Preliminary safety analysis of phase II open-label NIVACOR trial (GOIRC-03-2018) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer RAS or BRAF mutated.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Angela Damato ◽  
Annalisa Berselli ◽  
Francesco Iachetta ◽  
Alessandra Romagnani ◽  
Mario Larocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Dose Delay ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

37 Background: NIVACOR trial is an open-label, multicentric Italian phase II trial of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab in association with an anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report preliminary safety analysis by an Independent Monitoring Committee. Methods: Pts with mCRC RAS or BRAF mutated, regardless microsatellite status and eligible to receive a first line treatment will be enrolled. FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (BEV) in association with nivolumab (NIV) was administered every 2 weeks for 8 cycles (induction) followed by BEV plus NIV every 2 weeks (maintenance) until PD or unacceptable toxicities. BEV was administered intravenously at dose of 5 mg/kg and NIV intravenously as a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the ORR. The safety is assessed after the inclusion of the 10th patient, receiving ≥1 dose. Results: As of September 20, 2020, 25/70 pts are enrolled. The first 10 pts were evaluated for preliminary safety analysis. Median age was 58 years (32-66), 60% of pts were male, median cycles of treatment was 5.5 (1-9). 100% were KRAS G12D mut and BRAF wild type, respectively, and 2% MSI-H/dMMR. 7/10 pts experienced at least one AE related to FOLFOXIRI/BEV and 2/10 related to NIV. The most frequent grade 1-2 AEs related to FOLFOXIRI/BEV were nausea and vomiting 4(57%), fatigue 5(71%), and diarrhea 5(71%); 3(43%) pts had grade 3-4 neutropenia, and 1(14%) febrile neutropenia. Only 2 pts developed grade 1-2 AEs related to NIV represented by rash (50%) and salivary gland infection (50%); no grade 3-4 was reported. One of pts with dose delay because of serious AES (proteinuria) BEV related, and one patient discontinued due to serious AEs (ileo-urethral fistula) not related to NIV. Conclusions: Combination of FOLFOXIRI/BEV and NIV was generally well tolerated and showed an acceptable toxicity profile. The final analysis will be scheduled at the end of enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04072198.

Phase II Study of Uracil-Tegafur With Leucovorin in Elderly (≥ 75 years old) Patients With Colorectal Cancer: ECOG 1299

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (34) ◽  
pp. 5397-5402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Weixiu Luo ◽  
Elizabeta C. Popa ◽  
Bruce T. Lyman ◽  
Mary Mulcahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Gi Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients ≥ 75 years of age with previously untreated colorectal cancer were eligible for this phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter cooperative group clinical trial. UFT 100 mg/m2 plus LV 30 mg orally every 8 hours for 28 days every 35 days was administered until progression. Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled between June 2000 and July 2001, and 55 were treated. The median age of treated patients was 81 years (range, 75 to 90 years), 26 patients were (47%) women, and 80% had good performance status (0 to 1). The observed overall response rate was 22% (95% CI, 11.8% to 35.0%). The estimated median overall survival time was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 17.4 months), and median progression-free survival time was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.7 months). Among the 56 treated patients (including one ineligible patient), 31 (55%) experienced grade 3 to 4 toxicities, most commonly diarrhea (25%) and GI toxicity (36%), with patients older than 85 years of age at highest risk. Conclusion The results of this trial support the efficacy of oral UFT/LV in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The regimen is tolerated moderately well overall, particularly as compared with other fluoropyrimidine regimens, although there is increased GI toxicity in the most elderly. These results suggest that studies using newer oral fluoropyrimidine analogs should be investigated in this patient population.

