A phase II study of sitravatinib (Sitra) in combination with nivolumab (Nivo) in patients (Pts) undergoing nephrectomy for locally-advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (accRCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Jose A. Karam ◽  
Pavlos Msaouel ◽  
Surena F. Matin ◽  
Matthew T Campbell ◽  
Amado J. Zurita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

312 Background: Sitra is a spectrum-selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets TAM receptors (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK), VEGFR2, c-Kit, and MET. These receptors regulate several immune suppressive cell types in the tumor microenvironment, including M2-polarized macrophages, MDSCs, and T regulatory cells, which are implicated in resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. ccRCC is characterized by upregulation of VEGF and overexpression of MET and AXL. Sitra may combine effectively with immune checkpoint inhibition to augment antitumor activity in ccRCC. About 39% of patients with accRCC who receive surgery with curative intent relapse representing an unmet need in this setting. Together these data support the evaluation of neoadjuvant sitra with nivo in accRCC. Methods: This phase II study (NCT03680521) evaluated sitra and nivo in pts with locally- advanced ccRCC who were candidates for curative nephrectomy. Single-agent sitra (120 mg) was administered daily (QD) for 2 weeks, with nivo (240 mg intravenously Q2W) added to sitra for 4-6 weeks. A plan for potential dose de-escalation was implemented using a modified toxicity probability interval method with a maximum toxicity of 20% at the tolerated dose. Pts underwent pathology/tissue evaluation at 3 timepoints: biopsy prior to treatment, biopsy prior to the addition of nivo, and nephrectomy specimen evaluation at time of nephrectomy. The primary endpoint was objective response (RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included safety, PK, and correlative immune effects (selected protein and gene expression and immune cell populations). Results: A total of 20 pts were evaluated for safety (95% had T3 or higher stage tumors, 65% with baseline hypertension). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) led to a dose de-escalation, resulting in 7 pts treated at 120 mg QD sitra and 13 pts treated at 80 mg QD. DLTs included grade 3 (Gr3) hypertension (n=6); deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Gr3) were observed in 1 additional pt. Median duration of sitra treatment was 6.3 weeks at the 80 mg dose and 7.1 weeks at the 120 mg dose. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months after initiation of systemic therapy, no pts have relapsed. In 17 pts evaluable for efficacy, the investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 11.8%, including 2 PRs (33.3% ORR in pts who received 120 mg sitra). No pts experienced progressive disease while on therapy. Median DFS was not reached. There was 1 delayed surgery due to nivo-related thyroiditis that resolved. Reported TRAEs: Gr1/Gr2 in 55% of pts (dysphonia 50%, fatigue 45%, diarrhea 40%, hypertension 30%, increased ALT 30%), Gr3 in 45% of pts (hypertension 30%). There were no Gr4/Gr5 TRAEs. Correlative blood and tissue analyses will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of sitra and nivo is clinically active with a manageable safety profile as a neoadjuvant therapy for accRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03680521 .

A phase II study of sunitinib administered in a continuous daily regimen in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4529-4529 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. De Mulder ◽  
J. Roigas ◽  
S. Gillessen ◽  
S. Srinivas ◽  
P. Pisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Colon Perforation ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

4529 Background: Renal cell carcinomas are known for their vascularity and production of high levels of VEGF. Sunitinib malate (SU11248), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including VEGFR, PDGFR, KIT, RET, and FLT3, has previously demonstrated significant efficacy in 168 patients (pts) with mRCC, with a 42% objective response rate (ORR) at 50 mg/day in 6-week (wk) cycles of 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off. This study sought to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sunitinib in mRCC when administered in a continuous 37.5 mg/day regimen. Methods: Pts with histologically proven mRCC, refractory to a cytokine-based regimen, were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ function. Pts were randomized to receive sunitinib in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM) at a dose of 37.5 mg/day, with individual doses subsequently titrated based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined ORR. Secondary endpoints includedprogression-free survival, adverse events (AEs) and quality of life measures. Results: A total of 88/100 planned pts have been randomized to date: AM (43) and PM (45), and enrollment will be completed by end January 2006. 44 pts have been on continuous sunitinib treatment at 37.5 mg/day for >16 wks (3), >12 wks (9), >8 wks (12), and >4 wks (20). 2 pts (2.3%) discontinued (colon perforation and renal insufficiency) and 9 (10.2%) dose reduced to 25 mg/day due to grade 2/3 AEs: mucositis (2), hand-foot syndrome (2), thrombocytopenia (2), asthenia (1), nausea/diarrhea (1), and neutropenia (1). Preliminary efficacy data show some tumor shrinkage in the majority of patients evaluated at 4 wks, with 3 initial partial responses. There has been no significant difference between pts who received AM or PM doses. The most commonly reported AEs were mucositis, fatigue, hair/skin discoloration, and hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Sunitinib administered at a continuous dose of 37.5 mg/day was generally well tolerated; only a few patients required treatment breaks and/or dose reduction. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging. Mature data will be presented. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of the combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-GI18-149.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS461-TPS461
Author(s):  
Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
Chandrikha Chandrasekharan ◽  
Shadia Ibrahim Jalal ◽  
Al Bowen Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

