scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

Activity of a multitargeted, metronomic, and maximum-tolerated dose “chemo-switch” regimen in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A phase II study of sorafenib, gemcitabine (Gem), and metronomic capecitabine (Cap) in patients with advanced mRCC (SOGUG-02–06)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5040-5040
Author(s):  
J. Bellmunt ◽  
J. Trigo ◽  
E. Calvo ◽  
J. Carles ◽  
J. Perez-Gracia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Metronomic Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

5040 Background: Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) chemotherapy followed by metronomic chemotherapy (low doses administered on a frequent schedule) acts on tumor vascular endothelial cells and enhances the antitumor effect of anti-angiogenic agents (Pietras et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007). This study investigated treatment of mRCC with Gem at MTD combined with metronomic Cap and the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Methods: Eligible patients had cytologically or histologically confirmed mRCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 and no previous targeted therapy or chemotherapy, and were unsuitable for or intolerant to immunotherapy. Treatment consisted of six 3-week cycles of Gem 1000 mg/m2 i.v. (days 1 and 8), oral Cap 500 mg/m2 b.i.d. (days 1 to 14) and oral sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d. (every day), followed by sorafenib monotherapy (at the discretion of the investigator). Study endpoints included median progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint), disease control rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and safety. Results: Forty patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of treatment (median age 63 yrs, male n = 24, ECOG 0/1 n = 18/22, 1–2/>2 metastatic sites n = 31/9). Median duration of treatment was 6 months. Among 36 evaluable patients, 17 (47%) had a partial response and 17 (47%) achieved stable disease. Median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI 7.6, 20.5). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue/asthenia (78%) hand-foot syndrome (75%) and mucositis (69%). Most AEs were grade1/2, no grade 4 toxicities occurred. One patient had grade 5 dyspnea; 6 patients discontinued treatment for AEs. Conclusions: PFS and objective responses in this study were greater than those observed in previous studies with Gem and Cap or sorafenib monotherapy in patients with mRCC, while AEs remained moderate in the majority of patients. These findings confirm the synergistic activity of the “chemo-switch” concept seen in preclinical models. The combination of sorafenib with MTD Gem and metronomic Cap warrants further investigation in mRCC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals FOLFIRI regimen: an effective second-line chemotherapy after failure of etoposide–platinum combination in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas grade 3

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Hentic ◽  
P Hammel ◽  
A Couvelard ◽  
V Rebours ◽  
M Zappa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serum Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Good Condition ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) grade 3 have a poor prognosis. Etoposide–platinum combination is the standard chemotherapy but the role of a second-line therapy remains unknown. Irinotecan alone or in combination has shown some efficacy in patients treated for small cell lung cancer which had pathological similarities with neuroendocine tumors. The aim of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of the FOLFIRI regimen in patients with NECs grade 3 after failure of etoposide–platinum combination. This study was retrospective, including patients with NECs grade 3 and treated with the FOLFIRI regimen after progression or toxicity of etoposide–platinum combination in first-line. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥3 and/or serum alkaline phosphatase ≥5×upper limit of normal value (ULN) and/or bilirubin ≥1.5×ULN were excluded. Among 39 patients who failed etoposide–platinum combination, 19 (49%; 12 women, median age 53 (29–78) years) received the FOLFIRI regimen with a median number of 6 (1–16) courses. Six patients (31%) had at least one episode of grades 3–4 toxicity (neutropenia, n=3; diarrhea, n=3) without toxic death. Six patients (31%) had objective response, 6 (31%) stable disease, and 7 (38%) tumor progression. Median progression-free survival under FOLFIRI was 4 months. Overall survival was 18 vs 6.8 months in noneligible patients. FOLFIRI regimen is a safe and potentially efficient chemotherapy given as second-line in patients with NECs grade 3 who remain in good condition and with correct liver tests after failure of etoposide–platinum combination. These results should be confirmed in a future prospective study.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Attenuated regimen of biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients aged 65 years or older with advanced pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482097491
Author(s):  
Hasan Rehman ◽  
Jeffrey Chi ◽  
Nausheen Hakim ◽  
Shreya Prasad Goyal ◽  
Coral Olazagasti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Dose Reductions

