Everolimus and sunitinib as first- and second-line treatments of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC): A retrospective study of the GETUG (Groupe Français d’Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales).

505 Background: pRCC accounts for 15% of all renal cancers. Two French prospective phase II trials demonstrated efficacy of both Sun and Eve in first-line treatment of metastatic disease (RAPTOR (NCT00688753) and SUPAP (NCT00541008)). Most patients (pts) usually receive the alternate drug at progression. We report the first series of drug sequencing in pRCCs. Methods: We updated clinical data of metastatic pts with pathologically documented pRCC, who were treated in firs line or more with Sun or Eve, from 2/06 to 6/15, in 24 GETUG centers. Results: 196 pts (166 men, 30 women), median aged of 61 years, with histological subtypes (HST) I (28 pts), II (122 pts) or unclassified (46 pts), were treated for metastatic pRCC in 1st-line: group 1 Su 50 mg daily 4/6 weeks (n=158 pts) ; group 2 Eve 10 mg daily (n=38 pts). 76 pts were included in the RAPTOR or SUPAP studies. The median follow-up was 59.5 months. We found no difference between the 2 groups in terms of patients’ characteristics, clinical benefit in first-line (CR+PR+SD) (71% vs 72%; p=0.95) or progression-free survival (PFS) (PFS-1: 5.7 vs 4.6 months; p=0.152). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were tumor progression (74% vs 70%) or toxicity (26 vs 30%) (p=0.58). 134 pts received the alternative drug in second-line (group 1: Eve; group 2: Sun) with similar clinical benefit (64% vs 58%; p=0.69) and median PFS (PFS-2: 3.5 vs 3.0 months p=0.98). Overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (16.4 vs 17.6 months; p=0.58). Age, Karnofsky performance status < 80 (KPS-80), HST, platelet (Plts) and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), hemoglobin and calcium levels, time from diagnosis to metastases (TTM) were studied as prognostic variables. In multivariable analysis, only Plts and KPS-80 had prognostic impact on EFS-1, whereas ANC, KPS-80 and TTM were prognostic for OS. We found a trend in favor of HST I vs non I, with no statistical difference in terms of PFS or OS. Conclusions: In this large retrospective series of metastatic pRCC pts, Sun and Eve had good compliance and similar efficacy in terms of first-, second-line PFS and overall survival.

Download Full-text

Internal endoscopic drainage as first line or second line treatment in case of postsleeve gastrectomy fistulas

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/s-0044-101450 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 06 (06) ◽

pp. E745-E750 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

J. Gonzalez ◽

D. Lorenzo ◽

T. Guilbaud ◽

T. Bège ◽

M. Barthet

Keyword(s):

Demographic Data ◽

Median Number ◽

Endoscopic Management ◽

Endoscopic Drainage ◽

Efficacy Rate ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Tertiary Center ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Background and study aims Management of post-sleeve gastrectomy fistulas (PSGF) recently has evolved, resulting in prioritization of internal endoscopic drainage (IED). We report our experience with the technique in a tertiary center. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective study of 44 patients whose PSGF was managed with IED, comparing two periods: after 2013 (Group 1; n = 22) when IED was used in first line and before 2013 (Group 2; n = 22) when IED was applied in second line. Demographic data, pre-endoscopic management, characteristics of fistulas, therapeutic modalities and outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. The primary endpoint was IED efficacy; the secondary endpoint was a comparison of outcomes depending on the timing of IED in the management strategy. Results The groups were matched in gender (16 female, 16 male), mean age (43 years old), severity of fistula, delay before treatment, and exposure to previous endoscopic or surgical treatments. The overall efficacy rate was 84 % (37/44): 86 % in Group 1 and 82 % in Group 2 (NS). There was one death and one patient who underwent surgery. The median time to healing was 226 ± 750 days (Group 1) vs. 305 ± 300 days (Group 2) (NS), with a median number of endoscopies of 3 ± 6 vs. 4.5 ± 2.4 (NS). There were no differences in number of nasocavity drains and double pigtail stents (DPS), but significantly more metallic stents, complications, and secondary strictures were seen in Group 2. Conclusion IED for management of PSGF is effective in more than 80 % of cases whenever it is used during the therapeutic strategy. This approach should be favored when possible.