TPS461 Background: Metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has poor prognosis. Overall survival (OS) remains around 12 months (mo) with current therapies. Pembrolizumab is approved for advanced GEA that has progressed on at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. However, the majority of patients progress on this treatment, and less than 15% of patients experience objective response (OR). This study will evaluate efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, abemaciclib, in patients with advanced GEA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibitors can increase anti-tumor immunity and can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we hypothesize that abemaciclib will augment response to pembrolizumab in GEA. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, single arm, open label, phase II study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced GEA who have progressed or were intolerant to at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or with microsattelite unstable tumors will be excluded. Treatments will be given on a 21 day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Pembrolizumab, 200 mg intravenously, will be given on day 1, and abemaciclib, 150 mg, will be taken orally twice a day on days 1-21. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include PFS rate at 6 mo, disease control rate, OS and OR rate. Correlative endpoints will examine relationship between PDL1 status, genomic signature and treatment response. Saliva samples will be collected for microbiome analysis. Archival tumor tissue and blood samples will be banked for future studies. A total of 31 evaluable subjects will be enrolled to detect an anticipated increase in the median PFS from 2 months (null hypothesis) to 4 months with 80% power at the one-sided 0.05 significance level. The trial is open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03997448.

Preliminary results from a phase II study of nivolumab for patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludimila Cavalcante ◽  
Benedito A. Carneiro ◽  
Ricardo Lima Barros Costa ◽  
Young Kwang Chae ◽  
Alfred Rademaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Initial Report

96 Background: ACC is an exceedingly rare malignancy with an estimated incidence of 0.7 cases per million per year. Patients presenting with metastatic disease have an estimated 5-year survival rate of < 15%, without effective standard treatment options. Immunotherapy approaches such as checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as effective therapies for multiple malignancies. Nivolumab, a monoclonal IgG4 antibody against the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor on T-cells, acts by inhibiting the interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2 and thus eliciting an increased anti-tumor immune response. This phase II study will assess the efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy according to objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced ACC – the study is currently in the patient enrollment phase. Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced ACC with disease progression after treatment with ≥ 1 line of therapy (including mitotane and/or chemotherapy), or not eligible for first-line chemotherapy are currently being enrolled on this phase II study. Nivolumab is given at a fixed dose of 240mg IV q2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Planned accrual of up to 33 patients will follow a Simon two stage design with interim analysis for efficacy after 10 evaluable patients are enrolled. Results: This is an initial report of the first 7 evaluable patients enrolled on study. Median age 57 years; female (4/7); endocrine hyperfunction (2/7); prior chemotherapy with EDP +/- mitotane (5/7). Patients were treated with a median of 4 doses of nivolumab. Median time to progression of 8 weeks. Best overall response rate thus far has been progression of disease in 5 pts, with 2 pts pending evaluation. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to nivolumab: tremor, hypokalemia (1 pt each). Reported grade 1 and 2 AEs: LFT elevation (3 pts), lower extremity edema (2 pts), lymphopenia, urinary frequency and fatigue (1 pt each). Conclusions: Nivolumab has been well tolerated in this population of patients with metastatic ACC. Clinical trial information: NCT02720484.

