Quality of timely adjuvant chemotherapy for veterans with colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Richard Lewis Martin ◽  
Gretchen C. Edwards ◽  
Lauren R. Samuels ◽  
Christianne L. Roumie
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Port Placement ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Timely Treatment

78 Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Treatment within 8 weeks of surgery improves disease free survival and decreases recurrence. National Veterans Health Administration (VHA) CRC data demonstrated adherence to this standard; however, there was regional variation. We sought to describe time to treatment at a Southeast Regional VHA facility to determine local targets for quality improvement initiatives. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 705 electronic medical records of patients who underwent colorectal surgery from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 at VHA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Two trained clinician abstractors reviewed standard elements (k = 0.79 – 0.92). The population included patients with pathological stage high risk II or III CRC and excluded those with metastatic disease or documented NCCN defined exclusion from chemotherapy. We analyzed 2 populations; chemotherapy received and a sensitivity analysis population of patients who were eligible for, but did not receive, chemotherapy (no documentation of NCCN ineligibility or declined). The primary outcome was chemotherapy within 8 weeks of surgery, evaluated during three time periods due to changes in NCCN guidelines. Results: Of 705 colorectal surgeries, we excluded 262 for non-cancers, 220 for stage I or low-risk stage II cancers, and 46 for NCCN defined exclusion, yielding 177 cases: 120 colon and 57 rectal cancers. Patients were 98% male, 85% white, and median age 64 years [Interquartile Range 60, 70]. Among those receiving chemotherapy (123/177 [69.5%]), median time to treatment was 50.5 days [40,64]; with 63% receiving chemotherapy within 8 weeks. Results varied over time. Between 2000-2004 75% received within 8 weeks; 2005-2009, 62%; 2010-2015, 41%. Including all eligible patients, the proportion receiving timely treatment declined; overall 44%; 2000-2004, 57%; 2005-2009, 45%; 2010-2015, 25%. Conclusions: Improving care processes for patients with CRC can improve timely treatment. Exploring barriers such as prolonged hospitalization, wound healing, and port placement may reveal areas for quality improvement.

Temporal trends in receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for veterans with colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19171-e19171
Author(s):  
Richard Lewis Martin ◽  
Gretchen C. Edwards ◽  
Lauren R. Samuels ◽  
Cathy Eng ◽  
Christianne L. Roumie
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Over Time

e19171 Background: For patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer (CRC), adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Rates of use vary significantly across health care settings. Several demographic and healthcare factors are associated with decreased receipt of chemotherapy; however, few studies have assessed utilization patterns over time. We evaluated receipt of chemotherapy from 2000-2015 among patients treated at a Southeast Regional Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility to determine local targets for quality improvement initiatives. Methods: We reviewed 1,107 electronic medical records of patients undergoing colorectal surgery from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 at VHA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. We included patients with NCCN eligible pathologic high risk stage II (T4/perf, R1, < 12LN, LVI) or stage III CRC and excluded for age ≥80, age ≥75 hospitalized in the prior year with a major co-morbidity, and death or hospice within 30 days of surgery. The primary predictor was year of surgery, partitioned 2000-2005 (N = 60), 2006-2010 (N = 64), 2011-2015 (N = 56) to reflect changes in NCCN guidelines. The primary outcome was receipt of any chemotherapy. Results: Of 1,107 colorectal surgeries, we excluded 623 for non-cancers, 212 for stage I or low-risk stage II cancer, 47 for metastatic disease, and 45 for age, co-morbidity, death, and hospice, yielding a final cohort of 121 colon and 59 rectal cancers. Most patients were male (96%), white (79%), with median age 64 years [Interquartile Range 60, 70]. Overall, 117 of 180 (65%) received chemotherapy with a median time to treatment of 50.5 days [40,64]. Adjusting for known correlates, receipt of chemotherapy decreased over time; 2000-2005 (72%), 2006-2010 (69%), 2011-2015 (53%) p = 0.02. Regardless of CRC stage, more patients declined chemotherapy in 2011-2015 (27%) compared to 2000-2005 (6%) and 2006-2010 (8%) p < 0.01. Conclusions: We identified decreased utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in a non-elderly veteran cohort, which appeared to be due to patients declining chemotherapy regardless of cancer stage. Understanding patient and provider decisions around adjuvant chemotherapy and evaluating trends outside the VHA may offer important insights to implementing quality improvement measures.