Expanded analyses of napoli-1: Phase 3 study of MM-398 (nal-IRI), with or without 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 234-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Daniel D. Von Hoff ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

234 Background: MM-398 is a nanoliposomal encapsulation of irinotecan. OS in the ITT population was significantly longer with MM-398+5FU/LV over 5FU/LV alone, and the most frequent grade 3+ AEs included neutropenia, fatigue, and GI effects (diarrhea and vomiting). Expanded, pre-specified analyses of the Phase 3 study are presented. Methods: Patients (n=417) with mPAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, were randomized 1:1:1 in an open-label study to receive: (A) MM-398 (120 mg/m2 IV over 90 min) q3w; (B) 5FU (2,000 mg/m2 over 24 h) plus racemic leucovorin (LV) (200 mg/m2 over 30 min) x 4w followed by 2w rest; or (C) combination of MM-398 (80 mg/m2 IV over 90 min) prior to 5FU (2,400 mg/m2 over 46 h) and racemic LV (400 mg/m2 over 30 min) q2w. The primary endpoint was OS. The Intent To Treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients; the Per Protocol (PP) population included patients who received at least 80% of the target dose in the first 6 weeks and did not violate any inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Analysis of the PP populations confirmed the favorable OS, which was also reflected by the PFS, ORR and CA19-9 levels, of the combination MM-398+5FU/LV arm over the control 5FU/LV arm. The MM-398 monotherapy arm did not show a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with the control arm. Analysis of subgroups, based on pretreatment characteristics including stage at diagnosis, time since initial histological diagnosis, prior lines of therapy, time since last prior therapy, and CA19-9 levels, consistently favored OS for the MM-398+5FU/LV arm over the 5FU/LV arm. Conclusions: Expanded analysis of the PP population and sensitivity analyses support the favorability of MM-398+5FU/LV over 5FU/LV, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506. [Table: see text]

Randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with tri-weekly capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2 negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC): OGSG 1105 HERBIS-4A trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Atsushi Takeno ◽  
Youichi Makari ◽  
Shunji Endo ◽  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Ryohei Kawabata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Group 13 ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

102 Background: This phase II study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of XP compared to SP in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative AGC. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP (S-1 at 40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/ m2 on day 8, every 5 weeks) or XP (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events. Results: 84 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive SP ( N = 41) or XP ( N = 43). No statistical difference was observed in overall RR between the SP and XP groups [51.2% (95% CI, 35.1% to 67.1%) vs. 53.5% (95% CI, 37.7% to 68.8%), P = 1.000]. Despite not significant, however, SP vs. XP showed a trend toward better PFS [median, 5.9 months vs. 4.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.763; 95% CI, 0.462 to 1.259; P = .284] and OS (median, 13.5 months vs. 10.0 months; HR, 0.776; 95% CI, 0.485 to 1.244; P = .290). This trend in the SP vs. XP comparison was more pronounced in TTF (median, 4.5 months vs. 3.1 months; HR, 0.651; 95% CI, 0.421 to 1.006; P = .052). Common grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia (SP group, 23% and 23%; XP group, 35% and 28%). Grade 3-4 anorexia and hyponatremia were more frequently seen in the XP group (31% and 16%) compared to the SP group (13% and 5%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient (2.3%) in the XP group. Conclusions: XP failed to demonstrate the superior efficacy over SP. Higher incidence of severe toxicities by XP suggests SP as the standard 1st line chemotherapy for HER2 negative AGC in Japan. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006755.

Final analysis of KEYNOTE-189: Pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy (chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9582-9582
Author(s):  
Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu ◽  
Steven Francis Powell ◽  
Maximilian Hochmair ◽  
Shirish M. Gadgeel ◽  
Emilio Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Platinum Chemotherapy ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

