The successful phase 3 niraparib ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial included a substantial number of patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer (OC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5560-5560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Del Campo ◽  
Mansoor Raza Mirza ◽  
Jonathan S. Berek ◽  
Diane M. Provencher ◽  
Guenter Emons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Resistance Rate ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Duration Of Response

5560 Background: Niraparib is a highly selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor (PARPi); in preclinical studies, it concentrates in the tumor relative to plasma to deliver durable, near complete PARP inhibition and persistent antitumor effects.Niraparib demonstrated significantly longer progression free survival (PFS) vs placebo in patients (pts) with recurrent OC who were randomized following a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to platinum based chemotherapy in the controlled, double-blind phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. To more fully characterize the NOVA trial population, we assessed platinum resistance status, defined as a duration of response to platinum < 6 months to the most recent (ultimate) platinum regimen. Analysis was limited to pts in the placebo arm, as inclusion of pts receiving active treatment (niraparib) would have confounded the ability to determine duration of response to platinum alone. Methods: Pts with recurrent OC, no prior PARPi use, ≥2 prior courses of platinum based chemotherapy, and CR or PR to the most recent platinum based chemotherapy were eligible. Pts were assigned to one of two cohorts based on g BRCA testing (g BRCAmut or non-g BRCAmut) and randomized 2:1 within each cohort to niraparib 300 mg or placebo qd until progressive disease (PD). Randomization occurred up to 8 weeks following the last dose of the most recent platinum based chemotherapy. PFS was measured from time of randomization to death or earliest PD as assessed by independent review committee. Estimated probability of pts having disease progression in each cohort and pooled across cohorts 6 months after the last dose of their most recent platinum therapy was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: 181 pts were randomized to placebo (65 g BRCAmut and 116 non-g BRCAmut). Platinum resistance rate estimates for the g BRCAmut, non-g BRCAmut, and pooled cohorts were 42%, 53%, and 49%, respectively. Conclusions: Approximately half of the pts in the NOVA study, where niraparib treatment met its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS following a response to platinum, had developed platinum resistance to their last line of chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01847274.

Efficacy of niraparib on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) with partial response (PR) to the last platinum-based chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoor Raza Mirza ◽  
Bradley J. Monk ◽  
Marta Gil-Martin ◽  
Lucy Gilbert ◽  
Ulrich Canzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Study Results

5517 Background: Therapeutic paradigms for recurrent OC vary by geography. Maintenance following response to platinum-based chemotherapy (Plat) is standard in Europe, whereas in the US maintenance is considered following complete response (CR) vs treatment for partial response (PR). Niraparib is a highly selective PARP 1/2 inhibitor (PARPi). In preclinical studies it concentrates in the tumor relative to plasma, delivering > 90% durable PARP inhibition and antitumor effects. Niraparib demonstrated significantly longer PFS vs placebo (P) in pts with recurrent OC following a CR or PR to Plat in the randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Methods: Pts with recurrent OC, no prior PARPi use, ≥2 prior courses of Plat, and response to most recent Plat were eligible. Pts were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts on the basis of g BRCA testing (g BRCAmut or non-g BRCAmut) and randomized 2:1 within each cohort to niraparib 300 mg or P qd until progressive disease (PD). Randomization occurred up to 8 weeks after last dose of the most recent Plat. Pts were stratified by time to progression after penultimate Plat (6 to < 12 months or ≥12 months), prior use of bevacizumab (yes/no), and response to most recent Plat (CR or PR). PFS was measured from time of randomization to death or earliest PD as assessed by independent review committee. Results: 49% of pts (niraparib: 67/138; P: 32/65) in the g BRCAmut and ~49% of pts (niraparib: 117/234 [50%]; P: 56/116 [48%]) in the non-g BRCAmut cohorts entered NOVA with a PR following their most recent Plat. At time of unblinding, 30 (45%) niraparib and 23 (72%) P pts in the g BRCAmut and 65 (56%) niraparib and 45 (80%) P pts in the non-g BRCAmut cohorts had PFS events. PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.24 (0.131–0.441) in g BRCAmut and 0.35 (0.230–0.532) in non-g BRCAmut cohorts for pts who had a PR to their most recent platinum regimen. This compared favorably to the overall NOVA study results, where PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.27 (0.173–0.410) in g BRCAmut and 0.45 (0.338–0.607) in non-g BRCAmut cohorts. Conclusions: Niraparib treatment provided significant benefit to pts with recurrent OC who achieved a PR following Plat. Clinical trial information: NCT01847274.

