FIDES-02, a phase Ib/II study of derazantinib (DZB) as monotherapy and combination therapy with atezolizumab (A) in patients with surgically unresectable or metastaticurothelial cancer (UC) and FGFR genetic aberrations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS590-TPS590
Author(s):  
Arvind Chaudhry ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Maria De Santis ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Maximal Effect ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genetic Aberrations ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS590 Background: Deregulation of the FGFR signaling pathway is implicated in various cancers. In UC, FGFR genetic aberrations include FGFR1/2/3 mutations (M) and, less commonly, fusions (F), while the role of amplifications warrants further research. Prognosis of UC patients is overall poor and treatment options are limited. DZB is an oral small-molecule FGFR1/2/3 and CSF1R kinase inhibitor, which demonstrated promising antitumor activity in preclinical studies, including FGFR-driven patient-derived xenograft models. Preclinical data show that DZB reduced CSF1-stimulated CSF1R phosphorylation in macrophages, with a maximal effect similar to the CSF1R inhibitor BLZ945, suggesting DZB could have an effect on tumor-associated macrophage regulation. Thus, DZB+A (PD-L1 immune-checkpoint blockade [ICB]) is a rationale combination for immunogenic tumors like UC. FIDES-02 is a multicenter, multicohort open-label Phase 1b/2 study evaluating the effect of DZB as monotherapy and DZB+A combination. Methods: The study evaluates 300 mg DZB p.o. daily or DZB+A (1200 mg i.v.) in UC patients with FGFR1-3 M/F per liquid or tissue biopsy-based NGS. Cohort 1 (C1) enrolls pts after one or more standard chemotherapy ± ICB regimens (Phase 2; treatment: DZB); C2 enrolls patients with any advanced solid tumor, any FGFR status, any prior treatment (Phase 1b; for RP2D of DZB+A); C3 enrolls first-line patients with cisplatin-ineligible, PD-L1-low UC (Phase 2; DZB v DZB+A); C4 enrolls UC patients resistant to FGFR inhibitor treatment (Phase 2; DZB v DZB+A). Treatment will continue until disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. Using Simon’s two-stage designs, objective response rate (per RECIST 1.1 central review) is the primary endpoint to assess the antitumor activity of DZB or DZB+A in Ph2. Main secondary objectives include evaluation of median PFS, duration of response, safety profile, HR-QoL (incl., QLQ C30, FACT-Bl, EQ-5D), and symptom response from baseline. The study was initiated in July 2019 and C1 (N=71) and C2 (N=24) are currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04045613.

A phase Ib/II dose-escalation study evaluating triple combination therapy with a BRAF (encorafenib), MEK (binimetinib), and CDK 4/6 (ribociclib) inhibitor in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors and melanoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9518-9518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
Oliver Bechter ◽  
Pascal Wolter ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Elena Elez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Triple Combination Therapy ◽  
Phase 1B

9518 Background: The benefits of BRAF + MEK inhibition (dual combo) in pts with BRAF V600-mutant ( BRAFV600) melanoma are known. Preclinical data supports inhibiting CDK 4/6 and BRAF + MEK (triple combo) to improve antitumor activity. We report safety and preliminary efficacy from a phase 1b/2 study (NCT01543698) of encorafenib (ENCO; a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor), binimetinib (BINI; a MEK inhibitor), and ribociclib (RIBO; a CDK 4/6 inhibitor). Methods: Phase 1b of this open-label, multicenter study enrolled pts with confirmed BRAFV600advanced solid tumors. Escalating doses of RIBO 100 mg-600 mg QD for 3 wk on/1 wk off were administered with ENCO 200 mg QD + BINI 45 mg BID in successive cohorts (6 pts each) until the maximum tolerated or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was reached. Due to potential pharmacokinetic interactions with RIBO, the ENCO dose was lower than the dual combo RP2D (450 mg QD). Dose escalations followed an adaptive Bayesian model. In phase 2, the triple combo was tested in pts with BRAFV600melanoma naïve to prior BRAF inhibitor treatment; the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In phase 1b (n = 21), no dose-limiting toxicities were reported and the triple combo RP2D was ENCO 200 mg QD + BINI 45 mg BID + RIBO 600 mg QD. ENCO AUC was slightly lower than at the dual combo RP2D. In phase 2 (n = 42), 59.5% pts had an ECOG PS of 0 and 43% of pts had elevated lactate dehydrogenase. The most common (≥5%) grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.2%), increased alanine transaminase (14.3%), diarrhea (7.1%), and anemia (7.1%). Ten pts (23.8%) discontinued treatment due to an AE, of which 4 were increased transaminases. The confirmed ORR was 52.4%, including 4 complete responses, 18 partial responses, and 15 pts with stable disease. Median duration of exposure in phase 2 was 9.1 mo (range, 0.0-21.6). Median progression-free survival was 9.0 mo (95% confidence interval, 7.0-11.1). Conclusions: Triple therapy with ENCO + BINI + RIBO in this small trial of pts with high disease burden was associated with responses in over half of pts and some evidence of increased toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT01543698.

