How to Integrate Elotuzumab and Daratumumab Into Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4421-4430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
Sagar Lonial
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Abstract Data

Purpose Treatment options and outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma have dramatically improved over the past decade with new agents and drug targets for patients at all stages of disease. Incorporation of newly approved monoclonal antibodies is a clinical challenge because the trials used to gain approval are relatively limited in scope and may be less helpful for patients treated in the United States. This article will review data on the use of elotuzumab and daratumumab and provide a foundation for their use in current clinical practice. Methods We performed a review of current published articles and abstract data from clinical trials as well as data on managing adverse events. Results Single-agent activity was seen when using daratumumab in refractory myeloma, and trials for both elotuzumab and daratumumab have demonstrated significant activity when combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents. Unique antibody-related adverse events and challenges are reviewed and discussed. Conclusion These antibodies already have had and will continue to have a dramatic impact on myeloma treatment. Combination therapy likely represents the best approach for their use, and trials that evaluate optimal timing and duration of therapy are in progress as part of induction, salvage, and maintenance therapy.

scholarly journals A Novel Oncolytic Reovirus Immune Priming Strategy Dramatically Enhances the Efficacy of Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Therapy Against Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3960-3960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Kelly ◽  
Claudia M. Espitia ◽  
Weiguo Zhao ◽  
Valeria Visconte ◽  
Matt Coffey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Bone Destruction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Immune Priming

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common adult hematologic malignancy in the United States and is characterized by a unique form of progressive bone destruction. Despite the development of new treatments such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, patients with high-risk disease have a median survival of only 2-3 years, highlighting the demand for more effective therapeutic strategies. Oncolytic viral formulations represent a promising new class of anticancer agents that may have important applications in precision medicine. Recent studies have demonstrated that reoviruses specifically replicate only in cancer cells and this led to the development of a reovirus-based oncolytic viral therapy called Reolysin. We have demonstrated that reoviruses selectively replicate in MM cells and Reolysin possesses significant activity in preclinical in vitro and in vivo MM models. These findings established the framework for an ongoing investigator-initiated phase 1b clinical study of Reolysin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Recent gene ontology analyses of RPMI-8226 and U266 MM cells treated with Reolysin revealed that reovirus exposure triggers a highly significant transient increase in CD274(programmed death 1 ligand, PD-L1) in MM cell lines. Reolysin-mediated PD-L1 upregulation was confirmed by immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, and flow cytometric analyses in MM cell lines and primary patient specimens treated with Reolysin. Increased PD-L1 expression was also detected by immunohistochemistry in MM tumor samples collected from mice treated with Reolysin. Adaptive resistance mediated by inhibitory ligands such as PD-L1 has emerged as an important mechanism of malignant cell survival and has led to the development of new agents that disrupt the PD-L1/PD-1 immune checkpoint. These agents have exhibited dramatic efficacy in certain forms of cancer including melanoma and lung cancer. Analysis of specimens from patients treated on clinical trials with these agents indicates that high basal expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells may be necessary to elicit significant clinical benefit. Notably, most MM cell lines and primary CD138+ cells from MM patients do not overexpress PD-L1 compared to normal plasma cells and this may preclude patients with MM from optimally benefiting from immune checkpoint therapy. However, novel immune priming strategies that stimulate transient upregulation of PD-L1 on malignant cells could potentially render agents that target the PD-L1/PD-1 axis significantly more effective for a broader range of malignancies including MM. We hypothesized that Reolysin could be used as a precision immune priming agent to potentiate the anti-MM efficacy of PD-L1 targeted therapy by rendering MM cells vulnerable to PD-L1 inhibition through the transient upregulation of target expression. To investigate this therapeutic approach, 5TGM1-luc murine MM cells were injected IV into immunocompetent mice to generate MM bone disease. After disease was established, mice were randomized into groups and treated with vehicle, Reolysin (5 x 108 TCID50, Q7D), murine anti-PD-L1 antibody (200 mg/mouse, Q2D) or the combination for 5 weeks. Mice treated with the combination demonstrated decreased disease burden as measured by bioluminescent imaging and also showed reduced IgG2bk levels (specific IgG secreted by 5TGM1 cells) by ELISA. Importantly, the combination also led to increased overall animal survival compared to vehicle control and either single agent treatment (P<0.01). Analysis of bone marrow specimens from mice in all experimental groups showed that Reolysin stimulated elevated PD-L1 levels in vivo in a manner that was directly linked to the enhanced efficacy of the combination. Our findings demonstrate that Reolysin has dramatic PD-L1-related immune priming effects in clinically relevant models of MM and support its use as a precision agent to sensitize MM cells to immune checkpoint therapy. Based on these promising data, we are currently planning a clinical study of Reolysin in combination with bortezomib and a PD-1 inhibitor in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Disclosures Kelly: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coffey:Oncolytics Biotech: Employment.

