scholarly journals The Low-Dose ACTH Test: Usefulness of Combined Analysis of Serum and Salivary Maximum Cortisol Response in Pediatrics

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 4323-4330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Vaiani ◽  
Juan Manuel Lazzati ◽  
Pablo Ramirez ◽  
Mariana Costanzo ◽  
Silvia Gil ◽  
...  

AbstractContextThe low-dose (1 µg) ACTH test (LDT) is widely used to assess central adrenal insufficiency (CAI); however, the serum cortisol cutoff value is controversial. Salivary cortisol (SC) may be a more accurate measurement for CAI.ObjectiveTo assess a new maximum cutoff value of serum cortisol after LDT in pediatric patients, taking into account serum and SC measurements.Design and SettingProspective study in a pediatric tertiary referral center.Working HypothesisThe combined analysis of serum and SC response to LDT might improve LDT for CAI diagnosis.Participant and Outcome MeasurementA total of 145 pediatric patients underwent LDT. Serum and SC levels were measured. A central adrenal sufficient (CAS) response was established according to the reference serum cortisol cutoff value of ≥497 nmol/L.ResultsThe LDT study showed central adrenal sufficiency in 72 patients and CAI in 73 patients. Considering the lower quartile of maximum SC value (21 nmol/L) in the CAS group, an intermediate CAI (InCAI) group and a real CAI (RCAI) group were defined. Regarding the median maximum value of serum cortisol levels in the InCAI group, a new serum cortisol cutoff value of 450 nmol/L was established. Furthermore, 91% of the patients in the RCAI group were below this cutoff value.ConclusionThe combined evaluation of maximum serum and SC levels to LDT might be useful to define an InCAI group and to avoid unnecessary hormone replacement therapy. However, rigorous patient follow-up is required

1998 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
JG Gonzalez-Gonzalez ◽  
NE De la Garza-Hernandez ◽  
LG Mancillas-Adame ◽  
J Montes-Villarreal ◽  
JZ Villarreal-Perez

The short cosyntropin (synthetic ACTH) test is recognized as the best screening manoeuvre in the assessment of adrenocortical insufficiency. Recent data, however, suggest that i.v. administration of 250 microg cosyntropin could be a pharmacological rather than a physiological stimulus, losing sensitivity for detecting adrenocortical failure. Our objective was to compare 10 vs 250 microg cosyntropin in order to find differences in serum cortisol peaks in healthy individuals, the adrenocortical response in a variety of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis disorders and the highest sensitivity and specificity serum cortisol cut-off point values. The subjects were 83 healthy people and 37 patients, the latter having Addison's disease (11), pituitary adenomas (7), Sheehan's syndrome (9) and recent use of glucocorticoid therapy (10). Forty-six healthy subjects and all patients underwent low- and standard-dose cosyntropin testing. In addition, 37 controls underwent the low-dose test. On comparing low- and standard-dose cosyntropin testing in healthy subjects there were no statistical differences in baseline and peaks of serum cortisol. In the group of patients, 2 out of 11 cases of Addison's disease showed normal cortisol criterion values during the standard test but abnormal during the low-dose test. In our group of patients and controls, the statistical analysis displayed a better sensitivity of the low-dose vs standard-dose ACTH test at 30 and 60 min. In conclusion, these results suggest that the use of 10 microg rather than 250 microg cosyntropin i.v. in the assessment of suspicious adrenocortical dysfunction gives better results.


2008 ◽  
pp. S193-S199
Author(s):  
K Šimůnková ◽  
L Stárka ◽  
M Hill ◽  
L Kříž ◽  
R Hampl ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of low-dose combined oral contraception (COC) on basal and stimulated (1 microg ACTH test) levels of serum and salivary cortisol (F), cortisone and on basal serum cortisol binding globulin (CBG), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), dehydroepiadrosterone (DHEA) and calculated free cortisol in healthy young women. Three-month administration of COC resulted in 1) significant increase of basal (454.0+/-125.0 to 860.9+/-179.7 nmol/l) and ACTH-stimulated serum cortisol in 30th min (652.3+/-60.5 to 1374.1+/-240.6 nmol/l); 2) no significant change of basal (15.4+/-7.3 to 18.9+/-8.5 nmol/l) and ACTH-stimulated salivary cortisol at the 30th min (32.4+/-8.8 to 32.9+/-9.0 nmol/l); 3) no significant change of basal serum cortisone (38,8+/-7.68 to 45.2+/-24.2 nmol/l) and ACTH-stimulated cortisone at the 30th (34.8+/-10.9 to 47.0+/-35.7 nmol/l); 4) significant increase of basal ACTH (17.2+/-9.0 to 38.2+/-29.4 ng/l), CBG (991.0+/-161.0 to 2332.0+/-428.0 nmol/l), and 5) no significant change of basal DHEA (24.6+/-15.7 to 22.6+/-11.7 micromol/l) and calculated basal value for free cortisol (22.8+/-14.9 to 19.2+/-6.9 nmol/l). In conclusions, higher basal and ACTH-stimulated serum cortisol were found after three-month administration of COC, while basal and stimulated salivary cortisol were not significantly affected. Therefore, salivary cortisol can be used for assessment of adrenal function in women regularly using COC.