Download Full-text

Incorporating hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after second-line carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd)

Therapeutic Advances in Hematology ◽

10.1177/2040620720921046 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

pp. 204062072092104

Author(s):

Ja Min Byun ◽

Sung-Soo Yoon ◽

Youngil Koh ◽

Chang-Ki Min ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Background: Traditionally believed to be an integral part of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, the role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is being challenged. As such, we sought to evaluate the impact of HSCT in the era of novel agents. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. A total of 55 patients who received VTD (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone) as first-line treatment and KRd (carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) as second-line treatment were analyzed for outcomes. Results: The enrolled patients were divided into Group 1, defined as those who continued KRd treatment until progression ( n = 41), versus Group 2, defined as those who underwent HSCT after a certain number of cycles of KRd ( n = 14). Both groups showed a generally favorable response to KRd, with overall response rate (ORR) of 87.9% and clinical benefit rate of 92.8% after a median of seven cycles in Group 1, and ORR 92.8% and clinical benefit rate 100% after median of five cycles in Group 2. However, significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) ( p = 0.004) was observed in Group 1 (median 12 months) compared with Group 2 (median not reached). Multivariate analyses identified HSCT after KRd as potential risk factors associated with PFS. Also, in Group 1, bortezomib refractoriness was associated with significantly shorter PFS compared with those who were responsive (median 12 months versus 14 months, respectively, p = 0.039). Conclusions: In conclusion, even with the advent of novel agents, HSCT still remains a valuable treatment modality with additive efficacy.

Download Full-text

Impact of Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors As Second Line Treatment for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3780.3780 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3780-3780 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

J Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez ◽

Pilar Herrera ◽

Lorena L Abalo ◽

Maria Dolores Rey ◽

Maria Calbacho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Second Generation ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Salvage Treatment ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Abstract 3780 Background: Imatinib has shown an outstanding improvement in the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Nevertheless, some of them have proven to be resistant or intolerant to imatinib. For these patients, second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available. These drugs may be indicated in different circumstances as primary or second resistance, suboptimal responses or intolerance.The real benefits of second-generation TKIs as salvage treatment are surely in dependence with the indication in each case and are, therefore, difficult to evaluate. Second-generation TKIs are being evaluated as first line treatment compared to imatinib with quite favourable outcomes so long, but have not yet been compared with a strategy combining imatinib followed by second-generation TKIs for patients with previous unfavourable responses. Aims: Evaluate the real benefit of second-generation TKIs in second line treatment for CML patients regardless of the indication for its use. Study groups and methods: We have studied 98 patients treated with imatinib as first tyrosin kinase inhibitor (TKI) in our centre. These patients have been classified according whether second-generation TKIs were available or not. Group 1 includes 60 patients treated since 2001 to 2005, when the only salvage treatment was an increased imatinib dose, chemotherapy or allogenic stem cell transplantation. Group 2 includes 38 patients treated since 2005 until today. In the second group second-generation TKIs (dasatinib or nilotinib) were used according to the indications mentioned above. Follow up period was 39 months and 32 months for group 1 and 2 respectively. Sokal risk index was high in 14% and 16%; intermediate 42 % and 40%; and low in 44% and 44 % for group 1 and 2 respectively. Results: The use of second-generation TKIs as second line resulted in significant benefit to patients in terms of responses. Complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) at any time were achieved in 73% and 86% for patients in group 1 and 2 (p=.09). Probability of the achievement of mayor molecular responses (MMR) was 42% vs 71% for group 1 and 2 respectively [p=.009; ratio=0.3 (0.1–0.7)]. Response rates at the last follow up for group 1 and 2 were: MMR: 33% vs 62%; CCR: 68% vs 94% and failure 32% vs 6% (p=.008). Progression free survival (including all the patients who started treatment) was 88% vs 94% for group 1 and 2 respectively. We found no correlation among responses and some prognostic factors (Sokal index, mutations at the TK domain or imatinib plasma levels). Imatinib doses were increased in 21 patients (35%) in group 1 (reasons for increasing doses were failure in 14 patients and suboptimal responses in 7 patients). 10 patients (26%) in group 2 received second-line TKIs as second line treatment (4 because imatinib failure, 3 by suboptimal responses and 3 due to intolerance). Conclussions: The use of second-generation TKIs as salvage has improved the responses of CML patients treated with TKIs. Once the second-generation TKIs has shown benefit compared to imatinib in first line treatment, this therapeutic strategy should be compared vs the use of imatinib followed of second-line TKIs for patients without optimal responses to imatinib. Disclosures: Montalban: Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cancer (RETICC): Research Funding; Asociación Española contra el Cancer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Brain metastases in patients treated with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.326 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 326-326

