Immune-related adverse events in melanoma: A nationwide analysis 2016.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18253-e18253
Author(s):  
Manoj P. Rai ◽  
Prabhjot Singh Bedi ◽  
Rohanlal Vishwanth ◽  
Fawzi Abu Rous ◽  
Shiva Shrotriya ◽  
...  

e18253 Background: Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer. Immunotherapy is currently used as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic disease. Combination immunotherapy has been shown to improve overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to single-agent immunotherapy. However, immunotherapy related adverse events (irAE's) are being increasingly seen. This study analyses the incidence of irAE's and the variation in the length of stay, and mortality. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the 2016 NIS database. We identified hospitalizations with either primary or secondary diagnosis of Melanoma. Logistic regression of irAE's such as pneumonitis, colitis, hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, encephalitis, myocarditis was performed. We evaluated the association between irAE's and various parameters. Results: We identified 13170 hospitalizations with primary or secondary diagnosis of melanoma. Univariate logistic regression showed pneumonitis (OR: 1.39; p value: < 0.01), hypophysitis (OR: 20.61; p value < 001), adrenal insufficiency (OR: 10.36, p value = < 0.01), colitis (OR 23.94, p value < 001), myocarditis (OR: 1; p value was n/a), encephalitis (OR 1.71; p value was 0.5). Univariate logistic regression for LOS showed colitis (OR 1.23; p value: 0.01), adrenal insufficiency (OR 0.20; p value: 0.748), hypophysitis (OR -2.50; p value: 0), myocarditis no admissions, encephalitis (OR -2.15; p value 0.01). Univariate logistic regression for mortality showed pneumonitis (OR 6.07; p value: < 0.01), colitis (OR 0.86 p value: 0.721), adrenal insufficiency (OR 1; p value: 0.996). Conclusions: The above results suggest that the incidence of colitis is the highest among irAE’s in melanoma patients likely due to immunotherapy. Hypophysitis is the next most common side effect, it’s followed by adrenal insufficiency which can be life-threatening. A high index of suspicion and anticipation of the above complications can lead to their timely detection and treatment.

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2251-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
Naiyer Rizvi ◽  
Gary I. Cohen ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Daniel Sterman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: PV701, a replication-competent strain of Newcastle disease virus, causes regression of tumor xenografts after intravenous administration. This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of single and multiple intravenous doses of PV701 as a single agent in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with advanced solid cancers that were unresponsive to standard therapy were enrolled. Four PV701 intravenous dosing regimens were evaluated: (1) single dose: one dose every 28 days; (2) repeat dose: three doses in 1 week every 28 days; (3) desensitizing: one lower dose followed by two higher doses in 1 week every 28 days; and (4) two week: one lower dose followed by five higher doses over 2 weeks every 21 days. RESULTS: A 100-fold dose intensification was achieved over 195 cycles. A first-dose MTD of 12 × 109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/m2 was established for outpatient dosing. After an initial dose of 12 × 109 PFU/m2, patients tolerated an MTD for subsequent doses of 120 × 109 PFU/m2. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms that occurred principally after the first dose and were decreased in number and severity with each subsequent dose. Tumor site–specific adverse events and acute dosing reactions were also observed but not cumulative toxicity. Objective responses occurred at higher dose levels, and progression-free survival ranged from 4 to 31 months. Tumor tissue from one patient was obtained after 11 months of therapy and showed evidence of PV701 particles budding from the tumor cell membrane by electron microscopy and a pronounced lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate by histologic examination. CONCLUSION: PV701 warrants further study as a novel therapeutic agent for cancer patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Aram F. Hezel ◽  
Thomas Abrams ◽  
Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  

PurposeThe PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is activated in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and inhibition of this pathway has antitumor effects in preclinical studies. We performed a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II study of RAD001(everolimus), an oral inhibitor of mTOR, in patients who experienced treatment failure on first-line therapy with gemcitabine.Patients and MethodsThirty-three patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated continuously with RAD001 at 10 mg daily. Prior treatment with fluorouracil in the perioperative setting was allowed. Patients were observed for toxicity, treatment response, and survival.ResultsTreatment with single-agent RAD001 was well-tolerated; the most common adverse events were mild hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients were removed from the study because of drug-related adverse events. No complete or partial treatment responses were noted, and only seven patients (21%) had stable disease at the first restaging scans performed at 2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. One patient (3%) had a biochemical response, defined as ≥ 50% reduction in serum CA19-9.ConclusionAlthough well-tolerated, RAD001 administered as a single-agent had minimal clinical activity in patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Future studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer should assess the combination of mTOR inhibitors with other agents and/or examine inhibitors of other components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8528-8528 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. O'Day ◽  
R. Gonzalez ◽  
D. Lawson ◽  
R. Weber ◽  
L. Hutchins ◽  
...  

