Evaluation of bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in cervical cancer: Data from phase 1 and phase 2 studies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5509-5509
Author(s):  
Julius Strauss ◽  
Fadi S. Braiteh ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Maria De Miguel ◽  
Andres Cervantes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein ◽  
Grade 3

5509 Background: The accelerated FDA approval of pembrolizumab validated the efficacy of anti–PD-(L)1 therapy for pts with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer; however, the objective response rate (ORR) with pembrolizumab was 14.3% in pts with PD-L1 expressing tumors. HPV infection is implicated in > 95% of cervical cancers and is linked to upregulation of TGF-β signaling. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. We report pooled safety and efficacy in pts with immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer treated with bintrafusp alfa in phase 1 (INTR@PID 001; NCT02517398) and phase 2 (study 012; NCT03427411) studies. Methods: Pts with pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer received bintrafusp alfa 0.3-30 mg/kg (phase 1 dose escalation) or 1200 mg Q2W (phase 1 expansion/phase 2) until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Treatment past progression was allowed. Primary endpoints were safety for the dose-escalation part of the phase 1 study and best overall response per RECIST 1.1 for the expansion part of phase 1 and phase 2 studies. Secondary endpoints for the expansion part of the phase 1 and 2 studies included safety. Results: As of May 15, 2020 (phase 1) and December 22, 2020 (phase 2), 39 pts had received bintrafusp alfa for a median duration of 2.8 months (range, 0.5-19.3). The median follow-up to data cutoff was 35.0 months and 24.1 months for the phase 1 and phase 2 studies, respectively. All pts had received prior anticancer therapy; 16 pts (41.0%) had received ≥3 prior anticancer regimens. There were 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses (PRs; ORR per RECIST 1.1, 28.2%). Median duration of response was 11.7 months (range, 1.4-41.2), and 5 pts (45.5%) had ongoing responses (duration 1.5-41.2 months). An additional delayed PR was observed (duration 23.7 months). Reponses occurred irrespective of tumor histology or prior bevacizumab or radiation treatment. Median overall survival (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 to not reached); 24-month OS rate was 33.2%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 pts (84.6%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 8 pts (20.5%; anemia, colitis, gastroparesis, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, keratoacanthoma, cystitis noninfective, hematuria, pneumonitis, rash macular [n = 1 each]); 1 patient (2.6%) had a grade 4 TRAE (asymptomatic hypokalemia related to the above grade 3 gastroparesis). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Bintrafusp alfa had a manageable safety profile and demonstrated clinical activity in pts with heavily pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02517398 , NCT03427411.

scholarly journals Bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in patients with human papillomavirus-associated malignancies

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001395
Author(s):  
Julius Strauss ◽  
Margaret E Gatti-Mays ◽  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
Sébastien Salas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein

BackgroundBintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of transforming growth factor (TGF)-βRII (a TGF-β ‘trap’) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. This is the largest analysis of patients with advanced, pretreated human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies treated with bintrafusp alfa.MethodsIn these phase 1 (NCT02517398) and phase 2 trials (NCT03427411), 59 patients with advanced, pretreated, checkpoint inhibitor-naive HPV-associated cancers received bintrafusp alfa intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was best overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1; other endpoints included safety.ResultsAs of April 17, 2019 (phase 1), and October 4, 2019 (phase 2), the confirmed objective response rate per RECIST V.1.1 in the checkpoint inhibitor-naive, full-analysis population was 30.5% (95% CI, 19.2% to 43.9%; five complete responses); eight patients had stable disease (disease control rate, 44.1% (95% CI, 31.2% to 57.6%)). In addition, three patients experienced a delayed partial response after initial disease progression, for a total clinical response rate of 35.6% (95% CI, 23.6% to 49.1%). An additional patient with vulvar cancer had an unconfirmed response. Forty-nine patients (83.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were grade 3/4 in 16 patients (27.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.ConclusionBintrafusp alfa showed clinical activity and manageable safety and is a promising treatment in HPV-associated cancers. These findings support further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in patients with advanced, pretreated HPV-associated cancers.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1151
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Suzuki ◽  
Satoshi Toyoma ◽  
Yohei Kawasaki ◽  
Koh Koizumi ◽  
Nobuko Iikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

