Phase 1 study of the liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF): Results from the advanced gastric cancer expansion cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4025-4025
Author(s):  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Motohiro Hirao ◽  
Takashi Oshima ◽  
Kazuaki Harada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Expansion Cohort

4025 Background: Eribulin has proven efficacy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. E7389-LF is a new formulation that uses liposomes to encapsulate eribulin, which is anticipated to improve eribulin concentration in tumor tissues. In the dose-expansion part of a phase 1 study of E7389-LF, the safety profile was acceptable and 2 patients (pts) out of 10 with gastric cancer (GC) had an objective response. Thus, the GC cohort was expanded for further evaluation. Here, we report efficacy and safety data from the phase 1 expansion cohort of pts with advanced GC who were treated with E7389-LF. Methods: Eligible pts were those with GC who had no alternative standard or effective therapy options after ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Target total enrollment was 32 pts (10 pts in the initial GC cohort plus an additional 22 pts in the expanded cohort). E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks (± 1 week) by RECIST v1.1. Results: At data cutoff (Oct 16, 2020), 34 pts with GC were enrolled (10 pts in the initial GC cohort; 24 pts in the expanded GC cohort) with a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2–11). Previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy was reported for 26 (76.5%) pts. All pts were evaluable for objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and 30 pts were evaluable for overall survival (OS). Among all pts with GC, the ORR was 17.6% (95% CI 6.8–34.5) and the disease control rate was 79.4% (95% CI 62.1–91.3). Median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.7–4.3) and median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI 6.7–15.4). The ORRs were 19.2% (95% CI 6.6–39.4) in ICI-pretreated pts and 12.5% (95% CI 0.3–52.7) in pts without prior ICI therapy. Median PFS was similar regardless of prior treatment with ICIs (3.7 months [95% CI 2.7–5.6] in ICI-pretreated pts vs 3.4 months [95% CI 1.0–4.3] in pts without prior ICI therapy); however, the PFS rate at 6 months in ICI-pretreated pts was higher vs the rate in pts without prior ICI therapy (35.9% [95% CI 17.2–55.1] vs 0%, respectively). Median OS was also longer in ICI-pretreated pts (evaluable pts, n = 23) vs pts without prior ICI therapy (evaluable pts, n = 7) (10.0 months [95% CI 6.7–not estimable] vs 6.7 months [95% CI 3.1–8.5], respectively). Common grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (41.2%), leukopenia (29.4%), and anemia (26.5%). In cycle 1, there were no cases of febrile neutropenia among the 22 pts treated with prophylactic peg-GCSF; among pts who did not receive prophylactic peg-GCSF, 16.7% of pts had febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: E7389-LF had a manageable safety profile and encouraging activity in pts with heavily treated GC. In pts with GC, prior treatment with ICIs might enhance the potential efficacy of E7389-LF. These results support further development of E7389-LF for advanced GC. Clinical trial information: NCT03207672.