Final DFS results of the SCOT study: An international phase III randomised (1:1) non-inferiority trial comparing 3 versus 6 months of oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3502-3502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Iveson ◽  
Rachel Kerr ◽  
Mark P. Saunders ◽  
Niels Henrik Hollander ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Duration Of Treatment

3502 Background: Six months of oxaliplatin-based treatment has been the mainstay of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer for the last 13 years. Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin is cumulative, dose limiting, and potentially irreversible. A shorter duration of treatment would save patients significant toxicity/time and substantially reduce the costs of the drug, its administration, and treatment of adverse effects. Methods: SCOT is a non-inferiority randomised study designed to determine whether 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with OxMdG or Xelox (physician/patient choice) in Stage III/high risk Stage II colorectal cancer is as effective as 6 months treatment. Non-inferiority was determined to be a maximum 2.5% fall in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) on the 3 month arm (from 78% on the 6 month arm) corresponding to a hazard ratio upper limit of 1.13. The study was designed with 90% power at the 2.5% 1-sided level of statistical significance and aimed to recruit 9500 patients to observe 2,750 DFS events (relapses/deaths/new colorectal cancers). Analysis used a Cox model adjusted for study minimisation factors. Results: 6088 patients (60% male, median age 65) with Stage III/high risk Stage II cancers of the colon or rectum were randomised between 27th March 2008 and 29th November 2013. The arms were balanced for clinical and pathological factors. Intended treatment was OxMdG for 1981 and Xelox for 4107 patients. There were 1469 DFS events (734 in 3 month arm and 735 in 6 month arm) giving the study 66% power. 3 year DFS was 76.8% (se = .8%) for the 3 month arm and 77.4% (se = .8%) for the 6 month arm (HR 1.008, 95% CI 0.910-1.117, test for non-inferiority p = 0.014). Non-inferiority appeared stronger for Xelox than OxMdG (test for heterogeneity, p = .059). Results will be shown broken down by stage, site, age, gender and achieved duration of treatment. Conclusions: The SCOT study has shown that 3 months adjuvant treatment is not inferior to 6 months treatment. However the SCOT study is part of the IDEA consortium and the results from the 6 studies in the IDEA consortium addressing the same duration question will also be presented at ASCO 2017. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN59757862.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer in frail patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Mima ◽  
Nobutomo Miyanari ◽  
Keisuke Kosumi ◽  
Takuya Tajiri ◽  
Kosuke Kanemitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Frail Patients

Efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant therapy in ≥70-year-old patients with T3N0M0 colorectal cancer: An observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-631
Author(s):  
Abdullah Sakin ◽  
Nurgul Yasar ◽  
Suleyman Sahin ◽  
Serdar Arici ◽  
Saban Secmeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy in ≥70-year-old patients with stage IIA (T3N0M0) colorectal cancer. Methods Lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, margin positivity, dissected lymph node count of <12, and presence of perforation/obstruction were accepted as risk factors. Those patients with at least one risk factor were regarded as having high risk. Results The study included 168 patients, among which 95 (56.5%) were male and 73 (43.5%) were female. The median age of patients was 73 years (range: 70–94). One hundred one (60.1%) patients were identified to have high risk. Eighty-one (87%) patients received 5-flourouracil+leucovorin and 12 (13%) patients received capecitabine regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients receiving capecitabine regimen had significantly higher rates of dose reduction at initiation and during the treatment. Among low-risk group, there was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival (p = 0.528 and p = 0.217, respectively). In high-risk group, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy significantly differed from those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of median disease-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). While the grade, lymph node status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as the most significant independent factors for disease-free survival, the most significant factors for overall survival were the age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and recurrence. Conclusion The findings of our study showed improved disease-free survival and overall survival in high-risk ≥70-year-old patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy due to T3N0M0 colorectal cancer. We believe that 5-flourouracil+leucovorin or capecitabine regimens should be recommended for these older high-risk patients who could receive adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of age.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ribeirinho-Soares ◽  
Diana Pádua ◽  
Ana Luísa Amaral ◽  
Elvia Valentini ◽  
Daniela Azevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Low Expression

