Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus recombinant human endostatin in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective and multicenter phase 2 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21079-e21079
Author(s):  
Weize Lv ◽  
Beilong Zhong ◽  
Wenhua Zhao ◽  
Zhong Lin ◽  
Xiaofeng Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

e21079 Background: Although the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well established, evidence supporting the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic drugs in previous treatment patients with advanced NSCLC is insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with recombinant human endostatin (rh-Endostatin) as second-line or later treatment for advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this prospective and multicentre phase 2 trial we enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who had not responded to standardized first-line treatment regimen from two cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were those aged 18-75 years without ICIs in first-line treatment who received nivolumab (3mg/kg, intravenous drip, day 1) every 2 weeks and rh-Endostatin (30 mg, 24-hour continous intravenous infusion，day 1–7) every 4 weeks till disease progression or discontinuation. The primary end points were objective response rate and safety. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR1900023664. Results: A total of 35 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 37-72 years) received nivolumab and rh-Endostatin. Median previous treated line of eligible patients was 2 lines (range, 1-7 lines). Patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-14 cycles). Eleven of 33 evaluable patients achieved confirmed partial response with an objective response rate of 33.3% (11/33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.2% – 49.4%) and disease control rate of 60.6% (20/33,95%CI:43.9%–77.3%). Median follow-up was 8.2 months (range: 0.9 –17.1). Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 1.2m–13.0m), median overall survival was not reached and the 6-month overall survival rate was 54.5% (95% CI:37.6%–71.4%). The predominant grade 1-2 adverse events were thyroiditis, arrhythmia, hypertension. The grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were pneumonitis (3/35, 8.6%), hypertension (1/35, 2.9%) and atrial fibrillation (1/35, 2.9%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study that assessed nivolumab combined with rh-Endostatin as second-line or later treatment in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. In view of its encouraging efficacy and safety profile, nivolumab plus rh-Endostatin represents a promising treatment regimen in this patient population. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900023664.

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. FSO421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aung Myint Tun ◽  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Wai Lin Thein ◽  
Elizabeth Guevara
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upfront add-on immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Methods: We performed a literature search on first-line chemotherapy ± immunotherapy in NSCLC. We utilized Revman version 5.3 to calculate the estimated pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and pooled risk ratio for objective response rate (ORR), all-grade and high-grade adverse events with 95% CI. Results: We analyzed 4322 patients. The pooled hazard ratios for OS, PFS and ORR were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62–0.88; p = 0.0007), 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57–0.68; p = 0.00001) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.3–1.74; p = 0.00001), respectively. The pooled risk ratios for all-grade and high-grade adverse events were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99–1.03; p = 0.27) and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07–1.28; p = 0.0006), respectively. Conclusion: Add-on immunotherapy significantly improves PFS, OS and ORR for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with a reasonable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy as second-line or third-line treatment for metastatic small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20574-e20574
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Beibei Yin ◽  
Yaping Guan ◽  
Dongfeng Feng
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Extensive Stage ◽  
Grade 3

