CARSKIN: Pembrolizumab as first line therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9596-TPS9596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eve Maubec ◽  
Sabine Helfen ◽  
Isabelle Scheer-Senyarich ◽  
Marouane Boubaya ◽  
Olivier Schischmanoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recist 1.1

TPS9596 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic cSCCs. Cisplatin-based combinations have some efficacy but their toxicity often prohibits their use, particularly for the elderly. New therapeutic options are needed. Tumors divert the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) pathway suppressing immune control. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is a high-affinity humanized monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody. It leads to dual PD-1 ligand (PD-L1 and PD-L2) blockade that may reactivate the immune surveillance and elicit anti-tumor response. It has antitumor activity in several tumors including head and neck SCCs. Moreover, an efficacy of pembrolizumab in cSCCs has been reported recently in a series of 6 cases. Methods: CARSKIN (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02883556) is a French multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in 39 pts with unresectable and/or metastatic cSCCs, naive of chemotherapy and of EGFR inhibitors. Pembrolizumab is administered (200 mg IV Q3W) for up to 24 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible pts must undergo a baseline biopsy of the tumor prior to treatment for PD-L1 evaluation. Response is to be assessed at baseline, wk 9, 15 and 24, and thereafter Q12W by central radiology review per RECIST 1.1 and per modified RECIST v1.1. The primary objective is response rate (RR) at wk 15 per RECIST 1.1. Secondary efficacy objectives are to assess whether patients with PD-L1+ tumors have a better RR than the whole sample at wk 15 and to assess in the whole sample and in PD-L1+ pts, disease control rate (DCR) at wk15, RR at wk 24, best RR, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), duration of response / control and time to disease progression. A Simon optimal two-stage design will be used. Four responders among 19 pts will be needed in the 1st step to continue the trial. Overall 9 responses will be needed to conclude the effectiveness. Kaplan-Meier statistics will assess PFS and OS. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout the study and for 30 d thereafter (6 m for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Clinical trial information: NCT02883556.

Results of the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase 3 trial: avelumab maintenance following first-line (1L) chemotherapy (CTx) vs continuation of CTx for HER2− advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 278-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Mustafa Ozguroglu ◽  
Min-hee Ryu ◽  
Alina Simona Muntean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Induction

278 Background: We report the primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 100, which compared avelumab (anti–PD-L1) maintenance after 1L CTx vs continued CTx in patients (pts) with GC/GEJC. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02625610), eligible pts had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) HER2− GC/GEJC. Pts without progressive disease (PD) after 12 weeks of 1L oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine induction were randomized 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg Q2W switch maintenance or continued CTx, stratified by region (Asia vs non-Asia). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) post induction in all randomized or PD-L1+ (≥1% of tumor cells, 73-10 assay) pts. Results: 805 pts received induction CTx and 499 pts were randomized (avelumab, n = 249; CTx, n = 250). At data cutoff (Sep 13, 2019), minimum follow-up was 18 months. In the avelumab and CTx arms, median OS post induction/randomization was 10.4 months (95% CI 9.1-12.0) vs 10.9 months (95% CI 9.6-12.4), hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 (95% CI 0.74-1.11; p = 0.1779); 24-month OS rates were 22.1% (95% CI 16.8-28.0) vs 15.5% (95% CI 10.8-20.9), respectively. The HR for OS in PD-L1+ pts (n = 54) was 1.13 (95% CI 0.57-2.23). No OS trend was seen in Asian pts (n = 114; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.59-1.36]) or other subgroups, except for a potential benefit with avelumab in pts with no metastatic sites at randomization (n = 60; HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.28-0.98]). Progression-free survival was similar between arms (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.85-1.28]). In the avelumab vs CTx arms, objective response rates (post randomization only) were 13.3% (95% CI 9.3-18.1) vs 14.4% (95% CI 10.3-19.4), and 12-month rates for duration of response were 62.3% (95% CI 40.9-77.9) vs 28.4% (95% CI 13.2-45.7), respectively. Treatment-related adverse event rates (all grades/grade ≥3) were 61.3%/12.8% with avelumab and 77.3%/32.8% with CTx. Conclusions: Avelumab maintenance showed clinical activity and favorable safety vs continued CTx in pts with LA/M GE/GEJC; however, JAVELIN Gastric 100 did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior OS in the randomized or PD-L1+ population. Clinical trial information: NCT02625610.

