Can immunologically hot lung cancer be distinguished from cold tumor by peripheral blood?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Satoshi Muto ◽  
Hayato Mine ◽  
Hironori Takagi ◽  
Masayuki Watanabe ◽  
Yuki Ozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Antigen Specificity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

48 Background: Depending on the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, immunological cold to hot conditions vary. There are several clinical trials of administering immune checkpoint inhibitors as perioperative adjuvant therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally effective in immunologically hot conditions. However, biopsy specimens are not enough to determine the amount of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Therefore, we focused on effector T lymphocytes in peripheral blood, and tried to understand the tumor microenvironment by looking at peripheral blood. Methods: Twenty-four patients with lung cancer who underwent surgery at Fukushima Medical University Hospital from December 2018 to June 2019 were able to separate and collect tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by magnetic cell sorting. Flow cytometry was used to analyze infiltrating lymphocytes and preoperative peripheral blood lymphocytes. Those not expressing CD62L, a marker of Naïve T lymphocytes, were designated as effector T lymphocytes. Results: In the group with a high proportion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, the proportion of CD62L-negative effector CD4 T lymphocytes in peripheral blood was high (p < 0.05). The percentage of lymphocytes in peripheral blood was also high (p < 0.05). Furthermore, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes had a high proportion of effector CD4 T lymphocytes (p < 0.05). There was a similar trend in the proportion of CD8 T lymphocytes, but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: These results showed that immunologically hot cases could be identified by measuring effector CD4 T lymphocytes in peripheral blood. In the future, we will continue to verify the results and examine antigen specificity of these T lymphocytes.

Ανοσοθεραπεία ενάντια στον καρκίνο του παγκρέατος

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Παύλος Παπακοτούλας
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Ciclopirox Olamine ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Το πιο συχνό είδος καρκίνου του παγκρέατος είναι το αδενοκαρκίνωμα του παγκρέατος. Το παγκρεατικό αδενοκαρκίνωμα είναι η 4η κύρια αιτία των θανάτων από καρκίνο παγκοσμίως. Περίπου 60-80% των ασθενών έχουν τη στιγμή της διάγνωσης προχωρημένη νόσο, επειδή ο καρκίνος εισβάλλει στους περιβάλλοντες ιστούς έξω από το πάγκρεας (τοπικά προχωρημένος), ή έχει δώσει μεταστάσεις έξω από το πάγκρεας (μεταστατικός). Καθώς η νόσος παρουσιάζει πολύ υψηλό ποσοστό θνητότητας, κρίνεται επιτακτική η ανάγκη ανεύρεσης νέων αποτελεσματικότερων θεραπειών. Με τη ανάπτυξη της μοριακής και βιολογικής κατανόησης της ογκογενετικής εξέλιξης, εφαρμόστηκαν νέες στρατηγικές στην αντιμετώπιση του καρκίνου και κατ’ επέκταση σε αυτόν της ανοσοθεραπείας του καρκίνου. Η κατανόηση των μοριακών μηχανισμών που διέπουν την ανοσοδιαφυγή των όγκων, αλλά και την αλληλεπίδραση των καρκινικών κυττάρων με τα κύτταρα του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος, έχει δώσει τεράστια ώθηση στην ανοσοθεραπεία του καρκίνου την τελευταία δεκαετία. Τα κύτταρα του ανθρώπινου οργανισμού βρίσκονται υπό διαρκή ανοσιακή επιτήρηση και το ανοσοποιητικό σύστημα αποτελεί αποτρεπτικό μηχανισμό στον νεοπλασματικό μετασχηματισμό και τη δημιουργία νεοπλασιών. Κλινικό σημείο που επιβεβαιώνει τη θεωρία της ανοσοεπιτήρησης είναι η διαπίστωση της παρουσίας CD8+ T-λεμφοκυττάρων μέσα στους όγκους (Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes – TILs). Συνέπεια αυτού είναι και οι θεραπείες που βασίζονται στην καταστολή των σημείων ελέγχου του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors). Είναι γνωστό ότι φάρμακα με αντιμυκητιακές ιδιότητες συμβάλλουν στην ενίσχυση του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος. Ένα χαρακτηριστικό παράδειγμα είναι η κυκλοπιροξολαμίνη (Ciclopirox Olamine, CPX), που χορηγείται σε άτομα που ταλαιπωρούνται από μυκητιάσεις. Σύμφωνα με την παρούσα διατριβή η συγκεκριμένη θεραπεία μπορεί να μειώσει δραστικά την ταχύτητα εξέλιξης των καρκινικών όγκων, αλλά παράλληλα ενισχύει τη δράση των κυτταροστατικών που χορηγούνται στον ασθενή. Επίσης, η τινζαπαρίνη (Ηπαρίνη Χαμηλού Μοριακού Βάρους) χρησιμοποιείται για την πρόληψη και την αντιμετώπιση της φλεβικής θρομβοεμβολής, αλλά από τα αποτελέσματα της παρούσης διατριβής φαίνεται ότι μπορεί να διαδραματίζει ρόλο στην αντιμετώπιση του όγκου. Οι μηχανισμοί στους οποίους οφείλονται τα σημαντικά in vivο αποτελέσματα, είναι η αύξηση της IFN-γ, η αύξηση των CD8+ κυττάρων, η μείωση των Tregs κυττάρων, η μείωση της έκφρασης του VEGFR-2 και η αύξηση της απόπτωσης στα καρκινικά κύτταρα. Στην παρούσα διατριβή, προτείνεται πως η συνδυαστική θεραπεία με τη συμμετοχή της ανοσοθεραπείας, έχει προφανώς υψηλότερη αντινεοπλασματική επίδραση στη μείωση της ανάπτυξης του όγκου, υποδηλώνοντας μια συνεργική δράση. Αυτή η συνεργική στρατηγική μπορεί να ανοίξει νέους δρόμους για τη θεραπεία ασθενών με καρκίνο του παγκρέατος.