ARRY-520 Shows Durable Responses in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1860-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Acceptable Safety Profile ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1860 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent induction of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. Cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that depend on the short-lived survival protein Myeloid cell leukemia (MCL)-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520 in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary efficacy and biological activity of ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks without/with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients (pts) had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib [BTZ] and an immunomodulatory [IMiD] agent), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Cohorts were enrolled in a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Results: Enrollment in this Phase 1 study is complete. Thirty-one pts have been treated, with a median age of 60 years (range 43–79) and a median of 6 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received a prior proteasome inhibitor (30 pts BTZ, 4 pts carfilzomib) and an IMiD-based agent (28 pts lenalidomide, 23 pts thalidomide). Twenty-four pts had an autologous stem cell transplant. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.25 mg/m2/day without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation with G-CSF support was conducted and the MTD for ARRY-520 with G-CSF was determined to be 1.5 mg/m2/day. At the MTD, 1 of 7 pts had a DLT of febrile neutropenia. At doses above the MTD, additional DLTs of Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 corneal disorder were observed. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events (anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), as well as anorexia, blurred vision, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and rash. No treatment-related AEs of neuropathy or alopecia were reported at the MTD. ARRY-520 has been dosed over extended periods of time (to date, median 7 cycles [range 1–44]), with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The plasma concentrations of ARRY-520 were determined over a 7-day period during Cycle 1 following the Day 1 and 2 infusions of ARRY-520. The preliminary noncompartmental PK parameter estimates in this population were similar to those observed in prior oncology studies. The PK was characterized by low clearance (CL = 2.2 L/hr/m2) and a large volume of distribution (Vss = 232 L/m2). The t1/2 of elimination was very long (67 hrs). Concentrations were typically maintained above the in vitro IC50 for KSP inhibition for ≥ 7 days suggesting therapeutically active concentrations of drug were maintained in pts for sustained periods. Further analyses of PK relative to safety and activity are on-going. ARRY-520 showed activity as a single agent across a range of doses in this heavily pretreated population (31 evaluable pts) with 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 confirmed minimal response (MR) per International Melanoma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 7 prior therapies (range 2–8). Responses were durable; to date, the durations of responses for PRs were 3.4+ months (mos), 11.9+ mos and 12.0 mos, respectively. Of interest, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged, with a median time to PR of 3.7 mos (range 3.7–8.1). Notably, responses were observed in pts refractory to multiple standard-of-care agents. In addition, 4 pts experienced a best response of stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 10 mos. To date, 5 pts remain on study, including 2 of 3 PRs. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of clinical activity, with a long duration of response and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated MM Patients. A Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing to obtain additional information on the efficacy, safety and biological effects of ARRY-520 at 1.5 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support. Disclosures: Shah: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Karan:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hilder:a: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma Inc.: Consultancy. Lonial:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8032-8032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
D. Ross Camidge ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Ravi Salgia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Alk Positive ◽  
Expansion Cohort

8032 Background: ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase rearrangements define a subset of NSCLC sensitive to the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib, approved multinationally for the treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Updated efficacy and safety data are presented for crizotinib in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Methods: ROS1 status was determined by break-apart FISH assays, and patients were enrolled into an expansion cohort of an ongoing phase 1 crizotinib study (NCT00585195). Patients received crizotinib 250 mg BID. Responses were assessed using RECIST v1.0. The disease control rate (DCR; % stable disease [SD] + partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) was evaluated at weeks 8 and 16. Results: At the data cut-off, 33 patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC had enrolled, and 31 had received crizotinib, with 25 evaluable for response. Median age was 51 years (range 31–72), 79% of patients were never-smokers and 97% had adenocarcinoma histology. The median number of prior treatments for advanced disease was 1 (range 0–7). The objective response rate (ORR) was 56% (95% CI: 24.4–65.1), with 2 CRs, 12 PRs and 8 SDs. 8-week and 16-week DCRs were 76% and 60%, respectively. Median PFS has not been reached, with ~60% of patients still in follow-up for PFS; 6-month PFS probability was 71% (95% CI: 45.6–86.0). Median treatment duration was 24 weeks (range 2.3–112), and 24 patients were on treatment at the data cut-off; 5 patients died (all disease-related). 91% of patients had treatment-related adverse events (AEs): most commonly visual impairment (82%), nausea (36%) and diarrhea (33%). Most AEs were grade 1 in severity. Peripheral edema and elevated transaminases were also reported, similar to the previous experience of crizotinib. There were no treatment-related serious AEs or treatment-related permanent discontinuations. Accrual of patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC is ongoing. Conclusions: As observed in ALK-positive NSCLC, crizotinib had dramatic antitumor activity with a high ORR (56%) in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC and a generally tolerable and manageable AE profile. These findings indicate that crizotinib is an effective therapy for advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT00585195.

Mobocertinib (TAK-788) in EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins)+ metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC): Additional results from platinum-pretreated patients (pts) and EXCLAIM cohort of phase 1/2 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9014-9014
Author(s):  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Exon 20

