Contemporary trends and survival outcomes of females with esophageal cancer in the United States.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16100-e16100
Author(s):  
Camille Baumrucker ◽  
Lindsay Remer ◽  
Dido Franceschi ◽  
Alan S Livingstone ◽  
Francis Igor Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
White Males ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

e16100 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is historically a male dominant disease. Current evidence on the impact of gender on clinical presentation and survival outcomes of EC is limited by small sample size or single institution series. Methods: Patients with EC (stage I-III) were identified in the NCDB (2004-2016). Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics of male and female patients were compared using Chi-square analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable regression were used to estimate overall survival (OS). Results: Of 62,893 patients included, most patients were male (77.7%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common subtype (66.7%). Squamous cell carcinoma was more predominant in females (57.1% vs. 26.5%, p<0.001). Females were older (68.5 vs. 66.1 yrs; p<0.001) and more likely African American (AA, 14% vs. 8.1%; p<0.001). Females presented with more local disease (stage I, 19.6% vs. 18.2%; p<0.001) while males presented with more locoregional disease (LRD, stage II/III, 80.4% vs 81.8%, p<0.001). Of those with LRD, females less frequently received chemotherapy (CT, 75.4% vs. 82.9%, p<0.001), radiation therapy (RT, 78.9% vs. 82.6%, p<0.001), and esophagectomy (EG, 28% vs. 40.5%, p<0.001). White females with LRD received less CT (76.2% vs. 83.9%, p<0.001), RT (79.5% vs. 83.3%, p<0.001), and EG (30.6% vs. 43.5%, p<0.001). AA females with LRD received less CT (71.9% vs. 75.2%, p=0.013) and RT (77.4% vs. 80.5%, p=0.013) but had similar rates of EG as AA males (p=0.476). Females had worse OS than males (18.1 vs. 19.7mo, p=0.001; cI: 23.5 vs. 31.9mo, p<0.001; LRD: 17.2 vs 18.3mo, p=0.473). White females had worse OS than white males (18.6 vs. 20.4mo, p<0.001) while AA females had better OS (13.5 vs. 12.6mo, p=0.001). White females who underwent EG had improved OS over white males (47.6 vs 38mo, p<0.001) while AA males and females who underwent EG had similar OS (p=0.473). Female gender, older age, AA race, high comorbidity score and clinical stage, and lack of access to CT, RT, and EG were independent predictors of mortality (Table 1). Conclusions: Females with EC seem to have less access to CT, RT, and EG with worse OS than males. Healthcare policies should focus on increasing access to standard treatments for female patients with EC.[Table: see text]

Impact of gender on treatment and survival of patients with esophageal cancer in the United States.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 173-173
Author(s):  
Camille Baumrucker ◽  
Dido Franceschi ◽  
Alan S Livingstone ◽  
Francis Igor Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
White Males ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
The Impact