2007 ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Šimůnková ◽  
R Hampl ◽  
M Hill ◽  
J Doucha ◽  
L Stárka ◽  
...  

To date, a single report has appeared on the use of salivary cortisol for adrenal function testing with a low dose ACTH, although 1 microg has become preferred as a more physiological stimulus than the commonly used 250 microg ACTH test. Our present study was aimed to obtain physiological data on changes of free salivary cortisol after 1 microg ACTH stimulation. This approach was compared with the common method based on the changes of total serum cortisol. Intravenous, low-dose ACTH test was performed in 15 healthy women (aged 22-40 years) with normal body weight, not using hormonal contraceptives, in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Blood and saliva for determination of cortisol were collected before ACTH administration and 30 and 60 min after ACTH administration. Basal concentration of salivary cortisol (mean +/- S.E.M., 15.9+/-1.96 nmol/l) increased after 1 microg ACTH to 29.1+/-2.01 nmol/l after 30 min, and to 27.4+/-2.15 nmol/l after 60 min. The differences between basal and stimulated values were highly significant (p<0.0001). The values of salivary cortisol displayed very little interindividual variability (p<0.04) in contrast to total serum cortisol values (p<0.0001) A comparison of areas under the curve (AUC) related to initial values indicated significantly higher AUC values for salivary cortisol than for total serum cortisol (1.89+/-0.88 vs. 1.22+/-0.19, p<0.01). Correlation analysis of serum and salivary cortisol levels showed a borderline relationship between basal levels (r=0.5183, p=0.0525); correlations after stimulation were not significant. Low-dose ACTH administration appeared as a sufficient stimulus for increasing salivary cortisol to a range considered as a normal adrenal functional reserve.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-614
Author(s):  
Jean Abitbol

The purpose of this article is to update the management of the treatment of the female voice at perimenopause and menopause. Voice and hormones—these are 2 words that clash, meet, and harmonize. If we are to solve this inquiry, we shall inevitably have to understand the hormones, their impact, and the scars of time. The endocrine effects on laryngeal structures are numerous: The actions of estrogens and progesterone produce modification of glandular secretions. Low dose of androgens are secreted principally by the adrenal cortex, but they are also secreted by the ovaries. Their effect may increase the low pitch and decease the high pitch of the voice at menopause due to important diminution of estrogens and the privation of progesterone. The menopausal voice syndrome presents clinical signs, which we will describe. I consider menopausal patients to fit into 2 broad types: the “Modigliani” types, rather thin and slender with little adipose tissue, and the “Rubens” types, with a rounded figure with more fat cells. Androgen derivatives are transformed to estrogens in fat cells. Hormonal replacement therapy should be carefully considered in the context of premenopausal symptom severity as alternative medicine. Hippocrates: “Your diet is your first medicine.”


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 2405-2413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Madsen ◽  
Per L. Poulsen ◽  
Hans Ørskov ◽  
Niels Møller ◽  
Jens O. L. Jørgensen

Abstract Context: Cotreatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant and a somatostatin analog (SA) has proven feasible. Previous studies in the field have focused on patients with an insufficient response to SA monotherapy in whom pegvisomant was added without changing the SA dose. Objective: The objective of the study was to study whether patients sufficiently controlled on SA monotherapy can be transferred to combination therapy with low-dose pegvisomant and a reduced SA dose. Design: Eighteen acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy, mean ± se aged 54 ± 3 yr, were randomized in a parallel study over 24 wk to unchanged SA monotherapy or cotreatment with pegvisomant (15–30 mg twice a week) and SA (half the usual dosage). Setting: This was an investigator-initiated study in a single tertiary referral center. Main Outcome Measures: Glucose tolerance, substrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, body composition, and quality of life were measured. Results: Median pegvisomant dose was 52.5 mg/wk (range 30–60). IGF-I (micrograms per liter) was comparable both at baseline (P = 0.88) and after 24 wk of treatment (P = 0.48). The change in IGF-I between baseline and wk 24 also did not differ between groups (P = 0.15). Apart from increased peak insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test in the cotreatment group, no substantial differences between the two groups were detected. Moderately elevated liver enzymes were found in 17% of the patients on pegvisomant therapy. Conclusion: Acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy can maintain safe IGF-I levels during 24 wk of cotreatment with low-dose pegvisomant and a 50% reduced SA dose. This treatment modality, however, does not seem to provide significant benefits for the patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document