Multi-center, single arm phase II study of the dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib for patients with recurrent or progressive grade II-III meningiomas.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2024-2024
Author(s):  
Scott Randall Plotkin ◽  
Priya Kumthekar ◽  
Patrick Y. Wen ◽  
Frederick G. Barker ◽  
Anat Stemmer-Rachamimov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Correlative Studies

2024 Background: Grade II/III meningiomas represent about 20% of tumors and have increased rates of recurrence with no approved medical therapies. Historically, the progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) for these tumors is 25%. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group identified a PFS-6 rate of > 35% to be of interest for trials of grade II/III meningioma. Methods : NF2 gene inactivation occurs in the majority of meningiomas and is associated with mTORC1 activation. Human studies of everolimus for neurofibromatosis 2 patients documented growth arrest in only a minority of tumors. Based on our studies showing mTORC2/SGK1 pathway activation in NF2-deficient meningiomas and the known paradoxical activation of the mTORC2/AKT pathway in meningiomas, we hypothesized that dual inhibition of mTORC1/2 would be superior in meningiomas. Treatment of primary meningioma cells with vistusertib led to decreased cell proliferation and showed greater efficacy than rapamycin, regardless of NF2 expression. We studied the effect of vistusertib in patients with progressive or recurrent grade II/III meningiomas (NCT03071874). Vistusertib was administered orally at 125mg twice daily on two consecutive days each week. MRIs were obtained every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days). Tumor size was defined as the largest cross-sectional area. Progression was defined as ≥25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed. The primary endpoint was PFS-6. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, radiographic response, and correlative studies including immunohistochemistry for mTORC1/2 pathway activation and genetic biomarkers. Results: Twenty-eight patients (13 female), with a median age of 58 years (range, 32 to 77 years), were enrolled in this multicenter study. The median Karnofsky performance status was 80. Twenty-five patients have been followed to six months or to tumor progression. The median duration of treatment was 6.5 month (range, 1-18 months). Four patients chose to discontinue treatment, 1 withdrew to intercurrent illness, and 1 was withdrawn due to non-compliance. PFS-6 is 51.5% (CI, 29.3% - 70.0%). Adverse events at least possibly related to vistusertib with frequency > 10% include nausea (54%); fatigue (36%); hypophosphatemia (29%); diarrhea, anorexia, dry mouth, and hypertriglyceridemia (all 14%); hypertension, vomiting, increased ALT, constipation, and weight loss (all 11%). Conclusions: Vistusertib treatment was associated with a PFS-6 rate that exceeds the RANO target of 35% for recurrent high-grade meningioma. The follow-up data continue to mature. Adverse events were tolerable in this patient population. Correlative studies to identify biological factors that correlate with response are under way. These data support the initiation of larger randomized studies of vistusertib in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03071874.

CTNI-54. A SINGLE ARM PHASE II STUDY OF THE DUAL MTORC1/MTORC2 INHIBITOR VISTUSERTIB PROVIDED FOR SPORADIC PATIENTS WITH GRADE II-III MENINGIOMAS THAT RECUR OR PROGRESS AFTER SURGERY AND RADIATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi72-vi72
Author(s):  
Scott Plotkin ◽  
Priya Kumthekar ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Fred Barker ◽  
Roberta Beauchamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Intercurrent Illness ◽  
Sum Of Products ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Grade II/III meningiomas have increased rates of recurrence with no approved medical therapies. The historical progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) is 25% with rates >35% declared of interest for drug development. NF2 gene inactivation occurs in about half of meningiomas. Based on our studies showing mTORC1 and mTORC2/SGK1 pathway activation in NF2-deficient meningiomas and the paradoxical activation of the mTORC2/AKT pathway, we hypothesized that mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitors would be active in meningiomas. We studied the effect of vistusertib in patients with progressive/recurrent grade II/III meningiomas (NCT03071874). Vistusertib was administered orally at 125mg twice daily on two consecutive days each week. MRIs were obtained every 56 days. Tumor size was defined as the largest cross-sectional area. Progression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed. The primary endpoint was PFS-6. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, radiographic response, and correlative studies including immunohistochemistry for mTORC1/2 pathway activation and genetic biomarkers. Twenty-eight patients (13 female, median age 58 years, median KPS 80%) were enrolled. Median tumor size was 4.4cm; 71% were grade II and 50% harbored pathogenic NF2 variants. Four patients discontinued treatment voluntarily and 1 each withdrew for intercurrent illness and non-compliance. PFS-6 is 47% (CI, 26%-65%) and OS-12 is 72% (95%CI, 48%-86%). PFS but not OS was shorter for patients with grade 3 meningiomas; there was no difference in PFS/OS between genetic groups. Adverse events at least possibly related to vistusertib with frequency >10% include nausea, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, diarrhea, anorexia, dry mouth, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, vomiting, increased ALT, constipation, and weight loss. Vistusertib treatment was associated with a PFS-6 rate exceeding the target of 35% for recurrent high-grade meningioma. Adverse events were tolerable in this patient population. These data support the continued development of mTORC1/2 inhibitors in this setting.

