Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E–mutated biliary tract cancer (BTC): A cohort of the ROAR basket trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 187-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Ulrik Niels Lassen ◽  
Elena Elez ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Basket Trial

187 Background: BTCs are rare, aggressive malignancies with poor prognoses. Treatment options and outcomes after first-line therapy are not well defined. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in second-line BTC is < 5 mo. Combined BRAF + MEK inhibition is efficacious in BRAF V600–mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer, melanoma, and lung cancer, but less so in BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. Activating BRAF V600E mutations have been reported in 0% to 20% of BTCs; thus, D (BRAF inhibitor) + T (MEK inhibitor) was evaluated as a treatment for pts with BRAF V600E–mutated BTC in the ROAR basket trial. Methods: In this phase II, open-label trial, pts with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including BTC, received D (150 mg BID) + T (2 mg QD) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Eligible pts had advanced or metastatic cancer and had been treated with ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, overall survival (OS), biomarker correlates, and safety. Results: Thirty-three pts with BTC had enrolled at data cutoff (January 3, 2018). BRAF V600E mutations were centrally confirmed in 30 of 33 pts with BTC (91%). Median age was 58 y, and 78% had received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. 32 of 33 pts with BTC were evaluable. Investigator-assessed ORR was 41% (13/32; 95% CI, 24%-59%), with 6 of 13 responses ongoing at data cutoff, 7 of 13 pts (54%) had a DOR ≥ 6 mo. Median PFS was 7.2 mo (95% CI, 4.6-10.1 mo), and median OS was 11.3 mo (95% CI, 7.3-17.6 mo). Grade 3/4 adverse events in ≥ 3 pts were increased γ-glutamyltransferase (n = 3 [9%]) and decreased white blood cell count (n = 3 pts [9%]). Biomarker analyses demonstrate a heterogeneous genetic landscape, and suggest a higher baseline expression of MAPK pathway genes in the pts who did not respond to D + T. Conclusions: D + T demonstrated promising efficacy in pts with BTC, with a favorable safety profile. These pts should be considered for BRAF mutation analysis, and D + T should be considered for pts with BRAF V600E-mutated BTC. Clinical trial information: NCT02034110.

Efficacy of dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E–mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6023-6023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Robert J. Kreitman ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Jae Yong Cho ◽  
Jan H.M. Schellens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

6023 Background: ATC is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Median overall survival (OS) is < 6 mo. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is efficacious in BRAF V600–mutated melanoma and lung cancer. One-fourth of ATCs harbor activating BRAF V600E mutations; thus, D (BRAF inhibitor) + T (MEK inhibitor) was evaluated as a treatment for pts with BRAF V600E–mutated ATC. Methods: In this phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110), pts with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including ATC, received continuous D (150 mg BID) + T (2 mg QD) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Eligible pts had advanced or metastatic cancer with no standard-of-care treatment options. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. We report data from the ATC cohort. Results: 16 pts with BRAF V600E–mutated ATC had evaluable data with a median follow-up time of 47 wk (range 4-120 wk). BRAF V600E mutations were centrally confirmed in 15/16 pts. Median age was 72 y; all 16 pts had undergone prior tumor radiation and/or surgery and 6/16 pts (38%) had received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 69% (11/16; 95% CI, 41%-89%), with 7/11 responses ongoing at the time of data cut. The Bayesian estimate of ORR was 69% (95% credible interval, 47%-87%) with a 100% probability that this ORR exceeded the 15% historical RR. Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not estimable due to insufficient progression and death events. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 mo were 90%, 79%, and 80%, respectively. The safety population comprised 100 pts enrolled in 7/9 histologies. Among all pts, 92% had an AE. Common AEs of any grade for all histologies were fatigue (38%), pyrexia (37%), and nausea (35%). In the ATC cohort, the most common grade 3/4 events were hyponatremia (19%), pneumonia (13%), and anemia (13%). Conclusions: D+T combination therapy significantly improved outcomes in ATC with a favorable safety profile. This regimen represents a clinically meaningful therapeutic advance for pts with advanced/metastatic BRAF V600–mutated ATC. Clinical trial information: NCT02034110.

scholarly journals ACTR-30. UPDATED EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DABRAFENIB PLUS TRAMETINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT/REFRACTORY BRAF V600E–MUTATED HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (HGG) AND LOW-GRADE GLIOMA (LGG)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi19-vi20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ongoing Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND There is a lack of treatment options for HGG and LGG patients. BRAFV600E mutations are uncommon in glioma, with a poor long-term prognosis. Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition extends progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRAF V600E–mutated melanoma, non small-cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. METHODS This phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110) evaluated dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor, 150mg BID) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor, 2mg QD) in patients with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including HGG and LGG. Eligible patients had histologically-confirmed recurrent or progressive glioma (LGG:WHO grade 1 or 2; HGG:WHO grade 3 or 4), with HGG patients required to have received radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) using RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. RESULTS Interim analysis (IA) #14 (data cutoff: April 2, 2018) reported additional 3 months follow-up, with 49 patients enrolled (HGG, n=39; LGG, n=10) and 3 patients not evaluable for response. In HGG patients, ORR was 27% (10/37; 95%CI: 13.8%-44.1%), including CR (n=1), PR (n=9), and SD (n=11), with 16 patients currently ongoing treatment. In LGG patients, ORR was 56% (5/9; 95%CI: 26.8%-79.3%), including PR (n=5) and SD (n=4), with 6 patients currently ongoing treatment. OS, PFS, and DOR will be presented (IA#15). In HGG patients, adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (33%), headache (31%), rash (28%), and pyrexia (23%); grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (8%) and fatigue (5%). In LGG patients, AEs included headache (70%), fatigue, pyrexia (60% each), nausea, and arthralgia (50% each); grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (20%). CONCLUSIONS Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with recurrent or refractory BRAF V600E‒mutated HGG or LGG, with manageable AEs and no new safety signals.