Background: Treatment with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel confers a survival benefit over gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, such treatment can be associated with significant toxicities especially in older patients and carries practical disadvantages related to a weekly schedule along with financial cost. We retrospectively analyzed patients >65 years of age with APC who received a modified biweekly regimen of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to evaluate efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Patients aged >65 years with chemo-naïve APC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩽2 were studied. Patients were treated with a modified regimen of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 every 2 weeks on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with analyses performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events were recorded on the day of chemotherapy. Cancer antigen 19.9 was measured in every cycle and restaging scans were performed every two cycles. Results: A total of 73 patients (median age: 73 years; range: 66–93) were treated with biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment. The median OS and PFS were 9.1 months and 4.8 months, respectively. Around 66% of patients received growth-factor support based on American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines and no patient developed neutropenic fever. The incidences of grade ⩾3 toxicity for neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity were 2%, 7%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. Dose reductions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel were required in 10% and 4% patients, respectively. Conclusion: In patients older than >65 years of age with APC, a modified regimen of biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was found to be effective when compared with the historical control from the MPACT study. This regimen allowed for fewer dose reductions, reduced healthcare costs from additional appointments, travel-related cost, as well as a favorable side-effect profile while maintaining efficacy. Though retrospective in nature, this study underlines the need for further investigation, particularly in elderly patients with poor performance status, such as those with pancreatic cancer, and in order to combine with a third agent, such as a targeted treatment or immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Real-World Data for Lenvatinib in Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RELEVANT): A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis of Clinical Practice in Austria

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
G. Rendl ◽  
B. Sipos ◽  
A. Becherer ◽  
S. Sorko ◽  
C. Trummer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Proven Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study

Background. Lenvatinib has proven efficacy in progressive, radioiodine- (RAI-) refractory thyroid cancer (TC). Dose reductions are commonly performed due to decreased tolerability and adverse effects. This retrospective multicenter study analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerability in the Austrian patient population treated with lenvatinib. Methods. Clinical data of 43 patients (25 males and 18 females) with a median age of 70 years (range: 39–91 years) and RAI-refractory TC with metastases to the lymph nodes (74%), lungs (86%), bone (35%), liver (16%), and brain (12%) were analyzed. The mean duration of treatment with lenvatinib was 26.6 ± 15.4 months with dosage reductions required in 39 patients (91%). Results. PFS after 24 months was 71% (95% CI: 56–87), and overall survival (OS) was 74% (95% CI: 60–88), respectively. OS was significantly shorter ( p = 0.048 ) in patients with a daily maintenance dosage ≤ 10 mg (63%) (95% CI: 39–86) as compared to patients on ≥ 14 mg lenvatinib (82%) (95% CI: 66–98) daily. Dose reduction was noted in 39 patients (91%). Grade ≥3 toxicities (hypertension, diarrhea, weight loss, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome) were most common leading to discontinuation of lenvatinib in 7 patients (16%). Conclusion. Lenvatinib showed sustained clinical efficacy in patients with metastatic RAI-refractory TC even with reduced maintenance dosages over years. The effects were comparable to the registration trial, although patients had a higher median age and, more commonly, dose reductions.