scholarly journals CTNI-45. A PHASE 1B/2 CLINICAL STUDY OF NAPABUCASIN IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR ADULT PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT OR PROGRESSED GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii52-ii52
Author(s):  
Andrew Chi ◽  
Paula DeRobles ◽  
Emma Foos ◽  
Matthew Hitron ◽  
Warren Mason
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Napabucasin is an orally-administered NQO1–bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including STAT3. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study assessed napabucasin plus temozolomide for recurrent/progressive GBM. Phase 1b objectives were safety/tolerability, recommended phase 2 dose (primary), preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (secondary). Phase 2 objectives were preliminary antitumor activity via 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6 [20% projected]) (primary); disease control rate; median PFS; objective response rate (ORR); and overall survival (OS) (secondary). Arm A enrolled repeat surgical resection candidates; arm B enrolled patients ineligible for further resection. Patients received napabucasin (oral, 480 mg twice-daily) plus temozolomide (150 mg/m2, days 1–5, 28-day cycles). Arm A closed after 4 patients enrolled to prioritize Arm B enrollment. Arm B data are reported. Arm B enrolled/treated 30 patients (median age=56.5 [range=19–83] years; median napabucasin duration=55.0 [range=1–743] days; previous temozolomide=22 [73.3%] patients); all stopped therapy (radiologic progressive disease [PD], n=20; clinically unacceptable toxicities, n=7; follow-up loss, n=2; clinical PD, n=1). Mean relative dose intensity was 67.2% for napabucasin and 90.9% for temozolomide; 14/30 (46.7%) and 25/30 (83.3%) patients received ≥ 90% intended napabucasin and temozolomide doses, respectively. All patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE, grade ≤4); grade 3 TEAEs (≥ 10% patients) were diarrhea (23.3%, 7/30) and abdominal pain (16.7%, 5/30). One patient reported a grade 4 TEAE (seizure, treatment unrelated). PFS-6 was 28.1% (80% CI=16.8%-40.5%). Median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI=1.8–3.3), with PFS-12 and PFS-18 both 16.8% (80% CI=7.8%-28.8%). ORR was 10% (95% CI=2.1%-26.5%), with 3 partial responses, 6 stable disease, 14 PD, and 7 patients not evaluated. OS-12 was 28.3%. The napabucasin-plus-temozolomide safety profile was consistent with that anticipated for each agent. Napabucasin (480 mg twice-daily) was associated with grade 3 diarrhea and suboptimal compliance. Antitumor effects were observed per the primary endpoint in this patient population.

LEAP-005: A phase 2 multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the gastric cancer cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4030-4030
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Cheol Chung ◽  
Zarnie Lwin ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez-Roca ◽  
Federico Longo ◽  
Eduardo Yanez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

4030 Background: Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in the first- or second-line in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced gastric cancer. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is a phase 2, multicohort, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here, we present findings from the gastric cancer cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer, received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and provided a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the gastric cancer cohort; 87% were male, 58% were aged < 65 years, and 71% had PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 7.0 months (range, 1.9‒11.9); 19 patients (61%) had discontinued treatment. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26); 1 patient had CR (3%), and 2 had a PR (6%). 12 patients (39%) had SD. Median DOR was not reached (range, 2.1+ to 2.3+ months). DCR was 48% (95% CI, 30‒67). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8‒4.2). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.6‒8.7). 28 patients (90%) had treatment-related AEs, including 13 patients (42%) with grade 3‒5 AEs. 1 patient had a treatment-related AE that led to death (hemorrhage). 8 patients (26%) had immune-mediated AEs: hypothyroidism (n = 5), hyperthyroidism (n = 2), and pneumonitis (n = 1). There were no infusion-related reactions. Conclusions: In patients with advanced gastric cancer who received 2 prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Based on these data, enrollment in the gastric cancer cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706, panitumumab, and carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7119-7119 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Blumenschein ◽  
A. Sandler ◽  
T. O’Rourke ◽  
M. Eschenberg ◽  
Y. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase 1B