scholarly journals LGG-26. DIFFUSE LEPTOMENINGEAL GLIONEURONAL TUMOR (DLGNT) IN CHILDREN: DIFFERENT CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS AND OUTCOMES

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii371-iii371
Author(s):  
Andge Valiakhmetova ◽  
Ludmila Papusha ◽  
Ludmila Yasko ◽  
Alexander Druy ◽  
Alexander Karachunsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Glioneuronal Tumor ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Diffuse Leptomeningeal Glioneuronal Tumor ◽  
Braf Fusion

Abstract Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) is an extremely rare disease, newly recognized in the 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the CNS. Most DLGNTs are low-grade neuroepithelial tumors with variable elements of neuronal/neurocytic and glial differentiation, have diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI, and typically harbor KIAA1549-BRAF fusions. Other alterations, such as the BRAF V600E substitution, are less common. Here, we present three cases of DLGNT with different presentations and outcomes. The first patient is a 2yr-old male with KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, and was treated with Carbo/VCR chemotherapy after a biopsy, with resultant ongoing stable disease for 3.5 years. The second patient, an 8yr-old male had the BRAF V600E point mutation and was treated with conventional chemotherapy (VCR/carboplatin). On progression, he received the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, achieving a complete response which last 14 month. The third patient, a 27 month old male, harbored a KIAA1549-BRAF fusion and was treated at diagnosis with the MEK inhibitor trametinib. The tumor has been radiographically stable in the context of clinical improvement for 21 months since the treatment initiation, ongoing 24 month. In summary, we present further evidence of MAPK pathway alterations in children with DLGNT. We describe a range of molecular presentations and clinical outcomes, including one patient treated with conventional chemotherapy with further stabilization of disease during 3.5 years and two patients who were successfully treated with targeted therapy.

scholarly journals PD-L1 blockade in combination with inhibition of MAPK oncogenic signaling in patients with advanced melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoni Ribas ◽  
Alain Algazi ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
Marcus O. Butler ◽  
Sunandana Chandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein

AbstractCombining PD-L1 blockade with inhibition of oncogenic mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling may result in long-lasting responses in patients with advanced melanoma. This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT02027961) investigated safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of durvalumab (anti–PD-L1) combined with dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (MEK inhibitor) for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma (cohort A, n = 26), or durvalumab and trametinib given concomitantly (cohort B, n = 20) or sequentially (cohort C, n = 22) for patients with BRAF-wild type melanoma. Adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates were more common than previously reported for these agents given as monotherapy. Objective responses were observed in 69.2% (cohort A), 20.0% (cohort B) and 31.8% (cohort C) of patients, with evidence of improved tumor immune infiltration and durable responses in a subset of patients with available biopsy samples. In conclusion, combined MAPK inhibition and anti–PD-L1 therapy may provide treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma.

A Review of Selumetinib in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1–Related Plexiform Neurofibromas

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110462
Author(s):  
Mary Kate Anderson ◽  
Meredith Johnson ◽  
Lauren Thornburg ◽  
Zachery Halford
Keyword(s):  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Plexiform Neurofibromas

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of selumetinib, a novel MEK inhibitor, for the treatment of plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Data Sources: An English-based literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted using the terms selumetinib AND neurofibromatosis from inception to August 1, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant prescribing information, abstracts, and articles identified through the search were considered for inclusion in this review. Data Synthesis: The open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II SPRINT trial demonstrated clinically significant improvements in PN-related complications. Of 50 symptomatic patients, 68% experienced a partial response, with a median change in tumor volume of −27.9% from baseline. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 years was 84%. Additionally, clinically meaningful improvements were seen on patient- and parent-reported assessments evaluating pain, range of motion, disfigurement, and quality of life. Overall, the adverse effect profile for selumetinib appears mild and manageable. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Selumetinib is the first FDA-approved treatment for inoperable PN in patients with NF1, demonstrating that MEK inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy. Studies are ongoing to assess the effect of selumetinib on other NF1-associated tumor types and to determine the optimal dosing schedule and treatment duration. Cost and treatment burden must be considered when selecting selumetinib therapy. Conclusion: Selumetinib exhibits impressive antitumor activity and sustained clinical benefit in patients lacking other viable treatment options. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal age of initiation, treatment duration, and overall cost-effectiveness of selumetinib.