Phase 1b trial of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS541-TPS541
Author(s):  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Marjorie C. Green ◽  
Nehal Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS541 Background: Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of MET, VEGFR, and TAM family receptors (TYRO3, AXL, and MER). It is approved for patients (pts) with RCC after prior therapy with antiangiogenic therapy, and has demonstrated clinical activity in UC. In clinical studies, CABO exposure increased circulating CD8+ T cells and reduced immune-suppressive monocytes and Tregs. In preclinical tumor models, CABO increased MHC class 1 expression on tumor cells and reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cells. CABO may facilitate an immune-permissive tumor environment and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Atezolizumab (ATEZO), an anti-PD-L1 mAb, is approved for: locally advanced/metastatic UC in pts who are cisplatin-ineligible or have disease progression during/following platinum-containing chemo; pts with metastatic NSCLC and disease progression during/following platinum-containing chemo. We present the study design of an ongoing phase 1b study combining CABO with ATEZO in pts with locally advanced/metastatic UC or RCC. Methods: This multicenter, phase 1b, open-label study aims to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of CABO in combination with ATEZO (NCT03170960). The study will enroll pts with advanced UC (bladder, renal pelvis, ureter, urethra) or RCC. It consists of two stages: dose escalation and expansion. In the dose-escalation stage (3+3 design), a recommended CABO dose for the combination will be established. In the expansion stage, four tumor-specific cohorts will be enrolled: 1) pts with UC who have progressed on/after platinum-containing chemo; 2) chemo-naïve pts with UC who are cisplatin ineligible; 3) chemo-naïve pts with UC who are cisplatin eligible; and 4) untreated pts with RCC with clear cell histology; the primary objective is to determine the objective response rate in each cohort. Exploratory objectives include correlation of tumor and plasma biomarkers, and changes in immune cell profiles with clinical outcome. The study has been initiated and enrollment target is 120 pts across the 4 expansion cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT03170960.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus vandetanib (D+V) versus docetaxel followed by vandetanib (D-V) in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (OC): SWOG S0904.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5015-5015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Coleman ◽  
James Moon ◽  
Anil Sood ◽  
Donna Branham ◽  
James Edwin Delmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Therapy Stratification

5015 Background: Antiangiogenesis therapy has led to antitumor effects both preclinically and clinically. Vandetanib (V) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/3, EGFR and RET. These targets are of interest in OC care, as targeting has shown anti-tumor efficacy, particularly in combination with taxanes. We explored the efficacy, safety, and toxicity of docetaxel (D) and V in women with recurrent OC. Methods: Women with resistant, refractory, or progressive/persistent OC were eligible for this randomized phase II study provided they had not received D or V for recurrent disease. Patients were allowed to receive other anti-VEGF targeted agents for primary therapy (stratification variable). Up to 3 additional cytotoxic regimens for recurrence were allowed. Patients were allocated 1:1 to D(75 mg/m2, I.V.)+V (100 mg daily, p.o.) or D(75 mg/m2). Patients receiving single agent D were allowed to crossover to V upon progression (D-V). The primary endpoint was PFS. Other objectives were: OS, objective response (ORR), and frequency/severity of adverse events. The study was designed with 84% power to detect a 1.55 PFS hazard ratio using a one-sided P of 0.1. Results: 131 patients were enrolled; 5 were excluded (1 ineligible, 4 eligible but untreated). 9% had received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. 61 patients on D+V were assessable for toxicity; 19 (31%) had treatment-related G4 events, primarily hematologic. Similarly, 17 (26%) of 65 patients receiving D alone had G4 events, primarily hematologic. 34 (52%) patients crossed over to V; no G4 events were recorded among 32 evaluable patients. G3 diarrhea was observed in 14% of D+V patients; 5% D-V patients. G3 acneiform rash occurred in 2% and 0%, respectively. The median PFS estimates were 3.0 mos (D+V) vs 3.5 (D-V); HR (PFS): 0.98 (80% CI:0.75-1.27). For OS, the median estimates were 14 mos (D+V) vs 12 mos (D-V); HR (OS):0.84 (80% CI:0.56-1.28). ORR was 14% and 17%, respectively. Crossover V response was 4% (1/27 measurable patients). Conclusions: D+V was well tolerated in this population however, did not prolong PFS with respect to D.