A randomized phase II study of cabiralizumab (cabira) + nivolumab (nivo) ± chemotherapy (chemo) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS465-TPS465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Eileen Mary O'Reilly ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Erkut Hasan Borazanci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Modulation ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label

TPS465 Background: Treatment options for PDAC are limited; thus, new therapies that can improve outcomes and extend survival are needed. PDAC is associated with high infiltration by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that inhibit antitumor T-cell activity. Blocking colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling—which supports the recruitment, differentiation, and maintenance of immunosupressive macrophages in tumors—may lead to depletion of TAMs and upregulation of T-cell checkpoints. Cabira, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, binds to CSF-1R and blocks its signaling, a key determinant of TAM activation and survival. By reducing TAMs and promoting a proinflammatory microenvironment, cabira may stimulate T-cell responses, thereby sensitizing PDAC to therapy with nivo (anti‒PD-1). In a phase 1a/b study cabira + nivo was tolerable and showed evidence of on-target tumor immune modulation and durable clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced PDAC (Wainberg et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 [abst O42]; Carleton et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 [abst 3020]). Here we describe a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabira + nivo ± chemo in advanced PDAC. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC that progressed on/after first-line chemo (gemcitabine [gem] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] based) will be enrolled. Pts with active/suspected autoimmune disease, uncontrolled/significant cardiovascular disease, or prior exposure to select immune cell–modulating antibodies are not eligible. Depending on prior chemo received, pts will be randomized to 1 of 4 arms (n≈40 each): cabira + nivo; cabira + nivo + gem/nab-paclitaxel; cabira + nivo + oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin; or investigator’s choice of standard-of-care chemo. Endpoints include median progression-free survival (primary), overall survival rate, objective response rate, median duration of response, pharmacokinetics, and safety. In a completed preliminary safety cohort, 12 pts were treated with cabira + nivo + chemo and monitored for 4 wk; competitive enrollment is open, with 32 pts enrolled. (NCT03336216, NCT02526017) Clinical trial information: NCT03336216.

LENVAGIST - A multicenter, comparative, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase II study of the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic GIST after failure of imatinib and sunitinib.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11568-TPS11568
Author(s):  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Claire Cropet ◽  
Julien Gautier ◽  
Stéphanie Gagne ◽  
Katia Francourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Double Blinded

TPS11568 Background: GastroIntestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are paradigmatic models of cancers with a driver mutation of an oncogene, in which imatinib is recommended as adjuvant therapy or treatment of locally advanced and metastatic forms. After failure of imatinib (either progression or toxicity), sunitinib and regorafenib are indicated as 2nd and 3rd lines, respectively. Beyond approved drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can bring clinical benefit because some clones remain sensitive to TKI. Lenvatinib is a broad spectrum TKI targeting KIT, RET, PDGFRA, VEGFR 1-3 and FGFR 1-4, that is approved in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib in adult GIST patients (pts) who failed at least to previous imatinib and sunitinib. Seventy-four pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral lenvatinib, at a daily dose of 24mg, or its matching placebo, continuously, until progression of disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization will be stratified according to the number of different previous anticancer drugs (2 or > 2). The primary objective is to compare the Progression-free survival (PFS) between arms. The expected median PFS are 1.5 month in the control arm and 3.0 months in the experimental arm (HR = 0.5). Seventy one events will provide 90% power to show significant improvement in PFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 10% level. Secondary endpoints include the overall survival, the objective response rate, the best overall response, the quality of life and the safety profile. Patients allocated in the placebo arm who experience PD (RECIST 1.1) may switch to active lenvatinib. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives will be to identify blood and tumor parameters as predictive markers of lenvatinib efficacy. Recruitment has been activated in January 2020. Ten participating sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate in the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04193553 .

A phase Ib multicenter study of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with irinotecan (IRI) in patients with advanced recurrent or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (aGEC) after at least one line of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum containing regimen.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS251-TPS251
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Kit Tam ◽  
Edward Kim ◽  
Parvin Keshtmand ◽  
Samuel Ejadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recommended Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colon Cancer ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