Background and Objectives: In recent years, the effectiveness of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration has attracted attention in various cancers, including head and neck cancers. However, individual assessments of the administered chemotherapy regimens are insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration in recurrent metastatic head and neck cancer by focusing on a single regimen. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data from the medical records of 18 patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who received systemic chemotherapy with weekly cetuximab and paclitaxel (Cmab + PTX) after progression following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: In all patients, the ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 44.4%, 72.2%, 3.8 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Regarding AEs, three patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 3 anemia, paronychia, asthenia, and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Cmab + PTX was shown to maintain high efficacy and acceptable safety for R/M HNSCC that progressed after ICI therapy. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment sequences and drug combinations for recurrent R/M HNSCC.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Hepatotoxicity in Primary Liver Cancer Versus Other Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyang Fu ◽  
Wang-Zhong Li ◽  
Nicole A. McGrath ◽  
Chunwei Walter Lai ◽  
Gagandeep Brar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Liver Cancers ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundOverall risks of hepatotoxicity with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yet to be compared in primary liver cancers to other solid tumors.MethodsWe reviewed data from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, and assessed the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with ICIs.ResultsA total of 117 trials were eligible for the meta‐analysis, including 7 trials with primary liver cancers. The most common hepatotoxicity was ALT elevation (incidence of all grade 5.29%, 95% CI 4.52-6.20) and AST elevation (incidence of all grade 5.88%, 95% CI 4.96-6.97). The incidence of all grade ALT and AST elevation was 6.01% and 6.84% for anti-PD‐1 (95% CI 5.04-7.18/5.69-8.25) and 3.60% and 3.72% for anti-PD-L1 (95% CI 2.72-4.76/2.82-4.94; p< 0.001/p<0.001). The incidence of ≥ grade 3 ALT and AST elevation was 1.54% and 1.48% for anti-PD‐1 (95% CI 1.19-1.58/1.07-2.04) and 1.03% and 1.08% for anti-PD-L1 (95% CI 0.71-1.51/0.80-1.45; p= 0.002/p<0.001). The incidence of all grade ALT and AST elevation was 13.3% and 14.2% in primary liver cancers (95% CI 11.1-16.0 and 9.93-20.36) vs. 4.92% and 5.38% in other solid tumors (95% CI 4.21-5.76 and 4.52-5.76 in other solid tumors; p <0.001/p<0.001).ConclusionOur study indicates that anti-PD-1 is associated with a higher risk of all‐ and high‐grade hepatotoxicity compared to anti-PD-L1, and primary liver cancers are associated with a higher risk of all‐ and high‐grade hepatotoxicity compared to other solid tumors.

scholarly journals Phase Ib/II trial of ibrutinib and nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma1

