PIVOT-10: A phase II study of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) in cisplatin (cis) ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS589-TPS589
Author(s):  
Robert A. Huddart ◽  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Arjun Vasant Balar ◽  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Evaluable Population ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
New Treatment

TPS589 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors can achieve durable responses in cis-ineligible 1L mUC. However, use is restricted to patients whose tumors are PD-L1 high. Approximately 70% of cis-ineligible patients have tumors with low PD-L1 expression, leaving a significant proportion of 1L mUC patients in need of new treatment options. Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG; NKTR-214) is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist designed to provide sustained signaling through the IL-2 βγ receptor. NIVO is an anti-PD-1 antibody that is approved for treatment in several types of cancers, including 2L mUC after treatment with a platinum agent. Early BEMPEG plus NIVO data in 1L mUC (cis-eligible and -ineligible) patients found an objective response rate (ORR) of 48% (13/27) in the efficacy evaluable population (defined as having undergone at least one post-baseline scan) and a CR rate of 19%, prompting this further exploration of BEMPEG plus NIVO in a phase 2 study (Siefker-Radke, 2019). Methods: This Phase 2 multi-national trial evaluates BEMPEG plus NIVO in previously untreated patients with cis-ineligible mUC. Eligibility also requires tumor tissue be analyzed by central laboratory to document PD-L1 status. Approximately 205 patients will be enrolled. BEMPEG (0.006 mg/kg) and NIVO (360 mg) are given intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint is ORR assessed per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients with low PD-L1 expression (defined as Combined Positive Score [CPS] < 10). Secondary endpoints include ORR and duration of response in all treated patients, safety, and tolerability. Tumor and blood samples will be collected for biomarker analyses. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03785925.

A phase Ib study of combination of avelumab and taxane-based chemotherapy in platinum refractory or ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (AVETAX study).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Garje ◽  
Timothy Ginader ◽  
Douglas Earl Laux ◽  
Kenneth Gerard Nepple ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

487 Background: Advanced bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary system with 5-year OS rates of 5-7%. Platinum based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors are currently available treatment options but with limited benefit. We hypothesize that combining Avelumab (anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy) with Docetaxel is safe and will lead to cancer cell death releasing neoantigens with enhanced anti-tumor immune mediated cytotoxicity. Methods: This is a phase 1b, single arm, non-randomized, open label prospective clinical trial to evaluate the combination of Avelumab and Docetaxel in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy. It has two phases: Phase 1b dose de-escalation of docetaxel (Level 0: 75, Level -1: 60 or Level -2: 45 mg/m2) with standard dose avelumab (10 mg/kg) to establish phase 2 dose in the standard 3+3 design. In the dose expansion phase, the phase 2 dose of docetaxel with avelumab will be evaluated for efficacy. The combination therapy is administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then avelumab alone is continued every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint is safety. Efficacy endpoints include objective response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Results: At the cutoff date of 10/21/2019, 10 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Only one of the six patients treated with level 0 dose of docetaxel had a dose limiting toxicity (neutropenic fever). Docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 along the avelumab was deemed safe for dose expansion cohort. Additional 4 patients were enrolled in the dose expansion cohort. Efficacy data is preliminary with 1 patient achieving CR, 2 pts had PR, 2 pts had SD, 1 pt PD and 4 pts are not yet evaluable. The most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs were febrile neutropenia, urinary tract infection and confusion. No treatment related deaths were noted. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel in combination with avelumab is safe and the preliminary data showed promising efficacy, further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03575013.

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Phase II study of cabozantinib (cabo) combined with pembrolizumab (pembro) in metastatic or recurrent gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEC) to overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS253-TPS253
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Chloe Thomas ◽  
Gwendolyn Ung ◽  
Thomas H Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Number Of Patients