9014 Background: No approved targeted therapies are available for EGFR ex20ins+ mNSCLC. Mobocertinib, a first-in-class, potent, oral TKI targeting EGFR ex20ins mutations, has Breakthrough Therapy Designation in the US and China for post-platinum-based chemotherapy pts with EGFR ex20ins+ mNSCLC. Methods: This 3-part, open-label, multicenter study (NCT02716116) has dose-escalation/expansion and extension (EXCLAIM) cohorts. Pts with EGFR ex20ins+ mNSCLC, ECOG status 0–1, and ≥1 prior line of therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease received mobocertinib 160 mg QD. Primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) assessed by independent review committee (IRC). We present additional efficacy and safety data for 114 platinum-pretreated pts (PPP) and 96 pts from EXCLAIM safety cohort. Results: Results are from Nov 1, 2020, data cutoff. Among PPP pts (n=114; median age 60 y [27–84 y]), 66% were female, 60% were Asian, and 59% had ≥2 prior systemic anticancer lines. Confirmed ORR per IRC was 28%, including 1 complete response (CR); disease control rate (DCR) was 78% [95% CI: 69–85]; median duration of response (DOR) was 17.5 mo (Table). In EXCLAIM (n=96; median age 59 y [27–80 y]), 65% were female, 69% were Asian, and 49% had ≥2 prior lines. Confirmed ORR per IRC was 25%, with 1 CR; DCR was 76% [95% CI: 66–84]; median DOR was not reached (Table). In EXCLAIM, baseline brain metastases were present in 33/96 pts (34%); the first site of disease progression by IRC was the brain in 40% of all pts and 73% of pts with baseline brain metastases. Confirmed responses were seen in all prespecified subgroups in PPP and EXCLAIM. Efficacy by EGFR ex20ins mutation variant will be presented. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; >20%) in PPP were diarrhea (91%), rash (45%), paronychia (38%), decreased appetite (35%), nausea (34%), dry skin (31%), vomiting (30%), increased blood creatinine (25%), stomatitis (24%), and pruritus (21%); the only grade ≥3 TRAE in ≥5% was diarrhea (22%). AEs leading to discontinuation in >2% were diarrhea (4%) and nausea (4%). A similar safety profile was observed in EXCLAIM. Conclusions: Mobocertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit for pts with EGFR ex20ins+ mNSCLC in PPP and EXCLAIM cohorts, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02716116. [Table: see text]

Phase IIb Randomized Study of CPX-351 Vs. Conventional Cytarabine + Daunorubicin in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients Aged 60-75: Safety Report.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1033-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E Lancet ◽  
Eric J. Feldman ◽  
Jonathan E. Kolitz ◽  
Martin S. Tallman ◽  
Donna E. Hogge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 1 Study

Abstract Abstract 1033 Poster Board I-55 CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation that encapsulates cytarabine and daunorubicin at a 5:1 molar ratio that is consistently synergistic and avoids antagonism across multiple leukemic and solid tumor cell lines, in vitro. In preclinical observations CPX-351 has been shown to accumulate in bone marrow where it is preferentially taken up by leukemia cells. A recently completed Phase 1 study recommended that 90-minute infusions of 101 u/m2 be given on Days 1, 3, and 5 (1 u = 1 mg cytarabine + 0.44 mg daunorubicin). The results suggested that liposomal encapsulation of this chemotherapy doublet might change the safety profile by reducing non-hematologic toxicities including alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicities (such as mucositis), and hepatic toxicity, while retaining hematopoietic cytotoxicity as evidenced by a high proportion of aplasia achieved and a significant number of complete remissions. A Phase 2 randomized study was initiated comparing CPX-351 with conventional cytarabine + daunorubicin (“7 + 3” regimen) in AML patients aged 60-75. This report summarizes safety data for the first 45 patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with de novo or therapy-related AML or AML evolved from an antecedent hematologic disorder, ECOG PS of 0-2, SCr < 2.0 mg/dL, total bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dL, ALT/AST < 3 x ULN, and cardiac ejection fraction >50% by echo or MUGA were eligible. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive CPX-351 (100u/m2 Day 1, 3, and 5 by 90 minute infusion) or to “7 + 3” (cytarabine 100mg/m2/d for 7 days by continuous IV infusion and daunorubicin 45-60mg/m2 Day 1, 2 and 3 by IV push). Results: As of Aug. 1, 2009, 45 of the 80 patients enrolled to date have been randomized (31 to CPX-351 and 14 to “7 + 3” Control), treated and completed follow-up sufficient to capture safety data for at least the first induction course. Among this group of 45 patients one or more SAE events, as defined in the protocol, were reported in 15/31 (42%) CPX-351 patients and 5/14 (29%) Control patients. Deaths during induction were infrequently reported in both arms of the study [1 (3%) vs. 1 (7%)]. One patient in each arm of the study died of sepsis related events on Days 20 and 19, respectively. One post-induction death occurred in a patient in the CPX-351 arm who died on Day 83 of an intracranial bleed, 24 days after start of consolidation therapy. Cytopenia-related events associated with treatment of leukemia accounted for the majority of the SAEs in both arms of the study, including 11 of the 15 (73%) SAEs in the CPX-351 arm and 3 of 5 (60%) SAEs in the control arm. These SAEs consisted of fever and febrile neutropenia (13% vs.14%), sepsis (3% vs. 7%), pneumonia (3% vs. 0), major bleeding episodes (3% vs. 0) and a number of minor infections and anemia. Data for all adverse events are available for 41 patients and events occurring in 10 or more patients are presented in the table below. Skin rash was more common with CPX-351 and rigors/chills were more common with “7 + 3”. The majority of other adverse events were similar (±15%) in the two groups. Discussion/Conclusion: In this study, induction mortality to date with CPX-351 is low (3%). The overall toxicity of CPX-351 appears comparable to that due to 7 + 3. As observed in the Phase 1 study of CPX-351, grade 3/4 GI adverse events were distinctly uncommon. No adverse events unique to CPX-351 were observed. CPX-351 exhibits an acceptable safety profile for use in older, newly diagnosed AML patients. Disclosures: Chiarella: Celator Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Louie:Celator Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