8528 Background: STA-4783 (S), an inducer of heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) is a bis-thiobenzoylhydrazide compound. S leads to up-regulation of hsp70 in tumor cell lines. Xenograft models of solid tumors showed synergistic anti-tumor activity in combination with paclitaxel (P). The combination P + S, in phase I and II studies, showed dose-related hsp70 induction (evidence of biological activity) and tolerability. Methods: Eligibility was based on a diagnosis of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, ECOG <=2, and prior treatment with 1 or no chemotherapy regimens. A total of 81 patients (pts) were randomized 2:1 (P 80 mg/m2 + S 213 mg/m2:P 80 mg/m2) 3 weeks out of 4 at 21 US clinical sites. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Based on intent-to-treat analysis, the median PFS was 3.68 months (m) for P + S vs. 1.84 m in the P only arm (p=.035). RR was 15.1% in the P + S arm and 3.6% in the P arm. Subgroup analysis showed chemo- naive pts (n=23) with P + S showed a median PFS of 8.28 m vs. 2.40 in the P arm (n=9). For pts with 1 prior chemotherapy, (n=29), PFS on P + S was 3.12 m vs. 1.77 m on P (n=19). Of 19 pts who crossed over at progression, data are available for 14. PFS ranged from 0.72 to 5.5 m. Three of the 14 evaluable pts treated with P alone had rapid progression (0.95, 1.6, and 1.7 m) then significant inversion of the time to progression with the addition of S to P (2.3, 5.5, and 4.2 m) suggesting study drug effect. Scans were done at identical intervals (8 weeks). The proportion of pts with AEs of grade 3 or higher was 54% (n=52) in the P + S group and 57% in the P group (n=28); pts on P received a median of 2 cycles, while pts in the P + S group received a median of 4. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were low in both groups: 10% for the P + S, and 14% for P. Conclusions: The addition of S to P showed an increase in PFS vs. P alone particularly in chemo-naïve pts. A few pts failing single agent P appeared to benefit from P + S. Despite the additional treatment duration in the P + S group the drugs were well- tolerated, and showed mainly P related adverse events. A phase III study is planned to confirm a role for P + S in metastatic melanoma. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Frédéric Selle ◽  
Irina Davidenko ◽  
Jacob Korach ◽  
Cesar Mendiola ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of extending bevacizumab therapy beyond 15 months in nonprogressive ovarian cancer.Patients and MethodsIn this multinational prospective single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01239732), eligible patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB to IV or grade 3 stage I to IIA ovarian cancer without clinical signs or symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction or history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within the preceding 6 months. Prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy was permitted. After debulking surgery, patients received bevacizumab 15 (or 7.5) mg/kg every 3 weeks (q3w) with 4 to 8 cycles of paclitaxel (investigator’s choice of 175 mg/m2 q3w or 80 mg/m2 weekly) plus carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 q3w. Single-agent bevacizumab was continued until progression or for up to 24 months. The primary end point was safety.ResultsBetween December 2010 and May 2012, 1021 patients from 35 countries began study treatment. Bevacizumab was administered at 15 mg/kg in 89% of patients and for more than 15 months in 53%. Median follow-up duration was 32 months (range, 1–50 months). The most common all-grade adverse events were hypertension (55% of patients), neutropenia (49%), and alopecia (43%). The most common grade 3 or higher-grade adverse events were neutropenia (27%) and hypertension (25%). Bevacizumab was discontinued because of proteinuria in 5% of patients and hypertension in 3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.5 months (95% confidence interval, 23.7–27.6 months).ConclusionExtended bevacizumab demonstrated increased incidences of proteinuria and hypertension compared with 12 or 15 months of bevacizumab in previous trials, but these rarely led to bevacizumab discontinuation. Median PFS is the longest reported for frontline bevacizumab-containing therapy. The longer bevacizumab duration beyond 15 months in this study may improve PFS without substantially compromising safety.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1790-1790
Author(s):  
Abhijeet Kumar ◽  
Jose Guillen-Rodriguez ◽  
Jonathan H. Schatz ◽  
Lora Inclan ◽  