7119 Introduction: AMG 706 is an investigational, oral, multi-kinase inhibitor with both antiangiogenic and direct antitumor activity targeting VEGF, PDGF, and Kit receptors. Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), has shown antitumor activity and acceptable safety in pts with solid tumors. Methods: This is an ongoing, multicenter, dose finding, phase 1b study of AMG 706 with panitumumab and CP in pts with advanced NSCLC. Primary objectives were to assess the safety and PK of AMG 706; secondary objectives included drug exposure and objective response rates. Pts had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, ECOG score of 0–1, no symptomatic or untreated CNS metastases, and no prior chemotherapy for NSCLC (segments A&C) or ≤ 1 regimen for NSCLC (segment B). AMG 706 was given orally either QD (50 mg or 125 mg) or BID (75 mg) with CP Q3W (P:200 mg/m2; C: AUC = 6 mg/mL · min; Segment A), with panitumumab (9.0 mg/kg Q3W; Segment B), or with CP+ panitumumab (Segment C). AMG 706 was dosed continuously in 21-day cycles (days 3–21 in cycle 1; days 1–21 in cycle 2 and beyond); pts were sequentially enrolled into escalating AMG 706 dose cohorts. Results: As of 9/05, 22 pts were enrolled (10 in A, 12 in B) into AMG 706 dose cohorts of 50 mg and 125 mg QD. In A and B, respectively, 7 and 6 pts were men; median (range) age was 60.5 (60, 74) and 60.5 (55.7, 71.0). One pt in the 125 mg QD cohort in Segment B had grade (gr) 5 pneumonia. Treatment-related adverse events occurring in >5% of all patients are summarized ( table ). Preliminary data showed that AMG 706 PK profiles were similar when administered with CP either 30 min or 48 hrs apart. At 50 mg QD, there was no effect of AMG 706 on the PK of P. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that AMG 706 can be combined safely with CP or panitumumab in pts with advanced NSCLC and that there is no effect on the PK of AMG 706 or P. Updated data will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase Ib study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for patients (pts) with stage IV Kirsten rat sarcoma mutant (KRAS-mut) or squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCT02779751): Interim results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9562-9562
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Pujol ◽  
Johan F. Vansteenkiste ◽  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Vanesa Gregorc ◽  
Julien Mazieres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

9562 Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective small molecule cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor. In preclinical models, abemaciclib induced intratumor immune inflammation and synergized with PD-1 blockade to enhance antitumor efficacy in anti-PD-L1 refractory disease. Here, we report the safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib plus the approved NSCLC treatment pembrolizumab in 2 cohorts for pts with nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts for this nonrandomized, open-label, multicohort, phase 1b study were either chemotherapy-naive with ≥ 1% tumor cell (TC) PD-L1 staining, KRAS-mut nonsquamous NSCLC (Cohort A) or had a squamous subtype and received ≤ 1 prior platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen (Cohort B) for metastatic NSCLC. Primary endpoint was safety; secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-five pts with NSCLC were enrolled in each cohort. Most pts (68%) in Cohort B had received 1 prior line of chemotherapy. Safety profiles observed in both cohorts were largely consistent with previous reports for abemaciclib and pembrolizumab monotherapy. Grades 3/4 AEs in Cohorts A and B, respectively, included ALT increase (6 pts [24%]/ 0 pts), diarrhea (3 pts [12%]/ 0 pts), neutropenia (3 pts [12%]/ 0 pts), and pneumonitis (3 pts [12%]/ 1 pt [4%]). Six pts in Cohort A (24%) and 2 pts in Cohort B (8%) had a confirmed partial response for a disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 52% and 64%, respectively. In Cohort A, the ORR in pts with strong (≥50% TC) PD-L1 staining (n = 13) was 31% vs. 17% in pts with weak (1-49% TC) PD-L1 expression (n = 12). Median PFS and OS were 7.6 months (95% CI: 1.6, NR) and 22.0 months (95% CI: 9.9, NR) in Cohort A and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.4, 5.2) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.7, 13.1) in Cohort B, respectively. Conclusions: Abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab resulted in a numerical higher rate of transaminase elevations and pneumonitis. Antitumor activity was remarkable in the KRAS-mut nonsquamous NSCLC but not noticeably higher as compared to historical data for pembrolizumab monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02779751 .