Author(s):

H. Alharbi ◽

T. K. Choueiri ◽

C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽

S. North ◽

M. J. MacKenzie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Brain Metastases ◽

Treatment Time ◽

Karnofsky Performance Status ◽

Performance Status ◽

Local Treatment ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

First Line ◽

The Brain

326 Background: Patients with brain metastases from advanced RCC treated in the targeted therapy era are not well characterized. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 6 centers. Results: One hundred six out of 705 (15%) patients with mRCC had brain metastases. Forty-seven patients had brain metastases at the start of first-line anti-VEGF therapy and the rest developed metastases during follow-up. Of the patients with brain metastases, 6%, 68%, and 26% were in the favorable, intermediate and poor prognosis groups, respectively, per the Heng et al JCO 2009 criteria. Ninety percent had cerebral metastases, 17% had cerebellar metastases, 40% had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, and 81% had symptoms of brain metastases. The median largest size and number of brain metastases was 1.8 cm (range 0.2–6.6) and 1 (range 1–20), respectively. Patients were treated with first-line sunitinib (n=77), sorafenib (n=23), bevacizumab (n=5), and temsirolimus (n=1). Local disease treatment included whole brain radiotherapy (81%), stereotactic radiosurgery (25%), and neurosurgery (25%). The brain metastases of 59 patients were evaluable and based on the local treatment and/or targeted therapy achieved 7 (12%) complete responses, 23 (39%) partial responses, 14 (24%) patients with stable disease, and 15 (25%) patients with progressive disease in the brain metastases. Patients with more than 4 brain metastases vs. those with no more than 4 have an overall survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis of 3.9 vs. 15.4 months (p=0.0051). Previous nephrectomy, sarcomatoid, and non-clear cell histology are not associated with development of brain metastases. On multivariable analysis, KPS<80% (p=0.0139), diagnosis to treatment with targeted therapy <1 year (p=0.0012), and higher number of brain metastases (p=0.0311) were associated with worse survival from diagnosis of brain metastases. Conclusions: In patients with brain metastases from RCC, KPS at start of therapy, diagnosis to treatment time and number of brain metastases may be prognostic factors for overall survival. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Impact of response to prior chemotherapy (RTPC) on outcomes in second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): Implications for trial design.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4539 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4539-4539

Author(s):

Gregory Russell Pond ◽

Joaquim Bellmunt ◽

Ronan Fougeray ◽

Toni K. Choueiri ◽

Angela Q. Qu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Metastatic Disease ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase Ii Trials ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Prior Chemotherapy ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

The Impact

4539 Background: Performance status (PS), hemoglobin (Hb), liver metastasis (LM), and time from prior chemotherapy (TFPC) are significant prognostic factors in second-line therapy for advanced UC. Setting of prior chemotherapy, i.e., metastatic or perioperative, has not appeared significant. However, the impact of prior chemosensitivity is unclear, which may confound trial interpretation. Hence, we examined the prognostic impact of RTPC, when prior therapy was given for metastatic disease. Methods: Six phase II trials evaluating second-line chemotherapy and/or biologics (n=504) were pooled. Patients who received prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible for analysis if data regarding Hb, LM, PS, and TFPC were available. Response by RECIST to first-line therapy was recorded. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of registration using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 275 pts were evaluable for analysis. Patients received gemcitabine-paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel, pazopanib, docetaxel plus vandetanib/placebo or vinflunine (2 trials). Those with prior response (n=111) had a median (95% CI) OS of 8.0 (6.8-9.4) months (mo) and PFS of 3.0 (2.6-4.0), compared with OS and PFS of 5.9 (5.0-6.6) mo and 2.6 (2.0-2.8) for those without prior response (n=164). Multivariable analysis did not reveal an independent impact of RTPC on PFS or OS (Table). Conclusions: RTPC in patients receiving prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease did not confer an independent prognostic impact with second-line therapy for advanced UC. Patients who received prior chemotherapy in peri-operative or metastatic settings may be enrolled in the same second-line trial stratified for PS, anemia, LM and TFPC. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Is second-line targeted therapy beneficial in patients (pts) with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after first-line sorafenib (SOR) failure?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e17016 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e17016-e17016