Alfonso E Ayala ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is characterized by initial sensitivity to both chemotherapy and radiation but also by an invariable relapse and eventual resistance to treatment. Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor and is approved as a single agent for relapsed MCL and in combination therapy as part of initial therapy (Goy et al, JCO 2005; Robak et al, NEJM 2015). Cladribine is a purine nucleoside analog effective in indolent and mantle cell lymphomas (Inwards et al, 2008; Rummel et al, 1999), with 52% durable CR rate reported in MCL in combination with rituximab, and it shows CR rates of up to 20% in relapsed and up to 32% in untreated indolent lymphomas (Kay et al, 1992; Fridrik et al, 1998). The median age at diagnosis for these lymphomas is approximately 65 years which precludes many patients from receiving combination therapies which have significant toxicities, representing an unmet need for novel combinations with high efficacy, good tolerability and non-overlapping toxicities. We investigated a combination of bortezomib, cladribine and rituximab(VCR) in both front line and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings with a primary objective to determine 2-year progression free survival(PFS) in patients with MCL, marginal zone, lymphoplasmacytic, small lymphocytic, and relapsed follicular lymphomas (NCT00980395). Methods: Adult patients with histologically confirmed mantle cell, marginal zone, lymphoplasmacytic, small lymphocytic lymphoma (both frontline and relapsed), or follicular lymphoma (relapsed/refractory), platelet counts ≥100,000, absolute neutrophil count >1000, creatinine clearance >20 ml/min who met treatment criteria were eligible. Prior treatment with bortezomib and/or rituximab was acceptable. Patients with grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy, myocardial infarction in the last 6 months or other active cardiac ailments were excluded. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, Cladribine 4 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours days 1-5, Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 4 were administered every 28 days, which constituted a cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled with planned follow-up of two years from end of treatment. Eleven patients had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and rest was indolent lymphomas; 42% received the treatment as frontline. All patients received at least one cycle. Median age was 65 years, 75% were male, 96% were Caucasians, 54% of patients had bulky disease (>5cm), and 75% of patients had bone marrow involvement. Fifty eight percent of patients had grade 3 or greater adverse events and 67% of patients did not receive all 6 cycles, with median number of cycles being 5. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (25%), fatigue (21%) and anemia (4%). There were no deaths due to adverse events. Overall response rate was 92% and another 4% had stable disease. The overall CR rate was 33%, and duration of response for those in CR was 41.5 months. After a two year minimum follow-up, median progression free survival (PFS) was 42 months and median time to progression was 33 months. The overall 2 year PFS was 63%. The 2 year PFS in patients with no prior therapy and prior therapy were 78%, and 54% respectively. In patients with no prior therapy, median OS was not reached. Conclusion: This study shows VCR is an effective regimen in indolent and mantle cell lymphomas. This combination has better response rates that better than both single agent bortezomib and cladribine (Kay et al, 1992; Fridrik et al, 1998; Goy et al, JCO 2005). In combination, VR-CAP (bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone) was reported to have a complete response rate of 53 % and a median PFS of 24.7 months (Robak et al, NEJM 2015), and rituximab-cladribine-vorinostat had similar response rates (100%) but a CR rate of 69%(Spurgeon et al, ASH annual Meeting 2012). Rituximab-Cladribine combination is reported to have a response rate of 87% and a median PFS of 37.5 months (Spurgeon et al; Leuk Lymphoma 2011) which is slightly lower than our study. This regimen is associated with significant cytopenias leading to majority of patients not receiving all of the 6 planned cycles but has significant activity in mantle cell and indolent lymphomas. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Anwer: Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory Board Participant; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Persky:Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Puvvada:Spectrum: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Board participant; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory Board participant, Institutional Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Advisory board participant.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 568-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Eng ◽  
Aaron Udell Blackham ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Keith F. Fournier ◽  
Richard E. Royal ◽  
...  