Potential role of serum proteome in predicting immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21218-e21218
Author(s):  
Leeseul Kim ◽  
Young Kwang Chae ◽  
Chan Mi Jung ◽  
Emma Yu ◽  
Alice Daeun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21218 Background: Early recognition of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICI) is important. Circulating proteome reflects host response to diseases and is being explored as a marker for response to immunotherapy. We previously have reported that a serum-based proteomics test, Primary Immune Response (PIR) demonstrated a trend that PIR-sensitive patients are more likely to tolerate ICI treatment longer without developing irAEs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The VeriStrat test is another serum-based proteomic assay, which was reported to be predictive of survival outcomes for all treatment regimens and lines of therapy including ICI in NSCLC. We explored the associations between the VeriStrat test and developing irAEs in NSCLC patients treated with ICI. Methods: Data of 70 consented NSCLC patients treated with any regimens and lines of therapy including ICI were collected. Samples were grouped into either VeriStrat ‘Good’(VS-G) or VeriStrat ‘Poor’(VS-P). We analyzed the durations from the immunotherapy initiation to each episode of irAE and each irAE above grade 2 using log-rank test. IrAEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results: Among the 70 patients, 18 patients (25%) experienced one or more irAEs. There was no significant difference in ‘Time to first irAE’ between VS-G and VS-P (p = 0.72, HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.29-2.32). Among 48 VS-G patients, 12(25%) had one or more irAE and 5(10%)had irAE graded over 2. Among 22 VS-P patients, 6(27%) had one or more irAE and 2(9%) had irAE graded over 2. There was no significant difference between VS-G and VS-P groups in the development of irAE and irAE graded over 2. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant association between the VeriStrat test and the development of irAEs. Further studies are warranted to investigate proper serum based proteomic assay to predict the development of irAE.

scholarly journals Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Breast Cancer: Are Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Ready for Prime Time in Breast Cancer?