Kidney Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Matthew E. Tenold ◽  
Lihong Qi ◽  
Frances Lara ◽  
Daniel Robles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy has improved the outcomes of many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), most eventually develop disease progression. Newer agents that modulate immune response can possibly potentiate checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The ITK/ETK/BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been reported to inhibit myeloid derived suppressor cells in preclinical models and to potentiate immunotherapy. We conducted an investigator-initiated trial of ibrutinib plus the PD1 inhibitor nivolumab in mRCC patients, particularly in those previously exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Eligible patients had mRCC of any histologic subtype, completed at least one line of prior systemic therapy which could have included prior immunotherapy, and had acceptable end-organ function with ECOG performance status of 0–2. Treatment consisted of nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ibrutinib 560 mg (dose level 0) or 420 mg (dose level -1) orally once daily. Cycle length was 28 days. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any Grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) attributable to therapy. After identification of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), up to 19 patients were enrolled to an expansion cohort to further evaluate toxicities and any early evidence of efficacy. The primary endpoints of the trial were establishment of RP2D and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 6 to dose level 0, 7 (of which one was not evaluable for DLT) in dose level -1, and 18 in the expansion cohort. Median age was 60 years (range, 36–90), most had clear cell histology (n = 27; 87%), and most had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (n = 28; 90%). Three patients experienced one DLT each, all in dose level 0 (all Grade 3), namely elevated lipase, hypoalbuminemia, and nausea. No DLTs were seen in dose level –1 which was declared the RP2D. The most common Grade 3 or higher AEs include anemia (n = 5), lymphocyte count decrease (4), nausea (2), and hypotension (2). Of 28 patients evaluable for response, one patient (3.6%) had a complete response, 2 (7.1%) had a partial response, and 11 (39.2%) had stable disease, for an objective response rate of 10.7%(95%CI: 3.7%–27.2%) and a disease control rate of 50%(95%CI: 32.6%–67.4%). All responders had received prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Median PFS was 2.5 months (95%CI, 1.9 –4.8) while median OS was 9.1 months (95%CI, 6.6 –19.0). Conclusions: Ibrutinib at a dose of 420 mg orally once daily in combination with nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks is feasible and tolerable in mRCC patients. No unique immune-related AEs were observed. Anti-tumor activity was seen in patients previously exposed to PD-1 targeted therapy.

A phase 1 study of TTI-621, a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting CD47, in subjects with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7585-TPS7585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Maxted Ansell ◽  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
Owen A. O'Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Phase 1 Study

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced hepatitis: Risk factors, outcomes, and impact on survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14525-e14525
Author(s):  
Abdul Miah ◽  
Songzhu Zhao ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Andrew Johns ◽  
Madison Grogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Grade 3

e14525 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the survival of patients with multiple cancer types, however ICI treatment is associated with a unique set of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ. Few studies have evaluated the risk factors and outcomes of ICI induced hepatitis (ICIH). Methods: We utilized an institutional database of patients with advanced cancers treated with ICI between 2011 and 2017 at The OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center to identify patients with ICIH. Any patient who received at least one dose of ICI alone or in combination with other systemic therapies either as part of clinical trial or standard of care were included. Clinical data were extracted through chart abstraction. irAEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of ICI initiation to death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. OS with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. OS was also evaluated by occurrence of ICIH using the log-rank test. Results: We identified 1,096 patients treated with at least one dose of ICI. Most common cancers included lung (n=224, 20%) and melanoma (n=342, 31%). The most common ICIs were PD1/L1 (n=774, 71%) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (n=195, 18%). ICIH of any grade occurred in 64 (6%) patients. Overall, 46 (71%) were male and median age was 60 years. Severity of hepatitis was grade 1-2 in 30 patients (47%) (Table 1). The incidence of ≥grade 3 ICIH in the entire cohort was 3.1%. Median time to ICIH diagnosis was 63 days. ICIH occurred alone in 24 patients, and co-occurred with other irAEs in 40 patients. The most common co-occurring irAEs were pneumonitis (n=7); colitis (n=15), thyroid abnormality (n=14); and dermatitis (n=15). ICIH was more common in women (p=0.038), in patients treated with combination ICIs (p<0.001), and among patients receiving first line therapy (p=0.018). Patients who developed ICIH had significantly longer OS than patients who did not develop ICIH; there was no difference in OS between patients with ≥grade 3 ICIH vs grade 1-2 (Table). 33 out of 34 patients with ≥grade3 ICIH were treated with steroids; 3 received mycophenolate and one received infliximab. Of patients with ≥grade 3 ICIH, 11 resumed ICI therapy without recurrent ICIH. Conclusions: Female sex, combination immunotherapy, and line of therapy were associated with ICIH. Patients with ICIH had improved clinical outcomes compared to those that did not develop ICIH, even those with higher grade toxicity. Further study is needed to assist in developing risk stratification models and optimal treatment for ICIH. OS of patients with and without immune checkpoint inhibitor hepatitis.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document