568 Background: AEN is a malignancy including both indolent well-differentiated and highly aggressive signet ring carcinoma. Optimal therapy is believed to be cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Yet, some patients (pts) will recur, are suboptimal for surgery, and are considered for systemic chemotherapy (SC). The purpose of this study is to compare SC regimens in treatment-naïve surgically unresectable AEN pts. Currently, no standard exists. Methods: A retrospective review of AEN pts who were registered in our tumor registries between Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2009 was completed. Electronic medical records were reviewed for CRS, HIPEC, histology, stage, SC received, CEA, CA-125, and/or CA 19-9, response (R), and progression-free survival (PFS). All patients were required to be restaged at their respective institution with R defined as clinical or radiographic benefit. K-M method, Log-Rank, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results: Of 659 pts with AEN diagnosis, 134 pts were evaluable for PFS and R. Forty-eight (36%) pts were poorly-differentiated; 29 (22%) signet ring; and 22 (16%) had both features. Thirty-four (25%) were well-differentiated. After a median follow-up of 35M, adjusting PFS for prior CRS, HIPEC, histology, ascites, and biologic therapy, pts who received 5-FU alone fared worse vs. FOLFOX [HR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.2-4.6; p-value = 0.01]. FOLFIRI trended in favor of improved PFS, but was underpowered. No statistical difference in R was noted (Table). Conclusions: In the treatment of surgically unresectable AEN, combination chemotherapy resulted in improved PFS vs. single agent 5-FU. Quality of life analysis will be reported at a later date. Randomized prospective analysis should be considered. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7515-7515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Igor T. Gavrilovic ◽  
Thomas Joseph Kaley ◽  
Craig Nolan ◽  
Antonio Marcilio Padula Omuro ◽  
...  

7515 Background: PCNSL is an aggressive primary brain tumor with median progression free survival (PFS) after upfront methotrexate-based chemotherapy of 2-3 years. Outcome and treatment options are poor for recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease. Ibrutinib has shown promising clinical response in Mantle cell lymphoma, CLL, Marginal Zone, and Waldenström. This trial investigates Ibrutinib in patients with r/r PCNSL and SCNSL. Methods: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL or SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and unrestricted number of CNS directed prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled (3 at 560 mg; 22 at 840 mg). Median age was 68 (range 21-85); 15 were women. Median ECOG was 1 (0: 2, 1: 15, 2: 8). 64% had PCNSL and 36% SCNSL; 68% had recurrent disease. Seventeen had parenchymal disease, 3 isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and 5 both. Seven grade 4 adverse events were observed in 7 patients neutropenia (in 3 patients), lymphopenia (2), sepsis (1), and ALT elevation (1). Fourteen patients developed 20 grade 3 toxicities, including lymphopenia in 5 patients, hyperglycemia in 3, ALT elevation in 2, thrombocytopenia in 2, lung infection in 2, AST elevation in 1, neutropenia in 1, urinary tract infection in 1, colitis in 1, febrile neutropenia in 1 and fungal encephalitis in 1. The most common toxicities at any grade were hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia and anemia of which most were grade 1/2. No grade 5 events have been observed. After a median follow-up of 414 days (range 289-674), 22/25 patients were evaluated for response (3 did not complete at least 15 days of drug treatment). Over all response was 68% (17/22; 77% (17/22) in patient that completed at least 15 days of drug treatment) with 10 CR, 7 PR, 2 SD and 3 PD as best response. The median PFS is 4.6 months (5.4 months in patients that completed at least 15 days of drug treatment; longest: 15.3 months). The median overall survival has not been reached. Conclusions: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate Ibrutinib with manageable adverse events. Clinical response was seen in 68% of CNS lymphoma patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02315326.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5009-5009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Sweeney ◽  
Ivor John Percent ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Jennifer Cultrera ◽  
Bryan Allyn Mehlhaff ◽  
...  