Author(s):

Ramona Dadu ◽

Catherine E Devine ◽

Mike Hernandez ◽

Naifa Busaidy ◽

Steven Waguespack ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase Ii Trials ◽

First Line ◽

Promising Strategy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Investigational Drugs ◽

Baseline Characteristics

e17016 Background: SOR has demonstrated efficacy in phase II trials but responses are not durable. 2nd line therapy is used in clinical practice however there are no data showing clinical benefit with this approach. We sought to determine if 2nd line targeted therapy was beneficial after SOR failure. Methods: Adult pts with DTC treated with 1st line SOR for >3 months were included. We compared overall survival (OS) in pts who received only 1st line SOR (grp 1) with pts treated with 2nd line therapy after 1st line SOR failure (grp 2). OS was defined as time after SOR failure until death. SOR failure was defined as discontinuation due to progression or intolerable toxicity. Results: We identified 62 DTC pts from 2006-2012 who were treated with 1st line SOR. 10 pts in grp 1 were excluded due to missing data, secondary unrelated cancers and <3 mo on SOR. We included 52 pts: 31 in grp 1 and 21 in grp 2. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (Table). FTC was more frequent in grp 2. 2nd therapy included sunitinib, pazopanib, vemurafenib, and other investigational drugs. Median time on treatment with 2nd line therapy was 14.5 mo. Median OS in grp 1 and grp 2 was 6 and 50 mo, respectively (p=0.002). After excluding pts for death <3 mo after SOR end, median OS was 20 and 50 mo; there was a trend toward significance (p=0.07). Response and updated analysis will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Our study shows that pts receiving 2nd line therapy after SOR failure had a long OS despite more pts with FTC in this group. Acknowledging the limitations of a retrospective study, we conclude that in DTC pts, salvage targeted therapy after SOR failure appears to be beneficial and a promising strategy. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Second-Line Oxaliplatin, Folinic Acid, and Fluorouracil Versus Folinic Acid and Fluorouracil Alone for Gemcitabine-Refractory Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes From the CONKO-003 Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.53.6995 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (23) ◽

pp. 2423-2429 ◽

Cited By ~ 230

Author(s):

Helmut Oettle ◽

Hanno Riess ◽

Jens M. Stieler ◽

Gerhard Heil ◽

Ingo Schwaner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Folinic Acid ◽

Karnofsky Performance Status ◽

Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Gemcitabine Refractory

Purpose To assess the efficacy of a second-line regimen of oxaliplatin and folinic acid–modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. Patients and Methods A randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced disease progression during first-line gemcitabine therapy were randomly assigned to folinic acid and fluorouracil (FF) or oxaliplatin and FF (OFF). Patients were stratified according to the presence of metastases, duration of first-line therapy, and Karnofsky performance status. Results Median follow-up was 54.1 months, and 160 patients were eligible for the primary analysis. The median overall survival in the OFF group (5.9 months; 95% CI, 4.1 to 7.4) versus the FF group (3.3 months; 95% CI, 2.7 to 4.0) was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; log-rank P = .010). Time to progression with OFF (2.9 months; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.2) versus FF (2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) was significantly extended also (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; log-rank P = .019). Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment arms, with the exception of grades 1 to 2 neurotoxicity, which were reported in 29 patients (38.2%) and six patients (7.1%) in the OFF and FF groups, respectively (P < .001). Conclusion Second-line OFF significantly extended the duration of overall survival when compared with FF alone in patients with advanced gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

Download Full-text

Non-Effectiveness of Using RICE Post RDHAP or RDHAP Post RICE after Failure of First Line Salvage Therapy in DLBCL Patients Who Are Eligible for ASCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117444 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4226-4226 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Tony Ibrahim ◽