e20574 Background: For a small subset of patients, immune checkpoint blockade heralds a promising strategy for achieving disease control in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy has been granted accelerated approval for treatment of patients with extensive-stage SCLC with disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other line of therapy. Moreover, Based on IMpower133 and CASPIAN data, addition of PD-L1 antibody such as atezolizumab or durvalumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy prolongs overall survival over chemotherapy alone. However, it remains exclusive that whether PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy is effective against extensive-stage SCLC when progressed on previous chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed patients with extensive-stage SCLC who have failed in first-line or beyond chemotherapy and received PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy in a single institute. The efficacy and safety were evaluated. The primary end point was the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results: A total of 11 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. The median age was 46 years (range from 29 to 62). Seven patients were male. Four were current or former smokers. Six received two prior therapies. Nine had previously received radiation therapy. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were administrated in 5 and 6 patients, respectively. No patient had a complete response. 2 patients had a partial response, and the objective response rate was 18.2%. 5 patients were evaluated as stable disease with a disease control rate of 63.6%. The median overall survival and progression-free survival was 3.0 months and 2.3 months, respectively. A patient with partial response had a long duration of response of 5.2 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related were neutropenia, anemia, and decreased neutrophil count. Most immune-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with rash, pruritus and hypothyroidism being the most common, and 1 patient had grade 3 pneumonia. Conclusions: Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy could be beneficial for a subgroup of extensive-stage SCLC patients who have progressed after previous chemotherapy. Further prospective, randomized studies are warranted.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Locally Advanced and Advanced NSCLC Patients With Chronic Viral Infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiting Zhao ◽  
Ran Hu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Guoren Zhou ◽  
Shaorong Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chronic Viral Infection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Hepatic Transaminase ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become new research hotspots in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, but the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with chronic viral infection are still unclear, because existing clinical trials often exclude those patients. Methods We identified 78 locally advanced or advanced NSCLC patients with chronic viral infection treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy, of whom 60 with hepatitis B, 2 with hepatitis C, and 16 with syphilis. Objective response rates were assessed using the RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. ResultsObjective responses were observed in 19 out of 78(24.36%) patients, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.23% (54/78). No patient achieved a complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.49 months (95% CI:3.71-9.27). PFS was 1.44 months (95%CI:0.00-4.34) for monotherapy versus 7.34 months (95%CI:4.50-10.18) for combination therapy (P=0.053). Patients in the first-line treatment group revealed relatively higher ORR and longer PFS (ORR: 48.00% vs. 13.20%, P = 0.001; PFS: 7.67 months vs. 5.57 months, P = 0.129). Patients with combined radiotherapy showed longer PFS than those without combined radiotherapy (14.07 vs.4.62, P=0.027). The incidence of adverse events of any grade was 73.07% (57/78), among which there were 7 cases of grade 4 adverse events. The incidence of leukopenia was the highest (57.69%), followed by anemia (25.64%) and elevated hepatic transaminase (24.36%). Hepatic transaminase increased in 26.7% (16/60) of HBV patients, and remained unchanged in 65.0% (39/60) patients.ConclusionsThe PD-1 inhibitor showed an acceptable toxicity profile and moderate efficacy on locally advanced and advanced NSCLC patients with chronic viral infection, but still has the potential to increase the incidence of hepatitis. We recommend that those patients be monitored closely and treated with antiviral therapy.

Crizotinib Versus Chemotherapy on ALK-positive NSCLC: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Wang ◽  
Guanqi Wang ◽  
Haiyan Ma ◽  
Baoen Shan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Alk Positive

Introduction: Crizotinib was approved to treat anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011.We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and retrospective studies to compare the efficacy and safety of crizotinib with chemotherapy. </P><P> Methods: We searched electronic databases from inception to Dec. 2016. Clinical trials and retrospective studies regarding crizotinib and crizotinib versus chemotherapy in treatment of NSCLC were eligible. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Nine studies (five clinical trials and four retrospective studies) including 729 patients met the inclusion criteria. Crizotinib treatment revealed 1-year OS of 77.1% and PFS of 9.17 months. And crizotinib had a better performance than chemotherapy in ORR (OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 3.16 to 7.83, P<0.00001, I2=35%). DCR revealed superiority with crizotinib than chemotherapy (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.33 to 5.01, P<0.00001, I2=0%). PR (partial response) were significant superior to that of chemotherapy through direct systematic review. No statistically significant difference in CR (complete response) was found between crizotinib-treated group and chemotherapy-treated group. Regarding SD (stable disease), chemotherapy-treated group had a better performance than crizotinib-treated group. Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, nausea, and hematologic toxicity. This systematic review revealed improved objective response rate and increased disease control rate in crizotinib group comparing with chemotherapy group. Crizotinib treatment would be a favorable treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. ALK inhibitors may have future potential applications in other cancers driven by ALK or c-MET gene mutations.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1948-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zalcberg ◽  
M Millward ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
M McKeage ◽  
A Zimet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported. CONCLUSION Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

scholarly journals 363 Vactosertib and durvalumab as second or later line treatment for PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: interim result

