Metformin (Met): A cost-effective adjunct therapy with enzalutamide (Enza) for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)?

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 340-340
Author(s):  
Jordan Hill ◽  
Mike Paulden ◽  
Christopher McCabe ◽  
Peter Venner ◽  
Brita Lavender Danielson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Expert Elicitation ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Adjunct Therapy ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Effective Adjunct

340 Background: Several new therapies have changed the landscape of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, primarily due to their effectiveness in treating patients with mCRPC. Enza has garnered much attention, but is relatively expensive (~$3175/month). Met is less expensive (~$8.00/month) and has been used for decades to treat patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Two recent large population-based studies of PCa have demonstrated that diabetics taking Met had improved PCa specific and overall survival compared to those not taking Met. As a result, we hypothesized that Met has the potential to be a cost-effective adjunct therapy to Enza, although it is not currently used as such. Methods: We constructed a Markov-based decision analytic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of Enza alone versus Enza combined with Met. Through expert elicitation, we assumed that adding Met to Enza increases its efficacy by 15%. All other costs, utilities, and transition probabilities were derived from existing literature or expert elicitation. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were considered over a lifetime horizon and discounted at 5% per annum. Cost-effectiveness was considered using a willingness to pay threshold of $50 000/QALY. Results: Adding Met to Enza increases expected lifetime costs per patient by $83 651, and improves the expected effectiveness of treatment by 3.74 QALYs, compared to Enza alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $22 374/QALY. Accounting for parameter uncertainty, adding Met to Enza has a 72% probability of being cost-effective. Conclusions: Although Met is not currently used as an adjunct therapy to Enza, doing so would likely be cost-effective provided it is as effective as we have assumed in our model. Additionally, our results indicate that the combination of Enza and Met could be among the most cost effective interventions in oncology. However, given the uncertainty around the effectiveness of such an adjunct therapy, our results support the need for further clinical trials to provide more robust evidence of the effectiveness of such a combination therapy in clinical practice.

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and M2 occlusion

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016765
Author(s):  
Mihir Khunte ◽  
Xiao Wu ◽  
Sam Payabvash ◽  
Chengcheng Zhu ◽  
Charles Matouk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to M2 branch occlusion remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EVT compared with medical management in patients with acute stroke presenting with M2 occlusion using a decision-analytic model.MethodsA decision-analytic study was performed with Markov modeling to estimate the lifetime quality-adjusted life years and associated costs of EVT-treated patients compared with no-EVT/medical management. The study was performed over a lifetime horizon with a societal perspective in the Unites States setting. Base case, one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsEVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 93.37% of the iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and resulted in difference in health benefit of 1.66 QALYs in the 65-year-old age groups, equivalent to 606 days in perfect health. Varying the outcomes after both strategies shows that EVT was more cost-effective when the probability of good outcome after EVT was only 4–6% higher relative to medical management in clinically likely scenarios. EVT remained cost-effective even when its cost exceeded US$200 000 (threshold was US$209 111). EVT was even more cost-effective for 55-year-olds than for 65-year-old patients.ConclusionOur study suggests that EVT is cost-effective for treatment of acute M2 branch occlusions. Faster and improved reperfusion techniques would increase the relative cost-effectiveness of EVT even further in these patients.

A probabilistic threshold analysis of metformin (Met) with enzalutamide (Enza) to determine the cost and added efficacy needed to make such a combination theray cost-effective (CE).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e577-e577
Author(s):  
Jordan Hill ◽  
Peter Venner ◽  
Mike Paulden ◽  
Christopher McCabe ◽  
Scott A. North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Threshold Analysis ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Cost

e577 Background: Enza has become known for its' effectiveness in treating patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. However, Enza is expensive (~$3175/month) and unlikely to be CE at any willingness to pay (WTP) threshold from $0-$125 000/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Met is inexpensive (~$8.00/month) and recently two large population-based studies of prostate cancer (PCa) demonstrated that diabetics taking Met had improved PCa specific and overall survival compared to those not taking Met. As a result we theorized that there must be a cost of Enza and a specific added effect Met could provide that would make Met a CE adjuvant therapy to Enza even though it is not currently used as such. Methods: We constructed a Markov-based decision analytic model and performed a probabilistic threshold analysis to narrow in on several combinations of costs of Enza and added efficacies needed to make Enza + Met a CE combination therapy at different WTP thresholds. Costs, utilities, and transition probabilities were derived from existing literature. Effectiveness was measured using QALYs. Costs and QALYs were considered over a lifetime horizon and discounted at 5% per annum. Results: At a WTP threshold of $50 000/QALY Enza + Met is unlikely to be CE no matter the cost decrement or added efficacy applied to the model. At a WTP threshold of $75 000/QALY Met is also unlikely to be CE unless the price of Enza could drop to $1934/month and Met could also add 1% to the efficacy of Enza. At Enza's current cost and a WTP threshold of $100 000, Enza + Met could be CE barring Met adds 0.621% to the number of patients still on treatment at 36 months. Conclusions: Enza + Met is unlikely to be CE at WTP thresholds of $50 000/QALY or $75 000/QALY unless there is a significant price drop for Enza; these results make sense because a therapy that is considered not CE at these WTP thresholds by itself is unlikely to be CE with a theoretical adjuvant therapy that would hold a patient on such a treatment for even longer. Our results show that the only way for Enza + Met to be CE is through the theoretical overall survival benefit of Met as the price of Enza is unlikely to drop any time soon.