TPS253 Background: GEC is the third leading cause of cancer mortality and the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based combinations are the most commonly used 1L treatment regimens. There are few standard treatment options after 1st line regimens. In the 3L+ GEC Keynote-059 trial, objective response rate (ORR) with Pembro was 15.5% in PD-L1(+) vs. 6.4% in PD-L1(-) tumors. While the responses were durable, the 6-months PFS (6-PFS) was only 14.1% and the median PFS was 2.0 mo. This highlights the remaining unmet need for the majority of patients who either are refractory or develop disease progression following treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in GEC. Cabo plus checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical benefit in various cancers including hepatocellular, renal cell (RCC), urothelial and castration-resistant prostate cancers. In the CheckMate-9ER trial, Cabo+Nivolumab improved both OS and PFS vs sunitinib in 1L RCC. In patients with RCC who had progression on anti-PD1 inhibitor treatment, Cabo showed promising activity with an ORR of 33% and DCR of 79% (ESMO 2018, abstract 3793). Hypothesis: Based on preclinical and clinical observations, Cabo might contribute to overcoming primary or secondary resistance to PD-1 blockade in GEC. Methods: Prospective, open label, non-randomized phase 2 trial. Eligibility: Diagnosis of GEC, 2+ line of treatment including previous fluoropyrimidine/platinum, ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, prior checkpoint inhibitor if tumor PD-L1 CPS≥10%. Treatment: Cabozantinib 40mg PO daily, Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of 21d cycle. Primary objective: Feasibility of the combination and estimate of efficacy. Primary endpoint:PFS-6. Secondary objectives: OS, ORR, adverse events. Total number of patients to be enrolled N = 27. Current enrollment (Sep 2020) N = 10. Statistics: If the PFS-6 is > 25%, the study would be regarded as positive, in which case it is planned to expand patient enrollment into a larger single arm phase 2 trial with additional sites to establish the efficacy of the regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT04164979.

scholarly journals Atezolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer: a pooled analysis from the Spanish patients of the IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and 211 studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sotelo ◽  
T. Alonso-Gordoa ◽  
P. Gajate ◽  
E. Gallardo ◽  
R. Morales-Barrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Background The studies IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) upon progression to platinum-based chemotherapy worldwide. Yet, the real impact of this drug in specific geographical regions is unknown. Materials and methods We combined individual-level data from the 131 patients recruited in Spain from IMvigor210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 in a pooled analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the overall study population and according to PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Results Full data were available for 127 patients; 74 (58%) received atezolizumab and 53 (42%) chemotherapy. Atezolizumab patients had a numerically superior median overall survival although not reaching statistical significance (9.2 months vs 7.7 months). No statistically significant differences between arms were observed in overall response rates (20.3% vs 37.0%) or progression-free survival (2.1 months vs 5.3 months). Nonetheless, median duration of response was superior for the immunotherapy arm (non-reached vs 6.4 months; p = 0.005). Additionally, among the responders, the 12-month survival rates seemed to favour atezolizumab (66.7% vs 19.9%). When efficacy was analyzed based on PD-L1 expression status, no significant differences were found. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred more frequently in the chemotherapy arm [46/57 (81%) vs 44/74 (59%)]. Conclusion Patients who achieved an objective response on atezolizumab presented a longer median duration of response and numerically superior 12 month survival rates when compared with chemotherapy responders along with a more favorable safety profile. PD-L1 expression did not discriminate patients who might benefit from atezolizumab.

EV-301: Phase III study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin (EV) versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS497-TPS497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Ignacio Duran ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS497 Background: Standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with la/mUC is cisplatin-based chemotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy for pts unfit for cisplatin. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard treatment options for pts who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. While some pts with la/mUC achieve durable responses with CPIs, less than 25% of pts respond. Following failure of a CPI, no therapies are approved. Enfortumab vedotin is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to tumors expressing Nectin-4, which is expressed in 97% of mUC pt samples (Petrylak et al. ASCO, 2017). In a phase 1 study (EV-101; NCT02091999), single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 42% across the overall population of pts with mUC; in pts with prior CPI therapy or liver metastasis at baseline confirmed ORRs of 42% and 36% were observed. A pivotal phase 2 study of EV in la/mUC pts with prior CPI treatment (EV-201; NCT03219333) is ongoing. Methods: EV-301 is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial (NCT03474107) enrolling adult pts with la/mUC and an ECOG performance status score ≤1, who have received a prior platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have experienced disease progression during or following treatment with a CPI. Approximately 550 pts will be randomized (1:1) to receive EV (1.25 mg/kg) administered by IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle ( Arm A), or investigator choice of IV docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine (EU only) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle ( Arm B). Treatment with the study drug will continue until radiological disease progression, intolerance, or other discontinuation criterion is met. Radiological assessments of tumor response status will be performed at baseline and every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall response rate, as well as assessment of safety/tolerability, and quality-of-life parameters. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

