Comparison of perspectives and practices to mitigate financial toxicity between advance practice providers and attending oncologists.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Meera Vimala Ragavan ◽  
Divya Ahuja Parikh ◽  
Manali I. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Comparison Of Perspectives ◽  
Attending Physicians ◽  
Current Practices

82 Background: Characterizing the oncology provider’s role in addressing the growing epidemic of financial toxicity faced by cancer patients is of increasing importance. Advance practice providers (APPs) increasingly serve as primary providers for many cancer patients, but no studies to date have examined their perspectives and practices in addressing financial toxicity, nor compared them to that of attending physicians. Methods: We developed an 18-question electronic, anonymous survey informed by an extensive literature search regarding perspectives on the provider’s role and current practices in addressing financial toxicity. We emailed the survey to 75 attending physicians and 117 APPs at our institution’s cancer center. Responses during the study period 12/12/2018-1/31/2019 were analyzed. Results: 32 attending physicians and 28 APPs completed the survey. Response rates were higher among attending physicians (42%) compared to APPs (24%). Attending physicians were more likely than APPs to agree that providers should openly discuss cost (75% vs. 36%, p = 0.002). APPs were more likely to agree that providers should defer cost conversations to a third party (57% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) and make the same treatment recommendation regardless of cost (50% vs. 25%, p = 0.022). Use of cost-effectiveness (CE) guidelines was higher among APPs compared to attending physicians (71% vs. 31%, p = 0.0019). Awareness of out of pocket costs, frequency of referrals to financial counselors, and ranking of top barriers to cost conversations (price transparency, knowledge of resources, and time) were similar between attending physicians and APPs. Conclusions: While APPs and attending physicians differed considerably in their perspectives on the role oncology providers should take in mitigating financial toxicity, they were more consistent in current practices and identification of barriers to cost conversations. APPs were interestingly more likely to use CE guidelines than attending physicians. Higher response rates among attending physicians may reflect inherently stronger opinions regarding the provider’s role in addressing financial toxicity. Future studies should explore these differences to better inform provider-level interventions to reduce financial toxicity.

Perspectives and practices of oncology providers in addressing financial toxicity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18342-e18342
Author(s):  
Meera Vimala Ragavan ◽  
Divya Ahuja Parikh ◽  
Manali I. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Oncology Providers ◽  
Attending Physicians ◽  
Out Of Pocket Costs ◽  
Available Resources

e18342 Background: Few studies have evaluated the perspectives and clinical practices of oncology providers in regards to assisting patients with financial toxicity. Our study sought to assess providers’ attitudes regarding their role in addressing patients’ financial concerns, understand practice patterns in discussing cost of care, and obtain feedback on potential interventions to help address existing barriers. Methods: We developed an 18-question electronic, anonymous survey informed by an extensive literature search and piloted with three physicians with health services research experience. We emailed the survey to 75 attending physicians in Medical Oncology, Hematology, and Radiation Oncology, 117 advance practice practitioners (APPs) and 46 trainees. Responses during the study period 12/12/2018-1/31/2019 were analyzed. Results: A total of 71 (response rate of 30%) participants completed the survey, including 31 attending physicians, 28 APPs, and 12 trainees. Sixty-two percent of participants agreed that oncology providers should openly discuss cost of care with patients. There was wide variation in opinion around whether providers should offer the same treatment recommendations to all patients regardless of cost, with one third stating they agreed, one third stating they disagreed, and one third stating they were neutral. Sixty-one percent of participants did not use any cost-effectiveness tools in decision making. Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that a gap in knowledge of out of pocket costs was the number one barrier to helping patients avoid financial toxicity. The highest ranked intervention of those listed was a guide on available resources for patients with financial needs, voted for by 70% of respondents. Conclusions: Providers identified many barriers at our institution to discussing cost of care, including lack of transparency of out of pocket costs and lack of awareness of available resources. Providers were overwhelmingly interested in incorporating institutional resources and cost-effectiveness tools into their clinical practices. These findings can inform provider-level interventions to better address the financial burden patients face with their cancer care.