TPS251 Background: In 2L+ aGEC, taxanes +/- ramucirumab or IRI are recommended treatment options. IRI has been tested in multiple single arm and randomized trials in second line (2L)+ aGEC, with reported objective response rates (ORR) in the 15-29% range and median progression-free survival (PFS) of <3 months (mo). Outcomes for aGEC remain poor with a median overall survival (OS) of 9.6 mo and PFS at 6 mo (PFS6) of only 36%. The TAGS trial in third line (3L)+ aGEC showed a significant improvement in OS from 3.6 mo to 5.7 mo with FTD/TPI over placebo. A 2L treatment with taxanes after 1L platinum containing regimens is currently associated with worsening peripheral neuropathy, which often leads to dose reductions, treatment delays, and a reduced quality of life for patients. The feasibility of FTD/TPI combined with IRI (+/- bevacizumab) in a modified 14-day schedule has been published for advanced colon cancer (PMID: 31924737) with no new safety signals while also encouraging activity in a cohort of heavily pretreated patients. Methods: Hypothesis:The combination of FTD/TPI with IRI in 2L+ aGEC is feasible, clinically active, and provides a treatment option which is not associated with development of peripheral neuropathy. Trial Design: 2-center, prospective, open label, non-randomized phase 1b trial. Eligibility: Diagnosis of aGEC, 1+ line of treatment including a fluoropyrimidine/platinum, ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function. Treatment:FTD/TPI 25mg/m2 on days 1-5 and IRI 180mg/m2 on day 1 every 14 days. G-CSF in allowed as needed. Primary objective: Feasibility of the regimen and estimate of efficacy. Primary endpoint: PFS6. Secondary objectives: OS, ORR, adverse events. Total number of pts to be enrolled N=20. Current enrollment (September 2020) N=14. Clinical trial information: NCT04074343.

Safety of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): Primary results from KAMILLA study cohort 1.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1033-1033
Author(s):  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Rachel Wuerstlein ◽  
Antonio Anton ◽  
Suzette Delaloge ◽  
Filippo Montemurro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

1033 Background: KAMILLA is a single-arm, open-label, phase 3b safety study of T-DM1 in pts with HER2-positive advanced BC from 278 sites in 40 countries. We report the primary analysis of the first study cohort (N = 2003). Methods: Pts with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic BC (locally confirmed) with progression after prior treatment with chemotherapy and a HER2-directed agent for metastatic BC or within 6 mo of completing adjuvant therapy were enrolled. Pts received T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 wks until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or disease progression. The primary outcome was safety. Results: A total of 2002 pts were treated (median age 55 yrs, range, 26–88). Most pts had a baseline ECOG score of 0 (n = 1110, 55.4%) or 1 (n = 775, 38.7%), and 1232 (61.5%) had ER and/or PR positive tumors. Median time since initial BC diagnosis was 5 yrs (range, 0–53). Most pts had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy (0–1 prior lines: 29.7%; ≥2: 66.0%); 1855 (92.8%) received prior targeted therapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. Median T-DM1 exposure was 5.6 mo (range, 0–46). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 93.0% (n = 1862). Serious AEs occurred in 21.3% (n = 427), most commonly vomiting (17, 0.8%), pneumonia (16, 0.8%), anemia (13, 0.6%), and pyrexia (13, 0.6%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 40.8% (n = 816), most commonly anemia (60, 3.0%), thrombocytopenia (55, 2.7%), and fatigue (50, 2.5%). Additional AEs of grade ≥3 (multiple individual items grouped) were thrombocytopenia/platelet count decrease (74, 3.7%), hepatic disorders (139, 6.9%), and hemorrhage (46, 2.3%). Grade 5 AEs occurred in 2.2% (n = 45). Treatment discontinuation was most often due to disease progression (1495, 78.1%). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 (95% CI: 8.0–9.7), 6.5 (5.6–8.0), 5.9 (5.6–8.1), 5.6 (5.0–5.9), and 5.6 (5.4–6.6) mo in pts with 0–1, 2, 3, 4, and 5+ prior lines of therapy. Median overall survival was 27.2 mo (95% CI: 25.5–28.7). Conclusions: KAMILLA isthe largest (to date) cohort of T-DM1 treated pts and these data are consistent with safety and efficacy seen in prior randomized studies, thereby supporting T-DM1 as therapy for previously treated HER2-positive advanced BC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01702571.

A phase Ib study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT02779751): Interim results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Peter Kabos ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
Michael Jon Chisamore ◽  
Anwar Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Metastatic Setting

