A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (pc) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) receiving degarelix (GnRH receptor antagonist) or leuprolide (GnRH receptor agonist).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS395-TPS395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan F. Slovin ◽  
Chiara Melloni ◽  
Samreen Mansor-Lefebvre ◽  
Anders Neijber ◽  
Matthew Roe

TPS395 Background: Epidemiological studies showed an association between GnRH agonists and a long-term increased risk of CVD, early after treatment initiation and with a higher risk seen in pts with pre-existing CVD. Retrospective pooled safety analyses of 6 randomized trials showed that significantly fewer pts treated with the GnRH receptor antagonists, degarelix, had a CV event or death compared with pts receiving a GnRH receptor agonist. In those studies showing an increased CV risk, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy (ADT) was primarily with GnRH receptor agonists. The mechanistic differences between GnRH antagonists and agonists, including testosterone surge and time to suppression at initiation, effect on follicle-stimulating hormone and on GnRH receptors e.g. T-lymphocytes in atherosclerotic plaque, raises the possibility of different CV risk profiles. The PRONOUNCE trial is the first to prospectively assess whether a GnRH agonist/antagonist can worsen pre-existing CVD; assess the impact of GnRH agonist/antagonist on CV risk biomarkers; and effects of hormonal therapy on immune system. Methods: PRONOUNCE is a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial of 900 men with pc and concomitant CVD, assessing adjudicated MACEs, i.e. myocardial infarction (fatal, non-fatal), stroke (fatal, non-fatal), or death in pts randomized 1:1 to either degarelix or leuprolide according to label recommendations for up to one year. Eligibility include pre-defined CVD, metastatic or locally advanced pc; high-risk disease with plan for definitive radiation therapy (RT); recurrence after local therapy with PSA doubling time <12 months; or salvage RT with neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT for at least 12 months. Serum samples are collected for the analysis of various CV, inflammatory, and immune biomarkers. The primary endpoint will be based on Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival function and stratified for age group and region. Interim analysis is scheduled when 50% of MACE events have occurred allowing the DSMB to recommend for sample size correction. Clinical trial information: NCT02663908.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez ◽  
Yolanda Alvarez-Perez ◽  
Amado Rivero-Santana ◽  
Vanesa Ramos-García ◽  
Andrea Duarte-Díaz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a health condition sensitive to patient’s preferences and values regarding the benefits and risks of the different treatment options. In this sense, patient decision aids (PtDA) can play an important role in helping patients to incorporate their values, needs and preferences into the decision-making process, thus improving Person-Centred Care. Previous research has focused almost exclusively on knee OA, and therefore the aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a PtDA for patients with hip OA.Methods: The general design consists of two phases: 1) design a web-based PtDA for patients with hip OA, following the recommended procedures: systematic review of safety/effectiveness of treatments, and an iterative process of development with the help of an Advisory Committee composed of health professionals and patients; 2) To evaluate the impact of the PtDA on hip OA patients’ decision-making process related with their treatment. For that aim, a multicenter randomized controlled trial will be carried out with 124 patients with hip OA in Tenerife (Spain) comparing intervention or usual care.Discussion: PtDAs have been recommended as a useful and effective resource for improving PCC in many health conditions. The intervention is intended to empower patients by fostering their active participation during the decision-making process about their treatment, and by ensuring they make informed decisions congruent with their values and preferences. This study will contribute to the scientific knowledge about effectiveness of PtDAs in hip OA, in order to improve the quality of health care offered to these patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gob (NCT04241978). Registered on 24 January 2020.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1409-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Tsujita ◽  
Tomoki Kosugi ◽  
Norihiko Goto ◽  
Kenta Futamura ◽  
Morikuni Nishihira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Posttransplant anemia may be a major determinant of chronic allograft nephropathy. However, the impact of correcting anemia on graft function remains controversial. Methods A 3-year follow-up of an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving kidney transplantation recipients examined whether sustained maintenance of target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations at a high level (12.5–13.5 g/dL, n = 64) with either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin beta pegol would slow the graft function decline rate as the primary efficacy endpoint, compared with maintenance of a low Hb concentration (10.5–11.5 g/dL, n = 63). Results The mean blood pressures in the two groups were well controlled throughout the study. In the high Hb group, mean Hb concentrations increased to >12 g/dL at 3 months, reaching the target range at 18 months. At the end of this study (36 months), the mean Hb concentration was 12.8 ± 0.7 g/dL in the high Hb group and 11.5 ± 1.2 g/dL in the low Hb group. The decline rate of the estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate was considerably greater in the low Hb group (ΔeGFR, −5.1 ± 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) than in the high Hb group (−1.0 ± 8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) (P = 0.02). Of note, only a few high Hb patients developed cardiovascular events and returned to hemodialysis, but the low Hb patients did not. Conclusion This prospective study suggests that correcting anemia to the target Hb level range (12.5–13.5 g/dL) slows renal function deterioration by >3 years in the chronic phase of allograft nephropathy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document