Cabozantinib real-world effectiveness in the first through fourth-line settings for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 639-639
Author(s):  
Chun Loo Gan ◽  
Shaan Dudani ◽  
Connor Wells ◽  
Frede Donskov ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Characterization Methods ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure

639 Background: Cabozantinib (Cabo) is approved for mRCC patients based on the METEOR and CABOSUN trials. The real-world effectiveness of Cabo in mRCC patients in the first- (1L), second- (2L), third- (3L) and fourth-line (4L) settings requires characterization. Methods: This retrospective analysis included mRCC patients who were treated with Cabo and stratified using IMDC risk groups. Overall response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: A total of 413 patients (82.6% with clear cell and 17.4% non-clear cell) were identified. The median age was 57 years. Overall, 63% of patients had a Karnofsky performance status score of >80 and 82.6% had prior nephrectomy. 23.1%, 75.4% and 88.3% of patients received immunotherapy as a prior line of treatment, before receiving Cabo in the 2L, 3L and 4L settings, respectively. For patients treated with 1L PD(L)1 combination or monotherapy (n=31), 2nd line Cabo had ORR of 20.8%, median TTF of 5.4 months and median OS of 17.4 months. When segregated into IMDC favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, the median OS was 34.8 months (95% CI 5.52-NR), 18.0 months (12.3-35.6) and 9.8 months (7.4-20.8), p=0.0088, respectively for 2L Cabo; and 31.5 months (23.6-39.3), 20.5 months (10.1-21.8), and 6.9 months (4.1-10.9), p=<0.0001), respectively for 3L Cabo. Conclusions: The ORR and TTF of Cabo were maintained from the 1L to the 4L therapy settings. In the 2L and 3L settings, the IMDC criteria appropriately stratified patients into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups for OS. Cabo has activity after first line immunotherapy.[Table: see text]

Real-world assessment of clinical outcomes among first-line (1L) sunitinib (SUN) patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by the international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) risk group.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 610-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-France Savard ◽  
J Connor Wells ◽  
Jeffrey Graham ◽  
John A. Steinharter ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Trial Design ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Poor Risk

610 Background: Prognostic factors such as the IMDC criteria have included all types of targeted therapy. This study assesses clinical outcomes and provide benchmarks for mRCC pts treated specifically with 1L SUN in the real world to provide contemporary benchmarks for outcomes and survival. Methods: Clear cell mRCC pts initiating SUN as 1L therapy between 2010-2018 were included in a retrospective database study. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS: time to death) by IMDC risk groups based on Karnofsky Performance Status < 80%, diagnosis to treatment interval < 1 year, anemia, neutrophilia, hypercalcemia and thrombocytosis. Results: Among 1,769 1L SUN pts with clear cell in the RW clinical database, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, pts had similar mean age in years, gender distribution, and year of SUN initiation (age: 63.8, 62.9 and 62.6; male: 74%, 75%, and 72%; SUN initiation year of 2010-2013: all 71%). In the favorable risk group, 99% received nephrectomy vs 88% in intermediate and 66% in poor risk group. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months (mos) in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and was 7.1 mos in the combined intermediate/poor risk groups. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 mos in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and was 23.2 mos in the combined intermediate/poor risk groups. Conclusions: This real world study based on a contemporary cohort of 1L SUN mRCC pts found a median OS of 52 mos which sets a new benchmark for clear cell mRCC in the favorable risk group. OS in the intermediate and poor risk groups are similar to previous reports. This affects pt counselling and clinical trial design.

scholarly journals NCOG-76. BASELINE COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN GLIOMA PATIENTS WITH MGMT PROMOTOR METHYLATION AND/OR 1p19q CODELETION

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii146-ii146
Author(s):  
Sydney Park ◽  
Abigail Giles ◽  
Grace Liberatore ◽  
Katherine Morgan ◽  
Cynthia DeBruhl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Executive Functioning ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Neuropsychological Testing ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
1P19q Codeletion ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Chemotherapy Administration

