Combined use of methylated reprimo cell-free DNA and pepsinogens for noninvasive detection of early gastric cancer.
27 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) has been described as a multistep cascade of precursor lesions such as non-atrophic chronic gastritis (NACG), multiphocal atrophic gastritis (MAG), intestinal metaplasia (IM), low grade dysplasia (LGD) and high grade dysplasia (HGD) leading to early stages of GC (EGC). Currently, no non-invasive biomarkers for this progression are clinically available. We have previously identified a potential biomarker based on methylated Reprimo (RPRM) cell-free DNA (cfDNA) (Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:6264-9). In a cross-sectional study of 1,076 patients, we showed a sensitivity of 70.8% (95% CI: 60.3 to 81.3) and specificity of 74.3% (95% CI: 71.5 to 77) for methylated RPRM cfDNA, to distinguish NACG+MAG+IM+LGD vs HGD+EGC+AGC (Digestive Disease Week 2014 #108). However, the crude detection rate of EGC was only 46.6%. Here, we aim to explore the role of the combined use of methylated RPRM cfDNA and well stablished atrophy biomarkers such as pepsinogens, for non-invasive detection of EGC. Methods: A case-control study was performed including 237 patients (NACG:40; MAG:94; IM:55; LGD:11; HGD:5: EGC:15; AGC:17) scheduled for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE). A heparinized venous blood sample was collected and methylated RPRM cfDNA and Immunoassays for Pepsinogen I and II were performed. Positive value was considered if methylated RPRM cfDNA > 0 copies/mL and PG I/II ratio <3.0 were found. Results: Overall sensitivity and specificity for the combined use of methylated RPRM cfDNA and PGI/II to distinguish NACG+MAG+IM+LGD vs HGD+EGC+AGC was 67.5% (95% CI: 50.2% to 81.9%) and 63% (95% CI: 55.9% to 69.7%), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 25.2% (95% CI: 17% to 34.9%) and 91.3% (95% CI: 85.3% to 95.4%), respectively. Importantly, crude detection rate for EGC increased from 46.6% to 86.7%. Conclusions: The combined use of methylated RPRM cfDNA and PGI/II reached similar sensitivity and specificity compared to methylated RPRM cfDNA alone to distinguish NACG+MAG+IM+LGD vs HGD+EGC+AGC. However, combined use of methylated RPRM cfDNA and PGI/II significantly improved the detection rate of EGC, a lesion with a curability rate over 95%.