scholarly journals Pomalidomide – An Appraisal of Its Clinical Development and Role in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Paul G Richardson ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Stephen A Schey ◽  
Meletios A Dimopoulos ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Pomalidomide is a distinct immunomodulatory agent with significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The optimal treatment schedule in patients with RRMM who have received multiple lines of treatment, including bortezomib and lenalidomide, is 4 mg/day on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with weekly low-dose dexamethasone. Improved responses and outcomes relative to traditional therapies continue to be confirmed in recently completed and ongoing trials. Pomalidomide exhibits direct tumoricidal, immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory activities, which facilitate combination therapy with agents with complementary mechanisms of action, resulting in greater anti-myeloma effects than single-agent therapy or previous combination therapies. For example, in combination with proteasome inhibitors and traditional chemotherapeutic agents in doublet or triplet regimens, pomalidomide provides high rates of durable response, and represents an important new treatment option for patients with RRMM requiring effective new therapies. Additionally, pomalidomide maintains its efficacy and tolerability profile in difficult-to-treat patients, including the elderly, patients with poor cytogenetics and those with renal impairment. This review summarises the clinical development of pomalidomide and discusses this effective agent for the treatment of patients with RRMM in the context of current myeloma treatment options, as well as potential future directions to further improve patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and phase 1a study of bisthianostat, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-bo Zhou ◽  
Yang-ming Zhang ◽  
Hong-hui Huang ◽  
Li-jing Shen ◽  
Xiao-feng Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Preclinical Study ◽  
Parp Cleavage ◽  
Rpmi 8226 ◽  
Ongoing Phase

AbstractHDAC inhibitors (HDACis) have been intensively studied for their roles and potential as drug targets in T-cell lymphomas and other hematologic malignancies. Bisthianostat is a novel bisthiazole-based pan-HDACi evolved from natural HDACi largazole. Here, we report the preclinical study of bisthianostat alone and in combination with bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), as well as preliminary first-in-human findings from an ongoing phase 1a study. Bisthianostat dose dependently induced acetylation of tubulin and H3 and increased PARP cleavage and apoptosis in RPMI-8226 cells. In RPMI-8226 and MM.1S cell xenograft mouse models, oral administration of bisthianostat (50, 75, 100 mg·kg-1·d-1, bid) for 18 days dose dependently inhibited tumor growth. Furthermore, bisthianostat in combination with bortezomib displayed synergistic antitumor effect against RPMI-8226 and MM.1S cell in vitro and in vivo. Preclinical pharmacokinetic study showed bisthianostat was quickly absorbed with moderate oral bioavailability (F% = 16.9%–35.5%). Bisthianostat tended to distribute in blood with Vss value of 0.31 L/kg. This distribution parameter might be beneficial to treat hematologic neoplasms such as MM with few side effects. In an ongoing phase 1a study, bisthianostat treatment was well tolerated and no grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events (AEs) had occurred together with good pharmacokinetics profiles in eight patients with relapsed or refractory MM (R/R MM). The overall single-agent efficacy was modest, stable disease (SD) was identified in four (50%) patients at the end of first dosing cycle (day 28). These preliminary in-patient results suggest that bisthianostat is a promising HDACi drug with a comparable safety window in R/R MM, supporting for its further phase 1b clinical trial in combination with traditional MM therapies.

Real-world treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Clinical and economic outcomes in patients treated with pomalidomide or daratumumab

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
New Treatment

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of triple-exposed multiple myeloma patients treated in community oncology practices in the United States.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18727-e18727
Author(s):  
Robert Smith ◽  
Mei Xue ◽  
Natalie Dorrow ◽  
Prateesh Varughese ◽  
Cosima Hogea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
The United States ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
The Us