405 CDX1140–01, a phase 1 dose-escalation/expansion study of CDX-1140 alone (Part 1) and in combination with CDX-301 (Part 2) or pembrolizumab (Part 3)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A430-A430
Author(s):  
Rachel Sanborn ◽  
Ralph Hauke ◽  
Nashat Gabrail ◽  
Mark O’Hara ◽  
Nina Bhardwaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Expansion Cohort

BackgroundCDX-1140 is an agonist anti-CD40 mAb selected to optimize systemic exposure and hence tumor microenvironment (TME) ingress. CDX-1140 activity may be enhanced by combining with CDX-301 (recombinant Flt3L), a dendritic cell growth factor, or with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 mAb.MethodsPatients with advanced solid or hematologic (Part 1 only) tumors are enrolled. Part 1 dose-escalation results have been presented (SITC 2019). In Part 2, CDX-1140 dose-escalation (0.09–1.5 mg/kg q4w) is in combination with CDX-301 (75 mcg/kg sc QD x 5 for 2 cycles). In Part 3, CDX-1140 dose-escalation (0.72–1.5 mg/kg q3w) is in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg q3w. Part 1 and 2 expansion cohorts are dosed at the CDX-1140 MTD, 1.5 mg/kg q4w. Part 3 expansion cohorts are planned. Peripheral blood and tumor biomarkers analysis are ongoing.Results92 patients have been treated (Part 1 n=57, Part 2 n=31, Part 3 n=4). Part 1 expansion cohorts in SCCHN (n=7) and RCC (n=5) are fully enrolled. Part 2 dose-escalation completed to the highest CDX-1140 dose and a SCCHN expansion cohort is ongoing. Part 3 dose-escalation recently initiated. Safety data is available for 23 and 10 patients at the MTD in Part 1 and 2, respectively. In general, the safety profiles were similar, with arthralgia (52% vs. 50%), pyrexia (44% vs 50%), fatigue (30% vs. 50%), chills (39% vs. 40%), vomiting (30% vs. 20%), nausea (26% vs 40%), myalgia (22% vs. 30%), increased ALT (22% vs. 20%), and increased AST (22% vs. 30%) being the most common drug related AEs at the MTD in Part 1 and 2, respectively. Most AEs were low grade. Across all cohorts, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (G2 n=4, G3 n=2) occurred in 6 (Part 1 n=2; Part 2 n=4) and pneumonitis (G3) occurred in 5 (Part 1 n=4; Part 2 n=1) patients. Immune activation in the TME consistent with CD40 agonism and increases serum inflammatory cytokines were observed. Evidence of anti-tumor activity/clinical benefit include SD (n=13), tumor cavitation (n=2) and a uPR in solid tumors. A patient with follicular lymphoma has an ongoing durable complete metabolic response.ConclusionsThe CDX-1140 MTD dose of 1.5 mg/kg, a dose level expected to provide good systemic exposure and TME penetration, is generally well tolerated alone and with CDX-301. Transaminitis and CRS have generally been low grade and infrequent. A cohort combining CDX-1140 with chemotherapy will be initiated in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Trial RegistrationNCT03329950Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the following: Providence St. Joseph Health IRB, approval number MOD2020001128; WIRB, approval number 1188814 (Hauke, Gabrail, Bordoni & Gordon); University of Pennsylvania IRB, approval number UPCC 18917; Mount Sinai School of Medicine IRB, approval number 18-00202; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center IRB, approval number 18-225A; Houston Methodist IRB, approval number MOD00000836

