Prevalence of Targetable Mutations in Black Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e629-e636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippos A. Costa ◽  
Eduardo E. Saul ◽  
Yonette Paul ◽  
Sunil Iyer ◽  
Laercio Lopes da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Black Population ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Racial Groups ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Black Patients

PURPOSE: Inferior outcomes of Black patients with lung cancer compared with other racial groups are often linked to socioeconomic factors. It is crucial to determine whether a varying prevalence of targetable mutations limits treatments and contributes to disparities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis on the prevalence of lung cancer EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, and BRAF mutations in Black patients compared with White, Hispanic, and Asian patients. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. We selected studies reporting the prevalence of at least one mutation in the Black population. We calculated the pooled prevalence of mutations using fixed effects, exact binomial distributions, and Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation to stabilize the variances. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 11,867 patients were included. In Black patients, EGFR was the most prevalent mutation (6%; 95% CI, 5 to 7), followed by BRAF (1%; 95% CI, 0 to 2), ALK (1%; 95% CI, 0 to 2), and ROS-1 (0%; 95% CI, 0 to 1). Black patients had a lower prevalence of EGFR mutations than White, Hispanic, and Asian patients ( P < .01). BRAF mutations were less prevalent in Black compared with White patients ( P < .05), and ALK mutations were less prevalent when compared with Hispanic patients ( P < .05). CONCLUSION: EGFR is the most frequent mutation found in Black patients, although its prevalence is lower than that in other races. Black patients have a low overall prevalence of ALK, ROS-1, and BRAF mutations. Given that disproportional eligibility for targeted therapies may be contributing to inferior outcomes, research focused on the Black population is needed to evaluate specific tumor characteristics and therapeutic strategies.

Prevalence of targetable mutations in black patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13105-e13105
Author(s):  
Yonette Paul ◽  
Sunil G Iyer ◽  
Leonardo Tamariz ◽  
Zsuzsanna Nemeth ◽  
Gilberto Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Racial Groups ◽  
Lower Prevalence ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Arcsine Transformation

e13105 Background: Although poorer outcomes of lung cancer in Blacks compared to other racial groups has been strongly linked to socio-economic factors, it is important to investigate whether lower prevalence of targetable mutations limit treatment options, thereby also contributing to worse outcomes. This study examines the prevalence of EGFR, ALK, ROS-1 and BRAF lung cancer mutations in Blacks compared to other races. Methods: We conducted a meta- analysis compliant with PRISMA guidelines. Searched databases included PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov. Publication bias was mitigated by searching clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished studies. Searches were run to 11/19/2018. Two rounds of screening were performed based on title and then abstract by two independent reviewers. For the purposes of this study we defined racial groups as Black, Asian, Hispanic, and White/Caucasian. We selected studies of lung cancer patients (any stage or type) where the prevalence of at least one mutation was reported in Blacks. We calculated the pooled prevalence of mutations by racial group using fixed effects, exact binomial distributions and Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation to stabilize the variances. Results: Prevalence % of mutations by race reported with 95% Confidence Interval in parentheses N = number of tests performed We included 20 studies which totaled 11,867 lung cancer patients. Each mutation tested on a tissue sample was considered an event, for a total of 15,306 events. EGFR was the most prevalent mutation in Blacks (6%). Compared to other races Blacks had the lowest prevalence of all four mutations. Conclusions: In the era of targeted therapy, outcomes for metastatic lung have improved significantly. Of concern, our results show that Blacks are disproportionately ineligible for these therapies due to lower prevalence of targetable mutations. More research is needed to evaluate the unique tumor characteristics and therapeutic strategies in this sub group of patients, in the hope of achieving better disease outcomes.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cannabis Smoking And Risk Of Lung Cancer - A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Bouti ◽  
Rajae Borki ◽  
Hicham Fenane ◽  
Laila Harrak
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cannabis Smoking