Phase 1b trial of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS42-TPS42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel C. Maia ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS42 Background: Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of MET, VEGFR, and TAM family receptors (TYRO3, AXL, and MER). It is approved for patients (pts) with RCC after prior therapy with antiangiogenic therapy, and has demonstrated clinical activity in UC. In clinical studies, CABO exposure increased circulating CD8+ T cells and reduced immune-suppressive monocytes and Tregs. In preclinical tumor models, CABO increased MHC class 1 expression on tumor cells and reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cells. CABO may facilitate an immune-permissive tumor environment and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Atezolizumab (ATEZO), an anti-PD-L1 mAb, is approved for: locally advanced/metastatic UC in pts who are cisplatin-ineligible or have disease progression during/following platinum-containing chemo; pts with metastatic NSCLC and disease progression during/following platinum-containing chemo. We present the study design of an ongoing phase 1b study combining CABO with ATEZO in pts with locally advanced/metastatic UC or RCC. Methods: This multicenter, phase 1b, open-label study aims to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of CABO in combination with ATEZO (NCT03170960). The study will enroll pts with advanced UC (bladder, renal pelvis, ureter, urethra) or RCC. It consists of two stages: dose escalation and expansion. In the dose-escalation stage (3+3 design), a recommended CABO dose for the combination will be established. In the expansion stage, four tumor-specific cohorts will be enrolled: 1) pts with UC who have progressed on/after platinum-containing chemo; 2) chemo-naïve pts with UC who are cisplatin ineligible; 3) chemo-naïve pts with UC who are cisplatin eligible; and 4) untreated pts with RCC with clear cell histology; the primary objective is to determine the objective response rate in each cohort. Exploratory objectives include correlation of tumor and plasma biomarkers, and changes in immune cell profiles with clinical outcome. The study has been initiated and enrollment target is 120 pts across the 4 expansion cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT03170960.

Phase II study of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in patients undergoing nephrectomy for locally-advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS686-TPS686
Author(s):  
Jose A. Karam
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

TPS686 Background: Sitravatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI) that targets multiple closely related RTK pathways including VEGFR, PDGFR, KIT, MET and the TAM receptors (TYRO3, AXL and MERTK) Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1 and releases PD-1-mediated inhibition of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. Together, sitravatinib and nivolumab may cooperate to elicit greater anti-tumor activity than either agent alone, as sitravatinib is predicted to enhance several steps in the cancer immunity cycle that may augment nivolumab’s efficacy. Mechanisms by which sitravatinib may augment an antitumor immune response include enhanced antigen presentation; depletion of immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) via inhibition of split kinases VEGFR and KIT; and shifting tumor-associated macrophages from an immunosuppressive M2 to a pro-immunogenic M1 phenotype via inhibition of TAM RTKs. Each of these factors converge on promoting T effector cell expansion, tumor infiltration and an antigen-specific anti-tumor immune response. Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, preoperative window of opportunity Phase 2 study evaluates tolerability and clinical activity of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in pts with locally-advanced ccRCC undergoing nephrectomy. Study treatment consists of 2 weeks of sitravatinib monotherapy followed by 4 weeks of the combination. Sitravatinib is administered orally daily at 120 mg; nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks at 240 mg. The primary objective is to evaluate clinical activity using percentage of pts achieving a presurgical point-in-time objective response. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety and tolerability, and determination of the immune effects of sitravatinib monotherapy and the combination through serial tissue and blood collections (temporal changes in PD-L1 expression, selected cytokines and immune cell populations including MDSCs, Tregs and ratio of M1:M2 macrophages). The study is open for enrollment and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03680521.

A phase II study of infigratinib in previously treated advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR gene fusions/alterations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS356-TPS356
Author(s):  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Christoph Springfeld ◽  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Gene Fusions ◽  
Fgfr2 Gene