Efficacy finding cohort of a cancer peptide vaccine, TAS0313, in treating recurrent glioblastoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2038-2038
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Yoshiko Okita ◽  
Yoshitaka Narita
Keyword(s):  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2038 Background: TAS0313 is a cancer vaccine cocktail comprising three long peptides with a total of 12 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope peptides. These peptides were derived from eight cancer-associated antigens (EGFR, KUA, LCK, MRP3, PTHRP, SART2, SART3, and WHSC2) that are overexpressed in various cancer types including glioblastoma (GBM). We performed a single-arm, multicenter efficacy confirmatory cohort study as part of the TAS0313 Phase I/II study in patients with recurrent GBM. Methods: The enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed grade IV GBM (including gliosarcoma, giant cell glioblastoma, and epithelioid glioblastoma) had at least one of the following HLA types: HLA-A*02:01, -A*02:06, -A*02:07, -A*11:01, -A*24:02, -A*31:01, or -A*33:03. Eligible patients were those who received standard radiotherapy and temozolomide, had a confirmed first or second recurrence, or progression with measurable disease outcomes with good performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status score > 70). TAS0313 (27mg) was subcutaneously administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1 and 2 and day 1 of cycle 3 or later in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Tumor response was evaluated using The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. The antigen-specific CTL and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were analyzed by ELISPOT assay and Luminex assay, respectively, before and after treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of TAS0313. Secondary and exploratory methods were used to evaluate the safety and immune response of TAS0313. Results: As of 10th September 2020, 10 patients have been treated with TAS0313 (eight with GBM and two with gliosarcoma). The median age of participants was 56.5 [range, 33–69 years], and methylation status of the MGMT promoter was methylated in four patients, unmethylated in four, and unknown in two. The best overall response was partial response 1/10 (10.0%) and stable disease 4/10 (40.0%). One case showed 69.1% tumor shrinkage. The treatment of two patients was ongoing for over 7 months. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 25.0%, and the median PFS was 2.3 months. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were grade 1–2 injection site reactions and pyrexia. There were no grade 4 or 5 ADRs. In some patients, TAS0313 treatment was confirmed to increase CTL and IgG levels compared with pre-treatment samples. Conclusions: TAS0313 showed promising efficacy with expected immune responses and favorable safety and tolerability in patients with recurrent GBM. Further investigation of TAS0313 is warranted to validate our findings. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-183824.

Safety and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and low Karnofsky performance status: Results from the CheckMate 920 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
Jeffrey Yorio ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Heidi Ann McKean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