Tarek Assi ◽

Julien Lazarovici ◽

Maxime Annereau ◽

David Ghez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Background: The treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains challenging. The use of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in young and fit patients is considered the standard of care. RDHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, high dose cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin) and RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) are the two most commonly used salvage-regimens with comparable efficacy (CORAL study). However, nearly 40% of the patients do no respond to these regimens and subsequently they do not proceed to ASCT. There are no guidelines concerning the choice of a second-line salvage regimen. There are sparse data in the literature concerning the best choice if the first salvage regimen fails. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential role of a second salvage regimen, before intensification, by RICE or RDHAP in patients with DLBCL refractory to the first line salvage therapy by RDHAP or RICE, respectively. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients aged 18 years and above who had a relapsed or refractory DLBCL and who were eligible for an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) between the years 2008 and 2017. They should have had progressive or stable disease (PD/SD) following first-line salvage based on RICE (group 1) or RDHAP (group 2) and should have received a second-line salvage based on RDHAP or RICE, respectively. Patients who received carboplatin or oxaliplatin instead of cisplatin in the RDHAP protocol were also included. All cases were discussed at a tumor board and the revised International Working Group response criteria for Malignant lymphoma were used to assess the response to chemotherapy. Information were collected using electronic medical record. Ethics committee approval was not necessary. Results: 100 patients' medical files were reviewed, out of which 69 were excluded for the following reasons: 5 patients lacked necessary information; 13 patients were treated for a non-DLBCL; 30 patients could not receive second line salvage therapy because of deterioration of their performance status; 21 patients because they received a bridging therapy (other than RICE or RDHAP) before second line salvage therapy. The study included 31 patients with 19 (61.3%) males and 12 (38.7%) females. The median age was equal to 59 years (standard deviation 14). DLBCL was at the initial diagnosis in all but 6 patients in whom DLBCL developed after an indolent lymphoma (follicular lymphoma in 4 and marginal zone lymphoma in 2). 70% had germinal centre B-cell subtype, while 30% had activated B-cell subtype. 70% were refractory to the primary therapy (CR not attained on primary therapy or relapsed within 6 months) and 30% recurred after a CR lasting more than 6 months. All patients included in group 1 (n=5) have received cisplatin during the treatment with the RDHAP regimen. Among the 26 patients included in the second group, 19 (73.1%) have received cisplatin, 4 (15.4%) oxaliplatin, and 3 (11.5%) carboplatin in first line salvage. No patient in group 1 responded to RICE and eventually no patient proceeded to ASCT. In the second group, 2 patients (7.7%) deceased after the first cycle of RDHAP because of drug related toxicities (1 due to ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy and 1 due to septic choc following febrile neutropenia). Ten patients (38.5%) responded to RDHAP, in whom an ASCT was planned. However, 2 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of peripheral stem cell collection failure. After a median follow up of 8.7 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) of the 8 patients who proceeded to ASCT was 6.3 months (CI 95% 2.6-10.1). Only 1 patient had a tumor response lasting more than 30 months. No factor was found to be associated with PFS on cox regression analysis (which included age, sex, type of DLBCL, and refractory or recurrent status). Conclusion: There is little information regarding the effectiveness of a second-line salvage therapy in patients not responding to first line intensification. All except one patient either could not proceed to ASCT or had a limited response (less than 3 months) post ASCT. In addition, the toxicity was not negligible considering that 2 patients died because of drug related events. This study suggests that patients with DLBCL who failed to respond to first line salvage by RDHAP or RICE should be considered for investigational therapies rather than second line rescue. Disclosures Ribrag: pharmamar: Other: travel; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; Amgen: Research Funding; argenX: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of second-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.619 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 619-619 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kaldigul Smagulova