scholarly journals Cost-utility Analysis of Second-generation Direct-acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdollah Poursamad ◽  
Zahra Goudarzi ◽  
Iman Karimzadeh ◽  
Nahid Jallaly ◽  
Khosro Keshavarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genotype 1 ◽  
Medication Regimen ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Medication Therapy ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Study Results

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to increased mortality, disability, and liver transplantation if left untreated, and it is associated with a possible increase in disease burden in the future, all of which would surely have a significant impact on the health system. New antiviral regimens are effective in the treatment of the disease yet expensive. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of three medication regimens, namely, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), velpatasvir/sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir/sofosbuvir (DCV/SOF) for HCV patients with genotype 1 in Iran. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was developed to predict the costs and outcomes of the three mentioned medication therapy strategies. The final outcome of the study was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which was obtained using the previously published studies. The study was conducted from the perspective of the Health Ministry; therefore, only direct medical costs were estimated. The results were provided as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY. Ultimately, the one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to measure the strength of study results. Results: The results showed that the QALYs for LDV/SOF, DCV/SOF, and VEL/SOF were 13.25, 13.94, and 14.61, and the costs were 4,807, 7,716, and 4,546$, respectively. The VEL/SOF regimen had lower costs and higher effectiveness than the LDV/SOF and DCV/SOF regimens, making it a dominant strategy. The tornado diagram results showed that the study results had the highest sensitivity to chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and compensated cirrhosis (CC) state costs. Moreover, the scatter plots showed that the VEL/SOF was the dominant therapeutic strategy in 73% of the simulations compared to LDV/SOF and 66% of the simulations compared to DCV/SOF; moreover, it was in the acceptable region in 92% of the simulations and below the threshold. Therefore, it was considered the most cost-effective strategy. Moreover, the results showed that DCV/SOF was in the acceptable region below the threshold in 69% of the simulations compared to LDV/SOF. Therefore, the DCV/SOF regimen was more cost-effective than LDV/SOF. Conclusions: According to the present study results, it is suggested that the VEL/SOF regimen be used as the first line of therapy in patients with HCV genotype 1. Moreover, DCV/SOF can be the second-line medication regimen.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of genomic profiling in early breast cancer in Colombia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Rojas ◽  
María Rojas-Reyes ◽  
Diego Rosselli ◽  
Andres F. Cardona
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
United States Dollar ◽  
Life Years

Abstract BackgroundThe best strategy to establish indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer (EBC) in Colombia is unknown. This study aimed to identify the cost-effectiveness of various strategies to establish the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsThis study used an adapted decision-analytic model to compare cost and outcomes of care that includes Oncotype DX™ (ODX) or Mammaprint™ (MMP) test with routine care without ODX or MMP tests (application of adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients) over a 5-year time horizon, and the from the perspective of the Colombian National Health System (NHS) perspective (payer). Data were obtained from published literature and clinical trial database. The study population was composed of women with EBC, hormone-receptor positive (HR+), Her2-negative, lymph-node negative (LN0), with high-risk clinical criteria for recurrence. The outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; 2019 United States Dollar [USD] per quality-adjusted life years [QALY] gained) and net monetary benefit (NMB).ResultsODX increases QALYs by 0.05 and MMP by 0.03 with savings of $2,445 and $570 compared with the standard strategy, respectively. The ICER for ODX was −$41,857 and that for MMP was −$18,253 per QALY; NMB was $2,821 and $771, respectively. Both tests were cost effective under defined threshold. When the two tests were compared, ODX was more cost effective than MMP. Sensitivity analysis revealed that, with a threshold of 1 GDP per capita, ODX will be cost effective in 95.5% of the cases compared with 70.2% of MMP. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that ODX was a consistently superior strategy.ConclusionsGenomic profiling using ODX or MMP tests to define the need of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in patients with HR + and Her2 − EBC is a cost-effective strategy that allows Colombian NHS saving money.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Hao ◽  
Emelie Heintz ◽  
Ellinor Östensson ◽  
Andrea Discacciati ◽  
Fredrik Jäderling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Reflex Threshold