5009 Background: Preclinical and phase 1 results suggest PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition may enhance androgen receptor inhibition. We report the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 1b/2 study of ENZ±LY (a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) in pts with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. Methods: Phase 1b pts received single-agent LY 200 mg twice daily (BID) for 1 wk prior to starting LY+ENZ. Phase 2 pts were randomized 1:1 to 160 mg daily ENZ with PL or 200 mg BID LY on a 28-d cycle. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS: serological, radiographic [rPFS], or death) by PCWG2 criteria. Secondary objectives were rPFS, safety, decline in PSA, and PK. Exploratory biomarker analyses included outcomes by presence of androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7). 92 primary PFS events were needed for the study to have at least 80% power at one-sided alpha=0.20. Results: LY+ENZ was tolerable during Phase 1b with 1 dose limiting toxicity observed in 13 enrolled pts. Mean LY exposures remained in an efficacious range despite a 30% average decrease when combined with ENZ. In Phase 2, 129 pts were randomized to LY+ENZ (N=65) and PL+ENZ (N=64) (Table). Median PCWG2-PFS was 3.7 mos (LY+ENZ) vs 2.9 mos (PL+ENZ) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43, 0.99; p-value 0.0208). Conclusions: Combination LY+ENZ had a clinically manageable safety profile. The primary end-point of PCWG2-PFS was met and is supported by a clinically meaningful delay in rPFS in AR-V7 negative pts. The biomarker data provide important insights to inform future development strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02407054. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16549-e16549
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Shay ◽  
Andrew Nicklawsky ◽  
Elaine Tat Lam

e16549 Background: Numerous immunotherapy (IO) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFI) options are approved for first-line (1L) treatment of mRCC. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncologic outcomes and adverse events of these therapies. Methods: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating agents that are currently FDA-approved or on the NCCN compendium for 1L mRCC, with sunitinib (S) as a comparator. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 and 4 (G3/G4) adverse events (AEs). We attempted network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate relative effects of the comparative treatments. Survival outcomes were summarized using hazard ratios (HR). In the case that the HR was not reported but a Kaplan-Meier curve was available, the curve was digitized using Engauge Digitizer software. A frequentist fixed-effects NMA model was applied to each outcome. Results: 798 articles were identified, of which 47 were eligible for full text screening, and 8 were included for evidence synthesis. Eight RCTs recruiting a total of 5,565 pts with advanced or metastatic treatment-naïve RCC were included. The summary of all included studies is reported in Table 1. Ordered from the most to least effective, treatments with greatest mOS benefit include Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib (NC), Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib (PA), and Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NI); treatments with greatest mPFS benefit include Cabozantinib (C), NC, and Avelumab plus Axitinib (AA); treatments with the highest ORR include C, NC, and AA. Ordered from least to most toxic, treatments with G3/G4 AEs less frequent than sunitinib include Pazopanib (P), NI, and AA. Conclusions: OS generally favored IO-IO or IO-VEGFI combinations, while PFS and ORR favored single agent C or IO-VEGFI. The lowest risks of G3/G4 AE were seen with P or IO-IO. IO-VEGFI combinations had similar risks for G3/G4 AE. Longer real-world follow-up is needed. We recognize the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, but sought a summative view of the current data.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document