315 Background: Combination therapy with nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and tolerability for patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Most pivotal clinical trials in pts with aRCC have excluded pts with low Karnofsky performance status (KPS; < 70%). CheckMate 920 is a multi-arm, phase IIIb/IV, open-label clinical trial of NIVO+IPI treatment in pts enrolled in a community practice setting with aRCC and a high unmet medical need. We present safety and efficacy results for the cohort of pts with aRCC of any histology and KPS 50%–60% from CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954). Methods: Pts with previously untreated advanced/metastatic RCC and KPS 50%–60% received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × 4 doses followed by 480 mg NIVO Q4W for ≤ 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 (both per investigator). Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: Of 25 treated pts with KPS 50%–60%, 76% were men; median age was 67 years (range, 34–81). IMDC risk was favorable in 0%, intermediate in 32%, and poor in 68% of pts; 84% had clear cell and 16% had non-clear cell RCC histology. With a minimum follow-up of 25 months, median duration of therapy (95% CI) was 2.3 months (2.1–7.7) for NIVO and 2.1 months (2.1–2.1) for IPI. The median number of doses (range) received was 4 (1–27) for NIVO and 4 (1–4) for IPI; 76% of pts received ≥ 4 NIVO doses and 68% received all 4 IPI doses. The only grade 3–4 imAEs by category were hepatitis (4.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (4.0%). No grade 5 imAEs occurred. Overall, 4 (16%) pts discontinued due to any-grade adverse events (n = 1 each for elevated AST, malignant neoplasm progression, back pain, and acetabulum fracture). Of 18 evaluable pts, ORR was 33.3% (95% CI, 13.3–59.0); no pts had a complete response and 6 had partial response. Median time to objective response was 4.5 months (range, 2.5–24.7). Median duration of objective response was 20.6 months (range, 0.03+–24.2+). Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5–14.8). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–25.1). Conclusions: NIVO+IPI demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with previously untreated aRCC and KPS 50%–60%. The combination was tolerated at a dose intensity similar to that observed in clinical trials conducted in pts with higher KPS (≥ 70%). These data support the value of NIVO+IPI in pts who may not be considered ideal candidates for this therapy and consequently may have limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT02982954 .

scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

scholarly journals Management and outcome of primary CNS lymphoma in the modern era

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. e1027-e1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Houillier ◽  
Carole Soussain ◽  
Hervé Ghesquières ◽  
Pierre Soubeyran ◽  
Olivier Chinot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Population Based Study

ObjectiveReal-life studies on patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) are scarce. Our objective was to analyze, in a nationwide population-based study, the current medical practice in the management of PCNSL.MethodsThe French oculo-cerebral lymphoma network (LOC) database prospectively records all newly diagnosed PCNSL cases from 32 French centers. Data of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsWe identified 1,002 immunocompetent patients (43% aged >70 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] 60). First-line treatment was high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy in 92% of cases, with an increasing use of rituximab over time (66%). Patients <60 years of age received consolidation treatment in 77% of cases, consisting of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (54%) or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) (23%). Among patients >60 years of age, WBRT and HCT-ASCT consolidation were administered in only 9% and 2%, respectively. The complete response rate to initial chemotherapy was 50%. Median progression-free survival was 10.5 months. For relapse, second-line chemotherapy, HCT-ASCT, WBRT, and palliative care were offered to 55%, 17%, 10%, and 18% of patients, respectively. The median, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival was 25.3 months, 51%, and 38%, respectively (<60 years: not reached [NR], 70%, and 61%; >60 years: 15.4 months, 44%, and 28%). Age, KPS, sex, and response to induction CT were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur study confirms the increasing proportion of elderly within the PCNSL population and shows comparable outcome in this population-based study with those reported by clinical trials, reflecting a notable application of recent PCNSL advances in treatment.

Sorafenib With Interferon Alfa-2b As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Carcinoma: A Phase II Study of the Southwest Oncology Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 3296-3301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Bryan H. Goldman ◽  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Philip C. Mack ◽  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Alfa

Purpose This phase II study evaluated the activity of combined treatment with interferon alfa-2b and sorafenib, a Raf and multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced renal carcinoma. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had metastatic or unresectable renal carcinoma with a clear-cell component, no prior systemic therapy, performance status 0 to 1, and measurable disease. Treatment consisted of interferon alfa-2b 10 × 106 U subcutaneously three times weekly and sorafenib 400 mg orally bid. The primary end point was confirmed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rate. Results Twelve (19%) of 62 assessable patients achieved an objective confirmed response. An additional 31 (50%) had an unconfirmed partial response or stable disease as best response. The median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI, 4 to 11 months). The most common adverse events were fatigue, anorexia, anemia, diarrhea, nausea, rigors/chills, leukopenia, fever, and transaminase elevation. Von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations were detected in four (22%) of 18 archival tumor specimens. Conclusion The confirmed response rate for the combination of sorafenib and interferon in advanced renal carcinoma is greater than expected with either interferon or sorafenib alone. The toxicity of this combination is dominated by adverse events common to interferon that limit further development of this regimen.