AbstractObjectiveAssess the cost-effectiveness of no screening and quadrennial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening for prostate cancer using either Stockholm3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test as a reflex test.MethodsTest characteristics were estimated from the STHLM3-MR study (NCT03377881). A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a lifetime societal perspective using a microsimulation model for men aged 55-69 in Sweden for no screening and three quadrennial screening strategies, including: PSA≥3ng/mL; and Stockholm3 with reflex test thresholds of PSA≥1.5 and 2ng/mL. Men with a positive test had an MRI, and those MRI positive had combined targeted and systematic biopsies. Predictions included the number of tests, cancer incidence and mortality, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainties in key parameters were assessed using sensitivity analyses.ResultsCompared with no screening, the screening strategies were predicted to reduce prostate cancer deaths by 7-9% across a lifetime and were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained in Sweden. Using Stockholm3 with a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL resulted in a 60% reduction in MRI compared with screening using PSA. This Stockholm3 strategy was cost-effective with a probability of 70% at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €47,218 (500,000 SEK).ConclusionsAll screening strategies were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained compared with no screening. Screening with Stockholm3 test at a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL and MRI was predicted to be cost-effective in Sweden. Use of the Stockholm3 test may reduce screening-related harms and costs while maintaining the health benefits from early detection.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kuhlmann ◽  
Henning Krüger ◽  
Susanne Seidinger ◽  
Andreas Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Input Parameter ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Transfemoral Amputees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The safe use of a prosthesis in activities of daily living is key for transfemoral amputees. However, the number of falls varies significantly between different prosthetic device types. This study aims to compare medical and economic consequences of falls in transfemoral amputees who use the microprocessor-controlled knee joint C-Leg with patients who use non-microprocessor-controlled (mechanical) knee joints (NMPK). The main objectives of the analysis are to investigate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of C-Legs in transfemoral amputees with diabetes mellitus (DM) and without DM in Germany. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed that took into account the effects of prosthesis type on the risk of falling and fall-related medical events. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses were performed separately for transfemoral amputees with and without DM. The study took the perspective of the statutory health insurance (SHI). Input parameters were derived from the published literature. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to investigate the impact of changes in individual input parameter values on model outcomes and to explore parameter uncertainty. Results C-Legs reduced the rate of fall-related hospitalizations from 134 to 20 per 1000 person years (PY) in amputees without DM and from 146 to 23 per 1000 PY in amputees with DM. In addition, the C-Leg prevented 15 or 14 fall-related death per 1000 PY. Over a time horizon of 25 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 16,123 Euro per quality-adjusted life years gained (QALY) for amputees without DM and 20,332 Euro per QALY gained for amputees with DM. For the period of 2020–2024, the model predicted an increase in SHI expenditures of 98 Mio Euro (53 Mio Euro in prosthesis users without DM and 45 Mio Euro in prosthesis users with DM) when all new prosthesis users received C-Legs instead of NMPKs and 50% of NMPK user whose prosthesis wore out switched to C-Legs. Results of the PSA showed moderate uncertainty and a probability of 97–99% that C-Legs are cost-effective at an ICER threshold of 40,000 Euro (≈ German GDP per capita in 2018) per QALY gained. Conclusion Results of the study suggest that the C-Leg provides substantial additional health benefits compared with NMPKs and is likely to be cost-effective in transfemoral amputees with DM as well as in amputees without DM at an ICER threshold of 40,000 Euro per QALY gained.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biomarker-Guided Treatment for Metastatic Gastric Cancer in the Second-Line Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianna Lauren ◽  
Sassan Ostvar ◽  
Elisabeth Silver ◽  
Myles Ingram ◽  
Aaron Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Life Years