Examining perceptions of financial toxicity among cancer patients: The Financial Toxicity 16 Questionnaire.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19389-e19389
Author(s):  
Roberto Bordonaro ◽  
Fabrizio Castagna ◽  
Dario Piazza ◽  
Stefano Sergio Cordio ◽  
Concetta Sergi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Related Factors

e19389 Background: Financial toxicity (FT) among cancer patients (CP) is multifactorial, arising from both disease-related and non- disease related factors, including socio-cultural, environmental, and psychological attributes. It derives both from costs related to assistance and borne on the patients and its caregivers, and reduction of income capacity also in this case borne on the patients and on the caregivers. Stress levels may escalate to significant proportions in some patient, to present with symptoms of anxiety especially during therapy administration periods. Methods: In order to highlight financial toxicity related to the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic and lung cancer and to measure its evolution over time and any correlation with the prognosis, we developed a questionnaire called FT16 and we conducted a validation study on a sample of 31 patients. The design of the study involved the development and the psychometric assessment of a scale to measure the perceived sources of FT among CP. Following extensive literature review, a table of specification with the initial items was created to guide item construction for developing the scale. The items related to these FT were converted into an 16-item, multipoint questionnaire, resulting in the FT16. We also monitored quality of life of the patients, using the QlQ C-30 questionnaire, in the aim to capture correlation between FT onset and quality of life deterioration; clinical characteristics of the patients, response to therapy and outcome parameters also have been recorded in the aim to evaluate eventual correlation with FT. Results: The questionnaire was administered to 31 adult patients with lung and pancreatic metastatic cancer, both men and women, who were newly diagnosed and will undergo cancer treatment. Each of them has been informed about the research and written informed consent has been obtained. The internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.77 for the 16 items of the FT16. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) indicated that there were no significant differences in the mean FT16 score, between sexes, and age groups in the severity score. Conclusions: FT16 questionnaire seems to be an useful tool to capture FT onset in this poor-prognosis subset of patients; the analysis of the data recorded will continue to assess the capability of the FT16 to capture correlations with clinical characteristics at diagnosis and correlations with the prognosis.

A Matched-pair Analysis on the Effect of Migration Background on Response Rates and Survival of Cancer Patients Treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Rüdiger ◽  
Franziska Geiser ◽  
Manuel Ritter ◽  
Peter Brossart ◽  
Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Migration Background ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Migrant Background

Abstract Background: There are several studies that investigate health inequalities in Germany due to its being a destination for immigrants since the 1960s. In this study, we pay specific attention to differences in cancer survival between German patients with and without a migration background being treated at a comprehensive cancer center. This becomes of particular interest since previous studies suggested that immigrant patients have a worse response to treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country.Methods: We considered 8162 cancer patients being treated at the CIO Bonn of the University Hospital of Bonn between April 2002 and December 2015 for our matched-pair analysis. Patients with migrant background were identified using a manual name-based algorithm with high specifity and then matched with patients without migrant background adjusting demographic characteristics, tumor features, defined staging criteria and primary therapy. Finally, 211 patients with a migrant background were matched to 211 patients without a migrant background and then compared with regard to response to treatment and survival rates (i.e. Overall survival, Progression-free survival and Time to progression).Results: Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background is slightly older (57.9 vs. 54.9 years) with equal gender distribution (55.0% vs. 54.5% female) and had a longer follow-up time (42.6 vs. 36.9 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (overall survival; P=0.802) and response rates (ORR; McNemar's test, P=0.3458) between both collectives.Conclusion: In contrast to previous studies, we found no evidence that migration background of cancer patients being significantly affects response rates and survival. A worse outcome in populations of immigrant origin most likely has complex reasons, but highly standardized procedures in a comprehensive cancer center may contribute positively to reducing detrimental effects.

Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life: An Arabic version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199844
Author(s):  
Abdullah M Alhammad ◽  
Nora Alkhudair ◽  
Rawan Alzaidi ◽  
Latifa S Almosabhi ◽  
Mohammad H Aljawadi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arabic Speaking ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious complication of cancer treatment that compromises patients’ quality of life and treatment adherence, which necessitates regular assessment. Therefore, there is a need to assess patient-reported nausea and vomiting using a validated scale among Arabic speaking cancer patient population. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument in Arabic, a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the influence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life. Methods Linguistic validation of an Arabic-language version was performed. The instrument was administered to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital's cancer center in Saudi Arabia. Results One-hundred cancer patients who received chemotherapy were enrolled. The participants’ mean age was 53.3 ± 14.9 years, and 50% were female. Half of the participants had a history of nausea and vomiting with previous chemotherapy. The Cronbach coefficient alpha for the FLIE was 0.9606 and 0.9736 for nausea and vomiting domains, respectively, which indicated an excellent reliability for the Arabic FLIE. The mean FLIE score was 110.9 ± 23.5, indicating no or minimal impact on daily life (NIDL). Conclusions The Arabic FLIE is a valid and reliable tool among the Arabic-speaking cancer population. Thus, the Arabic version of the FLIE will be a useful tool to assess the quality of life among Arabic speaking patients receiving chemotherapy. Additionally, the translated instrument will be a useful tool for future research studies to explore new antiemetic treatments among cancer patients.

scholarly journals Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Breast Cancer Patients at a Medical Center in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542098391
Author(s):  
Chieh-Ying Chin ◽  
Yung-Hsiang Chen ◽  
Shin-Chung Wu ◽  
Chien-Ting Liu ◽  
Yun-Fang Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicine ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cam Use ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Background Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming more common in medical practice, but little is known about the concurrent use of CAM and conventional treatment. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the types of CAM used and their prevalence in a regional patient cohort with breast cancer (BC). Methods BC patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire survey on the use of CAM in southern Taiwan at an Integrative Breast Cancer Center (IBCC). The National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) classification was used to group responses. Over a period of 8 months, all patients receiving treatment for cancer at the IBCC were approached. Results A total of 106 BC patients completed the survey (response rate: 79.7%). The prevalence of CAM use was 82.4%. Patients who were employed, were receiving radiotherapy and hormone therapy, and had cancer for a longer duration were more likely to use CAM ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis identified employment as an independent predictor of CAM use (OR = 6.92; 95% CI = 1.33-36.15). Dietary supplementation (n = 69, 82.1%) was the type of CAM most frequently used, followed by exercise (n = 48, 57.1%) and traditional Chinese medicine (n = 29, 34.5%). The main reason for using CAM was to ameliorate the side effects of conventional therapies. Almost half (46.4%) of these CAM users did not disclose that they were using it in medical consultations with their physicians. Most chose to use CAM due to recommendations from family and friends. Conclusion A large portion of BC patients at the IBCC undergoing anti-cancer treatment courses used CAM, but less than half discussed it with their physicians. Given the high prevalence of CAM, it would be justifiable to direct further resources toward this service so that cancer patients can benefit from a holistic approach to their treatment.

scholarly journals A predictive nomogram for mortality of cancer patients with invasive candidiasis: a 10-year study in a cancer center of North China

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding Li ◽  
Tianjiao Li ◽  
Changsen Bai ◽  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Invasive Candidiasis ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Invasive candidiasis is the most common fungal disease among hospitalized patients and continues to be a major cause of mortality. Risk factors for mortality have been studied previously but rarely developed into a predictive nomogram, especially for cancer patients. We constructed a nomogram for mortality prediction based on a retrospective review of 10 years of data for cancer patients with invasive candidiasis. Methods Clinical data for cancer patients with invasive candidiasis during the period of 2010–2019 were studied; the cases were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Variables in the training cohort were subjected to a predictive nomogram based on multivariate logistic regression analysis and a stepwise algorithm. We assessed the performance of the nomogram through the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) in both the training and validation cohorts. Results A total of 207 cases of invasive candidiasis were examined, and the crude 30-day mortality was 28.0%. Candida albicans (48.3%) was the predominant species responsible for infection, followed by the Candida glabrata complex (24.2%) and Candida tropicalis (10.1%). The training and validation cohorts contained 147 and 60 cases, respectively. The predictive nomogram consisted of bloodstream infections, intensive care unit (ICU) admitted > 3 days, no prior surgery, metastasis and no source control. The AUCs of the training and validation cohorts were 0.895 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.846–0.945) and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.770–0.955), respectively. The net benefit of the model performed better than “treatment for all” in DCA and was also better for opting low-risk patients out of treatment than “treatment for none” in opt-out DCA. Conclusion Cancer patients with invasive candidiasis exhibit high crude mortality. The predictive nomogram established in this study can provide a probability of mortality for a given patient, which will be beneficial for therapeutic strategies and outcome improvement.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document