Background: Cannabis is the illicit psychoactive substance the most consumed in the world. Little is known about the association between the use of cannabis and the risk of lung cancer. Objective:The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine whether use of cannabis is a risk factor for lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of all languages articles using relevant computerised databases. MEDLINE (online PubMed), Web of knowledge, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Directory of Open Access Journals were searched to September 2014 for cohorts and case-control studies that assessed the risk of lung cancer associated with cannabis smoking. The literature search was performed with a combination of medical subject headings terms, "cannabis" and "lung neoplasms". Data extraction: Two investigators independently analysed and extracted results from eligible studies. Our study's registration number on PROSPERO is CRD42014008872. Results: The search strategy identified 2476 citations. 13 studies were eligible for inclusion: 2 pooled analysis of 9 case-control studies, one case-control study and 3 cohorts. The cumulative analysis for all the studies under a fixed-effects model showed that cannabis smoking determined an increased risk of developing lung cancer in the future (relative risk 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.999–1.5; p=0.051), with no evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (I2: 34%; p¼0.01). Conclusions: The use of cannabis with or without tobacco smoking is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer

Insufficiency of peripheral blood as a substitute tissue for detecting EGFR mutations in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Yongjun Zhang ◽  
Wenlong Bao ◽  
Chuming Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Egfr Mutations

scholarly journals Association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Liu ◽  
Yilong Pan ◽  
Yuyao Yin ◽  
Wenhao Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Abstract Background The numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and COVID-19 related deaths are still increasing, so it is very important to determine the risk factors of COVID-19. Dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with COVID-19, but the association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant studies up to August 24, 2020. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. All analysis was performed using Stata 13.1 software and Mantel–Haenszel formula with fixed effects models was used to compare the differences between studies. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results Twenty-eight studies involving 12,995 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was consisted of 26 cohort studies and 2 case–control studies. Dyslipidemia was associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.44, P = 0.038, I2 = 39.8%). Further, patients with dyslipidemia had a 2.13-fold increased risk of death compared to patients without dyslipidemia (95% CI 1.84–2.47, P = 0.001, I2 = 66.4%). Conclusions The results proved that dyslipidemia is associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, we should monitor blood lipids and administer active treatments in COVID-19 patients with dyslipidemia to reduce the severity and mortality.

scholarly journals Systemic immune‐inflammation index has prognostic significance in pancreatic carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaocheng Li ◽  
Huapeng Lin ◽  
Renbin Ouyang ◽  
Yaowei Yang ◽  
Jing Peng
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Promising Tool ◽  
Immune Inflammation

Abstract Background Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is reportedly a prognostic indicator for several malignancies, including pancreatic carcinoma, although there exists no consensus regarding its significance. In the current study, we used a systematically meta-analysis to evaluate the association between SII and prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma patients. Methods We screened PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, through May 2020, and retrieved studies describing the prognostic role of SII in pancreatic carcinoma. We calculated pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random or fixed effects models to reveal the correlation between SII and prognosis. Results A total of 4 studies, comprising 1,749 patients, met our inclusion criteria and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Our meta-analysis showed that elevated SII indicated significantly worse overall survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.24–1.65, P < 0.001), with subgroup analyses, stratified by the TNM stage and treatment, further validating these results. In addition, patients with high SII had poorer cancer-specific survival (HR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.55–3.48, P < 0.001). However, we found no significant associations between SII with disease-free and relapse-free survival. Conclusions These findings indicate that SII is a potential non-invasive and promising tool for predicting clinical outcomes of pancreatic carcinoma patients. However, further studies using adequate designs and larger sample sizes are required to validate our findings.

