is a significant risk factor of diabetes among breast cancer survivors. Although cessation of treatment is not recommended because the survival benefits of hormone therapy outweigh the risks, preventive strategies aimed at lifestyle modifications may minimize the risk.


Author(s):  
Francisco García-Torres ◽  
Rosario Castillo-Mayén

Cancer may influence personality in patients and survivors. However, the possible relations between the treatments that the patients have undergone and the personality in survivors are not clear. This study aimed to establish the differences in personality between a group of breast cancer survivors and a control group, and to test the predictive utility of the treatments on the personality traits in survivors. Thirty breast cancer survivors and thirty participants from the general population completed the Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised (EPQ-R) and a socio-demographic questionnaire. Survivors had lower scores on extraversion and higher scores on neuroticism than the control group, but these differences were not significant. However, differences in psychoticism were significant, with higher scores in the survivor group. Breast-conserving therapy predicted extraversion while breast reconstruction predicted psychoticism. These results suggest that the physical consequences of surgery may lead to social and psychological impairments in this group of patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 475-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Holmberg ◽  
O.-E. Iversen ◽  
C. M. Rudenstam ◽  
M. Hammar ◽  
E. Kumpulainen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1069-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie A. Befort ◽  
Heather Austin ◽  
Jennifer R. Klemp

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10572-10572
Author(s):  
Chana Weinstock ◽  
Cristina Campassi ◽  
Olga G. Goloubeva ◽  
Saranya Chumsri ◽  
Ting Bao ◽  
...  

10572 Background: Mammography is currently used in the surveillance of breast cancer survivors, who are at increased risk of developing ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers regardless of age at diagnosis or time since diagnosis. Several prospective studies have shown the utility of breast MRI in other high risk populations; however, little data exists on the use of MRI for surveillance of breast cancer survivors. We aimed to compare the outcome of surveillance breast MRI vs. mammography in this population. Methods: We identified women <65 with non-metastatic breast cancer or DCIS with at least one MRI performed at our center >11 months after initial diagnosis, along with a mammogram done within 6 months of the MRI. We compared the outcome of MRI and mammography in terms of biopsies performed as well as in detection of new cancers. Results: Of 512 consecutive charts reviewed, 204 patients met inclusion criteria, 105 (51.4%) of whom were African-American. The average number of MRIs per patient was 2.3 (range 2-7), with a total of 474 MRIs performed between 2005 and 2011. MRI resulted in BIRADS scores of 1 or 2 in 73.5% of studies vs. 84.4% for mammography. There were 19 biopsies performed due to MRI findings alone, 7 done due to mammographic findings alone, and 6 biopsies done based on abnormalities seen on both MRI and mammography. There were 7 malignancies identified based on an abnormal MRI, 3 seen on both MRI and mammography, and none identified via mammography alone. The malignancies identified via MRI alone included 1 patient with DCIS, 5 with stage I disease, and 1 with isolated lung metastases. Of the 10 recurrences detected, 5 (50%) were in African Americans. Two patients developed interval cancers within 6 months of normal screening MRI and mammography. Sensitivity and specificity for MRI were 83.3% (95% CI 0.51-0.97) and 92.2% (95% CI 0.87-0.95), vs. 25% (95% CI 0.05-0.57) and 94.8% (95% CI 0.90-0.97) for mammography. Positive and negative predictive values were 40% and 98.9% for MRI vs. 25% and 95.2% for mammography. Conclusions: Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI is a useful surveillance modality in breast cancer survivors < age 65. Prospective studies are needed in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document