Clinical activity of fianlimab (REGN3767), a human anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, combined with cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9515-9515
Author(s):  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

9515 Background: Fianlimab and cemiplimab are two high-affinity, fully human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies. In a Phase 1 dose escalation study, fianlimab combined with cemiplimab showed an acceptable safety profile and some clinical activity in pts with advanced malignancies. Here, we present safety and clinical activity data from two expansion cohorts of pts with advanced melanoma (anti–programmed cell death/ligand-1 [anti–PD-(L)1] naïve or experienced) who were treated with fianlimab + cemiplimab and had an opportunity for first on-treatment tumor assessment (cut-off date: Jan 4, 2021). Methods: Pts with advanced melanoma who had no prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment (naïve) or prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment within 3 months of screening (experienced) received fianlimab 1600 mg + cemiplimab 350 mg by IV infusion every 3 weeks. Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and subsequently every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: 48 pts with advanced melanoma were treated with the combination therapy: 33 were anti–PD-(L)1 naïve and 15 were anti–PD-(L)1 experienced (median age: 69 years vs 59 years; male: 66.7% vs 46.7%; Caucasian: 87.9% vs 60%). The safety profile (including immune-related adverse events [AEs]) of fianlimab + cemiplimab combination therapy was similar to that of anti–PD-1 monotherapy with one exception. The rate of adrenal insufficiency, 8.3% (4/48) of pts, is similar to the rate previously observed with anti–PD-1 + anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy but higher than that observed with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 35.4% (17/48) of patients; Grade ≥3 serious TEAEs occurred in 22.9% (11/48) of patients; 8.3% (4/48) of patients discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (n = 15, 31.3%) and rash (n = 11, 22.9%). By investigator assessment, objective response rate (includes unconfirmed complete [CR] and partial responses [PR]) was 63.6% (3 CRs and 18 PRs) for anti–PD-(L)1 naïve pts and 13.3% (1 CR and 1 PR) for anti–PD-(L)1 experienced pts. Median progression-free survival and median duration of response for the anti–PD-(L)1 treatment naïve cohort have not been reached. Prognostic clinical markers and tumor biomarkers such as expression of LAG-3, PD-L1, and major histocompatibility complex II are being evaluated. Recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions: The safety profile of fianlimab + cemiplimab is similar to that observed with cemiplimab monotherapy and other anti–PD-1s, with the exception of higher rate of adrenal insufficiency. Fianlimab + cemiplimab combination has shown clinical activity for pts with advanced melanoma that is similar to anti–PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination therapy, but with lower demonstrated rates of TEAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final results from a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study (DESTINY-CRC01).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3505-3505
Author(s):  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label