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cvetanović ◽  
Slađana Filipović ◽  
Nikola Živković ◽  
Miloš Kostić ◽  
Svetislav Vrbić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Prime Time ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

SummaryIn recent years, results obtained from different studies with large cohorts have revealed a bond between the presence of extensive lymphocytic infiltration and favourable prognostic associations in the early-stage of breast cancer (BC) and high response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Examiners used tumors from large cohorts of patients who took part in randomized neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. The importance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) appears to be subtype-specific and varies depending on the histological characteristics of the tumor. TILs have proven to be a good prognostic marker, but only in highly proliferative breast tumors such as triple negative breast tumors (TNBC) or HER 2 positive BC.In the era when standard, well-known, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are ever changing and the use of molecular profiling analyses are increasing, we are looking for techniques to improve our understanding of tumor biology and improve patient outcome. The relevance of TILs cannot be ignored but needs to be properly evaluated in larger prospective studies which must encompass the parameters set out in previous studies. The use of TILs as prognostic biomarkers in early breast cancer may represent a new dawn, and use of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, probably is the future for the breast cancer but it is not yet ready for prime time.

scholarly journals Modulation of peripheral blood immune cells by early use of steroids and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Fucà ◽  
Giulia Galli ◽  
Marta Poggi ◽  
Giuseppe Lo Russo ◽  
Claudia Proto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Use

BackgroundSteroids are frequently used in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), but they could be detrimental for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here, we assessed the association between early use of steroids, clinical outcomes and peripheral immune blood cells modulation in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs.MethodsWe reviewed patients with mNSCLC treated at our institution between April 2013 and December 2017. Early use of steroids was defined as the use of a daily prednisone-equivalent dose ≥10 mg for at least 1 day within 28 days after ICI initiation. Peripheral immune blood cell counts were retrieved at baseline and at 4 and 6 weeks after ICI initiation.ResultsOut of 151 patients included, 35 (23%) made early use of steroids that was associated with poor disease control (OR 0.32, p=0.006), progression-free survival (HR 1.80, p=0.003) and overall survival (HR 2.60, p<0.001). Early use of steroids significantly correlated with higher median absolute neutrophil count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR, and lower median absolute and relative eosinophil count, both at 4 and 6 weeks after ICI initiation.ConclusionsIn patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, early use of steroids was associated with worse clinical outcomes and remarkable modulation of peripheral blood immune cells, which could contribute to restraining the activation of antitumour immunity. If confirmed in prospective studies, these findings would highlight the importance of carefully evaluating and, whenever possible, avoiding steroids during early phases of ICI treatment.

