Inherited germline mutations in men with prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16564-e16564
Author(s):  
Robert Reid ◽  
Marcie DiGiovanni ◽  
Ryan Bernhisel ◽  
Krystal Brown ◽  
Jennifer Saam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Commercial Laboratory ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of

e16564 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes that confer hereditary cancer risk among men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC); however, PC does not currently receive attention as an indication for genetic testing. We assessed the clinical features of men with PC who received clinical testing as well as the distribution of PVs identified. Methods: A commercial laboratory database was queried to identify men with PC who underwent testing with a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel from September 2013–September 2016. Clinical information was obtained from provider-completed test request forms. Individuals with PC only were evaluated separately from those who had ≥1 additional malignancy. Personal/family history was evaluated relative to the 2013 NCCN guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) testing. Results: Overall, 700 men with a personal history of PC were identified: 384 (54.9%) with only PC and 316 (45.1%) with PC and ≥1 additional malignancy. The most common additional malignancies were colorectal (115) and breast cancer (105). The median age of diagnosis in men with only PC was 57.5, which is younger than tested men who had an additional malignancy (62) and the SEER data (2009-2013) for all men with PC (66). HBOC testing criteria were met by 75.9% of men, including 44 (6.3%) who met based only on a personal/family history of PC and 202 (28.9%) who met in part due to a personal/family history of PC. PVs were identified in 14.0% of all men: 11.5% of men with PC only and 17.1% of men with PC and a second malignancy (see Table). Conclusions: PC patients selected for genetic testing here were younger than men diagnosed with PC from the general population (SEER), and almost half had a diagnosis of an additional malignancy. They also have a high positive mutation rate across a broad spectrum of genes. [Table: see text]

Inherited germline mutations in men with prostate cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
Robert Reid ◽  
Marcie DiGiovanni ◽  
Ryan Bernhisel ◽  
Krystal Brown ◽  
Jennifer Saam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of

357 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes that confer hereditary cancer risk among men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC); however, PC does not currently receive attention as an indication for genetic testing. We assessed the clinical features of men with PC who received clinical testing as well as the distribution of PVs identified. Methods: Men with PC who underwent testing with a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel (Myriad Genetic Laboratories) from September 2013–September 2017 were included. Clinical information was obtained from provider-completed test request forms. Individuals with PC only were evaluated separately from those who had ≥1 additional malignancy. Personal/family history was evaluated relative to the 2013 NCCN guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) testing. Results: Overall, 1004 men with a personal history of PC were identified: 606 (60.4%) with only PC and 398 (39.6%) with PC and ≥1 additional malignancy. The most common additional malignancies were breast (136) and colorectal cancer (134). The median age of diagnosis in men with only PC was 59, which is younger than tested men who had an additional malignancy (63) and the SEER data (2009-2013) for all men with PC (66). HBOC testing criteria were met by 78.0% of men, including 68 (6.8%) who met based only on a personal/family history of PC and 330 (32.9%) who met in part due to a personal/family history of PC. PVs were identified in 12.9% of all men: 11.2% of men with PC only and 15.4% of men with PC and a second malignancy (Table). Conclusions: PC patients selected for genetic testing here were younger than men diagnosed with PC from the general population (SEER), and about a third had a diagnosis of an additional malignancy. They also have a high positive mutation rate across a broad spectrum of genes. [Table: see text]

Clinical characteristics of men with prostate cancer and evaluation of NCCN prostate cancer guidelines on germline genetic testing outcomes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 252-252
Author(s):  
Samantha Greenberg ◽  
Brock O'Neil ◽  
Kathleen A. Cooney ◽  
Lisa M. Pappas ◽  
Jonathan David Tward
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Genetic Counselor ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Genetic Test Results ◽  
History Of