9582 Background: The phase III KEYNOTE-189 study (NCT02578680), showed significant improvements in OS and PFS with pembro + chemo vs placebo + chemo in pts with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations. We report the protocol-specified final analysis of KEYNOTE-189. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 35 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W (n = 410) or placebo Q3W (n = 206) plus 4 cycles of pemetrexed (pem) and carboplatin/cisplatin followed by maintenance pem. Pts in the placebo + chemo arm could crossover to pembro upon PD. PFS and OS were primary endpoints; ORR was a secondary endpoint. PFS2 (time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line treatment/death), was an exploratory endpoint. Results: At data cutoff (May 20, 2019), median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff was 31.0 (26.5–38.8) mo. 17 pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 1 pt in the placebo + chemo arm were receiving initially assigned treatment; 84 pts crossed over to pembro. Median (95% CI) OS (22.0 [19.5–24.5] vs 10.6 [8.7–13.6] mo; HR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.46–0.69]) and PFS (9.0 [8.1–10.4] vs 4.9 [4.7–5.5] mo; HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.41–0.59]) were longer with pembro + chemo vs placebo + chemo (Table). The 2-y OS rate was 45.7% vs 27.3% and the 2-y PFS rate was 22.0% vs 3.4%. ORR was 48.3% with pembro + chemo vs 19.9% with placebo + chemo. 56 pts in the pembro + chemo arm completed 35 cycles of pembro among whom ORR was 85.7% (4 CR, 44 PR, 8 SD) and median OS was not reached. 292 (72.1%) pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 135 (66.8%) pts in the placebo + chemo arm had grade 3–5 AEs. Conclusions: Pembro + chemo continued to show improved outcomes in OS, PFS, ORR and PFS2 compared with placebo + chemo, with manageable toxicity. These findings support first-line pembro + chemo in pts with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02578680 . [Table: see text]

XELOX with bevacizumab in elderly patients age 75 or older with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a planned interim analysis for multicenter phase II ASCA study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 502-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽  
Yoshinori Munemoto ◽  
Masaki Matsuoka ◽  
Taishi Hata ◽  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

502 Background: Combination chemotherapy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab is commonly used as standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A previous meta-analysis showed that there was no difference between two age groups of <65 years and ≥65 years on overall survival (OS) after treatment with chemotherapy with bevacizumab. However, the safety and efficacy of XELOX with bevacizumab in elderly patients (pts) ≥75 years with mCRC remain unclear. Methods: This study was an open-label multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX with bevacizumab in pts ≥75 years with metastatic CRC. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the safety, response rate (RR), time to treatment-failure (TTF) and OS. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Pts characteristics were; median age 78 (range 75-86); male/female, 21/15; ECOG performance status 0/1, 30/6; colon/rectum 24/12, creatinine clearance (CCr) 60.2 ml/min (range 32.6-84.6). Median follow-up period was 220 days. RR was 55.6% and median TTF was 209 days. The median PFS and median OS are not reached. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 22 pts (62.8%). Common grade 3 or 4 AEs were hypertension (11.4%), leukopenia (20.0%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), hand foot syndrome (8.6%), and fatigue (8.6%). Examining the relationship between renal function (CCr) and AEs, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 AEs in the lower CCr group was significantly higher than that in the higher CCr group (61.6% vs. 47.8%; p=0.013); hematological toxicities (87.5% vs. 14.8%; p=0.0003) and non-hematological toxicities (61.5% vs. 11.1%; p=0.018). Conclusions: XELOX with bevacizumab is safely administered in elderly patients ≥75 years. Renal function (CCr) could be a good predictive marker for grade 3 or 4 AEs. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003500.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine (G) with pazopanib (P) or gemcitabine with docetaxel (T) in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11008-11008
Author(s):  
Neeta Somaiah ◽  
Brian Andrew Van Tine ◽  
Elizabeth Goodwin Hill ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
Scott Schuetze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Alternative Regimen