scholarly journals Axitinib plus avelumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a stratified, open-label, single-center phase 2 clinical trial (GliAvAx)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001146
Author(s):  
Gil Awada ◽  
Laila Ben Salama ◽  
Jennifer De Cremer ◽  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
Lydia Fischbuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Corticosteroid Dose

BackgroundNo treatment demonstrated to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) in a randomized trial. Combining axitinib with the programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking monoclonal antibody avelumab may result in synergistic activity against rGB.MethodsAdult patients with rGB following prior surgery, radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were stratified according to their baseline use of corticosteroids. Patients with a daily dose of ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) initiated treatment with axitinib (5 mg oral two times per day) plus avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks) (Cohort-1). Patients with a higher baseline corticosteroid dose initiated axitinib monotherapy; avelumab was added after 6 weeks of therapy if the corticosteroid dose could be tapered to ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (Cohort-2). Progression-free survival at 6 months (6-m-PFS%), per immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria, served as the primary endpoint.ResultsBetween June 2017 and August 2018, 54 patients (27 per cohort) were enrolled and initiated study treatment (median age: 55 years; 63% male; 91% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–1). Seventeen (63%) patients treated in Cohort-2 received at least one dose of avelumab. The 6-m-PFS% was 22.2% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI 3.8% to 33.2%) in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively; median overall survival was 26.6 weeks (95% CI 20.8 to 32.4) in Cohort-1 and 18.0 weeks (95% CI 12.5 to 23.5) in Cohort-2. The best objective response rate was 33.3% and 22.2% in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively, with a median duration of response of 17.9 and 19.0 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were dysphonia (67%), lymphopenia (50%), arterial hypertension and diarrhea (both 48%). There were no grade 5 adverse events.ConclusionThe combination of avelumab plus axitinib has an acceptable toxicity profile but did not meet the prespecified threshold for activity justifying further investigation of this treatment in an unselected population of patients with rGB.

scholarly journals Survival benefits of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or temozolomide plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with glioblastoma aged ≥ 75 years

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Ohno ◽  
Yasuji Miyakita ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Igaki ◽  
Yuko Matsushita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background and purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), who were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy comprising 45 Gy in 15 fractions combined with temozolomide (TMZ) or TMZ and bevacizumab (TMZ/Bev). Materials and methods Between October 2007 and August 2018, 30 patients with GBM aged ≥75 years were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 45 Gy in 15 fractions. Twenty patients received TMZ and 10 received TMZ/Bev as upfront chemotherapy. O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was analyzed by pyrosequencing. The cutoff value of the mean level of methylation at the 16 CpG sites was 16%. Results Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.9 months and 9.9 months, respectively. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 64.7 and 34.7%, respectively. Median OS and PFS did not differ significantly between patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (N = 11) and those with hypomethylation (N = 16) (17.4 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.32; and 13.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.11, respectively). The median OS and PFS were not significantly different between TMZ (N = 20) and TMZ/Bev (N = 10) chemotherapy (median OS: TMZ 12.9 months vs. TMZ/Bev 14.6 months, p = 0.93, median PFS: TMZ 8.5 months vs TMZ/Bev 10.0 months, p = 0.64, respectively). The median time until Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score decreasing below 60 points was 7.9 months. The best radiological responses included 11 patients with a partial response (36.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included leukopenia in 15 patients (50%), anorexia in 4 (13.3%), and hyponatremia during concomitant chemotherapy in 3 (10%). Conclusion Our hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen combined with TMZ or TMZ/Bev showed benefits in terms of OS, PFS, and KPS maintenance with acceptable toxicities in elderly patients with GBM aged ≥75 years.