252 Background: Growing evidence suggests up to 12% of men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) harbor a pathogenic variant (PV) in genes associated with hereditary cancer risk. Updated NCCN PC guidelines include consideration for germline testing (GT) in men with high risk, very high risk, regional, or metastatic PC. As a result, we expanded our criteria for GT in men with PC to include these groups and men with a strong family history for PC beginning in January 2018. This study reports the clinical characteristics and germline findings before and after this expansion. Methods: Men with PC underwent multi-gene genetic testing (GT) for PVs from June 2016-June 2018 with genetic counselors. Clinical information and germline GT results were analyzed. Results: Of 285 eligible men who met with a genetic counselor, there were 201 evaluable GT results. One PV was excluded for suspicion of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Twenty-seven PVs were identified in 24 men (12.4%). Three men had two PVs identified (1.5%), at least one PV of which was in ATM or BRCA2. The most common PVs were ATM (n = 6, 3.0%), BRCA2 (n = 7, 3.5%), MYH (n = 4, 2.0%), and HOXB13 (n = 4, 2.0%). Rate of PVs were not statistically different across the two timeframes of GT, (2016-17, 14%; 2018, 11.2%; p = 0.60). PVs were not statistically associated with a higher ISUP group (1-3: 10.1%, 4-5: 13.6%; p = 0.49) and were distributed across multiple NCCN risk groups. Almost all men tested reported a family history of cancer, with the most frequent cancers reported including PC (n = 79, 39.3%), breast (n = 55, 27.4%), and colon cancer (n = 23, 11.4%). Family history of PC was not statistically associated with genetic test results (PV: 54%, no PV: 37%; p = 0.11). Conclusions: Expanding germline GT criteria will substantially increase patient volume without significant changes to the PV rate. Higher PC risk defined by ISUP or NCCN was not associated with the rate of PVs. Given this finding, further broadening the criteria for GT in PC may be warranted.

Family history and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in prostate cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Rachel Sabol ◽  
Elisa Marie Ledet ◽  
Ellen Jaeger ◽  
Marcus W. Moses ◽  
Brian E. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
History Of

143 Background: Recent literature highlights the importance of germline genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Surprisingly, a literature review indicates that family history records are incomplete in published studies. Methods: Prospective and complete family history data were gathered from 496 men in a single institution with a personal history of PCa who underwent germline genetic testing using a panel of at least 79 genes (Invitae testing) from 2016-2020. Comprehensive FH were obtained in all PCa patients in this database and analysis of prevalent FH was assessed at the time of sample collection. Age, race, metastastes at any time, and Gleason score were also ascertained. MUTYH heterozygotes were not considered pathogenic. Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) were not associated with age at diagnosis, race, or presence of metastasis. Men with Gleason scores 8-10 at time of diagnosis were more likely to have PV/LPV ( P= 0.004). One or more first degree relatives (FDR) with any cancer with was not predictive for germline PV/LPVs for men with PCa ( P= 0.96). Analysis of patients with one or more FDR with breast, prostate, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer revealed that only FDR with breast cancer ( P = 0.028) or ovarian cancer ( P = 0.015) was predictive for PV/LPVs. Though one or more FDR with prostate cancer did not predict a PV/LPV in the overall panel, further analysis indicate that a history of a FDR with PCa was predictive for PV/LPV in a DNA damage repair (DDR) gene ( P= 0.044). Conclusions: In men with a personal history of PCa, germline PV/LPVs were associated with a FDR with breast or ovarian cancer. A FDR with PCa was predictive for PV/LPV in DDR genes. These data emphasize the contribution of FH to germline genetic testing results in a cohort with complete ascertainment of cancer in first degree relatives.

Hereditary Cancer Gene Variants in Hispanic Men with a Personal or Family History of Prostate Cancer

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chethan Ramamurthy ◽  
Eric W. Stutz ◽  
Martin Goros ◽  
Jonathan Gelfond ◽  
Teresa L. Johnson-Pais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Gene Variants ◽  
Cancer Gene ◽  
Hispanic Men ◽  
History Of

Germline mutations in Brazilian pancreatic carcinoma patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16749-e16749
Author(s):  
Livia Munhoz Rodrigues ◽  
Simone Maistro ◽  
Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama ◽  
Luiz A.Senna Leite ◽  
Joao Glasberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Family History Of Cancer ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Cancer