TROPHY-u-01: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS495-TPS495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS495 Background: Patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy and pts ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy who progress after CPI have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Trop-2 is an epithelial cell surface antigen that is overexpressed in UC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that targets Trop-2 and delivers the active metabolite (SN38) of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan to tumor cells. In a phase 1/2 single-arm trial, pts with advanced cancers received SG 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle; preliminary results in the cohort of 41 evaluable pts with mUC and a median of 3 (range 1–6) prior therapies showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 34%. Adverse events (AE) were mostly low grade, including diarrhea (63%), nausea (56%), and fatigue (49%). Neutropenia (all grades) occurred in 49% of pts (≥ grade 3/4, 39%; treatment-related serious AE of febrile neutropenia, 5%). Median overall survival was 16.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 7.1 months. These results warrant further investigation in a dedicated phase 2 trial. Methods: TROPHY-U-01 is a single-arm, open-label, global phase 2 trial evaluating the antitumor activity and safety of SG in 140 pts with advanced UC. The primary cohort (progression after platinum chemotherapy and CPI) will enroll 100 pts in a Simon 2-stage design with > 90% power accounting for dropouts to exclude the null hypothesis or ORR < 12%, while a second cohort (40 pts) will comprise cisplatin-ineligible pts who received prior CPI. The primary objective is ORR per RECIST 1.1, assessed by central review. Secondary objectives include response duration, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Enrollment began in August 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

EV-201: Results of enfortumab vedotin monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer previously treated with platinum and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4505-4505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Arjun Vasant Balar ◽  
Peter H. O'Donnell ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated

4505 Background: Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) remains a lethal disease with limited treatment options for patients (pts) who progress on or after platinum and/or checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in UC. EV-201 is a pivotal, single-arm, two-cohort study of EV in la/mUC patients with prior CPI and platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cohort 1) or a CPI and no prior chemotherapy (Cohort 2). Here, we present preliminary data from Cohort 1. Methods: Pts in this open-label, multicenter study received 1.25 mg/kg EV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints are duration of response, PFS, OS, safety/tolerability. Results: Between Oct 2017 and Jul 2018, EV-201 enrolled 128 pts in Cohort 1 (la/mUC pts previously treated with platinum and a CPI), 125 of whom were treated with EV (70% male; median age 69 y [range 40–84 y]; 34% upper tract; a median of 2 prior systemic therapies). As of 03 Jan 2019, the confirmed ORR was 42% (95% CI: 33.6%–51.6%), with 9% CR. The ORR in CPI non-responders was 38% (95% CI: 27.3%–49.2%), and 36% (95% CI: 22.9%–50.8%) in pts with liver metastases (LM). Most common treatment-related AEs, as determined by investigators, included fatigue (50%), alopecia (48%), and decreased appetite (41%). Treatment-related AEs of interest include any rash (48% all grade, 11% ≥ G3) and any peripheral neuropathy (50% all grade, 3% ≥ G3). One death was reported as treatment related by the investigator (interstitial lung disease), but was confounded by a suspected pulmonary infection. Conclusions: Preliminary results from this EV pivotal study demonstrated a clinically meaningful ORR, consistent with the phase 1 trial, in la/mUC pts with prior platinum and CPI, including LM pts, where there is a high unmet need. EV was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile in these pts. Updated data, including duration of response, PFS, and OS will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03219333.