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC. Methods For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Development and validation of a robust prognostic and predictive signature for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
A. M. Glas ◽  
P. Roepman ◽  
R. Salazar ◽  
G. Capella ◽  
V. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Cohort

4036 Background: Between 25 and 35% of stage II CRC patients will experience a recurrence of their disease and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Official guidelines give suggestions but no clear recommendation for best risk stratification. Here we describe the development a robust signature that predicts disease relapse and can assist in treatment decisions. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor tissues from 180 patients with stage I, II and III colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were analyzed using high density Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median FU was 70.2 months; 85% of patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on full-genome gene expression measurement indicated the existence of 3 main colon molecular subclasses. Survival analysis of the 3 classes showed that subtype C (n= 27) had a poor outcome and subtype A (n= 48) good outcome. Only the intermediate group B (n=104) was used to develop a signature by using a cross validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-yr distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and subsequently applied to all samples (n=180). The obtained gene signature was further validated on an independent cohort of 178 stage II + III colon samples. Results: A set of 38 prognosis related gene probes showed robust DMFS association in over 50% of all iterations in the Training Set of 180 samples. The gene signature was validated on an independent cohort of 178 samples from stage II + III colon cancer patients. The profile classified 61% of the validation samples as low-risk and 39% as high-risk. The low- and high-risk samples showed a significant difference in DMFS with a HR of 3.19 (P= 8.5e-4). Five-year DMFS rates were 89% (95%CI 83–95) for low-risk and 62% (95%CI 50–77) for high-risk samples. Moreover, the profile showed a significant performance within stage II (P=0.0058) and III (P=0.036) only samples. The performance of the profile was significant for both untreated (P=0.0082) and treated patients (P=0.016) suggesting that its power is independent of treatment benefits. Conclusions: ColoPrint is able to predict the prognosis of stage II and III colon cancer patients and facilitates the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Shusuke Yagi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Grade 3

867 Background: CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard care option for stage III and high risk stage II colorectal cancer(CRC). And then chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) is known as one of the dose-limiting toxicities for CAPOX. Although diverting ileostomy is useful for preventing serious complications of high risk anastomosis, it is well recognized that high ileostomy output is hard to manage. Furthermore, the effect of diverting ileostomy on CID of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we addressed the clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Methods: Patients who diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and stage II or III rectal cancer after curative surgery and received CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy during 2011- 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the relationship between diverting ileostomy and dose intensity, toxicities and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 112 patients (median age 60 years, 52% male, 69% colon cancer, 63% stage III, median follow-up 47 months) were enrolled in this study. Of 112 patients, 100 patients were received chemotherapy without ileostomy (non-ileostomy group: NIG) and 12 patients were received chemotherapy with ileostomy (ileostomy group: IG). 112 Patients received 870 chemotherapy cycles. All treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events were documented in 39% of patients in NIG and 33% of patients in IG (P = 0.77). Grade 3/4 of CID occurred in 8% of patients in NIG and 8% of patients in IG (P = 1). Grade 3/4 of neutropenia were recognized in 21% of patients in NIG and 17% of patients in IG (P = 1). Average relative dose intensity (RDI) in NIG were 75.7% and 85.8% for capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. Average RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in IG were 76.1% and 82.7%, respectively. Significant difference of RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were not shown in comparison between NIG and IG (P = 0.93, P = 0.63). The 3-year DFS rate was 85.0% in NIG and 75.0% in IG. The HR for DFS for NIG compared to IG was 1.709 (95% CI, 0.49 to 5.95; P = 0.40). Conclusions: The presence of diverting ileostomy does not affect RDI of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Immunological nomograms predicting prognosis and guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 499-499
Author(s):  
Junjie Peng ◽  
Yaqi Li ◽  
Yang Feng
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