11008 Background: P is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in many sarcoma subtypes. We designed a trial to assess the benefit of adding P to G as an alternative regimen to the commonly used combination of G+T in pts with STS (NCT01593748). Methods: We performed an open-label, randomized phase 2 trial enrolling pts with advanced non-adipocytic STS who had received prior anthracycline based therapy. Pts were assigned (1:1 stratified randomization based on leiomyosarcoma and prior pelvic radiation) to receive G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 with P 800 mg daily or G 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and T 100 mg/m2 on day 8, repeated q 3 wks. The primary objectives were estimating median PFS and rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Secondary objectives included estimating the hazard ratio (HR) and response rates. Cross-over was allowed for RECIST progression. Sample size of 90 was derived based on the precision of 95% confidence intervals (CI) for reporting toxicity and PFS in each arm. Results: A total of 90 pts enrolled; 45 on each arm. Pt characteristics and results are detailed in Table. Median PFS was 4.1 months for each arm (p= 0.3, based on stratified log-rank test). The clinical benefit rate (PR+SD) was 29% for each arm (p>0.99, based on Fisher’s exact test). The rate of related grade ≥3 AEs were 20.6% with G+T and 19.9% with G+P. Related grade ≥3 AEs (%) occurring in ≥10% of pts (G+T; G+P): anemia (36, 20), fatigue (29; 13), low platelets (56; 51), low neutrophils (20; 49), AST increase (2; 13) and hypertension (2; 20). Conclusions: This study demonstrates comparable efficacy between G+P and G+T, suggesting that G+P can be considered for second-line therapy in advanced non-adipocytic STS. Pt Characteristics and Results. Clinical trial information: NCT01593748. [Table: see text]

Bortezomib With or Without Irinotecan in Relapsed or Refractory Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Randomized Phase II Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2320-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Kozuch ◽  
Caio Max Rocha-Lima ◽  
Tomislav Dragovich ◽  
Howard Hochster ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib with or without irinotecan, in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned in a 3:4 ratio to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2(arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2plus irinotecan 125 mg/m2(arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days consisted of four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, irinotecan on days 1 and 8. The primary objective of this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study was to determine tumor response to treatment. Secondary objectives were safety and tolerability.ResultsA preplanned interim analysis to assess efficacy revealed inadequate activity, resulting in early termination of this study. A total of 102 patients were treated, 45 in arm A and 57 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The investigator-assessed response rate was 0 in arm A and 3.5% in arm B (all partial responses). Adverse events in both treatment arms were as expected, with no significant additive toxicity. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events reported, per patient, during the study were fatigue (27%), vomiting (13%), nausea (11%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (11%) in arm A, and diarrhea (33%), fatigue (25%), neutropenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (18%), dyspnea (12%), abdominal pain (12%), dehydration (12%), and anemia (11%) in arm B.ConclusionBortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan was not effective in patients with relapsed or refractory CRC.

TIVO-3: Final OS analysis of a phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study to compare tivozanib to sorafenib in subjects with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5062-5062
Author(s):  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Camillo Porta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

5062 Background: Tivozanib (T) is a potent and highly selective VEGFR inhibitor. TIVO-3 is a phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of T with those of sorafenib (S) as 3rd and 4th line therapy in patients with metastatic RCC. Methods: Subjects with RCC who failed 2 or 3 prior systemic regimens, one of which included a VEGFR TKI other than S or T, were stratified by IMDC risk category and type of prior therapy (two TKIs; TKI plus checkpoint inhibitor (CPI); TKI plus other) then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to T or S. Results: The 2 arms were well balanced for demographics and prior cancer history. 60% of subjects had 2 prior lines of therapy and 40% had 3 prior lines. 26% had prior treatment with a CPI. Patients treated with T demonstrated PFS superiority compared to S, 5.6 (95% CI 7.3 - 5.3) v. 3.9 mos (95% CI 5.6 – 3.7; HR 0.73; p=0.02). ORR was 18% for T compared to 8% for S (p=0.02). 44% of T treated subjects experienced a grade 3 treatment-related adverse event compared to 55% for S. The predefined, interim analysis for OS performed two years after enrollment was closed had a HR of 0.99 based on 227 events. The final analysis will be presented based on an estimate of 263 events. Conclusions: T is superior to S as measured by PFS; 2-year PFS, and ORR in this heavily-treated/relapsed or refractory RCC population and is better tolerated than S. Final OS data will be updated prior to presentation. Clinical trial information: 02627963 .