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A388-A388
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Byoung Yong Shim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundTargeting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is reported to augment the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) through either enhanced anti-tumor immunity or the correction of tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of vactosertib, a highly selective TGF-β RI kinase inhibitor, and durvalumab is anticipated to improve anti-tumor activity of the ICI. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to evaluate the combination of vactosertib and durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients were treated with vactosertib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (five days on and two days off) and durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg every four weeks. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) and have no prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors or other TGF- β R1 kinase inhibitors. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety, antitumor activity including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) as well as circulating pharmacodynamic biomarkers related to TGF-β signaling. Response was assessed per RECIST (v1.1).ResultsBy August 4 2020, twenty-six PD-L1 positive (SP263 assay) patients were analyzed. Median age was 61.5 years (range 48–83), 69.2% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–4), and all patients were PD-L1 positive (15 patients with PD-L1≥25% and 11 patients with PD-L1 1–24%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were itching (38.5%) and skin rash (34.6%), but no Gr≥3 itching and rash were observed. Each case of the following was reported as Grade 3 TRAEs: adrenal insufficiency, anemia, and pneumonitis; Grade 4 TRAE, CPK increase, was observed in one patient. Objective response rate was 30.8% and 40.0% in patients with PD-L1≥1% and ≥25% respectively. Circulating PAI-1 and CTGF evaluated in 15 patients decreased significantly on Cycle 1 day 5. Ongoing biomarker results will be presented.ConclusionsThe combination of vactosertib and durvalumab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity as a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The efficacy outcomes of this combination in a larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC will be followed.Trial RegistrationNCT03732274Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Ethics Board of Severance Hospital (4-2018-0892), National Cancer Center (NCC2019-0057), St. Vincent’s Hospital (VC19MDDF0205), and Chungbuk National University Hospital (2019-08-015).

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TITAN-TCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
Bernd Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
Uwe Zimmermann ◽  
Barbara Grün ◽  
Gustavo Bruno Baretton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line

446 Background: Several PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors including Nivolumab (Nivo) are approved in urothelial cancer. Recently, in the front line setting, improved activity of combined PD-L1 and CTLA4 immune-checkpoint inhibition has been reported and a phase III trial with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) is ongoing. Here we report a response-based tailored approach starting treatment with Nivo monotherapy using Nivo+Ipi as immunotherapeutic “boost”. Methods: Between July 2017 and April 2019 86 patients were enrolled and treated according to protocol version 3 (cohort 1). Patients started with Nivo 240 mg Q2W induction. After 4 dosings and tumor assessment at week 8 (i) responders (PR/CR) to Nivo monotherapy continued with maintenance while (ii) patients with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received 2 cycles Nivo3+Ipi1 followed by another 2 cycles Nivo1+Ipi3 if not responding. Median follow-up is 8.7 months. The primary endpoint is confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints include activity of Nivo monotherapy at week 8, remission rate with Nivo+Ipi “boosts”, safety, overall survival and quality of life. Results: Of the patients 42, 39 and 5 were first, second and third line, respectively. Median age was 67 years (range 45-84), 61 patients (71 %) were male and 25 female. ORR with Nivo monotherapy at first assessment (week 8) was 29 % and 23 % in first and second/third line, respectively. Of the patients 41 received Nivo+Ipi “boosts” after week 8 while 12 received later “boosts”. Best overall response (BOR) rate with Nivo induction ± Nivo+Ipi “boosts” was 48 % and 27 % in first and second/third line, respectively. In first line 7/17 (41 %) patients receiving Nivo+Ipi after week 8 had an improved response compared to 2/24 (8.3 %) in second/third line. Of the patients who continued with Nivo maintenance after week 8 and received later “boosts” 2/12 (17 %) had a PR and 2/12 (17 %) improved to SD. Treatment-related AEs will be presented. Conclusions: TITAN–TCC explores a response-driven use of Nivo+Ipi as an immunotherapeutic “boost”. In first line, this significantly improved ORR compared to the expected response rate of Nivo monotherapy, providing further evidence to the added value of Ipi in combination with Nivo. Further follow-up is ongoing to characterize duration and depth of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03219775 . Research Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-chuan Ma ◽  
Yi-hong Liu ◽  
Kai-lin Ding ◽  
Yu-feng Liu ◽  
Wen-jie Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Methods We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Results A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). Conclusion Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