e18727 Background: Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) over the past decade has significantly improved survival. In particular, 3 drug classes have altered the treatment paradigm for MM patients: proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and CD38 monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD38s). Despite these advances, the majority of patients with MM will become refractory to PIs, IMiDs, and anti-CD38s, and limited evidence indicates these patients have poor outcomes. A retrospective study in the US showed that 275 patients treated at 14 academic institutions with prior exposure to a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 had median overall survival of 9.2 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes (duration of therapy and overall survival) of patients who had been treated with a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 in community practices in the US. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted using the Integra Connect (IC) database. The IC database includes electronic health data from structured and unstructured fields from 12 community practices on the East and West Coast of the US. Adult patients with ≥2 ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for MM on at least 2 separate dates, who received MM treatment between Jan 1, 2016, and Dec 31, 2019, with treatment history that included at least one PI, one IMiD, and one anti-CD38 (triple exposed), and initiated a subsequent line of therapy (s-LOT) after becoming triple exposed, were included. Duration of length of s-LOT was defined as number of days from start of s-LOT to last-day supply of s-LOT. Overall survival was defined as the length of time from start of s-LOT through death or the date of the last office visit. Results: A total of 501 patients were included in this analysis. The median age of patients was 64.9 years; 50% were male; 50% had commercial insurance. 82.8% of patients had ECOG 0 or 1 at diagnosis and had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (LOTs) before initiating s-LOT. Prior to initiating s-LOT, 91% had been exposed to bortezomib, 81% to carfilzomib, 94% to lenalidomide, 82% to pomalidomide, and 100% to daratumumab. In s-LOT, 95% received treatment that included same drug or same drug class (30% received bortezomib, 48% carfilzomib, 31% lenalidomide, 47% pomalidomide, and 31% daratumumab). The median duration of s-LOT was 78 days and median survival was 10.3 months (308 days) from initiation of s-LOT. Conclusions: For triple-class exposed patients, there is a lack of consensus on the most efficacious approach to subsequent treatment. The present study shows a significant amount of retreatment with previously used agents or classes among these patients with short duration of therapy and poor survival. As has been previously noted, new strategies and agents targeting novel aspects of MM are needed to improve outcomes for these patients. Disclosures: This study (213286) was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.

scholarly journals Quantitative PK/PD Prediction of the Efficacious and Safe Dose Ranges of the LMP7 Inhibitor M3258 for Phase I Application in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5582-5582
Author(s):  
Florian Lignet ◽  
Christina Esdar ◽  
Manja Friese-Hamim ◽  
Andreas Becker ◽  
Elise Drouin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Oral Application ◽  
Development Institute ◽  
Safe Dose

M3258 is an orally bioavailable, potent, selective, reversible inhibitor of the large multifunctional peptidase 7 (LMP7, β5i, PSMB8) proteolytic subunit of the immunoproteasome; a crucial component of the cellular protein degradation machinery, which is highly expressed in malignant hematopoietic cells including multiple myeloma. M3258 was previously shown to deliver strong in vivo preclinical efficacy in multiple myeloma xenograft models, as well as a more benign non-clinical safety profile compared to approved pan-proteasome inhibitors, exemplified by a lack of effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems and cardiac and respiratory organs. Here we describe preclinical PK/PD and PK/efficacy modelling which led to a prediction of the PK profile, and the efficacious and safe dose ranges of M3258 in human which were used to guide the design of the phase I dose-escalation trial of M3258 in >3 line relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Mouse, rat, dog and monkey PK, plasma protein binding and intrinsic clearance data were used to estimate a half-life of approximately 6 hours for M3258 in human. The human total clearance and volume of distribution for M3258 were predicted to be 0.033 L/h/kg and 0.28 L/kg, respectively, whilst oral bioavailability was estimated to be above 80%. LMP7 proteolytic activity was assessed as a PD readout in human multiple myeloma tumor cells xenografted to mice as well as in dog peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A strong PK/PD relationship was observed for M3258 across both species. LMP7 inhibition by M3258 also correlated strongly with anti-tumor efficacy in multiple myeloma xenografts, with maximal efficacy observed at M3258 exposure delivering sustained inhibition of tumor LMP7 activity. Quantitative PK/PD/efficacy modeling predicted the biologically efficacious dose (BED) of M3258 upon oral application to be between 10 - 90 mg daily in human. By incorporating data from nonclinical safety studies, these data suggest an attractive human PK profile of M3258, enabling oral application, as well as an improved human therapeutic index compared to approved pan-proteasome inhibitors. M3258 is being investigated in a phase I, first-in-man, 2-part, open label clinical study designed to determine the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and early signs of efficacy of M3258 as a single agent (dose-escalation) and co-administered with dexamethasone (dose-expansion) in participants with RRMM whose disease has progressed following > 3 prior lines of therapy and for whom no effective standard therapy exists. Integration of these data will guide the selection of the BED for potential further clinical development of M3258. Disclosures Lignet: Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Esdar:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Friese-Hamim:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Becker:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment, Other: Holding shares with a value below 1000-USD. Drouin:EMD Serono Research and Development Institute: Employment. El Bawab:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Goodstal:EMD Serono Research and Development Institute: Employment. Gimmi:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Haselmayer:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Jährling:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Sanderson:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Sloot:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Stinchi:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Victor:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Walter:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment. Rohdich:Merck Healthcare KGaA: Employment.