Phase III Study of Denileukin Diftitox (ONTAK®) To Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in CD25+ and CD25- Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 696-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Negro-Vilar ◽  
Zofia Dziewanowska ◽  
Eric Groves ◽  
Elyane Lombardy ◽  
Victor Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Denileukin Diftitox ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Phase Iii Study

Abstract Denileukin diftitox (ONTAK®) is a genetically engineered fusion protein composed of the enzymatically active domain of diphtheria toxin and the full length sequence of interleukin-2 (IL-2), designed to target malignancies expressing the IL-2 receptor. The drug is approved for the treatment of CTCL in patients expressing the CD-25 component of the IL-2 receptor. L4389-14 is a phase III study designed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of denileukin diftitox (DD) in distinct subgroups of CTCL patients. The study met its accrual goal of 90 patients and included three subgroups of patients: 1) CD25 (+) patients that crossover from a placebo course of treatment in a companion study (L4389-11) and had progressed or failed to respond during an 8-course placebo treatment (N=34); 2) CD25 (−) patients (N=36) and 3) CD25 (+) patients that had previously been treated with DD, responded, and subsequently relapsed (retreatment group, N=22). Patients entered the study at stages Ia to III and received DD at a dose schedule of 18mcg/Kg/day by IV infusion once daily for 5 days every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. Efficacy of treatment was assessed based on tumor burden, lymph nodes, lymphocyte count, and patient status (PGA) at every cycle, beginning on cycle 2. A response assessment required confirmation in two subsequent cycles. Responses were evaluated by an independent Drug Evaluation Review Committee. Assessment of activity of DD across the 3 groups based on an analysis of the data is shown in the table below. Patient demographics were consistent across subgroups and representative of a general CTCL population. Disease status at baseline was Stage IIa or earlier 66% of patients and stage IIb or higher 34% of patients. About 46% of patients presented with mild to severe erythroderma. Adverse events were similar to those previously observed with ONTAK. Serious adverse events of ≥5% incidence were nausea (9%), vomiting (5%), capillary leak syndrome (5%), pyrexia (9%) and infections (10%). The results of this large phase III trial showed very consistent efficacy of denileukin diftitox across treatment-naïve CD25 (+) and CD25 (−) patients, as well as in patients undergoing retreatment with DD. Duration of response and progression free survival were also quite favorable across the different CTCL subgroups. Response Assessment CD25 (+) Placebo Crossover CD25 (−) CD25 (+) Retreatment N = 34 36 22 ORR (CR/CCR/PR) 47.1% 30.6% 36.4% CR/CCR 17.6% 8.3% 9.1% PR 29.4% 22.2% 27.3% SD 29.4% 44.4% 31.8% PD 20.6% 25.0% 31.8% Duration of Response (days) 820 340 274 Progression Free Survival (days) 870 Not reached 429

Cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R&M SCCHN) (EXTREME)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5537-5537 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Vermorken ◽  
R. Mesia ◽  
M. E. Vega-Villegas ◽  
E. Remenar ◽  
R. Hitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Phase Iii

5537 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in nearly all SCCHN and carries a strong prognostic significance, providing the rationale for using EGFR-targeted agents, such as cetuximab, in this indication. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy commonly used in the treatment of R&M SCCHN. Methods: Patients (pts) were enrolled into this phase III trial from December 2004 to December 2005 and randomized either to Group A: cetuximab (first dose 400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus a maximum of 6 three-weekly cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV on day 1) or carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for the first 4 days of each cycle) or to Group B: cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-FU as before. Cetuximab was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is overall survival time; secondary endpoints are progression-free-survival, response rate, disease control rate, safety, and Quality of Life. It was planned to randomize a total number of 420 pts in order to detect a difference in improvement in overall survival of 2.5 months. Results: At the end of the recruitment,440 pts have been randomized, to date 320 pts are under treatment, 21 have withdrawn from the study and 99 have completed the study. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has performed an independent preplanned safety analysis from the first 140 pts, 138 pts of whom were treated. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks: M/F122/16, median age57 years [range, 38–79],median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 80 [range, 70–100]. In this safety analysis, there were 14 deaths, none of which were treatment related. The most frequent drug related grade 3–4 toxicity was mainly represented by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Conclusions: The DSMB evaluated baseline and safety data, found no reason to stop the trial and recommended continuation of the study. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document