Abstract INTRODUCTION Methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status is associated with better overall survival while 1p19q co-deletion is associated with long-term survival. Cognitive dysfunction is a common complication of brain tumors and treatment; however, information regarding the relationship between MGMT status, 1p19q codeletion, and cognition is limited. METHOD Baseline neuropsychological testing was performed in patients with malignant glioma prior to radiation and/or chemotherapy administration. A retrospective data analysis was conducted. We calculated composite and subdomain scores for attention/executive functioning, memory, and language in patients with or without MGMT promotor methylation and/or 1p19q codeletion. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (Age M = 48.73 ± 14.98; 50% female) diagnosed with glioma (29% grade II, 16% grade III, 21% grade IV; Karnofsky Performance Status score (KPS) M = 88.75 ± 14.24) were selected from a retrospective. Memory was marginally significant, such that methylated participants performed better on memory tasks than the unmethylated group (p = .053). Independent samples t-test revealed no significant differences between either marker across the overall cognitive composite (methylated M = 41.35; unmethylated: M = 39.91; p = .955; 1p19q co-deleted: M = 50.94; 1p19q intact: M = 43.66; p = .158) and subdomains attention/executive functioning (p = .585; p = .157) and language (p = .581; p = .765). Logistic regression showed MGMT does not predict cognitive status (p =.052) and there were not enough cases to complete the model with 1p19q. CONCLUSION MGMT status may be correlated with baseline cognitive status as MGMT methylated patients had better memory scores than their unmethylated counterparts. We did not find any significant association between the remaining cognitive domains and MGMT or 1p19q although sample size is a significant limitation. These results suggest further assessment of changes in cognition during treatment through serial neuropsychological testing of glioma populations with defined marker status is warranted.

Radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale Ding ◽  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
Ian T. McNeill ◽  
Chun-Po Yen ◽  
Jason P. Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Tumor Control Rate ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Status Score ◽  
Performance Status Score

Object Parasagittal and parafalcine (PSPF) meningiomas represent the second most common location for intracranial meningiomas. Involvement of the superior sagittal sinus or deep draining veins may prevent gross-total resection of these tumors without significant morbidity. The authors review their results for treatment of PSPF meningiomas with radiosurgery. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the institutional review board–approved University of Virginia Gamma Knife database and identified 65 patients with 90 WHO Grade I parasagittal (59%) and parafalcine (41%) meningiomas who had a mean MRI follow-up of 56.6 months. The patients' mean age was 57 years, the median preradiosurgery Karnofsky Performance Status score was 80, and the median initial tumor and treatment volumes were 3 and 3.7 cm3, respectively. The median prescription dose was 15 Gy, isodose line was 40%, and the number of isocenters was 5. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with PFS. Results The median overall PFS was 75.6 months. The actuarial tumor control rate was 85% at 3 years and 70% at 5 years. Parasagittal location, no prior resection, and younger age were found to be independent predictors of tumor PFS. For the 49 patients with clinical follow-up (mean 70.8 months), the median postradiosurgery Karnofsky Performance Status score was 90. Symptomatic postradiosurgery peritumoral edema was observed in 4 patients (8.2%); this group comprised 3 patients (6.1%) with temporary and 1 patient (2%) with permanent clinical sequelae. Two patients (4.1%) died of tumor progression. Conclusions Radiosurgery offers a minimally invasive treatment option for PSPF meningiomas, with a good tumor control rate and an acceptable complication rate comparable to most surgical series.

Safety and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and low Karnofsky performance status: Results from the CheckMate 920 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
Jeffrey Yorio ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Heidi Ann McKean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

315 Background: Combination therapy with nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and tolerability for patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Most pivotal clinical trials in pts with aRCC have excluded pts with low Karnofsky performance status (KPS; < 70%). CheckMate 920 is a multi-arm, phase IIIb/IV, open-label clinical trial of NIVO+IPI treatment in pts enrolled in a community practice setting with aRCC and a high unmet medical need. We present safety and efficacy results for the cohort of pts with aRCC of any histology and KPS 50%–60% from CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954). Methods: Pts with previously untreated advanced/metastatic RCC and KPS 50%–60% received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × 4 doses followed by 480 mg NIVO Q4W for ≤ 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 (both per investigator). Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: Of 25 treated pts with KPS 50%–60%, 76% were men; median age was 67 years (range, 34–81). IMDC risk was favorable in 0%, intermediate in 32%, and poor in 68% of pts; 84% had clear cell and 16% had non-clear cell RCC histology. With a minimum follow-up of 25 months, median duration of therapy (95% CI) was 2.3 months (2.1–7.7) for NIVO and 2.1 months (2.1–2.1) for IPI. The median number of doses (range) received was 4 (1–27) for NIVO and 4 (1–4) for IPI; 76% of pts received ≥ 4 NIVO doses and 68% received all 4 IPI doses. The only grade 3–4 imAEs by category were hepatitis (4.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (4.0%). No grade 5 imAEs occurred. Overall, 4 (16%) pts discontinued due to any-grade adverse events (n = 1 each for elevated AST, malignant neoplasm progression, back pain, and acetabulum fracture). Of 18 evaluable pts, ORR was 33.3% (95% CI, 13.3–59.0); no pts had a complete response and 6 had partial response. Median time to objective response was 4.5 months (range, 2.5–24.7). Median duration of objective response was 20.6 months (range, 0.03+–24.2+). Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5–14.8). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–25.1). Conclusions: NIVO+IPI demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with previously untreated aRCC and KPS 50%–60%. The combination was tolerated at a dose intensity similar to that observed in clinical trials conducted in pts with higher KPS (≥ 70%). These data support the value of NIVO+IPI in pts who may not be considered ideal candidates for this therapy and consequently may have limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT02982954 .