499 Background: The type, abundance, and location of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic role of TILs and develop a nomogram for accurate prognostication of stage II colorectal cancer. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess the densities of intraepithelial and stromal CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+ and FOXP3+ TILs, and to estimate PD-L1 expression in tumor cells for 168 patients with stage II colorectal cancer. The prognostic roles of these features were evaluated using COX regression model, and nomograms were established to stratify patients into low and high-risk groups and compare the benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: In univariate analysis, patients with high intraepithelial or stromal CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+ and FOXP3+ TILs were associated significantly with better relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), except for stromal CD45RO+ TILs, whereas PD-L1 expression wasn't associated with RFS or OS. In multivariate analysis, patients with high intraepithelial CD3+ and stromal FOXP3+ TILs were associated with better RFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.032, respectively), while only stromal FOXP3+ TILs was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.031). The nomograms were well calibrated and showed a c-index of 0.751 and 0.757 for RFS and OS, respectively. After stratifying into low and high-risk groups, the high-risk group exhibited a better OS from adjuvant chemotherapy (3-year OS of 81.9% v 34.3%, p = 0.006). Conclusions: These results may help improve the prognostication of stage II colorectal cancer and identify a high-risk subset of patients who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

JCOG1805 (PanDRa-BD study): A randomized controlled study of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer patients at high-risk of developing recurrence according to T-stage and three selected pathological factors (Pn, DR, and BD).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3621-TPS3621
Author(s):  
Megumi Ishiguro ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Keita Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

TPS3621 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains controversial. Although the NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with “high-risk features,” the survival benefit has not been confirmed. We reviewed the evidence levels for prognostic values of risk factors, because lack of their robustness is a major source of uncertainty regarding the optimal indication of adjuvant chemotherapy. Consequently, on top of the T-stage, three pathological factors—perineural invasion (Pn), tumor budding (BD), and desmoplastic reaction (DR)—were selected as robust risk factors of recurrence. Among the conventional factors, the prognostic value of Pn had been well validated in a multicenter study conducted by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR; Am J Surg Path 2013), but others were deemed suboptimal in terms of the prognostic value. BD and DR are novel tumor- and stroma-factors, respectively, associated with cancer microenvironment at the tumor front. According to the JSCCR and ITBCC 2016 criteria, tumors are graded as BD1, BD2, or BD3. The DR heterogeneity is categorized into Mature, Intermediate, and Immature patterns based on site-specific products of cancer-associated fibroblasts—keloid-like collagen and myxoid stroma. According to a recent prospective multicenter study, BD and DR characterization represent a higher level of prognostic value than other conventional factors (SACURA trial; J Clin Oncol 2019, Br J Cancer 2021). Based on the four selected risk factors, we can exclude the patient group with favorable prognosis (i.e., > 90% of 5-year RFS), which accounts for approximately 40% of the total population, resulting in enabling us to identify the concentrated population of high risk of developing recurrence. Methods: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) launched a randomized controlled phase III trial to evaluate the superiority of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) over observation only in stage II CRC patients aged 20–80 years having one or more of the following risk factors: pathological T4, Pn, BD3, and non-Mature DR. Patients are randomised, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to [A] observation, [B] capecitabine monotherapy for 6 months, or [C] capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 months. A total of 1680 patients will be accrued from 54 Japanese institutions assuming 3-year RFS with [A] to be 82% and expected 5% increase in 3-year RFS for [B] and [C] with one-sided alpha of 2.5% and power of 80% for each pair comparison. Patient enrollment was started in January 2020 and 170 patients have been enrolled until January 2021. This trial has been registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031190186. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031190186.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document