1051 Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective small molecule cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitor, approved to treat HR+, HER2- MBC patients (pts) on a continuous twice daily dosing schedule as monotherapy or in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine based therapy or in combination with fulvestrant. Abemaciclib monotherapy increased tumor immunogenicity and synergized with anti-PD-1 to boost antitumor efficacy in murine models. Here we report safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in HR+, HER2- MBC pts. Methods: This multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, multi-cohort phase Ib study of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab enrolled a cohort of endocrine resistant HR+, HER2- MBC pts who had received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. No prior CDK4/6 inhibitor was allowed. Patients received 150mg abemaciclib orally every 12 hours plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV on day 1 every 21 days. Primary objective was to characterize safety of the abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab combination. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 28 pts enrolled, 15 (54%) received 1 line and 10 (36%) 2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. Safety of the combination was generally consistent with known side effects of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab and was generally manageable. Grade 3/4 adverse events in >2 pts included neutropenia (8 pts/29%), AST increase (5 pts/18%), diarrhea, and ALT increase (3 pts/11% each). Eight pts had confirmed partial response (29% ORR), and disease control rate (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]+stable disease [SD]) was 82%. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD persisting for ≥6 months) was 46%. Median PFS and OS were 8.9 months (95% CI 3.9, 11.1) and 26.3 months (95% CI 20.0, 31.0), respectively. Conclusions: Combination of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a generally tolerable safety profile with numerically higher rate of transaminase elevations than reported for the individual treatments. Compared to historical data for abemaciclib monotherapy in a similar pt population, a numerically higher but not obviously different ORR, PFS, and OS was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02779751 .

Phase II trial of carboplatin plus cetuximab for the treatment of stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18005-18005 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Bradford ◽  
M. A. Socinski ◽  
R. V. LaRocca ◽  
T. A. Hensing ◽  
R. E. Bordoni
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody

18005 Background: Cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on both normal and tumor cells, has been investigated in advanced NSCLC as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. At the time of study design, triplet therapy had not demonstrated activity greater than doublets. This ongoing phase II open-label trial evaluates the doublet of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin (Cb) in patients (pts) with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts receive cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Starting on day 8, pts receive cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV weekly plus Cb AUC=6 IV q3w for 4 cycles (12 weeks). Pts who achieve CR, PR, or SD after 4 cycles may continue weekly cetuximab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to evaluate the response rate. Secondary objectives are to determine median progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and median overall survival (OS) at 1 year. Results: The study has completed accrual, enrolling and treating 57 pts, all evaluable for response. None had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC. All pts received cetuximab; 49 received Cb. Of the 57 pts, 55 have discontinued: 30 (52.6%) for disease progression or relapse. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 53 pts (93%). Conclusions: These preliminary data of cetuximab in combination with Cb demonstrated modest response rates with an acceptable toxicity profile in pts with advanced NSCLC. Final PFS and OS data are pending. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of the anti-TGF-β monoclonal antibody (mAb) NIS793 with and without the PD-1 inhibitor spartalizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (NG) versus NG alone in patients (pts) with first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4173-TPS4173
Author(s):  
Peter Grell ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
Michele Milella ◽  
Cheng Ean Chee ◽  
Shivan Sivakumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

TPS4173 Background: Overall survival remains low for pts with mPDAC despite approved therapies, highlighting the need for further innovative treatment options. Intra-tumoral fibrosis that characterizes PDAC has been associated with a state of immune exclusion and may constitute a mechanical obstacle to the penetration of chemotherapy into the tumor as well as contribute to the lack of efficacy of immunotherapy. TGF-β plays a key role in regulating the tumor microenvironment and emerging evidence points to TGF-β as a pivotal activator of cancer-associated fibroblasts, leading to the development of fibrotic networks. Preclinical data in murine models have shown that TGF-β blockade augmented the benefit of both NG and anti-PD-1 therapy, leading to tumor regression. These data provide the rationale for combining TGF-β-targeting agents with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. NIS793 is a human IgG2 mAb that binds to TGF-β. This study investigates NIS793 with and without spartalizumab combined with NG in treatment naïve mPDAC. Methods: This is a phase II open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT04390763) beginning with a safety run-in period followed by randomization. Eligible pts are adults with previously untreated mPDAC and an ECOG performance status ≤1. Pts are excluded if they have a tumor histology other than adenocarcinoma or microsatellite instability-high tumor. The safety run-in data will be analyzed after ≥6 pts have received NIS793 (intravenously [IV] 2100 mg Q2W) + spartalizumab (IV 400 mg Q4W) + nab-paclitaxel (IV 125 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + gemcitabine (IV 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) for 1 cycle (28 days) to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination and confirm the dose for the randomized part. Pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to NIS793 + spartalizumab + NG (n=50) or NIS793 + NG (n=50) or NG (n=50). Treatment will continue until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, discontinuation by investigator’s or pt’s choice, or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective is to evaluate the progression-free survival of NIS793 + NG ± spartalizumab versus NG alone. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, antitumor activity, overall survival, change in CD8 and PD-L1 status, and characterization of immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. Efficacy will be assessed locally per RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST at screening, every 8 weeks for 1 year and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. Blood and tumor samples will be taken at baseline and during study treatment for pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity and biomarker assessments. This study is ongoing and will enroll pts from 30 sites across 15 countries. The first pt was treated on October 22, 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04390763.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study: Efficacy and safety of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy I-131-1095 (1095) plus enzalutamide (enza) in 18F-DCFPyL PSMA scan avid, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-abiraterone (abi) progression (ARROW).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS187-TPS187
Author(s):  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
David Laidley ◽  
Frederic Pouliot ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Robert Sabbagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Modified Recist