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Subventricular Zone Glioblastoma Contact and Ventricular Entry During Resection in Predicting Dissemination, Hydrocephalus, and Survival

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. E924-E932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshitkumar M Mistry ◽  
Patrick D Kelly ◽  
Jean-Nicolas Gallant ◽  
Nishit Mummareddy ◽  
Bret C Mobley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subventricular Zone ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Leptomeningeal Dissemination ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Radiation Treatments ◽  
Distant Tumor

Abstract BACKGROUND Ventricular entry during glioblastoma resection and tumor contact with the subventricular zone (SVZ) have both been shown to associate with development of hydrocephalus, leptomeningeal dissemination, distant parenchymal recurrence, and decreased survival. However, prior studies did not analyze these variables together in a single-patient population; therefore, it is unknown which is an independent predictor of these outcomes. OBJECTIVE To conduct a comparative outcome analysis of surgical ventricular entry and SVZ contact by glioblastoma in a retrospective cohort of 232 patients. METHODS Outcomes studied included hydrocephalus, leptomeningeal dissemination, distant tumor recurrences, and progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. The Cox proportional regression analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, preoperative Karnofsky performance status score, extent of resection, temozolomide and radiation treatments, and tumor molecular status (specifically, IDH1/2 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation). RESULTS Surgical ventricular entry, SVZ-contacting glioblastoma, hydrocephalus, leptomeningeal dissemination, and distant recurrences were observed in 85 (36.6%), 114 (49.1%), 19 (8.2%), 78 (33.6%), and 59 (25.4%) patients, respectively. Multivariate, adjusted analysis revealed SVZ tumor contact—but not ventricular entry—associated with hydrocephalus (hazard ratio, HR, 4.20 [1.13-15.7], P = .03), leptomeningeal dissemination (HR 1.93 [1.14-3.28], P = .01), PFS (HR 2.10 [1.53-2.88], P &lt; .001), and OS (HR 1.90 [1.35-2.67], P &lt; .001). Distant recurrences were not associated with either. No interaction between the 2 variables was statistically noted. CONCLUSION SVZ contact by glioblastoma was independently associated with the development of hydrocephalus, leptomeningeal dissemination, and decreased survival. SVZ tumor contact was associated with ventricular entry during surgical resections, which did not independently correlate with these outcomes.

Activity of MVA 5T4 alone or in combination with either interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon-α (IFN) in patients (Pts) with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3069-3069
Author(s):  
A. Cao ◽  
J. Hernandez-McClain ◽  
J. Willis ◽  
R. Harrop ◽  
W. Shingler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Clinical Activity

3069 Background: MVA 5T4 consists of the highly attenuated modified Vaccinia Ankara virus containing the gene encoding the human TAA 5T4. Ninety percent or more of RCCs overexpress the 5T4 antigen. A series of clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of MVA 5T4 as a single agent or in combination with Interleukin-2 or Interferon Alpha 2B. Methods: Eligibility: pathologic diagnosis of clear cell or papillary RCC, progressive measurable metastases, any prior therapy, adequate physiologic parameters, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) = 80%, and no active CNS involvement. A regimen of MVA 5T4 alone or in combination with IFN or IL-2 was given. Results: A total of 41 patients received MVA 5T4 alone or in combination. 33 patients received MVA 5T4 with low dose IL-2 or IFN. 23 pts had clear cell; 12 papillary; 5 mixed clear cell; and 1 mixed papillary. 19 pts continue to receive therapy. 2 pts (both clear cell RCC) developed complete responses, 3 pts/partial responses (2 clear cell, 1 papillary) 8 pts/stable for 3+months and 6 pts are too early to be staged at this time. Median duration of therapy is 3.0+ (1+-13+) months. Conclusion: Although comparable antibody response were observed in papillary and clear cell histotypes, clear cell patients appeared to be more likely to respond in terms of clinical benefit parameters, to be presented. Of note is that preliminary analysis of clear cell patients suggests a relationship between the anti-5T4 immune response and tumor response. With the immunological potency and encouraging clinical activity, the future research will focus on the phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel group study to investigate whether MVA 5T4, added to first line standard of care therapy, prolongs the survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic clear cell as well as studies to further optimize MVA 5T4 potency. [Table: see text]

A multicentered population-based analysis of outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 353-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Georg A. Bjarnason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Number Of Patients

