Phase II randomized, double-blind, study of mFOLFIRINOX plus ramucirumab versus mFOLFIRINOX plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer patients hcrn GI14-198.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS475-TPS475
Author(s):  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
Bert O'Neil ◽  
Bassel F. El-Rayes ◽  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Tina Ashley Khair ◽  
...  

TPS475 Background: The prognosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) remains poor. A chemotherapy backbone is the current standard of care in PCA. The choice of a chemotherapeutic backbone may impact the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy in PCA. Ramucirumab has increased activity with fluoropyrimidines (5FU) because 5FU increases VEGF expression. Methods: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled Phase II study. Subjects will receive either Ramucirumab or a placebo followed by mFOLFIRINOX every two weeks of a 28 day cycle until progression or discontinuation for other reasons. The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is nine month PFS defined as the time from enrollment to the time of progression or death. Among the key inclusion criteria, subjects must have recurrent or metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) with no prior first-line systemic treatment, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, no DVT, PE or other thromboembolism within three months of randomization. Total number of patient enrolled as of September 19, 2018 is 48 of 85 at eight sites; 27 male (56%), 42 Caucasians (87.5%), three African American (6.2%), one Asian (2%). Median age is 63 (40 - 76). Majority of patients (41) had de novo metastatic disease and six with recurrent disease after surgery. Regimen has been tolerated well with no unanticipated events. Clinical trial information: NCT02581215.

2021 ◽  
pp. 2100746
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Goss ◽  
Isabelle Fajac ◽  
Raksha Jain ◽  
Wolfgang Seibold ◽  
Abhya Gupta ◽  
...  

BackgroundInhibition of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in cystic fibrosis (CF) airways provides a mutation-agnostic approach that could improve mucociliary clearance in all CF patients. BI 1265162 is an ENaC inhibitor with demonstrated preclinical efficacy and safety already demonstrated in humans.ObjectiveWe present results from BALANCE-CF™ 1, a Phase II, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study of four dose levels of BI 1265162 versus placebo for 4 weeks on top of standard of care in adults and adolescents with CF.ResultsInitially, 28 randomised subjects (n=14 each BI 1265162 200 µg BID, placebo BID) were assessed at an interim futility analysis. Compared with placebo, numerical changes of –0.8% (95%CI –6.6, 4.9) in ppFEV1 and +2.1 units (95%CI –2.4, 6.5) in LCI were observed in the active group, meeting a predefined stopping rule; accordingly, the study was terminated. Recruitment had continued during the interim analysis and pending results; 24 patients were added across three dose levels and placebo. The final results including these patients (+1.5% ppFEV1, 200 µg BID dose versus placebo) were not supportive of relevant clinical effect. LCI change was also not supportive, although interpretation was limited due to insufficient traces meeting quality criteria. A 9.4-point improvement in CFQ-R Respiratory Domain was observed in the 200 µg BID dose group versus placebo. BI 1265162 up to 200 µg BID was safe and well-tolerated. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those in healthy volunteers.ConclusionBI 1265162 was safe, but did not demonstrate a potential for clinical benefit. Development has been terminated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
Manali Rupji ◽  
Tina Ashley Khair ◽  
Erwin L. Robin ◽  
Bassel F. El-Rayes ◽  
...  

413 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-mediated signaling and angiogenesis contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA).VEGF is expressed in all PCA tumors. VEGF-A/VEGFR-2 signaling plays an important role in inducing invasion and migration of PCA cells. The pVEGFR-2 is significantly associated with invasion of the anterior capsule of pancreas and arteries. In preclinical studies, the anti-tumor activity of fluoropyrimidines, but not that of gemcitabine, caused the release of bone marrow derived circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) and Tie-2 expressing monocytes (TEMs) as well as the induction of pro-angiogenic growth factors. Methods: This phase II randomized, multi-center, and double-blinded trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX/ramucirumab (Arm A) versus mFOLFIRINOX/ placebo (Arm B) as front-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic PCA patients. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) at 9 months, and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and response rate. Results: A total of 86 subjects were enrolled, 82 were eligible (42 in Arm A v. 40 in Arm B). The mean age of the subjects in the two arms were comparable (61.7 v. 63.0, respectively); 43 male, 69 Caucasian. On the univariate analysis, there was no difference in distribution between the 2 arms for age, gender, race and ethnicity. The median PFS was 5.6 in Arm A compared to 6.7 months in Arm B (one-sided log-rank, p = 0.322). At 9 months, the progression free rates were 25.1% v. 35% for Arms A and B, respectively. The mFOLFIRINOX/ramucirumab combination was well tolerated. Patients in Arm A reported a slightly higher number of adverse events (AEs) encounters, most commonly diarrhea (29 vs 28), fatigue (25 v. 25), vomiting (24 v. 14), weight loss (23 v. 17), and abdominal pain (20 v. 15). Arm A had more SAEs than Arm B (43 v. 25), with sepsis most commonly reported in both arms (3 in each), vomiting (3 v. 2), diarrhea (3 v.1) and duodenal obstruction (3 v. 0). Arm B had a slightly higher response rate (22.58%) compared to Arm A (17.65%) that was not statistically significant. The median OS in Arm A was 10.3 compared to 9.7 months for Arm B (one-sided log-rank, p = 0.094). Conclusions: In this randomized phase 2 study, the addition of ramucirumab to mFOLFIRINOX did not improve PFS, response rate, or OS as initial therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. FOLFIRINOX/Ramucirumab combination was well tolerated in the treatment of PCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02581215.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Blayney ◽  
Yuankai Shi ◽  
Hryhorii Adamchuk ◽  
David Feng ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
...  