A randomized, double-blind phase II study of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with docetaxel (DOC) compared to DOC plus placebo (PL) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
A. Stopeck ◽  
A. A. Joy ◽  
S. Chan ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: Single-agent DOC is commonly used to treat MBC. Axitinib (AG) is a potent TKI of VEGFRs. A phase I lead-in study identified 80 mg/m2 q3wks of DOC in combination with 5 mg BID of AG as the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary objective was to determine whether the time to progression (TTP) of AG+DOC arm is superior to DOC+PL. Methods: Pts with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and =12 mos from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, and no uncontrolled brain metastases were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive treatment with either DOC+AG or DOC+PL without prophylactic growth factor in cycle 1. Tumor measurements were performed q9wks. Pts were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, prior aCT and PS (0–1 or 2). Results: A total of 168 pts were randomized. 92 pts had received prior aCT, 27 of whom received a prior taxane. Treatment arms were well balanced for prior adjuvant and taxane therapy. A median of 7 cycles of AG+DOC (range: 1–18) and 7 cycles of DOC+PL (range: 1–23) were administered. The most common non-hematologic adverse events observed in the AG+DOC arm included diarrhea (60%), nausea (53%), alopecia (51%), fatigue (49%), stomatitis (44%) and vomiting (40%). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were increased with AG+DOC vs DOC included febrile neutropenia (16 vs 7%), fatigue (13 vs 5%), stomatitis (13 vs 2%), diarrhea (11 vs 0%) and hypertension (5 vs 2%). Other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were similar in both arms. The median TTP (by RECIST) was 8.2 mo with AG+DOC arm and 7 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (prespecified, one-sided p=0.052). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% for AG+DOC arm and 23% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.038). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, the median TTP in patients receiving prior aCT was 9.0 mo with AG+DOC arm and 6.3 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (p=0.012). Within this stratum, ORR was 45% for AG+DOC arm and 13% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.003). Conclusions: The anti-angiogenic TKI AG combined with DOC (80 mg/m2 q3wks) as first line therapy for MBC has an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Treatment guided by ERCC1, RRM1, and BRCA1 protein expression in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19094-e19094
Author(s):  
B. Han ◽  
J. Shen ◽  
Z. Gao
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Brca1 Protein ◽  
Chemotherapy Group

e19094 Purpose: We investigated whether Treatment Guided by ERCC1,RRM1 and BRCA1 protein expression levels could improve clinical outcomes in Patients With Advanced-Stage NSCLC. Experimental Design: Eligibility: Main inclusion criteria: Stage IV or stage IIIB NSCLC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status (PS) 0–1; Measurable disease; Adequate bone marrow, kidney, liver function. Main exclusion criteria: previous NSCLC therapy; Central nervous system metastasis; Requiring immediate intervention or Untreated with radiation within 28 days of study regimen initiation. Previously untreated patients with Stage IV or stage IIIB NSCLC(N=180): Standard chemotherapy group(N=60): Cisplatin 75mg/m2 Day1+Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 Days 1,8 every 28 days; Individualized chemotherapy group (N=120) (ERCC1,RRM1 and BRCA1 protein expression assayed with IHC); Low ERCC1 protein expression subgroup: Cisplatin 75mg/m2 Day1+Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 Days 1,8 every 28 days; High ERCC1 protein subgroup: Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 Days 1,8+Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 Days 1,8 every 28 days. Description of Current Analysis: ERCC1,RRM1 and BRCA1 protein expression assayed with IHC; Assigned treatment based on ERCC1 protein expression; Primary endpoint: overall response rate; Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (OS), Progression-free survival (PFS). Enrollment progress (As of time Dec-31–2008): See Table . [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel (CP) and docetaxel alone (D) in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): NJLCG 0801.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7565-7565
Author(s):  
Shunichi Sugawara ◽  
Makoto Maemondo ◽  
Toshiyuki Harada ◽  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Nobumichi Matsubara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Lethal Arrhythmia ◽  
Grade 3