TPS356 Background: The FGFR family plays an important role in cholangiocarcinoma, with FGFR2 gene fusions detected in about 15% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Infigratinib is an FGFR1–3-selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor under evaluation in multiple indications including front-line and pre-treated cholangiocarcinoma. CBGJ398X2204 is an ongoing phase II study evaluating the efficacy of single-agent infigratinib in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR genetic alterations who have received prior gemcitabine. Methods: Study CBGJ398X2204 consists of 3 cohorts and patients in all cohorts receive oral infigratinib once daily for 21 days of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease, intolerance, withdrawal of consent, or death. Cohort 1 includes patients with FGFR2 gene fusions or translocations. Cohort 2 includes patients with FGFR genetic alterations other than FGFR2 gene fusions (patients in both Cohorts 1 and 2 must not have received any prior FGFR inhibitors). Cohort 3 includes patients with FGFR2 gene fusions who have received prior treatment with a selective FGFR inhibitor other than infigratinib. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1 per central review). Secondary endpoints include overall survival and overall response rate (per investigator). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory genetic alterations/biomarkers will also be measured. The study was initiated in 2014 and has a planned enrollment of up to 160 patients across all 3 cohorts (120 in Cohort 1, 20 in Cohort 2, and 20 in Cohort 3). Cohort 1 has completed enrollment and findings from this Cohort are the focus of a separate abstract submitted to the meeting. Results are not currently available from Cohorts 2 and 3 (trial in progress). Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.

scholarly journals Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1020-1028
Author(s):  
David F. McDermott ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Georg A. Bjarnason ◽  
James M. G. Larkin ◽  
Rustem A. Gafanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, demonstrated promising single-agent activity in untreated patients with various cancer types. The phase II KEYNOTE-427 study evaluated efficacy and safety of single-agent pembrolizumab in treatment-naive patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC; cohort A) and advanced non-ccRCC (cohort B). Results of cohort A are reported. METHODS In this open-label, single-arm phase II study, patients with advanced ccRCC received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤ 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate by RECIST, version 1.1. RESULTS In the total population (N = 110), median time from enrollment to data cutoff was 35.9 (range, 29.5-40.3) months. Objective response rate was 36.4% with four (3.6%) complete responses and 36 (32.7%) partial responses; disease control rate was 58.2% (95% CI, 48.4 to 67.5). Most patients (68.2%) had a decrease in target lesions, including 30.9% with a reduction ≥ 60%. Median duration of response was 18.9 (range, 2.3-37.6+) months; 64.1% of responders had a response ≥ 12 months (Kaplan-Meier). Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.0). Median overall survival was not reached; 12-month and 24-month overall survival rates were 88.2% and 70.8%, respectively. Durable responses were observed across all International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium categories. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 30.0% of patients, of which colitis and diarrhea were most frequent. CONCLUSION Single-agent pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced ccRCC, with durable responses across International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium categories. Safety and tolerability profile of pembrolizumab monotherapy was comparable to what has been previously described in other tumor types.

Sunitinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: preliminary results from a phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4603-4603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Bang ◽  
Y. Kang ◽  
W. Kang ◽  
N. Boku ◽  
H. Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3

4603 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. We investigated the safety and activity of SU monotherapy in pts with previously-treated gastric cancer. Preliminary results from this open-label, multicenter, phase II study are reported. Methods: Eligibility criteria included measurable stage IV disease; 1 prior chemotherapy regimen; and ECOG PS =1. Pts took SU 50 mg/day for 4 wks followed by 2 wks off treatment in 6-wk cycles. A Simon 2-stage design was used with a target accrual of 38 pts in the first stage, expanding to 63 pts if =2 partial responses (PRs) were observed. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Ctrough parameters were also monitored. Results: As of Sept 15 2006, 38 evaluable pts (median age 56 years [range 29–78]; 2–3 metastatic sites [63%]; prior treatment with 5-FU ± platinum [P] [24%], capecitabine ± P [13%], TS-1 ± P [26%], other [37%]) have received a median of 2 SU cycles (range 1–3). Of 21 pts evaluable for efficacy, 1 PR has been confirmed and 8 pts had stable disease (SD), 4 with SD for =2 cycles. The most commonly reported AEs were typically grade 1/2 in severity and included stomatitis, skin discoloration, fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea and vomiting. Grade 3/4 toxicities included HFS (10.5%), fatigue (7.9%), anorexia (7.9%) and mucosal inflammation (5.3%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and anemia (11%). 7 pts experienced serious SU- related AEs requiring dose modifications in 3 pts and treatment discontinuation in 1 pt. Preliminary PK investigations indicate that concentrations seen in gastric pts are similar to those seen in other pts treated with SU. Conclusions: These initial findings show that SU is generally well tolerated and may have single-agent antitumor activity in pre-treated gastric cancer pts. Further trials with SU in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens are planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document