173 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is historically a male-predominant disease. Current available evidence on the impact of gender on clinical presentation and survival outcomes of EC is limited by small sample size or single institutional series. Methods: Patients with EC (stage I-III) were identified in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB, 2004-2016). Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics of male and female patients were compared using Chi-square analysis. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of 62,893 patients included, male gender was predominant (77.7% vs 22.3%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common subtype (66.7%); however, squamous cell carcinoma was more predominant in females (57.1% vs. 26.5%, p<0.001). Females were significantly older (68.5 vs. 66.1 years; p<0.001) and more likely African American (AA) (14% vs. 8.1%; p<0.001). Females were more likely to present with local disease (stage I, 19.6% vs. 18.2%; p<0.001), while males presented more likely with locoregional disease (LRD, stage II/III, 80.4% vs 81.8%, p<0.001). Females had worse OS compared to males (18.1 vs. 19.7 mo; p=0.001; cI: 23.5 vs. 31.9mo, p<0.001; cII/III: 17.2 vs 18.3mo, p=0.473). White females had worse OS than white males (18.6 vs. 20.4mo, p<0.001), while AA females had better OS (13.5 vs. 12.6mo, p=0.001). Among patients with LRD, females less frequently received chemotherapy (CT, 75.4% vs. 82.9%, p<0.001), radiation therapy (RT, 78.9% vs. 82.6%, p<0.001), and esophagectomy (28% vs. 40.5%, p<0.001). Females who underwent esophagectomy had improved OS over males (40.3 vs. 32.7mo; p<0.001). More specifically, white females who underwent esophagectomy had improved OS over white males (47.6 vs 38mo, p<0.001); however, AA males and females who underwent esophagectomy had similar OS (33.8 vs 32.6mo, p=0.452). Female gender, advanced age, AA race, high comorbidity score and clinical stage, and lack of access to CT, RT, and esophagectomy were independent predictors of mortality (Table). Conclusions: Females with EC seem to have less access to CT, RT and esophagectomy, which is associated with worse OS compared to males. Healthcare policies should be implemented to increase access to standard of care treatment for female patients with EC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Trends in Esophageal Cancer Mortality and Stage at Diagnosis by Race and Ethnicity in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Corona ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Eric Esrailian ◽  
Kevin A. Ghassemi ◽  
Jeffrey L. Conklin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Annual Percent Change ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Abstract Introduction Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Mortality and disease stage at diagnosis are important indicators of improvements in cancer prevention and control. We examined United States trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) mortality and stage at diagnosis by race and ethnicity. Methods We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to identify individuals with histologically confirmed EAC and ESCC between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2016. For both EAC and ESCC, we calculated age-adjusted mortality and the proportion presenting at each stage by race/ethnicity, sex, and year. We then calculated the annual percent change (APC) in each indicator by race/ethnicity and examined changes over time. Results The study included 19,257 EAC cases and 15,162 ESCC cases. EAC mortality increased significantly overall and in non-Hispanic Whites from 1993 to 2012 and from 1993 to 2010, respectively. EAC mortality continued to rise among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) (APC = 1.60, p = 0.01). NHB experienced the fastest decline in ESCC mortality (APC = − 4.53, p < 0.001) yet maintained the highest mortality at the end of the study period. Proportions of late stage disease increased overall by 18.5 and 24.5 percentage points for EAC and ESCC respectively; trends varied by race/ethnicity. Conclusion We found notable differences in trends in EAC and ESCC mortality and stage at diagnosis by race/ethnicity. Stage migration resulting from improvements in diagnosis and treatment may partially explain recent trends in disease stage at diagnosis. Future efforts should identify factors driving current esophageal cancer disparities.

scholarly journals Smoking Behavior and Prognosis After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Alwers ◽  
Prudence R Carr ◽  
Barbara Banbury ◽  
Viola Walter ◽  
Jenny Chang-Claude ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Smoking Behavior ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Heavy Smoking ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Clear Dose Response ◽  
Former Smokers

Abstract Background Smoking has been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in previous studies, but current evidence on smoking in association with survival after CRC diagnosis is limited. Methods We pooled data from 12,345 patients with stage I-IV CRC from 11 epidemiologic studies in the International Survival Analysis in Colorectal Cancer Consortium (ISACC). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the associations of pre-diagnostic smoking behavior with overall, CRC-specific and non-CRC-specific survival. Results Among 12,345 patients with CRC, 4379 (35.5%) died (2515 from CRC), over a median follow-up time of 7.5 years. Smoking was strongly associated with worse survival in stage I-III patients, whereas no association was observed among stage IV patients. Among stage I-III patients, clear dose-response relationships with all survival outcomes were seen for current smokers. For example, current smokers with ≥40 pack-years had statistically significantly worse overall, CRC-specific, and non-CRC-specific survival compared to never smokers (hazard ratio [HR] =1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.68–2.25; HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.12–1.78; and HR = 2.67, 95% CI = 2.19–3.26, respectively). Similar associations with all survival outcomes were observed for former smokers who had quit for less than 10 years, but only a weak association with non-CRC-specific survival was seen among former smokers who had quit for more than 10 years. Conclusions This large consortium of CRC patient studies provides compelling evidence that smoking is strongly associated with worse survival of stage I-III CRC patients in a clear dose-response manner. The detrimental effect of smoking was primarily related to non-colorectal cancer events, but current heavy smoking also showed an association with CRC-specific survival.