e16749 Background: Pancreatic cancer has the prospect of becoming the second leading cause of cancer death by 2030. The NCCN Guidelines recommend genetic testing for all patients with pancreatic cancer, however, the spectrum of germline mutations has not been extensively evaluated because recent studies with genetic testing have explored only a limited number of genes and have focused predominantly on Caucasian populations. Therefore, our objective is to evaluate the frequency and spectrum of germline mutations in unselected patients with pancreatic cancer in a multiethnic population. Methods: Patients from Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (Brazil) with histopathological diagnosis of non-endocrine pancreatic carcinoma were included, regardless of the family history of cancer. These patients answered a life habits and family history of cancer questionnaire and supplied blood for the Next Generation Sequencing (MiSeq platform) with the TruSight Hereditary Cancer panel (Illumina), which includes 115 cancer predisposing genes. Variant analysis was performed with the VarStation, a Brazilian tool that offers post-sequencing computational support and aid for clinical interpretation. Results: To the present moment, 77 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (27-83), among whom, 13% with young age (≤50 years) and 47 women (61%). Thirty-eight patients (49%) reported cases of cancer in first-degree relatives. Regarding risk factors, 41 patients (53%) reported smoking, 19 (25%) alcohol ingestion and 20 (26%) had obesity. Seven out of 77 patients presented pathogenic variants in ATM (n = 2) , CHEK2, FANCM (n = 2) or PALB2 (n = 2) genes. Two of these patients ( CHEK2 and FANCM) had early onset pancreatic cancer (≤45 years), both denied smoking habit and family history of cancer in 1st degree relatives. Two patients, who were ATM mutation carriers, reported 1st or 2nd degree relatives with cancer and are alive after 4 and 8 years of diagnosis. Conclusions: In this unselected group of pancreatic cancer patients, 15% were young, almost half reported first-degree relatives with cancer and 9% were carriers of pathogenic variants in genes related with the homologous recombination DNA repair.

scholarly journals Elucidating the phenotypic variability associated with the polyT tract and TG repeats in CFTR

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Nykamp ◽  
Rebecca Truty ◽  
Darlene Riethmaier ◽  
Julia Wilkinson ◽  
Sara L. Bristow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Phenotypic Variability ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
History Of ◽  
Disease Risks ◽  
Reduced Penetrance ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Single Organ

ABSTRACTPurposeTo evaluate the risk and spectrum of phenotypes associated in individuals with one or two of the CFTR T5 haplotype variants (TG11T5, TG12T5 and TG13T5) in the absence of the R117H variant.MethodsIndividuals who received testing with CFTR NGS results between 2014 and 2019 through Invitae at ordering provider discretion were included. TG-T repeats were detected using a custom-developed haplotype caller. Frequencies of the TG-T5 variants (biallelic or in combination with another CF-causing variant [CFvar]) were calculated. Clinical information reported by the ordering provider (via requisition form) or the individual (during genetic counseling appointments) was examined.ResultsAmong 548,300 individuals, the minor allele frequency of the T5 allele was 4.2% (TG repeat distribution: TG11=68.1%, TG12=29.5%, TG13=2.4%). When present with a CFvar, each of the TG[11-13]T5 variants were significantly enriched in individuals with a “high suspicion” of CF/CFTR-RD (personal/family history of CF/CFTR-RD) compared to those with very “low suspicion” for CF or CFTR-RD (hereditary cancer testing, CFTR not requisitioned). Compared to CFvar/CFvar individuals, TG[11-13]T5/CFvar individuals generally had single organ involvement, milder symptoms, variable expressivity, and reduced penetrance.DiscussionData from this study provides a better understanding of disease risks associated with inheriting TG[11-13]T5 variants and has important implications for reproductive genetic counseling.

scholarly journals Germinal defects of SDHx genes in patients with isolated pituitary adenoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-379
Author(s):  
Grégory Mougel ◽  
Arnaud Lagarde ◽  
Frédérique Albarel ◽  
Wassim Essamet ◽  
Perrine Luigi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Pituitary Adenoma ◽  
Family History ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposing Genes ◽  
History Of ◽  
New Gateway

Background: The ‘3PAs’ syndrome, associating pituitary adenoma (PA) and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), is sometimes associated with mutations in PPGL-predisposing genes, such as SDHx or MAX. In ’3PAs’ syndrome, PAs can occur before PPGL, suggesting a new gateway into SDHx/MAX-related diseases. Objective: To determine the SDHx/MAX mutation prevalence in patients with isolated PAs and characterize PAs of patients with SDHx/MAX mutations. Design: Genes involved in PAs (AIP/MEN1/CDKN1B) or PPGLs (SDHx/MAX) were sequenced in patients with isolated PAs. We then conducted a review of cases of PA in the setting of ’3PAs’ syndrome. Results: A total of 263 patients were recruited. Seven (likely) pathogenic variants were found in AIP, two in MEN1, two in SDHA, and one in SDHC. The prevalence of SDHx mutations reached 1.1% (3/263). Of 31 reported patients with PAs harboring SDHx/MAX mutations (28 published cases and 3 cases reported here), 6/31 (19%) developed PA before PPGL and 8/31 (26%) had isolated PA. The age of onset was later than in patients with AIP/MEN1 mutations. PAs were mainly macroprolactinomas and showed intracytoplasmic vacuoles seen on histopathology. Conclusions: We discovered SDHx mutations in patients bearing PA who had no familial or personal history of PPGL. However, the question of incidental association remains unresolved and data to determine the benefit of SDHx/MAX screening in these patients are lacking. We recommend that patients with isolated PA should be carefully examined for a family history of PPGLs. A family history of PPGL, as well as the presence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in PA, requires SDHx/MAX genetic testing of patients.