FIDES-01, a phase II study of derazantinib in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and FGFR2 fusions and mutations or amplifications (M/A).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS597-TPS597
Author(s):  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
Stephan Braun ◽  
Marc Engelhardt ◽  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Symptom Response

TPS597 Background: Deregulation of the FGFR signaling pathway is implicated in various cancers. In iCCA, FGFR genetic aberrations include FGFR2 fusions and, less commonly, FGFR2 M/A. iCCA prognosis is poor, and chemotherapeutic and targeted treatment options are limited. While FGFR2 fusions are acknowledged oncogenic drivers, the oncogenic potential of FGFR2 M/A is less well defined. Derazantinib (DZB) is an investigational, oral small-molecule kinase inhibitor with activity against FGFR1, 2 and 3, which demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with unresectable iCCA with FGFR2 fusions. Based on preliminary efficacy data demonstrating durable responses of > 6 months and a clinically meaningful progression-free survival in a subset of iCCA patients harboring FGFR2 M/A (NCT01752920), the multicenter, multicohort open-label phase 2 study FIDES-01 is evaluating the effect of DZB in separate cohorts of iCCA patients with FGFR2 fusions or FGFR2 M/A. Methods: The new cohort evaluates 300 mg once daily dosing of DZB in patients with unresectable iCCA with FGFR2 M/A per liquid or tissue biopsy-based next generation sequencing and at least one previous systemic therapy. Treatment will continue until progressive disease, intolerance, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. Using a Simon’s two-stage design, the primary endpoint to assess the antitumor activity of DZB is the proportion of patients with PFS at 3 months (PFS3; per RECIST 1.1 central review). Secondary objectives are evaluation of median PFS, objective response rate, duration of response, safety profile, quality of life (incl., QLQ-C30, QLQ-BIL21, EQ-5D), and symptom response from baseline. Current status: The study was initiated in July 2019 with planned enrollment of 43 patients with confirmed FGFR2 M/A. Clinical trial information: NCT03230318.

scholarly journals Antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: results from an open-label, multicenter phase 2 basket study

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e003831
Author(s):  
Lingfang Xia ◽  
Jin Peng ◽  
Ge Lou ◽  
Mei Pan ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Platinum Resistant

BackgroundCombination treatments with immune-checkpoint inhibitor and antiangiogenic therapy have the potential for synergistic activity through modulation of the microenvironment and represent a notable therapeutic strategy in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). We report the results of camrelizumab (an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody) in combination with famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) for the treatment of platinum-resistant ROC from an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 basket trial.MethodsEligible patients with platinum-resistant ROC were enrolled to receive camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion) and oral famitinib (20 mg once daily). All patients had disease progression during or <6 months after their most recent platinum-based chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 based on investigator’s assessment. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month OS rate and safety profile.ResultsOf the 37 women enrolled, 11 (29.7%) patients had primary platinum resistant, 15 (40.5%) patients had secondary platinum resistant and 11 (29.7%) patients had primary platinum refractory disease. As the cut-off date of April 9, 2021, nine (24.3%) patients had achieved a confirmed objective response, the ORR was 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8 to 41.2) and the DCR was 54.1% (95% CI, 36.9 to 70.5). Patients with this combination regimen showed a median TTR of 2.1 months (range, 1.8–4.1) and a median DoR of 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.3). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.7), and median OS was 18.9 months (95% CI, 10.8 to not reached), with the median follow-up duration of 22.0 months (range, 12.0–23.7). The estimated 12-month OS rate was 67.2% (95% CI, 49.4 to 79.9). The most common ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (32.4%), decreased neutrophil count (29.7%) and decreased platelet count (13.5%). One (2.7%) patient died of grade 5 hemorrhage that was judged possibly related to study treatment by investigator.ConclusionThe camrelizumab with famitinib combination appeared to show antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with platinum-resistant ROC with an acceptable safety profile. This combination might provide a novel alternative treatment strategy in platinum-resistant ROC setting and warranted further exploration.Trial registration numberNCT03827837.