scholarly journals Selinexor in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072093062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Deepu Madduri ◽  
Shambavi Richard ◽  
Ajai Chari
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Combination Drug ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
The Past ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Drug Choice ◽  
Combination Regimens

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents an incurable hematologic malignancy. Despite significant advances over the past decade, with the advent of multiple new classes of anti-myeloma agents, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, patients ultimately relapse. Selinexor is a first-in-class exportin-1 inhibitor with activity in these multiply relapsed and refractory patients. Although the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval is for the doublet of Selinexor in combination with dexamethasone, ongoing clinical trials are evaluating a number of combination regimens. These triplet and quadruplet, selinexor-based, regimens are showing significant activity in “triple-class” refractory patients. With appropriate combination drug choice, drug dosing, and supportive measures, patients with previously no viable options for therapy, now have multiple potential regimens to control their disease.

Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
The Many

Abstract Advances in treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma have made a significant impact on the overall survival of patients and have helped achieve levels of response and duration of remission previously not achievable with standard chemotherapy-based approaches. These improvements are due, in large part, to the development of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, each of which has substantial single-agent activity. In addition, a large number of second-generation agents are also in clinical development, such that the repertoire of available treatment options continues to expand. To better interpret clinical trials performed in the relapsed setting, it is important that definitions of relapse categories are used to help better pinpoint the specific benefit for a given therapy, especially in the combination therapy setting as it aids in determining if ongoing work should be continued or abandoned for a given new agent. Insights from preclinical modeling and in vitro work have identified several new combinations, new targets and second- or third-generation versions of existing targets that hold great promise in the setting of relapsed myeloma. Combinations of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide with conventional agents or among each other have resulted in enhanced response rates and efficacy. Clinical trials of agents such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide, vorinostat, panobinostat, and elotuzomab are just a few of the many exciting new compounds that are being tested in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials for relapsed patients. Further clinical and translational testing are critical to better understanding how best to combine these new agents, as well as identifying patient populations that may best benefit from treatment with these developing new agents.

scholarly journals Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: A Challenge to Develop Novel Targets

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Nishida ◽  
Taketo Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
The Past ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Car T ◽  
Immune Therapies

The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.

Cardiac Biomarkers Predict for Ability To Tolerate and Complete Therapy with Lenalidomide ± Dexamathosone in AL Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 130-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Steven Zeldenrust ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Cardiac Biomarker ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: We studied the toxicity and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with symptomatic AL. Patients received single agent lenalidomide. If progression by 3 months or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Originally, twenty-three patients (Cohort 1) were enrolled according to study design. Because of a significant early drop out rate and notable activity of the regimen, the trial was modified to include an additional 15 patients (Cohort 2). Baseline characteristics and adverse events are available for all enrolled patients, but at the time of this writing, response data are available for Cohort 1 patients due to short follow-up of Cohort 2, but will be updated by the time of the meeting. Results: Median age was 64 years, with 69% male. Twenty-three were previously treated. Organ involvement was cardiac (67%), renal (64%), hepatic (17%), nerve (17%). Thirty-three, twenty-two, and forty-four percent of patients were cardiac biomarker stage 1, 2, and, 3 respectively. Of the 37 patients, one was a cancel, and 6 have not yet made it through 3 months of protocol treatment and event monitoring. The respective median follow-ups for Cohorts 1 and 2 are 17 and 3.4 months. Of the remaining, 30 patients, within the first 3 cycles of therapy fifteen patients discontinued treatment: 7 early deaths and 8 adverse events or other causes. Three additional patients died 0.5 to 2 months after stopping treatment. The best predictor for early withdrawal and/or death was baseline NT-proBNP and cardiac biomarker staging system (cut-offs for serum troponin T &lt;0.035 ng/ml and NT-proBNP &lt;332 pg/ml--Stage I neither above cut-off; Stage III, both above cut-off; and Stage II, one above cut-off). Figure1 Figure1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Of the twenty 22 patients assessed for response ten patients responded to treatment for an overall response rate of 45%, including 23% organ responders. Among the patients with organ responses, there were four renal responses, two cardiac responses and two liver responses. All but one of the responders had dexamethasone added to their treatment program. The most common grade 3−4 adverse events at least possibly attributable to lenalidomide were neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (21%), fatigue (15%), and rash (12%). Conclusions: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone has significant activity in patients with AL with an overall response rate of 45%. Baseline NT−proBNP may be an effective eligibility screening strategy for subsequent trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document