SATURN: A double-blind, randomized, phase III study of maintenance erlotinib versus placebo following nonprogression with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8001-8001 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Cappuzzo ◽  
T. Ciuleanu ◽  
L. Stelmakh ◽  
S. Cicenas ◽  
A. Szczesna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Ecog Ps

8001 Background: Erlotinib (E), a small-molecule EGFR TKI, is proven to extend survival versus placebo (P) in 2nd/3rd-line advanced NSCLC. The phase III SATURN study (BO18192) was initiated to evaluate E as maintenance therapy after standard 1st-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) in advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with no evidence of disease progression after 4 cycles of CT were randomized to receive either E 150 mg/day or P until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients and the co-primary endpoint was PFS in EGFR immunohistochemistry-positive (IHC+) patients. Results: A total of 1,949 patients entered the CT phase, of whom 889 were randomized to E (n=438) or P (n=451). Median age was 60 years for both arms. Baseline characteristics for E and P arms (%): male/female: 73/27 and 75/25; adenocarcinoma + BAC/squamous-cell/other: 47/38/15 and 44/43/13; stage IIIB/IV: 26/74 and 24/76; Caucasian/Asian/other: 84/14/2 and 83/15/2; ECOG PS 0/1: 31/69 and 32/68; current/former/never smoker: 55/28/18 and 56/27/17. PFS (by investigator assessment; confirmed by independent review) was significantly prolonged with E versus P in all patients (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.62–0.82]; p<.0001) and in EGFR IHC+ patients (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58–0.82]; p<.0001). Subgroup analyses will be reported. Response rate was 12% with E versus 5% with P. Disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease >12 wks) was 40.8% with E versus 27.4% with P (p<.0001). OS data are not yet mature. E was well tolerated: the majority of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2. AEs reported in ≥10% of all patients were rash (60% with E versus 9% with P) and diarrhea (20% with E versus 5% with P); again, most were grade 1/2. Only 2.3% of patients receiving E had a serious treatment-related AE and 2.8% withdrew due to a treatment-related AE. Conclusions: The SATURN study met its primary and co-primary endpoints with high statistical significance. Erlotinib in the 1st-line maintenance setting is well tolerated, and significantly improves disease control and delays progression versus placebo across patient subgroups. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (18) ◽  
pp. 2038-2050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Shirley D'Sa ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Hui-Peng Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity.

Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rituximab + Galiximab Vs Rituximab + Placebo In Advanced Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 428-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Bence-Bruckler ◽  
David Macdonald ◽  
Patrick J Stiff ◽  
Byron McKinney ◽  
Katherine L. Ruffner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract Abstract 428 Background: Galiximab is a primatized chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD80, an immunoregulatory protein normally expressed on antigen presenting cells and T cells, as well as in B-cell NHL, Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and certain leukemias. Galiximab directly mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against tumor cells in vitro. In ex vivo assays, galiximab can act on non-malignant cells to modulate immune signaling within the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory, Grade I-IIIa, follicular NHL in relapse following treatment with at least 1 chemotherapy regimen, and who were not refractory to rituximab were randomized to rituximab (375 mg/m2) plus galiximab (500 mg/m2; R+G) or rituximab plus placebo (R+P) and treated on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Randomization and primary efficacy analyses were stratified by age (≤60 vs >60), rituximab exposure (rituximab naïve vs non-naïve), and baseline tumor bulk (diameter of largest lesion ≤7 cm vs >7 cm). Primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using a stratified log-rank test. Results: This study, originally planned as a Phase 3 confirmatory study, was terminated early due to changes in standard of care and converted to a Phase 2 study. Therefore, interpretation of p-values was focused on assessing the potential of these data to support subsequent Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies. At study termination, 337 subjects were randomized (175 R+G and 162 R+P) with median follow-up of 13.8 months. Demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced across the 2 treatment groups (Table 1). The addition of galiximab to rituximab reduced the hazard for disease progression or death by 26% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.738; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.543, 1.002]; p = 0.050) compared to the R+P group. Kaplan-Meier median PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI [9.0, 14.7]) for R+G and 9.0 months (95% CI [8.9, 10.5]) for R+P. Overall response rate was 51% for R+G vs 48% for R+P (p = 0.455) and complete response was 20% for R+G and 15% for R+P (p = 0.251). Consistency in treatment effect was seen across patient subgroups (Figure 1). A trend toward a larger PFS effect was observed in patients who were rituximab-naïve, had bulky tumor (largest lesion >7 cm), had lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >1 × upper limit of normal, or had bone marrow involvement at study entry. There were 10 deaths in R+G vs 17 deaths in R+P; HR = 0.549 based on a stratified log-rank analysis (95% CI [0.248, 1.217]; p = 0.135). No substantial difference was observed between groups for Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs, and there were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Incidence of AEs was ≥3% higher in the R+G vs R+P group for the following: pyrexia (18% vs 11%), headache (13% vs 7%), cough (10% vs 6%), upper respiratory infection (8% vs 4%), insomnia (8% vs 4%), neutropenia (6% vs 3%), muscle spasms (5% vs <1%), and oropharyngeal pain (4% vs 1%). Anti-galiximab antibodies were not detected in 169 subjects treated with galiximab who were tested while on study. Conclusions: Galiximab in combination with rituximab demonstrated a trend toward an improved PFS compared with rituximab alone and was well tolerated in subjects with relapsed or refractory follicular NHL. Disclosure: McKinney: Biogen Idec: Employment. Ruffner:Biogen Idec: Employment. Wilson:Biogen Idec: Employment. Whiteley:Biogen Idec: Employment.

scholarly journals Prolonged duration of response in lenvatinib responders with thyroid cancer (Russian translation)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
A. G. Gianoukakis ◽  
C. E. Dutcus ◽  
N. Batty ◽  
M. Guo ◽  
M. Baig
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Duration Of Response

We present an updated analysis of lenvatinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) with new duration of response (DOR) data unavailable for the primary analysis. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, patients ≥18 years old with measurable, pathologically confirmed RR-DTC with independent radiologic confirmation of disease progression within the previous 13 months were randomized 2:1 to oral lenvatinib 24 mg/day or placebo. The main outcome measures for this analysis are DOR and progression-free survival (PFS). The median DOR for all lenvatinib responders (patients with complete or partial responses; objective response rate: 60.2 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 54.2–66.1) was 30.0 months (95 % CI 18.4–36.7) and was generally similar across subgroups. DOR was shorter in patients with greater disease burden and with brain and liver metastases. Updated median PFS was longer in the overall lenvatinib group vs placebo (19.4 vs 3.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.24; 99 % CI 0.17–0.35; nominal P <0.0001). In lenvatinib responders, median PFS was 33.1 months (95 % CI 27.8–44.6) vs 7.9 months (95 % CI 5.8–10.7) in nonresponders. The median DOR of 30.0 months seen with patients who achieved complete or partial responses with lenvatinib (60.2 %) demonstrates that lenvatinib responders can have prolonged, durable and clinically meaningful responses. Prolonged PFS (33.1 months) was also observed in these lenvatinib responders.

scholarly journals Prolonged duration of response in lenvatinib responders with thyroid cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G Gianoukakis ◽  
Corina E Dutcus ◽  
Nicolas Batty ◽  
Matthew Guo ◽  
Mahadi Baig
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Duration Of Response

We present an updated analysis of lenvatinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) with new duration of response (DOR) data unavailable for the primary analysis. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, patients ≥18 years old with measurable, pathologically confirmed RR-DTC with independent radiologic confirmation of disease progression within the previous 13 months were randomized 2:1 to oral lenvatinib 24 mg/day or placebo. The main outcome measures for this analysis are DOR and progression-free survival (PFS). The median DOR for all lenvatinib responders (patients with complete or partial responses; objective response rate: 60.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 54.2–66.1) was 30.0 months (95% CI 18.4–36.7) and was generally similar across subgroups. DOR was shorter in patients with greater disease burden and with brain and liver metastases. Updated median PFS was longer in the overall lenvatinib group vs placebo (19.4 vs 3.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.24; 99% CI 0.17–0.35; nominal P < 0.0001). In lenvatinib responders, median PFS was 33.1 months (95% CI 27.8–44.6) vs 7.9 months (95% CI 5.8–10.7) in non-responders. The median DOR of 30.0 months seen with patients who achieved complete or partial responses with lenvatinib (60.2%) demonstrates that lenvatinib responders can have prolonged, durable and clinically meaningful responses. Prolonged PFS (33.1 months) was also observed in these lenvatinib responders.