Brigatinib (BRG) in ALK+ crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Final results of the phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9071-9071
Author(s):  
Scott N. Gettinger ◽  
Rudolf M. Huber ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
Lyudmila Bazhenova ◽  
Karin Holmskov Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

9071 Background: BRG is a kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with ALK+ metastatic NSCLC; specific details for BRG use vary by indication and country. We report long-term efficacy and safety results of the Phase 1/2 and Phase 2 (ALTA) trials of BRG. Methods: The Phase 1/2 study was a single-arm, open-label trial (NCT01449461) of BRG 30–300 mg/d in pts with advanced malignancies. ALTA (NCT02094573) randomized pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to receive BRG at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 180 mg qd with 7-d lead-in at 90 mg (arm B). For the Phase 1/2 study, investigator assessments of confirmed objective response rate (cORR; RECIST v1.1), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in pts with ALK+ NSCLC are reported. The primary endpoint of ALTA was cORR per investigator; secondary endpoints included cORR per independent review committee (IRC), DoR, PFS, and OS. Results: In the Phase 1/2 study, 137 pts received BRG; of these, 79 pts had ALK+ NSCLC (71/79 had prior CRZ; 28/79 received 180 mg qd [7-d lead-in at 90 mg]; 14/79 received 90 mg qd). In ALTA, 222 pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC were randomized (n = 112/110, arm A/B). At the end of the Phase 1/2 study (Feb 18, 2020), with median 27.7 mo follow-up (̃67 mo after last pt enrolled), 4 pts remained on BRG. At the end of ALTA (Feb 27, 2020), with median 19.6/28.3 mo follow-up in arm A/B (̃53 mo after last pt enrolled), 10/17 pts in arm A/B were still on treatment. Table shows efficacy results from final analyses with long-term follow-up. In ALTA, the IRC-assessed intracranial cORR in pts with measurable baseline brain metastases was 50% (13/26) in arm A and 67% (12/18) in arm B; Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated median intracranial DoR was 9.4 mo (95% CI, 3.7, not reached [NR]) in arm A and 16.6 mo (3.7, NR) in arm B. With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to dose interruption (Phase 1/2: 59%; ALTA arm A/B: 49%/61%), dose reduction (13%; 8%/33%), or discontinuation (10%; 4%/13%). Conclusions: BRG showed sustained long-term activity, PFS, and manageable safety in pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC. The 180 mg/d dose after 7-d lead-in at 90 mg/d led to numerically higher median PFS and OS. Final results are similar to those reported for other approved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01449461, NCT02094573. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) after checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS498-TPS498
Author(s):  
Gurjyot K. Doshi ◽  
Nicholas J. Vogelzang ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
Daniel Chong ◽  
David R. Shaffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 2 Study

TPS498 Background: Combination therapy with agents targeting molecular and cellular mechanisms of CIT resistance is a rational approach to restoring CIT efficacy in patients (pts) with immunotherapy-resistant UC. Sitravatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets multiple closely-related receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways, including the split RTKs VEGFR-2 and KIT, as well as the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, and MER) RTKs. Inhibition of the split RTKs enhances antitumor activity by reduction of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Inhibition of TAM RTKs further restores a more immune-supportive TME by depletion of MDSCs and repolarization of tumor-associated macrophages to the M1 phenotype associated with secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Given these pleiotropic immune-activating effects, the combination of sitravatinib with nivolumab is a rational approach to restoring or enhancing CIT clinical activity in pts with immunotherapy-resistant UC. This combination has been shown to be safe and tolerable in an ongoing Phase 2 study in pts with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: This open-label Phase 2 study evaluates tolerability and clinical activity of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in pts with advanced or metastatic UC who experienced disease progression on or after CIT as the most recent systemic therapy. Enrollment is stratified by prior receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy. If the initial 2 cohorts are of high interest for efficacy, the protocol allows for addition of new cohorts to include pts previously treated with selected immunotherapies (anti-CTLA-4, anti-OX40 or anti–CD137 therapy) or who are CIT-naïve. The primary objective is Objective Response Rate. A Predictive Probability Design will be applied allowing for expansion to 40 pts per cohort. Sitravatinib is administered orally daily in continuous 28-day cycles at 120 mg; nivolumab intravenously at 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. Status: The study is open for enrollment and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03606174.

scholarly journals Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Ann-Li Cheng ◽  
Zhenggang Ren ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
Hongming Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document