scholarly journals Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors (PARPi) for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
YongCheng Su ◽  
XiaoGang Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are new class of drugs that are currently being studied in several malignancies. However, datas about the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitors are limited. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with breast cancer.METHODS: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) were searched for articles published from 2000 to June 2018.Summary incidences and the RR, HR with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated by using a random-effects or fixed-effects model.RESULTS: The summary HR indicated PARPi was not associated with OS (HR=0.83, 95%CI 0.66–1.06, Z=1.49, P=0.14), while it could significantly improve PFS ande time to deterioration (TTD) of global health status/quality of life(GHS/QoL) as compared with traditional standard therapy, the HR was 0.60(95%CI 0.50-0.72; Z=5.52, P＜0.00001) and 0.4 (95%CI 0.29–0.54,z=5.80 ,p=0.000),respectively.The RR of grade 3 or more anemia ,fatigue and headache was 3.02 (95% CI, 0.69–13.17;p = 0.14,,I2=90%),0.77 (95%CI, 0.34–1.73;p=0.52,I2=7%) and 1.13 (95% CI,0.30–4.18;p=0.86,I2=0%),respectively.CONCLUSION: The findings of this meta-analysis showed that PARPi has no significant effect on OS, while it could significantly improve in PFS and TTD of GHS/QoL for patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Furthermore,our findings also demonstrated that the PARPi treatment is connected with an increased risk of grade 3 or more anemia adverse events.

scholarly journals Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for sepsis: A meta-analysis of preclinical studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
xueyi sun ◽  
xianfei ding ◽  
huoyan liang ◽  
xiaojuan zhang ◽  
shaohua liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cell ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Fixed Effects Model

Abstract Background: Multiple studies have reported that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has beneficial effects in experimental models of sepsis. However, this finding remains inconclusive. This study was performed to systematically determine the connection between MSC therapy and mortality in sepsis animal models by pooling and analyzing data from newly published studies. Methods: A detailed search of related studies from 2009 to 2019 was conducted in four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. After browsing and filtering out articles that met the inclusion criteria for statistical analysis, the inverse variance method of the fixed effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Twenty-nine animal studies, including 1,266 animals, were identified. None of the studies were judged to have a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC therapy was related to a significantly lower mortality rate (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.22–0.38, P <0.001). Subgroup analyses performed based on the MSC injection dose (<1.0 × 10 6 cells, OR=0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.56, P <0.001; 1.0 × 10 6 cells, OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.16–0.35, P <0.001) and injection time (<1 hour, OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.13–0.45, P <0.001; 1 hour, OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.17–0.46, P <0.001) demonstrated that treatment with MSCs significantly reduced the mortality rate of animals with sepsis. Conclusion: This up-to-date meta-analysis showed a connection between MSC therapy and lower mortality in sepsis animal models, supporting the potential therapeutic effect of MSC treatment in future clinical trials. The results in this study contradict a previous meta-analysis with regards to the ideal dose of MSC therapy. Thus, further research is required to support these findings.

scholarly journals Nervous and Muscular Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Chen ◽  
Yuangui Cai ◽  
Yicong Chen ◽  
Anthony P. Williams ◽  
Yifang Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label

Background: Nervous and muscular adverse events (NMAEs) have garnered considerable attention after the vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, the incidences of NMAEs remain unclear. We aimed to calculate the pooled event rate of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the incidences of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination was conducted. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception to 2 June 2021. Two independent reviewers selected the study and extracted the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and generated with random or fixed effects models. The protocol of the present study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021240450). Results: In 15 phase 1/2 trials, NMAEs occurred in 29.2% vs. 21.6% (p < 0.001) vaccinated participants and controls. Headache and myalgia accounted for 98.2% and 97.7%, and their incidences were 16.4% vs. 13.9% (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.002) and 16.0% vs. 7.9% (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) in the vaccine and control groups, respectively. Headache and myalgia were more frequent in the newly licensed vaccines (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.02 and OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) and younger adults (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003 and OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.20–1.96, p < 0.001). In four open-label trials, the incidences of headache, myalgia, and unsolicited NMAEs were 38.7%, 27.4%, and 1.5%. Following vaccination in phase 3 trials, headache and myalgia were still common with a rate of 29.5% and 19.2%, although the unsolicited NMAEs with incidence rates of ≤ 0.7% were not different from the control group in each study. Conclusions: Following the vaccination, NMAEs are common of which headache and myalgia comprised a considerable measure, although life-threatening unsolicited events are rare. NMAEs should be continuously monitored during the ongoing global COVID-19 vaccination program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document