Preliminary results from a phase II study of nivolumab for patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludimila Cavalcante ◽  
Benedito A. Carneiro ◽  
Ricardo Lima Barros Costa ◽  
Young Kwang Chae ◽  
Alfred Rademaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Initial Report

96 Background: ACC is an exceedingly rare malignancy with an estimated incidence of 0.7 cases per million per year. Patients presenting with metastatic disease have an estimated 5-year survival rate of < 15%, without effective standard treatment options. Immunotherapy approaches such as checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as effective therapies for multiple malignancies. Nivolumab, a monoclonal IgG4 antibody against the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor on T-cells, acts by inhibiting the interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2 and thus eliciting an increased anti-tumor immune response. This phase II study will assess the efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy according to objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced ACC – the study is currently in the patient enrollment phase. Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced ACC with disease progression after treatment with ≥ 1 line of therapy (including mitotane and/or chemotherapy), or not eligible for first-line chemotherapy are currently being enrolled on this phase II study. Nivolumab is given at a fixed dose of 240mg IV q2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Planned accrual of up to 33 patients will follow a Simon two stage design with interim analysis for efficacy after 10 evaluable patients are enrolled. Results: This is an initial report of the first 7 evaluable patients enrolled on study. Median age 57 years; female (4/7); endocrine hyperfunction (2/7); prior chemotherapy with EDP +/- mitotane (5/7). Patients were treated with a median of 4 doses of nivolumab. Median time to progression of 8 weeks. Best overall response rate thus far has been progression of disease in 5 pts, with 2 pts pending evaluation. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to nivolumab: tremor, hypokalemia (1 pt each). Reported grade 1 and 2 AEs: LFT elevation (3 pts), lower extremity edema (2 pts), lymphopenia, urinary frequency and fatigue (1 pt each). Conclusions: Nivolumab has been well tolerated in this population of patients with metastatic ACC. Clinical trial information: NCT02720484.

scholarly journals Actual treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
Anastasia V. Ignatova
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
New Information ◽  
New Treatment

Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), is the second most frequent type of skin cancer, and its incidence continues to rise all over the world. Usually has a benign clinical behavior, but it can be presented as locally invasive and metastatic aggressive tumor with 2% mortality rate. Nowadays, new risk factors for have appeared, that form pharmacologically-induced CSCC after immunosuppressant drugs used for organ transplantation, or BRAF inhibitors used for melanoma. In recent years we have got a new information about the role of mutational burden, signaling pathways involved in CSCC development and new possibilities and molecules for targeted therapy. Better understanding of the immune system functioning and benefits of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1) for CSCC that has changed the therapeutic approach. According to recent clinical trials data, new treatment options with PD-1 inhibitors achieved a response rate of 50% for locally advanced CSCC and 47% for metastatic CSCC, including 16.1% complete remissions. This review focuses on the molecular profile, targeted therapies and immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic CSCC.

Phase 2 study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for previously-treated malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8549-8549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepti Venkatraman ◽  
Adrienne Anderson ◽  
Subba Digumarthy ◽  
Patrick H. Lizotte ◽  
Mark M. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Pre Treatment

8549 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with MPM who experience disease progression after first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. This study was designed to explore the activity of combined CTLA-4 + PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition using tremelimumab plus durvalumab in previously-treated MPM. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 study of tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks for four cycles followed by durvalumab maintenance every 4 weeks. Eligible pts had previously received pemetrexed-based platinum doublet chemotherapy and had measurable disease using modified RECIST criteria for mesothelioma. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) as well as safety and tolerability of this combination. A Simon two-stage design was employed to enroll up to 40 patients if 4 or more responses were observed among the first 19 study patients. Pre-treatment, on-treatment, and optional post-progression biopsies underwent flow cytometric immunoprofiling for correlative studies. Results: Among 19 pts enrolled in this study, the best objective response was a confirmed partial response in one patient (5%), stable disease in 9 pts (47%), progressive disease in 8 pts (42%), and not evaluable in one patient. At a median follow-up of 7.1 months, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.04-5.72), and the median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI 6.24-not reached). Of 17 PD-L1 evaluable cases, 10 (59%) were PD-L1 negative, and 7 (41%) had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥1%. Treatment was generally well-tolerated and there were no treatment-related study discontinuations or deaths. Flow cytometric immunologic changes over the course of treatment associated with disease control will be presented. Conclusions: Tremelimumab + durvalumab was well-tolerated in unselected pts with previously-treated MPM. This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Additional strategies are necessary to develop novel immunotherapeutics and biomarkers of response in MPM. Clinical trial information: NCT03075527.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document