Optimizing FOLFIRINOX tolerability in patients with colorectal cancer through dosing irinotecan in the morning for men and in the afternoon for women.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Levi ◽  
Annabelle Ballesta ◽  
Abdoulaye Karaboué ◽  
Qi Huang ◽  
C. N. J. Focan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Fixed Time ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Administration Timing ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Specific Timing

120 Background: Irinotecan (IRI) toxicity was worse in female (F) than in male (M) patients (pts) on FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). This finding could reflect different optimal administration timing of IRI in M and F pts along the 24 hours. IRI pharmacology is regulated by the circadian clock, and its least toxic daily time (LTT) occurred ~6 hours later in F as compared to M mice. The relevance of sex for the LTT of IRI is addressed here using data from an international randomized trial, whose primary endpoint was not met for all the 193 pts with MCC (EORTC 05011). Methods: 130 M and 63 F were randomized to receive chronomodulated IRI (180 mg/m2 over 6-h, with peak delivery in the morning (at 5:00 or 9:00), in the afternoon (at 13:00 or 17:00) or at night (at 21:00 or 01:00) on day (d) 1, followed by fixed-time chronomodulated oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil-leucovorin for 4 d. Triplet combination was given q3 weeks as 1st or 2nd line, without prophylactic G-CSF. The relevance of IRI timing for main toxicities was determined separately in M and F, using Cosinor and Fisher Exact tests. Results: Baseline characteristics of M or F pts did not differ significantly according to IRI timing group. Main worse grade 3-4 toxicities per pt after 6 courses were diarrhea (M, 40.2%; F, 51.9%) neutropenia (M, 12.6%; F, 18.4%), fatigue (M, 13.4%; F, 17.3%) and anorexia (M, 8.2%; F, 9.6%). These toxicities were reduced following IRI delivery in the morning for M, but in the afternoon for F, with statistically significant rhythms (p < 0.05 from cosinor) and sex*timing interactions (Fischer Exact, diarrhea, p = 0.023; neutropenia, p = 0.015; fatigue, p = 0.062; anorexia, p = 0.032). IRI timing was most critical for F, with Grade 3-4 toxicities ranging from 55.2% of the pts (morning) to 29.4% (afternoon) for diarrhea, and from 25.9% (morning) to 0% (afternoon) for neutropenia. IRI timing did not significantly influence efficacy. Conclusions: The present study results supports the administration of irinotecan in the morning for M and in the afternoon for F in order to minimize adverse events of triplet chemotherapy without impairing efficacy. Prospective trials testing sex specific timing issues are warranted. Clinical trial information: 05011.

Outcomes by hypomagnesemia (hypomag) in the randomized phase III ASPECCT trial of patients (pts) with chemofractory wild-type (WT) KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 507-507
Author(s):  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
Paul Ruff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Trial Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Kras Exon ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

507 Background: ASPECCT demonstrated that panitumumab (pmab) was noninferior to cetuximab (cmab) for overall survival (OS). Ad hoc analyses from ASPECCT suggested that hypomag was associated with better outcomes for pmab and cmab (Price 2015). However, results from the phase 3 NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17 trial indicated hypomag at day 28 was associated with worse outcomes for cmab (Vickers 2013). Methods: Patients (pts) with chemorefractory WT KRASexon 2 mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab or cmab. Ad hoc analyses by hypomag were performed from the final analysis of ASPECCT at week 5, consistent with the NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17 trial analysis (Vickers, 2013). Results: 999 pts were treated: 496 received pmab and 503 received cmab. Any grade hypomag was 29.0% and grade ≥3 was 7.3% in the pmab arm vs 19.3% and 2.8% in the cmab arm, respectively. In the pmab arm, 1.2% of pts discontinued treatment and 5% of pts had dose modifications due to hypomag vs 0.4% and 3% in the cmab arm, respectively. Efficacy results by hypomag are shown (Table). Conclusions: In ASPECCT, rates of hypomag were higher in the pmab vs the cmab arm. Pts who developed any grade hypomag with pmab or cmab had longer median OS compared with those pts who did not. Consistent with previous analyses, development of hypomag at week 5 was associated with worse median OS for cmab. Clinical trial information: NCT01001377. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document