Background. The 5-year survival rate of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) is only 5%. However, trials have demonstrated promising antitumor activity for targeted therapies/immunotherapies among chemorefractory metastatic GC patients. Pembrolizumab has shown particular efficacy among patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biomarker-guided second-line GC treatment. Methods. We constructed a Markov decision-analytic model using clinical trial data. Our model compared pembrolizumab monotherapy and ramucirumab/paclitaxel combination therapy for all patients and pembrolizumab for patients based on MSI status or PD-L1 expression. Paclitaxel monotherapy and best supportive care for all patients were additional comparators. Costs of drugs, treatment administration, follow-up, and management of adverse events were estimated from a US payer perspective. The primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY over 60 months. Secondary outcomes were unadjusted life years (survival) and costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model uncertainty. Results. The most effective strategy was pembrolizumab for MSI-H patients and ramucirumab/paclitaxel for all other patients, adding 3.8 months or 2.0 quality-adjusted months compared to paclitaxel. However, this strategy resulted in a prohibitively high ICER of $1,074,620/QALY. The only cost-effective strategy was paclitaxel monotherapy for all patients, with an ICER of $53,705/QALY. Conclusion. Biomarker-based treatments with targeted therapies/immunotherapies for second-line metastatic GC patients substantially improve unadjusted and quality-adjusted survival but are not cost-effective at current drug prices.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fourth- or Further-Line Ripretinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiting Liao ◽  
Huiqiong Xu ◽  
David Hutton ◽  
Qiuji Wu ◽  
Kexun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Health State ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Health State Utilities

BackgroundThe INVICTUS trial assessed the efficacy and safety of ripretinib compared with placebo in the management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.MethodWe used a Markov model with three health states: progression-free disease, progression disease and death. We parameterized the model from time-to-event data (progression-free survival, overall survival) of ripretinib and placebo arms in the INVICTUS trial and extrapolated to a patient’s lifetime horizon. Estimates of health state utilities and costs were based on clinical trial data and the published literature. The outcomes of this model were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainty was tested via univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe base-case model projected improved outcomes (by 0.29 QALYs) and additional costs (by $70,251) and yielded an ICER of $244,010/QALY gained for ripretinib versus placebo. The results were most sensitive to progression rates, the price of ripretinib, and health state utilities. The ICER was most sensitive to overall survival. When overall survival in the placebo group was lower, the ICER dropped to $127,399/QALY. The ICER dropped to $150,000/QALY when the monthly cost of ripretinib decreased to $14,057. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that ripretinib was the cost-effective therapy in 41.1% of simulations at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000.ConclusionAs the fourth- or further-line therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, ripretinib is not cost-effective in the US. Ripretinib would achieve its cost-effectiveness with a price discount of 56% given the present effectiveness.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer third-line treatment in China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Peng ◽  
Xingduo Hou ◽  
Yangmu Huang ◽  
Tong Xie ◽  
Xinyang Hua
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Third Line ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Abstract Background: In this study, we analyze the cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in China, especially after a recent price drop suggested by the National Healthcare Security Administration. Methods: A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib compared to placebo among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The Chinese healthcare payer’s perspective was considered with a lifetime horizon, including direct medical cost (2019 US dollars [USD]). A willing‐to‐pay threshold was set at USD 27,130/QALY, which is three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. We examined the robustness of the model in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.Results: Fruquintinib was associated with better health outcomes than placebo (0.640 vs 0.478 QALYs) with a higher cost (USD 20750.9 vs USD 12042.2), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 53508.7 per QALY. This ICER is 25% lower than the one calculated before the price drop (USD 70952.6 per QALY).Conclusion: After the price negotiation, the drug becomes cheaper and the ICER is lower, but the drug is still not cost effective under the standard of 3 times GDP willing‐to‐pay threshold. For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in China, fruquintinib is not a cost-effective option under the current circumstances in China.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer third-line treatment in China

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Peng ◽  
Xingduo Hou ◽  
Yangmu Huang ◽  
Tong Xie ◽  
Xinyang Hua
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Third Line ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Abstract Background In this study, we analyze the cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in China, especially after a recent price drop suggested by the National Healthcare Security Administration. Methods A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib compared to placebo among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The Chinese healthcare payer’s perspective was considered with a lifetime horizon, including direct medical cost (2019 US dollars [USD]). A willing-to-pay threshold was set at USD 27,130/QALY, which is three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. We examined the robustness of the model in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Fruquintinib was associated with better health outcomes than placebo (0.640 vs 0.478 QALYs) with a higher cost (USD 20750.9 vs USD 12042.2), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 53508.7 per QALY. This ICER is 25% lower than the one calculated before the price drop (USD 70952.6 per QALY). Conclusion After the price negotiation, the drug becomes cheaper and the ICER is lower, but the drug is still not cost effective under the standard of 3 times GDP willing-to-pay threshold. For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in China, fruquintinib is not a cost-effective option under the current circumstances in China.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document