533 Background: Peg is standard of care (SoC) for the prevention of CIN. Peg’s mechanism of action leaves patients vulnerable to FN in week 1 of the chemo cycle(C), as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) does not normalize until week 2. Plin is a first-in-class, non-G-CSF small molecule agent, which received breakthrough designation from FDA in CIN. It prevents CIN by protecting progenitor cells in bone marrow from chemo assault and has normal ANC in week 1 (Blayney JAMA Onc 2020). Phase 2 testing showed the combination of Plin and Peg achieved CIN protection throughout the entire cycle vs Peg alone (Blayney: St Gallen 2019, ASCO 2019). Methods: Plin is given on Day (D)1 after Chemo, has a favorable safety profile, and also has anticancer activity. A separate phase 3 study evaluating Plin as an anticancer agent (DUBLIN-3; NCT02504489) in NSCLC pts is underway, with anti-cancer results in OS expected in 2021. In PROTECTIVE-2 (Study 106; NCT0329457), we added Plin (on D1) to Peg (on D2), testing superiority of the combination for CIN prevention vs Peg alone. Study 106, is a global multicenter randomized (1:1) double-blind study to evaluate Plin 40 mg + Peg 6mg (Arm 1) versus Peg 6mg + Placebo (Plac) (Arm 2) in preventing Severe Neutropenia (N), (defined as ANC <0.5 cells × 10E9/L) in early-stage BC (node positive or node negative with a high risk of recurrence) pts. 221 pts with ECOG status 0 or 1 received Docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (TAC) on D1 for four 21 D cycles and study treatment. Central laboratory ANC was assessed at Covance in Cycle 1 (C1) on D 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15. Primary objective was to compare the percentage (%) of pts with a Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) of 0 days [that is % of pts with no Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia (N)] in C1 in each arm. Key secondary endpoints were DSN and ANC Nadir in C1. We also evaluated safety (AE frequency and Grade). Conclusions: Adding Plin to Peg offers superior CIN protection compared to Peg alone and also has a superior safety profile by lowering over 20% of grade 4 AE. The effect size of the CIN protection in the combination is also correlated to clinical meaningful FN reduction compared to peg alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03531099. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9627-TPS9627
Author(s):  
Ferdinandos Skoulidis ◽  
Joel W. Neal ◽  
Wallace L. Akerley ◽  
Paul K. Paik ◽  
Thales Papagiannakopoulos ◽  
...  

TPS9627 Background: Mutational activation of the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway occurs in >20% of NSCLC patients (pts). KEAP1/NRF2 activation protects tumor cells from diverse forms of oxidative stress and promotes tumor growth and survival. In pts w/ advanced NSCLC, mutation of the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway is associated w/ dramatically reduced survival and poor outcomes following standard-of-care therapy. These tumors have increased dependence on GLS-mediated conversion of glutamine to glutamate due to upregulation of NRF2 target genes involved in glutamine metabolism. Telaglenastat (CB-839), an investigational, first-in-class, potent, oral GLS inhibitor, has demonstrated preclinical activity in KEAP1/NRF2-mutated NSCLC cell lines and xenograft models. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of telaglenastat + standard-of-care pembro and chemotherapy as 1L therapy for KEAP1/NRF2-mutated non-squamous mNSCLC (NCT04265534). Methods: This phase II, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study will enroll ~120 pts with histologically or cytologically documented stage IV non-squamous NSCLC w/ KEAP1 or NRF2 mutation, no prior systemic therapy for mNSCLC, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), ECOG PS 0-1, and no EGFR, ALK, ROS, or other actionable mutation w/ available approved therapy in 1L setting. KEAP1 or NRF2 mutations will be determined by next generation sequencing (NGS), and study-provided liquid biopsy NGS will be available. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive telaglenastat (800 mg BID PO) or placebo, in combination with pembro, carboplatin, and pemetrexed at standard doses on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Pts will be stratified by STK11/LKB1 mutational status and M stage of cancer (M1a-b vs M1c). The study will include an initial safety run-in period (n=12; 1 cycle). Co-primary endpoints are safety and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, overall survival, and efficacy analysis in the subgroup of pts w/ biochemical confirmation of KEAP1/NRF2 pathway activation. Findings of this novel NGS biomarker-selected study will inform the efficacy and safety profile of telaglenastat + standard-of-care chemoimmunotherapy for 1L treatment of KEAP1/NRF2-mutated, non-squamous mNSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04265534 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document