Treatment of a BRAF V600E Positive Ameloblastoma in a Pediatric Patient with MEK Inhibitor Monotherapy

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110051
Author(s):  
Steven Daws ◽  
Kongkrit Chaiyasate ◽  
Arshi Lehal
Keyword(s):  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e Mutation ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Targeted Chemotherapy ◽  
Odontogenic Epithelium ◽  
Genetic Landscape ◽  
Frequent Presence

Ameloblastomas are uncommon tumors of the odontogenic epithelium standardly treated with radical resection. Recent studies of the genetic landscape of ameloblastoma have revealed the frequent presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, suggesting a possible role for targeted chemotherapy. We present the case of a primary mandibular ameloblastoma found in a 13-year-old female with confirmed BRAF V600E mutation. Prior to invasive surgical intervention she was treated for 8 weeks with the MEK inhibitor trametinib, but her tumor demonstrated little radiographic, clinical, or histologic response. Previous case reports have shown ameloblastoma in adult patients to be responsive to other agents targeting the MAPK pathway. Our observations in the presented case demonstrate the need for further research into the utility of targeted chemotherapy in ameloblastoma treatment.

scholarly journals The Evolutionary Landscape of Treatment for BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Erica Bonazzina ◽  
Alessio Amatu ◽  
Federica Tosi ◽  
Katia Bencardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

The BRAFV600E mutation is found in 8–10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and it is recognized as a poor prognostic factor with a median overall survival inferior to 20 months. At present, besides immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for those tumors with concomitant MSI-H status, recommended treatment options include cytotoxic chemotherapy + anti-VEGF in the first line setting, and a combination of EGFR and a BRAF inhibitor (cetuximab plus encorafenib) in second line. However, even with the latter targeted approach, acquired resistance limits the possibility of more than an incremental benefit and survival is still dismal. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for this subset of patients and perform a systematic review of ongoing clinical trials. Overall, we identified six emerging strategies: targeting MAPK pathway (monotherapy or combinations), targeting MAPK pathway combined with cytotoxic agents, intensive cytotoxic regimen combinations, targeted agents combined with CPIs, oxidative stress induction, and cytotoxic agents combined with antiangiogenic drugs and CPIs. In the future, the integration of new therapeutic strategies targeting key players in the BRAFV600E oncogenic pathways with current treatment approach based on cytotoxic chemotherapy and surgery is likely to redefine the treatment landscape of these CRC patients.

scholarly journals Advanced melanoma, a pharmacological evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabela Andrade ◽  
Jorge Balteiro
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

Abstract Background Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive cancer that occurs in melanocytes, located in the epidermis. Historically it has a high rate of morbidity and mortality, due to the resistance and toxicity of traditional therapies. Its incidence has increased annually by 4% to 8%. Until 2011 it was still considered a devastating and almost always fatal disease in a few months. Advances in therapies have significantly improved the results of most patients with advanced melanoma, especially those with a BRAFV600 mutation, which account for almost 50% of tumors. Before the recent evolution in treatment, the prognosis and overall survival were considered very bad. The introduction of new drugs has improved progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as producing faster clinical responses. Methods Comparison of endpoints such as progression-free survival and overall melanoma survival from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) studies of each drug in the therapeutic groups under assessment used in the disease. The variables used were the Endpoints Global Survival at various times (12 months, 24 months, 36 months and the median) and Progression-Free Survival. Results Combined immunotherapy (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) improves overall survival and progression-free survival, achieving better results than targeted therapy. In this, the combination of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor, presents better results with the combination of Encorafenib and Binimetinib. Conclusions Both targeted therapy and immunotherapy transform melanoma with a dismal prognosis into a life-threatening illness.

scholarly journals Durable Response to the Combination of Atezolizumab With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in an Untreated Non-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient With BRAF V600E Mutation: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Niu ◽  
Yingjia Sun ◽  
David Planchard ◽  
Luting Chiu ◽  
Jian Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Nsclc Patient ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
First Line ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) has become a major treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and demonstrated a clinical benefit for NSCLC patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 drivers; however, the benefit in BRAF V600E NSCLC is so far unknown. Here, we report a case of prolonged tumor response to the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy in a non-smoking BRAF V600E NSCLC patient.Materials and MethodsWe verify a co-expression of BRAF V600E mutation and PD-L1 high expression more than 50% on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sample of a newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma patient by immunohistochemistry and BRAF V600E/EGFR/ALK/ROS1 Mutations Detection Kit. The tissue and liquid biopsies were further subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identification of mutations with progression on immunotherapy and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi). The patient had provided written informed consent and authorized the publication of clinical case.ResultsWe demonstrate the case of 62-year-old female non-smoker with high PD-L1 expression and BRAF V600E mutated NSCLC. The progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line combination of atezolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy and sequential second-line treatment with BRAFi Vemurafenib are 20 and 5.5 months, respectively.ConclusionThis case shows a durable response to ICPi in BRAF V600E non-smoking lung adenocarcinoma with PFS of 20 months under first-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment. The case supports the idea that the combination immunotherapy may be an attractive option for BRAF V600E mutated non-smoking NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document