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

619 Background: Advances in molecular biology and a wide introduction to the practice of targeted therapies have improved outcomes and significantly affect the overall survival of patients. To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) beyond first progression combined with chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: 68 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy treatment at the Department of the Kazakh Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology. Selecting second-line chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin or irinotecan depended of an earlier first-line therapy (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI). The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier, comparison of survival curves was performed by log-rank. Results: The study included 68 patients, who were randomized from February 2009 to November 2011(to 33 [48.5%] BEV + CT and 35 [51.5%] to CT alone). Analysis of the immediate results of treatment showed that in neither case was not achieved complete response of the tumor. Partial regression in group 1 – 11 (33.3 ± 8.2)%, and group 2 - in 9 (25.7 ± 7.3)%. Stabilization is achieved in 20 (60.6 ± 8.5)% and 23 (6.7 ± 8.0)% of cases, respectively. The progression of the disease was observed in the group 1 in 2 (6.1 ± 4.1)% and 3 (8.6 ± 4.7)% of cases. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months (7-16) and 12.2 months in group 1, and 9.7 months (6-13.2) (PFS), 9.1 months(OS) in group 2, respectively. The adverse event profile was consistent with previously reported data for BEV + CT. BEV-related significant adverse events included bleeding grade 3-4 (1.5 %) and venous thrombosis (2.3 %). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that BEV + CT continued beyond progression significantly prolong OS and PFS in second-line therapy mCRC.

Download Full-text

Azacitidine Use in MDS and AML Patients: Best Selection for Better Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.5070.5070 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 5070-5070

Author(s):

Mauricette Michallet ◽

Mohamad Sobh ◽

Stéphane Morisset ◽

Carine Champigneulle ◽

Florence Ranchon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Scoring System ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

International Prognostic Scoring System ◽

First Line ◽

Fab Classification ◽

Group 2 ◽

French American British ◽

Group 1

Abstract Abstract 5070 In a recent phase III trial, azacitidine was demonstrated to significantly prolong OS compared with conventional care regimens in patients classified in intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) (Fenaux et al. 2009). This study used the French- American-British (FAB) classification for MDS and included approximately one third of patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-t; 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts). WHO criteria now define AML as ≥20% BM blasts. Using those criteria, RAEB-t is now considered as AML. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients who received azacitidine between August 2005 and November 2011 at our institution for MDS or AML. Patients were identified through the hospital database and individual charts were reviewed. The primary objective was to investigate the outcome of patients receiving azacitidine in a daily clinical practice in high risk MDS and AML patients and to evaluate its impact on overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were hematological response rate and transfusion spare. Patients were included if they received at least one cycle of azacitidine. Disease status was defined by both the French American British (FAB) and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems, and risk was scored by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). All analyses were conducted using R statistical software. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate overall survival (OS). There were 79 patients, 51 (65%) males and 28 (35%) females with a median age of 70 years (32–85). The indication of azacitidine was the first line treatment use for MDS, mainly refractory anemia with excess blasts, in 40 (51%) patients (group1) and treatment for patients who had AML and transformed, in 39 (49%) patients (group2). (post chemotherapy: n=16, first line: n=23). Patient characteristics, prognostic factors according to FAB classification, ISPP risk and cytogenetics for both groups are shown in table1. The median number of azacitidine cycles in groups 1 and 2 was 8 (1–30) and 3 (1–29) respectively. Evaluation after 6 cycles showed 55% of responders in group 1 and 31% in group 2; the rest of patients have progressed. The median OS for the group 1 was 24. 5 months (17. 8-NR) while in group2; it was 15. 5 months (11. 2-NR) for patients who received AZA in first line and 6 months (3. 9-NR) for patients with previous chemotherapy. In terms of transfusions number, we did not find any significant spare in terms of both RBC and platelets transfusion in group1 while there was a significant spare of 33% of red blood cells transfusions (p=0. 05) and 42% of platelets transfusions only in group 2 (p=0. 04). The multivariate analysis studying the impact of different variables on OS showed: a worse OS in AML patients with previous chemotherapy (HR= 9. 84 [ 3. 56 – 27. 19 ], p< 0. 001), a worse OS in patients with unfavorable caryotype (HR= 7. 30 [ 2. 13 – 24. 98 ], p< 0. 001), and a better OS in female patients (HR= 0. 31 [ 0. 14 – 0. 68 ], p= 0. 003). Our study confirmed results from previous prospective study in MDS patients while AML patients not receiving azacitidine in first line do not seem to benefit from this treatment. Cytogenetics remain a major factor impacting OS with no significant impact of IPSS. Disclosures: Nicolini: Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text