3505 Background: T-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate of a humanized anti-HER2 antibody bound to a topoisomerase I inhibitor by a cleavable linker. The primary analysis of DESTINY-CRC01 (DS8201-A-J203; NCT03384940), a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing mCRC showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile (cohort A median follow-up [FU], 27.1 weeks; Siena S, ASCO 2020). We present updated longer-term efficacy and safety data. Methods: Pts had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing, RAS wild-type mCRC that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens. 6.4 mg/kg of T-DXd was administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 3 cohorts (A: HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+; B: IHC2+/ISH−; C: IHC1+). The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: At data cutoff (Dec 28, 2020), 86 pts (A, 53; B, 15; C, 18) received T-DXd. Median age was 58.5 y (range, 27-79), 53.5% were male, and 90.7% had left colon or rectum cancer. Median prior regimens for metastatic disease was 4 (range, 2-11). All pts had prior irinotecan; 30.2% in cohort A had prior anti-HER2 therapy. Median (m) treatment duration (all pts) was 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.1-4.1; cohort A, 5.1 mo [95% CI, 3.9-7.6]). In cohort A (median FU, 62.4 weeks), confirmed ORR was 45.3% (24/53 pts; 95% CI, 31.6-59.6), DCR was 83.0% (44/53 pts; 95% CI, 70.2-91.9), mDOR was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.8-9.5), mPFS was 6.9 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) with 37 (69.8%) PFS events, and mOS was 15.5 mo (95% CI, 8.8-20.8) with 36 (67.9%) OS events. These results are consistent with the primary analysis. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% (7/16 pts; 95% CI, 19.8-70.1) in pts with prior anti-HER2 therapy, 57.5% (23/40 pts; 95% CI, 40.9-73.0) in pts with IHC3+ status, and 7.7% (1/13 pts; 95% CI, 0.2-36.0) in pts with IHC2+/ISH+ status. In cohorts B and C, mPFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and 1.4 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.1); mOS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE) and 7.7 mo (95% CI, 2.2-13.9), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade (G) ≥3 occurred in 65.1% of pts (56/86); the most common TEAEs were hematologic and gastrointestinal. TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 13 pts (15.1%). 8 pts (9.3%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD) adjudicated by an independent committee as related to T-DXd (4 G2; 1 G3; 3 G5). Conclusions: T-DXd at 6.4 mg/kg Q3W showed promising activity and durability with longer-term FU in this pt population. The safety profile was consistent with prior results; ILD continues to be recognized as an important identified risk that requires careful monitoring and intervention as needed. These results support continued exploration of T-DXd in pts with HER2-overexpressing mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03384940.

scholarly journals TRLS-06. PHASE 1 EXPANSION STUDY OF IRINOTECAN LIPOSOME INJECTION (nal-IRI) IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (mBC): FINDINGS FROM THE COHORT WITH ACTIVE BRAIN METASTASIS (BM)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i9-i9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carey Anders ◽  
Pamela Munster ◽  
Donald Northfelt ◽  
Hyo Sook Han ◽  
Cynthia Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cns Metastases ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Topoisomerase 1 ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract BACKGROUND: nal-IRI is a liposomal formulation of irinotecan (topoisomerase-1 inhibitor). Preclinical data show that nal-IRI accumulates in BMs and prolongs survival in animal models of BM. Findings from a phase 1 expansion study (NCT01770353), evaluating patients with mBC and active BM, are reported. METHODS: This phase 1 expansion study enrolled patients with mBC who received multiple prior lines of cytotoxic therapy in the metastatic setting, including one cohort with mBC and active BM, defined as radiographic evidence of new or progressive central nervous system (CNS) metastases after radiation therapy with ≥1 lesion of ≥1 cm in the longest dimension on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Patients received nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 (free-base equivalent; FBE) every two weeks (q2w) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, escalating to 70 mg/m2 FBE q2w, if tolerated. RECIST v1.1 and modified RECIST criteria were used to assses non-CNS and CNS disease, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were enrolled (10 with active BM). Median age was 53 years (range 29–70 years) and median number of prior cytotoxic anti-cancer regimens was 3 (range 0–6); 29 patients received ≥1 dose of nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 FBE. Overall, nal-IRI monotherapy appeared to be well tolerated, and achieved ≥30% objective response rates for both CNS and non-CNS disease. Among the 10 patients with active BM, 6 achieved CNS disease control (3 partial responses [PRs] and 3 stable disease [SD]), including one patient with durable CNS SD and non-CNS PR for 2 years. Among 7 patients with serial evaluation of CNS metastases posttreatment, 6 patients achieved a reduction in target CNS lesions compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: Treatment with nal-IRI resulted in CNS disease control among 6 of 10 heavily pretreated patients with mBC and active BM. Further exploration of nal-IRI in patients with mBC and active BM is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document