scholarly journals Pathogenic Variant Profile of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Vietnamese Cohort

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van Thuan Tran ◽  
Sao Trung Nguyen ◽  
Xuan Dung Pham ◽  
Thanh Hai Phan ◽  
Van Chu Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Carrier Frequency ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of Cancer

BackgroundHereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) are responsible for 5-10% of cancer cases. Genetic testing to identify pathogenic variants associated with cancer predisposition has not been routinely available in Vietnam. Consequently, the prevalence and genetic landscape of HCS remain unknown.Methods1165 Vietnamese individuals enrolled in genetic testing at our laboratory in 2020. We performed analysis of germline mutations in 17 high- and moderate- penetrance genes associated with HCS by next generation sequencing.ResultsA total of 41 pathogenic variants in 11 genes were detected in 3.2% individuals. The carrier frequency was 4.2% in people with family or personal history of cancer and 2.6% in those without history. The percentage of mutation carriers for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes was 1.3% and for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome was 1.6%. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were the most prevalent with the positive rate of 1.3% in the general cohort and 5.1% in breast or ovarian cancer patients. Most of BRCA1 mutations located at the BRCA C-terminus domains and the top recurrent mutation was NM_007294.3:c.5251C>T (p.Arg1751Ter). One novel variant NM_000038.6(APC):c.6665C>A (p.Pro2222His) was found in a breast cancer patient with a strong family history of cancer. A case study of hereditary cancer syndrome was illustrated to highlight the importance of genetic testing.ConclusionThis is the first largest analysis of carrier frequency and mutation spectrum of HCS in Vietnam. The findings demonstrate the clinical significance of multigene panel testing to identify carriers and their at-risk relatives for better cancer surveillance and management strategies.

Germline pathogenic variants in patients with pheochromocytoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 668-668
Author(s):  
Shirley A Yao ◽  
Elizabeth A Wiley ◽  
Lisa R. Susswein ◽  
Megan L. Marshall ◽  
Natalie J. Carter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
History Of ◽  
Testing Algorithms ◽  
Cancer Panel

668 Background: Approximately 25% of pheochromocytomas (PCC) have a hereditary basis, and germline variants in the SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, TMEM127, MAX, VHL, FH, RET, MEN1, and NF1 genes have been associated with a predisposition to PCC and paraganglioma (PGL). Multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing for PCC has become increasingly more common than single-gene testing algorithms. Identification of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (PV/LPV) in one of these genes has important implications for surveillance in patients and their family members. Here we describe the spectrum of PV/LPV variants identified in individuals with PCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of clinical and molecular data for all individuals diagnosed with PCC who underwent panel testing through BioReference Laboratories that included at least SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, TMEM127, MAX, VHL, FH, RET, MEN1, and NF1 between January 2016 and February 2017. Results: Seventy-nine individuals underwent testing due to a personal (n = 76) or family (n = 3) history of PCC. The positive yield was 14% (11/79). The majority of PV/LPV were in SDHB (n = 4; 36%), followed by RET (n = 2, 18%), with the remaining variants being identified in SDHA (1), SDHC (1), VHL (1), TMEM127 (1), and MAX (1). Approximately half (6/11) of those with a PV/LPV had a non-syndromic presentation of a unilateral PCC with no reported family history of PCC or PGL. The average age at tumor diagnosis was lower for probands testing positive than those without PV/LPV (34y±14 vs 44y±16). Conclusions: Our data support previous recommendations that patients with apparently sporadic, non-syndromic PCC be considered for genetic testing. Panel testing is a useful tool for identifying individuals with hereditary PCC.

scholarly journals Clinical Utility of Telomere Length-Directed Genomic Assessment in Patients with Short Telomere Syndromes

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1222-1222
Author(s):  
Abhishek A Mangaonkar ◽  
Alejandro Ferrer ◽  
Filippo Pinto E Vairo ◽  
Margot Cousin ◽  
Ryan Kuisle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Short Telomere ◽  
Cryptogenic Cirrhosis ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Likelihood Score ◽  
History Of ◽  
Age Appropriate