scholarly journals 1769. The Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy on Infections in Lung Cancer Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S652-S652
Author(s):  
Alexandre Malek ◽  
Johny Fares ◽  
Melissa Khalil ◽  
Ray Y Hachem ◽  
Anne-Marie Chaftari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy has ushered cancer treatment into a potentially curative era. However, infectious complications remain largely unknown and the few studies that described infectious complications associated with ICI had no comparative control groups. We assessed the rate of infections in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI plus conventional chemotherapy (CC) vs. CC alone. Methods We performed a comparative single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with NSCLC who received de novo treatment with either Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab, and/or Ipilimumab combined with CC including Pemetrexed and Carboplatin vs. patients treated with CC alone between August 2016 and January 2019. We excluded all patients who were switched from CC to ICI or vice-versa. We evaluated patients’ characteristics, treatment modality, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and outcome. Infections were defined by clinical signs and symptoms, microbiologic documentation, and/or imaging studies. Results A group of 126 patients who received ICI concurrently with CC were compared with 126 patients who received CC alone (control group). Patients in the ICI group were more likely to have stage IV NSCLC compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). Pembrolizumab was most commonly used as a single ICI agent in 107 patients (85%), followed by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as dual therapy (9%). Confirmed infections were identified in 20 (16%) patients in the ICI group and 18 (14%) in the control group (P = 0.7). The control group had a higher rate of multiple infections at different times compared with the ICI group (P = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the types of infections (bacterial, fungal or viral) that occurred between the two groups. The irAEs were reported in 14 (11%) patients, 13 of them received corticosteroids with a median duration of 32 days (range, 15–64 days). Out of these patients, three (21%) developed confirmed infections of which two were viral upper respiratory tract infections and one was a bacterial urinary tract infection. Conclusion Patients with NSCLC treated with the combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Conventional Chemotherapy have comparable risk of developing infections compared with those on Conventional Chemotherapy alone. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Circulating predictive markers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
A. A. Musaelyan ◽  
A. L. Akopov ◽  
S. V. Lapin ◽  
V. D. Nazarov ◽  
D. I. Fillipov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Predictive Markers ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy have become one of the key approaches in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evaluation of level of PD-L1 (ligand of the programmed cell death receptor 1) expression on tumor cells using immunohistochemistry is the only approved option for determining the indications of ICIs in this group of patients. However, despite high level of PD-L1 expression, up to 80 % of patients do not respond to therapy due to the presence of primary or acquired resistance, which determines the limited effectiveness of ICI. In addition, 8–17 % of PD-L1-negative patients with NSCLC are also able to respond to ICIs. The limitation of this marker is that it does not allow assessing both intratumoral and systemic immune status. It is necessary to search for additional predictive markers to improve the accuracy of the selection of candidates for immunotherapy, which will avoid costs, wasted time, and a high risk of immune-related adverse events in potentially unresponsive patients. The attention of researchers is devoted to circulating markers in peripheral blood, as a non-invasive alternative to biopsy for predicting and monitoring the response. This review focuses on the most promising immunological markers in peripheral blood as potential predictors of response to ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio influences impact of steroids on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lauko ◽  
Bicky Thapa ◽  
Mayur Sharma ◽  
Baha’eddin Muhsen ◽  
Addison Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

AbstractSteroids are often utilized to manage patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM). Steroids and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with decreased overall survival (OS) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We retrospectively investigated patients treated with ICI after the diagnosis of NSCLCBM at a single tertiary care institution examing the impact of steroids and NLR. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. 171 patients treated with ICI for NSCLCBM were included. Thirty-six received steroids within 30 days of the start of ICI, and 53 patients had an NLR ≥ 5 before the start of ICI. Upfront steroids was associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis (median OS 10.5 vs. 17.9 months, p = .03) and intracranial PFS (5.0 vs. 8.7 months, p = .045). NLR ≥ 5 was indicative of worse OS (10.5 vs. 18.4 months, p = .04) but not intracranial PFS (7.2 vs. 7.7 months, p = .61). When NLR and upfront steroids are modeled together, there is a strong interaction (p = .0008) indicating that the impact of steroids depended on the patient’s NLR. In a subgroup analysis, only in patients with NLR < 4 was there a significant difference in OS with upfront steroids (26.1 vs. 15.6 months, p = .032). The impact of steroids on the efficacy of ICI in patients with NSCLCBM is dependent on the patient's NLR underscoring its importance in these patients. Patients with a low NLR, steroid use decreases the efficacy of ICI. These results can inform clinicians about the impact of steroids in patients treated with ICI.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Brain Metastases: From Biology to Treatment

2016 ◽  
pp. e116-e122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna S. Berghoff ◽  
Vyshak A. Venur ◽  
Matthias Preusser ◽  
Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Treatment Target ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Extracranial Metastases

Cancer immunotherapy has been a subject of intense research over the last several years, leading to new approaches for modulation of the immune system to treat malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti–CLTA-4 antibodies and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies) potentiate the host’s own antitumor immune response. These immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown impressive clinical efficacy in advanced melanoma, metastatic kidney cancer, and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—all malignancies that frequently cause brain metastases. The immune response in the brain is highly regulated, challenging the treatment of brain metastases with immune-modulatory therapies. The immune microenvironment in brain metastases is active with a high density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in certain patients and, therefore, may serve as a potential treatment target. However, clinical data of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases compared with extracranial metastases are limited, as most clinical trials with these new agents excluded patients with active brain metastases. In this article, we review the current scientific evidence of brain metastases biology with specific emphasis on inflammatory tumor microenvironment and the evolving state of clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with brain metastases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document