TPS187 Background: PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC) and further upregulated in castrate resistant disease. 1095 is a novel PSMA-targeted small molecule radioligand therapeutic that binds to the extracellular domain of PSMA selectively with high affinity, internalized, and delivers a targeted lethal radiation dose to PC cells. 18F-DCFPyL is a novel PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that has shown robust diagnostic performance for detecting recurrent and metastatic PC. In the ARROW study, pts must demonstrate 18F-DCFPyL avidity prior to 1095 treatment. Methods: ARROW is an open-label, randomized (2:1) trial of enza plus 1095 or enza alone in pts with progressive mCRPC who previously received abi. ~120 pts (80: 1095 + enza; 40: enza alone) will be treated at multiple sites in the US and Canada. Eligible male pts must have metastatic disease documented by bone scan or soft tissue lesions measurable per RECIST 1.1 on CT/MRI, be PSMA-avid as determined by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, have evidence of biochemical or radiographic progression on abi, and be ineligible for or refuse to receive chemotherapy. Pts will receive enza (prescribed per approved labeling) with or without 1095 (100 mCi dose, followed by up to 3 additional doses administered at least 8 weeks apart, as determined by dosimetry evaluation and occurrence of dose-limiting events). The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of 1095 plus enza compared to enza alone, based on PSA response (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%) rate according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Additional objectives include objective response rate based on PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of radiographic progression (PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1), unequivocal clinical progression, or death from any cause, duration of response, overall survival, and the safety and tolerability of 1095 radioligand therapy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment was halted in April 2020 but is reopening in October 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT03939689.

Results of a Nonrandomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Combined Gemcitabine, Mitoxantrone, and Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4452-4452
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
Patrick J. Flynn ◽  
Margaret A. MacRae ◽  
Mary A. Rauch ◽  
Yunfei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive type of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that usually presents as disseminated disease. Prognosis is poor, and responses to chemotherapy are less durable than those achieved in other types of lymphoma. New treatment options are desperately needed. Gemcitabine has shown activity in MCL as a single agent. In addition, the combination of mitoxantrone and rituximab has also been shown to be active in MCL. However, the use of these drugs in combination has not been evaluated in the treatment of MCL. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine+mitoxantrone+rituximab in relapsed or refractory MCL; secondary objectives were duration of response, survival at 1-year, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity, especially myelotoxicity. Sixteen patients were enrolled between April 2005 and December 2006, and only 15 were evaluable due to one patient’s withdrawal of consent. Patients received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 IV (30–60 min infusion), mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV (5–10 min infusion), and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 (max 400 mg/hr). Patients also received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on Day 8 of the 21-day cycle. Medication was administered in the following order: gemcitabine→mitoxantrone→rituximab. Patients were to be treated for a maximum of 8 cycles or until the patient had evidence of a response, progressive disease, or intolerable toxicity. The median patient age was 74 years, 100% were white, and 69% were male. Of all patients, 86% had Stage IV MCL at baseline. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 3 – 8). Efficacy results for the evaluable population are CR 13%, PR 27%, PD 13%, and SD 47%. Median PFS was 8.72 months (range, 1.84 – 23.49); median overall survival was 10.03 months (range, 2.50 – 23.49). Grade 3–4 treatment related toxicities reported in >1 patient were neutropenia (93%), leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (53% each), anemia (20%), and asthenia (13%). 60% of patients are currently alive as of July 2007; 9 patients discontinued study treatment due to disease progression (13%), toxicity (27%), MD request (7%), or withdrawal of consent (13%). 7 patients had normal study completion (44%). The study was closed early due to slow accrual owing to alternative treatment which became available at the time. The combination of gemcitabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in MCL was well-tolerated with manageable adverse events in spite of 93% neutropenia. Supplemented growth factor use was able to minimize neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 infection was reported. This regimen holds promise in patients with MCL and further studies are warranted. Updated data will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document