353 Background: Clinical trials have strict eligibility criteria to maintain internal validity. These criteria exclude many patients to whom the trial results are later applied to in clinical practice. Patients that do not meet eligibility criteria are poorly characterized. Methods: mRCC patients treated with VEGF targeted therapy were retrospectively deemed ineligible for clinical trials (according to commonly used inclusion/exclusion criteria) if they had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70%, brain metastases, non-clear cell histology, hemoglobin ≤ 9 g/dL, creatinine > 2x the upper limit of normal, platelet count of < 100x103/uL, neutrophil count < 1500/mm3 or corrected calcium ≤ 12 mg/dL. Results: 894/2076 (43%) patients were deemed ineligible for clinical trials by the above criteria. Between ineligible versus eligible patients, the response rate, median progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival of first-line targeted therapy were 21% vs 29%, 5.2 vs 8.8 months and 14.5 vs 28.8 months (all p < 0.0001), respectively. Second-line PFS (if applicable) was 3.2 months in the trial ineligible vs 4.4 months in the trial eligible patients (p = 0.0074). When adjusted by the Heng et al prognostic categories, the hazard ratio for death between trial ineligible vs trial eligible patients was 1.621 (95% CI = 1.431–1.836, p < 0.0001). If only KPS, brain metastases and non-clear cell histology were used as exclusion criteria, 672 (32%) patients were excluded and the results were similar. Conclusions: The number of patients that are ineligible for clinical trials is high and their outcomes are inferior. Designing more inclusive clinical trials for this “ineligible” patient population are needed. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Is Function-Based Resection Using Intraoperative Awake Brain Mapping Feasible and Safe for Solitary Brain Metastases Within Eloquent Areas?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Pelletier ◽  
Alessandro Moiraghi ◽  
Marc Zanello ◽  
Alexandre Roux ◽  
Sophie Peeters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Solitary Brain Metastasis ◽  
Neurological Condition ◽  
Eloquent Areas ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status Score ◽  
Status Score ◽  
Performance Status Score

Abstract ObjectiveTo assess feasibility and safety of function-based resection under awake conditions for solitary brain metastasis patients.MethodsRetrospective, observational, single-institution case-control study (2014-2019). Inclusion criteria: adult patients, solitary brain metastasis, supratentorial location within eloquent areas, function-based awake resection. Case matching (1:1) criteria between metastasis group and control group (high-grade gliomas): sex, tumor location, tumor volume, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score, age, educational level.ResultsTwenty patients were included. Intraoperatively, all patients were cooperative, no obstacles precluded procedure from being performed. A positive functional mapping was achieved at both cortical and subcortical levels, allowing for a function-based resection in all patients. The case-matched analysis showed that intraoperative and postoperative events were similar, except for a shorter duration of the surgery (p<0.001) and of the awake phase (p<0.001) in the metastasis group. A total resection was performed in 18 cases (90%, including 10 supramarginal resections), and a partial resection was performed in two cases (10%). At three months postoperative months, none of the patients had worsening of their neurological condition or uncontrolled seizures, three patients had an improvement in their seizure control, and seven patients had a Karnofsky Performance Status score increase ≥10 points.ConclusionsFunction-based resection under awake conditions preserving the brain connectivity is feasible and safe in the specific population of solitary brain metastasis patients and allows for high resection rates within eloquent brain areas while preserving the overall and neurological condition of the patients. Awake craniotomy should be considered to optimize outcomes in brain metastases in eloquent areas.

Weekly doxorubicin in endocrine-refractory carcinoma of the prostate.

1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Torti ◽  
D Aston ◽  
B L Lum ◽  
M Kohler ◽  
R Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marked Improvement ◽  
Prostatic Cancer ◽  
Prostatic Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastrointestinal Toxicity ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Cancer Project

Twenty-five patients with endocrine-refractory prostatic carcinoma were treated with doxorubicin, 20 mg/m2 given weekly. All patients had prior hormonal therapy (68% had two or more prior hormonal maneuvers), and 21 (84%) had prior therapeutic or palliative irradiation. Median Karnofsky performance status at the time of entry was 70. Hemoglobin was less than 12.0 g/dL in 15 patients. Bidimensional tumors were present in 12 patients in 19 disease sites; four of the 12 patients (33%) responded in eight of the 19 sites (42%); and three of eight patients had a 75% decrease in prostatic nodule size. Ten of 20 evaluable patients had an improvement of 20% or greater in Karnofsky performance status and 67% (14 of 21) had marked improvement in pain. A greater than 50% reduction or normalization of acid phosphatase occurred in 19% and of alkaline phosphatase in 53%. The overall response rate by National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria was 84%. Gastrointestinal toxicity and alopecia were minimal and myelosuppression was not life threatening in any patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document