Phase II study of modulation of sorafenib (SOR)-induced autophagy using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in advanced hepatocellular cancer (HCC): Planned interim efficacy and safety analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 305-305
Author(s):  
Sukeshi Patel Arora ◽  
Jennifer L. Moseley ◽  
Laura LaNiel Tenner ◽  
Luisa Arellano ◽  
Mary Salazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Hepatocellular Cancer ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Advanced Hcc

305 Background: SOR is the first systemic therapy approved for advanced HCC, but has shown only modest improvements in survival. Resistance to SOR in pre-clinical models has been attributed to autophagy induction. Autophagy inhibition with HCQ enhanced SOR-induced cell death and apoptosis in early pre-clinic and clinical studies. Data from the phase I study of SOR plus HCQ in advanced solid tumors at showed clinical safety and efficacy. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate efficacy of SOR and HCQ in advanced HCC patients (pts) (NCT03037437) and report planned interim analysis for our first-line cohort. Methods: Prospective phase II study of SOR 400 mg po BID + HCQ 400 mg daily in pts with advanced HCC (CP A-B8 cirrhosis). Cohort 1: first-line SOR/HCQ. Cohort 2: add HCQ upon progressing on SOR. CP B pts started at 200 mg BID, with dose escalation as tolerated. Cycle = 4 weeks. Primary endpoint: mTTP. Secondary endpoints: mOS, response by RECIST; AEs (NCI-CTCAEv3.0); PD analysis for markers of autophagy and immunity. Pts evaluable for efficacy if completed C1. Planned interim efficacy and safety analysis approved by DSMB is reported here. Results: For cohort 1, n = 19. Median age 63.5 (51-80). 80% Male; 65% Hispanics. ECOG 0-1: 100%. CP B cirrhosis: 32%. Etiology of cirrhosis: HCV 84%, ETOH 26%, NASH 5%. BCLC B 21%, C 70%. AFP > 400: 47%, PVT: 32%, metastases: 64%, post-transplant: 21%. Reason off study: PD (n = 10), toxicity (n = 2), lost to f/u (n = 1), withdrew (n = 1). N = 16 completed C1, n = 2 remain on study. mTTP is 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.7-NA). mOS 13.8 months (95% CI: 13.8-NA). Response Rate (CR+PR): 25%. Best response: CR n = 1 (6%), PR n = 3 (19%), SD n = 7 (44%). 4+ cycles: n = 9 (56%). % alive. Median duration of response 7.6 months (3.67-20). Gr 1/2 AEs as expected from SOR. Gr 3: AST elevated (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1) due to SOR. Gr 2 rash (n = 1) due to HCQ. No Gr 4/5. Dose reduction: 70% for SOR, 0% for HCQ. PD analysis on the 3 responders show favorable immune profile changes (increase in cytotoxic T cells and decrease T Regs). Conclusions: SOR/HCQ had a better response rate (25%) than historically SOR alone (2%) in pts with advanced HCC, predominantly BCLC C, with CP A and B cirrhosis. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are taking the forefront in advanced HCC, SOR/HCQ may have a role in patients with CP B cirrhosis, transplant or contraindications to ICIs. Further, analysis of predictive markers of response is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03037437.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document