Introduction: Short telomere syndromes (STS) are accelerated aging syndromes affecting hematopoietic, pulmonary, hepatobiliary and/or immunological systems. Clinical assessment of age-appropriate telomere length (TL) is performed using flow cytometry & fluorescence in-situ hybridization (flowFISH). Screening for germline variants in STS-related genes is guided by flowFISH-determined centile categories of TL, with screening recommended for TL <1st centile or 1-10th centile in lymphocytes (L) or granulocytes (G). However, the utility of genetic testing for patients with TL >10th centile and integration of clinical phenotype with flowFISH data in predictive algorithms is currently unclear. Methods: FlowFISH testing was done at reference laboratories in Vancouver (Repeat Diagnostics; Canada) & Johns Hopkins University (JHU, USA). Salient clinical features were pre-determined as, personal history of premature hair greying (onset at age < 30 years), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or IPF/emphysema overlap (in smokers), cryptogenic cirrhosis or NRH, unexplained cytopenias &/or immunodeficiency, & family history of the above (in >1 1st or 2nd degree relatives). Clinical likelihood score (CLS) was assigned as low (1), intermediate (int, 2) or high (>2), based on the number of aforementioned clinical features present prior to flowFISH testing. Genetic testing was performed using either an in-house or commercial bone marrow failure-specific next generation sequencing (NGS) panel or whole exome sequencing (WES), and data for known variants affecting telomerase or telomeric function (TERT, TERC, DKC1, TINF2, NHP2, NOP10, TCAB1, NAF1, & RTEL1) was recorded. Results: One hundred forty-nine patients at our institution underwent TL assessment at Repeat diagnostics (n=38) and JHU (n=111) laboratories, respectively. Median age was 56 (range: 7-79) years; 88 (59%) being males. Significant family history was present in 40 (27%) patients, while premature greying of hair was present in 13 (9%) patients. Organ-specific clinical features included unexplained cytopenias (n=89, 60%) IPF (n=71, 48%), cryptogenic cirrhosis or NRH (n=21, 14%), & unexplained immunodeficiency (n=14, 9%). CLS stratification included low (n=74, 50%), int (n=54, 36%), & high (n=21, 14%), with higher CLS significantly correlating with lower delta TL for L (p=0.0005) but not G (p=0.3). Genetic testing was performed in 51 (35%) patients (NGS-51, WES-1) among which 13 (26%) patients had a telomere-associated variant; 5 (10%) pathogenic (pv, all TERT). CLS alone was unable to predict likelihood of finding a telomere-associated variant (p=0.4). Based on age-appropriate centile categorization of L & G TL (information for both available in 134 patients), patients were stratified into six groups (table 1). TL <1st centile in L: This group was further divided into two groups; TL<1st centile in both L & G [A1, n=7, CLS low-3 (43%), int-2 (29%), & high-2 (29%)] and TL <1st centile in L and 1-50th centile in G (A2, n=2, CLS low & high) patients. Among the 4 (57%) patients who underwent genetic (NGS-3, WES-1) testing, 3 (75%) had TERTpv in A1 subgroup and 1 A2 subgroup patient had a VUS in TERT.TL <1st centile in G, 1-10th centile in L (n=18): This group included 9 (50%) low, 8 (44%) int and 1 (6) high CLS patients, of which only 1 of 8 NGS-tested patients had TERTpv.TL 1-10th centile in L or G: This group was divided into; 1-10th centile in both L & G [C1, n=28, CLS low-3 (11%), int-14 (50%), high-11(39%)] of whom 8 (22%) underwent NGS with no pathogenic variants but 3 VUS in RTEL1, NAF1 & PARN genes, and 1-10th centile in L, >1-90th centile in G [C2, n=36, CLS low-19 (53%), 16 (44%), 1 (3%)] of whom 8 (22%) underwent NGS with 1 TERTpv and 2 VUS in TINF2TL >10th centile in L & 1-90th centile in G (n=43, 32%): CLS stratification in this group included 27 (63%) low, 12 (28%) int, 4 (9%) high. NGS testing was done in 13 (30%) patients [CLS low-9(69%), int 2(15%), high 2 (15%)], of whom only 2 (15%) had VUS in TINF2 and TERT gene, but no pathogenic variants (figure 1). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the importance of using a flowFISH assay based predictive algorithm to screen patients with suspected STS for telomere-related genetic alternations, in comparison to a clinical likelihood score. We also demonstrate a limited role for genetic testing in patients with lymphocyte TL >10th centile, regardless of the clinical likelihood score. Disclosures Patnaik: Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document