Phase II consolidation trial with anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after a second remission

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002239
Author(s):  
Oren Smaletz ◽  
Gustavo Ismael ◽  
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz ◽  
Ivana L O Nascimento ◽  
Ana Luiza Gomes de Morais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lewis Y

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hu3S193, a humanized anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody, as a consolidation strategy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after salvage platinum-doublet chemotherapy.MethodsThis single-arm phase II study accrued patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with Lewis-Y expression by immunohistochemistry who had achieved a second complete response after five to eight cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous infusions of hu3S193, 30 mg/m2 every 2 weeks starting no more than 8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing for 12 doses, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the second remission. Secondary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were enrolled. Most had a papillary/serous histology tumor (94%), stage III disease at diagnosis (75%), and five (17%) underwent secondary cytoreduction before salvage chemotherapy. Two patients were not eligible for efficacy but were considered for toxicity analysis. Eighteen patients (62%) completed the full consolidation treatment while nine patients progressed on treatment. At the time of analysis, 23 patients (85%) of the eligible population had progressed and seven of these patients (26%) had died. Median progression-free survival of the second remission was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.6–13.9), with a 1-year progression-free survival of the second remission rate of 50.1%. The trial was terminated early since it was unlikely that the primary objective would be achieved. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (55%) and vomiting (51%).ConclusionsHu3S193 did not show sufficient clinical activity as consolidation therapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationNCT01137071.

Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) cohort by agent in the phase 3 ASCENT study of patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1077-1077
Author(s):  
Joyce O'Shaughnessy ◽  
Kevin Punie ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Filipa Lynce ◽  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

1077 Background: In pts with pretreated mTNBC, standard-of-care chemotherapy is associated with low objective response rates (ORRs) and short median progression-free survival (PFS). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of pts with mTNBC who have received ≥2 prior therapies for metastatic disease. The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts with relapsed/refractory mTNBC demonstrated a significant survival benefit of SG over TPC (median PFS: 5.6 vs 1.7 mo, HR 0.41, P< 0.0001; median overall survival [OS]: 12.1 vs 6.7 mo, HR 0.48, P< 0.0001) with a tolerable safety profile. Here we summarize efficacy results for SG vs each TPC agent in ASCENT to examine how each TPC agent performed individually. Methods: Pts had mTNBC refractory to or progressing after ≥2 prior standard chemotherapy regimens. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or single-agent TPC (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Secondary endpoints were ORR per RECIST 1.1, duration of response, OS, and safety. Outcomes for each of the agents in the TPC arm were analyzed and compared with SG. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 were BMNeg. Among pts in the TPC cohort (n = 233), eribulin was the most commonly chosen chemotherapy (n = 126), followed by vinorelbine (n = 47), capecitabine (n = 31), and gemcitabine (n = 29). Treatment with eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine resulted in shorter median PFS vs SG (2.1, 1.6, 1.6, and 2.7 vs 5.6 mo, respectively); similar results were observed for median OS (6.9, 5.9, 5.2, and 8.4 vs 12.1 mo), ORR (5%, 4%, 6%, and 3% vs 35%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; 8%, 6%, 10%, and 14% vs 45%). Key grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with TPC overall vs SG included neutropenia (33% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), and anemia (5% vs 8%). Key grade ≥3 TRAEs with eribulin vs SG included neutropenia (30% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), anemia (2% vs 8%), and peripheral neuropathy (2% vs none), respectively. The safety profiles of vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine combined were consistent with that of TPC overall and with eribulin. One treatment-related death was reported for the TPC arm (eribulin) and none with SG. Conclusions: The efficacy benefit observed with SG vs TPC in pts with mTNBC was retained when evaluating each TPC chemotherapy agent individually. These results confirm that SG should be considered as a new standard of care in pts with pretreated mTNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document