Room for improvement? The adoption of multimodal esophageal cancer care in the United States.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
R. P. Merkow ◽  
K. Y. Bilimoria ◽  
M. McCarter ◽  
A. Stewart ◽  
W. B. Chow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Factors Associated

78 Background: Consensus guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemo- or chemoradiation therapy as the preferred treatment for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma; however, it is unknown if this recommendation has been widely adopted in the U.S. Our objective was to examine esophageal cancer multimodal therapy and identify factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: From the National Cancer Data Base, patients with middle third, lower third and GE junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas were identified. Patients who were clinical stage I-III and underwent surgical resection were included. Separate logistic regression models were developed to identify predictors of neoadjuvant therapy utilization and outcomes. Results: From 1998 to 2007, 8,051 patients underwent surgical resection for esophageal cancer: 16.3% stage I, 45.0% stage II and 38.7% stage III. For stage II/III tumors, neoadjuvant use increased (49.0% to 77.8%, p<0.001). After adjustment, factors associated with underuse of neoadjuvant therapy in stage II/III patients were older age, Black or Hispanic ethnicity, more severe comorbidities, tumor location (GEJ and middle vs. lower third), tumor size ≥ 2cm, stage II (vs. III) and geographic region. Stage II/III patients not receiving neoadjuvant had an over two fold increased risk of positive lymph nodes (OR 2.14. 95% CI 1.79 – 2.55, p<0.001). In addition, the positive surgical margin rate increased almost three fold (OR 2.80 95% CI 2.17-3.62, p<0.001) but 30-day postoperative mortality risk was not significantly affected (OR 1.50 95% CI 0.94-2.39; p=0.090). For stage I patients, neoadjuvant therapy decreased over time (38.0% to 11.4%, p<0.001). The overuse of neoadjuvant therapy was associated with higher tumor grade, larger tumor size, and low surgical case volume (all p<0.05). Conclusions: The adoption of neoadjuvant therapy has increased in the past decade; however, opportunity exists to improve guideline treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Registry-based feedback to individual hospitals, such as benchmark comparison tools, could help institutions provide care in concordance with national guidelines. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Patterns of care and treatment outcomes of patients with stage I esophageal cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4035-4035
Author(s):  
Amy Catherine Moreno ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Steven H. Lin ◽  
Sharon Hermes Giordano
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Patterns Of Care ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Comorbidity Score ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Definitive Therapy

4035 Background: The aim of this study was to examine current patterns of care and associated outcomes for patients with stage I esophageal cancer (EC) treated in the United States. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1-2N0 EC from 2004-2012. Patients were categorized into four treatment groups: observation without definitive therapy (Obs), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), local excision (LE), and esophagectomy (Eso). Patient, tumor, and treatment parameters were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates, postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality comparisons, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling are reported. Results: A total of 5,460 patients met the criteria. Of these, 21% were observed, 14% underwent CRT, 23% LE, and 42% Eso. Median age and follow up were 67 years and 28 months, respectively. Eso was the primary treatment for patients of age ≤ 80 while 48% of patients age > 80 were observed. Age, race, comorbidity score, tumor location within the esophagus, type of medical insurance, median income, type of facility (academic vs. non-academic), and distance from treating facility were significant factors for predicting receipt of local therapy over observation. Postoperative 30-day mortality between the LE and Eso groups was 0.5% and 2.9%, respectively ( P< .001), which increased to 1.4% and 5.5% at 90 days ( P< .001). Five-year OS was 21% for Obs, 26% CRT, 64% LE, and 63% Eso ( P < .001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated improved OS with any form of local definitive therapy: CRT ( HR: 0.54, 95% CI [0.48 - 0.61], P< .001), LE ( HR: 0.24, [0.20 - 0.27], P< .001), Eso (HR: 0.31, [0.28 - 0.35], P< .001). Age, comorbidity score, facility type, distance, median income quartile, and insurance status were also independently associated with OS. Conclusions: Management of stage I EC is influenced by several demographic and socioeconomic factors. Clinical observation yields suboptimal outcomes compared to any local therapy, and a surgical approach should be considered over CRT whenever feasible.

Esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for clinical stage I esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Xiang Mei ◽  
Jun-Xian Mo ◽  
Yong Chen ◽  
Lei Dai ◽  
Yong-Yong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Definitive Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy are commonly used in the treatment of stage I esophageal cancer (EC). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC. Methods This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020197203). Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from database inception to June 30, 2020. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was employed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was employed to compare treatment-related death, complications, and tumor recurrence. Results A total of 13 non-randomized controlled studies involving 3,346 patients were included. Compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy, esophagectomy showed an improved OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.86; P &lt; 0.001), PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.67; P &lt; 0.001), and a lower risk of tumor recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30–0.61; P &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75–1.65; P = 0.60) and treatment-related death (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.31–4.30; P = 0.84) between the two treatments. Conclusions Current evidence shows esophagectomy has superior survival benefits as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC. It is still the preferred choice for patients with clinical stage I EC. However, future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.

Survival by anatomic site, histologic type, and tumor stage in stomach and esophageal cancer patients from the U.S. SEER Cancer Registry.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
L. Wang ◽  
L. Chu ◽  
M. Shing ◽  
W. Dong
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Intestinal Type ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Histologic Type ◽  
Anatomic Site

28 Background: Data on the association of tumor characteristics and survival for stomach cancer (SC) and esophageal cancer (EC) patients (pts) are limited. The objective of this study was to describe survival in United States. SC and EC pts by anatomic site, histologic type, and tumor stage. Methods: SC and EC pts were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Registry. SC was classified by anatomic site (cardia and non-cardia/other) and histologic type (intestinal, diffuse, other per Lauren criteria). EC was classified into anatomic site (middle/upper third, abdominal/lower third, overlapping lesions, NOS) and histologic type (adenocarcinoma (AC), squamous cell carcinoma (SQ), other). Frequency distribution and median survival were examined in these subgroups. Results: From 2004-2006, >15,500 SC and > 9,800 EC cases were diagnosed. SC: (29% cardia) and (24% diffuse, 66% intestinal, 10% other). Compared with non-cardia/other pts, cardia pts tended to be male (77% vs 56%), white (88% vs 66%), intestinal type (77% vs 61%) and present with earlier stage disease (stage I-IIIa: 48% vs 42%). With the exception of stage I/II pts, survival was longer in cardia than non-cardia/other pts. The difference was most striking in stage IIIb/IV pts (7 months (mos) cardia vs 4 mos non-cardia/other). Compared to intestinal type, diffuse type tended to be younger (median age: 64 vs 72 yrs), more female (49% vs 34%), and present with more stage IIIb/IV disease (50% vs 39%). No difference in survival by histologic type was observed when accounting for stage. EC: (26% middle/upper, 58% lower, 5% overlapping, 11% NOS) and (57% AC, 34% SQ, 9% other). Among pts with AC histology 78% occurred in the lower third; in SQ most occurred in upper/middle third (56%). Compared to SQ, AC tended to be male (85% vs 63%), white (95% vs 67%), and present with stage IV disease (34% vs 25%). For all stages combined, survival was longer for AC pts (11 mos AC, 9 mos SQ, 4 mos other). This difference was most apparent among early stage (I-III) pts. Conclusions: Survival in SC and EC was associated with staging, anatomic and histologic subtypes. Quantifying this provides insights for the design and interpretation of clinical development programs. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Farmers Markets: Recent Evidence from the US

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3423
Author(s):  
Phillip Warsaw ◽  
Steven Archambault ◽  
Arden He ◽  
Stacy Miller
Keyword(s):  
Food Systems ◽  
Food System ◽  
Agricultural Practices ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Farmers Markets ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Regional Food ◽  
Recent Scholarship ◽  
Fresh Food

Farmers markets are regular, recurring gatherings at a common facility or area where farmers and ranchers directly sell a variety of fresh fruits, vegetables, and other locally grown farm products to consumers. Markets rebuild and maintain local and regional food systems, leading to an outsized impact on the food system relative to their share of produce sales. Previous research has demonstrated the multifaceted impacts that farmers markets have on the communities, particularly economically. Recent scholarship in the United States has expanded inquiry into social impacts that markets have on communities, including improving access to fresh food products and increasing awareness of the sustainable agricultural practices adopted by producers, as well developing tools for producers and market stakeholders to measure their impact on both producers and communities. This paper reviews the recent scholarship on farmers markets to identify recent trends and synthesizes the current evidence describing the ways in which farmers markets contribute to the wellbeing of their communities, as well as identifying areas for additional future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document