7565 Background: Standard first-line chemotherapy for elderly NSCLC pts has been considered as a monotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine globally. However, we have demonstrated the high efficacy of CP for elderly pts in our previous trial (Ann Oncol 2010). Meanwhile, D has been considered as an alternative option for this population in Japan according to the result of WJTOG9904 (JCO 2006). Thus we compared the two regimens to select the proper candidate for future phase III trial. Methods: Eligible pts were aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC; ECOG performance status 0-1; adequate organ function; written informed consent. Pts were randomized to receive carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 1 and paclitaxel (70mg/m2 on day 1, 8, and 15) every 4 weeks or D (60mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity profile. Assuming that ORR of 40% would be potential usefulness while ORR of 20% would be the lower limit of interest, 40 pts in each arm were required if expect 10% loss to follow up. Results: Between July 2006 and September 2010, 84 pts were enrolled and 41 pts in CP arm and 42 pts in D arm were eligible (median age, 76 years; 75% male; 72% stage IV). Median treatment cycle was 4 in each arm (CP, range 1-6; D, range 1-8). ORRs were 51% (95%CI: 36-66%) and 26% (95%CI: 12-39%) in the CP and D arm, respectively. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median PFS were 6.5 and 3.9 months in the CP and D arm, respectively (Logrank, P=0.0027). Grade 3 or severer toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (CP, 56% and D, 79%), anemia (CP, 15% and D, 7%), thrombocytopenia (CP, 10% and D, 0%), infection (CP, 20% and D, 25%). One treatment-related death due to neutropenia, pneumonia, and lethal arrhythmia occurred in D arm but none in CP arm. Conclusions: The platinum doublet CP achieved higher activity with an acceptable toxicity profile for elderly pts with advanced NSCLC compared to monotherapy with D. The superiority of CP to the monotherapy in this trial is consistent with results of recent IFCT-0501 trial (Lancet 2011).

Retrospective analysis of sorafenib as first or second target therapy in mRCC patients in Italian centers: An update.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15524-e15524
Author(s):  
Lisa Derosa ◽  
Angela Gernone ◽  
Franco Morelli ◽  
Teodoro Sava ◽  
Fable Zustovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Daily Clinical Practice ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

e15524 Background: With several agents available for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) a better understanding of their use in daily clinical practice is fundamental in the decision-making process. Methods: The REtrospective analysis of Sorafenib (So) as 1st or 2nd targET therapy (RESET) in mRCC was a retrospective, observational field study that assessed the use and safety of So in clinical practice in Italian centers. Treatments were determined by physicians per local prescribing guidelines. Patients (pts) treated with So single agent as 1st or 2nd target therapy (TT) for mRCC between 1st Jan 2008 and 31st Dec 2010 were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, response rate and treatment duration. Subgroup analyses included age, ECOG performance status, prior therapy, number of metastases and line of TT with So. Results: From Feb to Jul 2012, 358 pts from 37 Italian centers were enrolled. The most common ≥ grade 3 drug-related adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (6.7%), rash (2.2%), hypertension, fatigue and diarrhea (1.7% each). In the overall population, median OS was 17.2 months (mos) (95% CI 15.4 – 19.6 mos) and median PFS was 5.9 mos (95% CI 4.9-6.7 mos). Median duration of treatment with So was 5.03 mos. Disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was observed in 198(56%) pts. In pts receiving So as first or as second TT median OS was 19.9 mos (95% CI 15.9-25.3 mos) and 16.3 mos (95% CI 13.0-18.2 mos) respectively. In the subgroup of pts treated with So 1st TT followed by sunitinib (Su) 2nd TT (44 pts) and Su 1st TT followed by So 2nd TT (173 pts), median OS was 30.4 mos (95% CI 22.0-34.8 mos) and 16.6 mos (95% CI 13.1-18.2 mos) respectively. There were 269(76%) pts that received a total of 2 lines of therapy for mRCC, 133(38%) pts 3 lines and 43(12%) pts 4 lines of therapy. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety profile of So in the setting of Italian community-based daily clinical practice was similar to data reported in prospective clinical trials. The efficacy of So was observed in both the subgroups of pts receiving So as either the first or second TT for mRCC, with intriguing OS data in first line.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document