What Is a “Racial Health Disparity”? Five Analytic Traditions

Author(s):  
Merlin Chowkwanyun

Abstract What exactly is a “racial health disparity”? This article explores five lenses that have been used to answer that question. It contends that racial health disparities have been presented—by both academic researchers and those outside of it—as problems of five varieties: of biology, of behavior, of place, of stress, of policy. It also argues that a sixth tradition exploring class—and its connection to race, racism, and health—has been underdeveloped. I examine each of these conceptions of racial disparities in turn. Baked into each interpretive prism is a set of assumptions about the mechanisms that produce disparities: a story, in other words, about where racial health disparities come from. Discursive boundaries set the parameters for policy debate, determining what is and is not included in proposed solutions. How one sees a racial health disparity, then, determines the strategies a society advocates—or ignores—for their elimination. I end by briefly discussing problems in the larger research ecosystem that dictates how racial health disparities are studied.

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e4
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Long ◽  
Jessica Pugel ◽  
J. Taylor Scott ◽  
Nicolyn Charlot ◽  
Cagla Giray ◽  
...  

Racial disparities and racism are pervasive public health threats that have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, it is critical and timely for researchers to communicate with policymakers about strategies for reducing disparities. From April through July 2020, across four rapid-cycle trials disseminating scientific products with evidence-based policy recommendations for addressing disparities, we tested strategies for optimizing the reach of scientific messages to policymakers. By getting such research into the hands of policymakers who can act on it, this work can help combat racial health disparities. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 9, 2021:e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306404 )


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Howard

Preliminary racial data on the coronavirus pandemic indicates that African Americans are much more likely to experience infections, hospitalizations, and death from the virus in comparison to other racial groups. While this appears to be an alarming health outcome regarding African Americans, it is, in fact, not surprising, nor even new information, considering the historical context of racial health disparities and the marginal health of African Americans in the United States. The leading causes of death for African Americans generally and historically reflects the leading causes of death for the entire United States population. More research, and obviously data, is needed to fully understand the factors that cause the overall racial health disparities, in general, and racial disparities in coronavirus cases and deaths, in particular. In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, the racial disparities in deaths reflect racial differences in the way that African Americans live, work, and exist as a result of their ‘second-class citizenship’ with respect to their lower socioeconomic status in comparison to other racial groups. From a health policy perspective, challenges exist to reversing the current trend in coronavirus deaths among African Americans due to a myriad of historic, consistent, and pervasive societally-induced deficits within African American life. The proposed chapter will rely on systematic review of the extant literature on racial health disparities to identify multiple factors that may affect African American deaths due to the current coronavirus pandemic. The chapter will also rely on this framework to inform evidence-based approaches to improve public health for African Americans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
Kristine Ajrouch ◽  
Noah Webster ◽  
Toni Antonucci

Abstract This symposium brings together four papers that address racial health disparities by investigating stressful aspects of social relations at different points in the life course. Cleary and colleagues focus on racial disparities in psychological health by testing cross-sectional effects of intergenerational stress over time. In particular, they investigate effects of network composition on the relationship between mothers' stressors and their children's depressive symptoms at three time points over 23 years. Camacho and colleagues use longitudinal data from the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project to examine cognitive decline among U.S. African-American, Latino, and White adults aged 60 and above. Results indicate loneliness predicted greater global cognitive decline over time in all groups. However, race differences in this association were found across cognitive function domains. Turner and colleagues consider dementia caregiving challenges among non-Hispanic Blacks. Data from five focus groups were analyzed to reveal distinctive challenges to caregiver health during the COVID-19 pandemic including increased burden and barriers to service access. Finally, Sol and colleagues examined the bidirectional association between loneliness and self-rated health over time among a racially diverse sample. Findings illustrate racial patterns in how loneliness at midlife influences health in later life. Antonucci will discuss the role of stress from social relations as a means to fully understand racial disparities in health across the life course.


2018 ◽  
Vol 680 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rucker C. Johnson

This article investigates the influence of family background and neighborhood conditions during childhood on health later in life, with a focus on hypertension. To document the proportion of current adult racial health disparities rooted in early-life factors, I use nationally representative longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) spanning four decades. The results indicate that racial differences in early life neighborhood conditions and family background characteristics play a substantial role in explaining racial disparities in hypertension through at least age 50. Contemporaneous socioeconomic factors account for relatively little of the racial disparities in this health condition in adulthood. Second, I match the PSID data to county-level data on Medicaid expenditures during these cohorts’ childhoods, and provide new causal evidence on the long-run returns to childhood Medicaid spending: Medicaid-induced increases in access to public health insurance led to significant reductions in the likelihood of low birth weight, increased educational attainment and adult income, and reduced adult mortality and the annual incidence of health problems.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Lu ◽  
Kaveh Hajifathalian ◽  
Majid Ezzati ◽  
Eric Rimm ◽  
Goodarz Danaei

Introduction: Health disparities remain pervasive in US and eliminating such disparities is one of the overarching goals of the Healthy People 2020 agenda. Previous studies have assessed the disparities in risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality by race/ethnicity, but most of them only focused on the average CHD risk without taking into account the full risk distribution which would enable analysis of specific high-risk sub-groups. In this study, we estimated the 10-year risk distribution of CHD mortality based on 5 leading modifiable risk factors in US (i.e. smoking, adiposity, high blood pressure, serum cholesterol and blood glucose). We quantified the racial disparities in absolute CHD risk while accounting for full risk distribution. Methods: We included 3866 individuals aged 45 to 74 years, who were black or white, non-pregnant, free of CHD and had measurements of all 5 risk factors from 6 consecutive 2-year cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2010. We used mortality data from National Center for Health Statistics to estimate the cause-age-sex-race specific mortality in 2010. We also obtained hazard ratios of the selected 5 risk factors on CHD mortality from large meta-analyses of epidemiological studies. We predicted the 10-year risk of CHD death for each individual by simulating their survival process from 2010 to 2020 incorporating competing risks by death from other correlated causes. To assess health disparities, we compared the 5 th , 25 th , 50 th , 75 th and 95 th percentile of the predicted risks between black and white by age and sex. Results: More than half of the black and white population aged 45 to 74 years had a low 10-year risk of CHD death (< 2%). The age-sex-race specific distributions of 10-year CHD risk were right-skewed with a large proportion of population on the low risk tail. Comparing to white, black had similar shape of CHD risk distributions, but higher risk levels at all percentiles across age and sex groups. In 55-64 ages where CHD was the major cause of death, the median of CHD risk for black males was 2.9% (interquartile range (IQR) 1.7% - 4.4%), which was 0.7% larger than that for white males (2.2%, IQR 1.4% - 3.3%). This risk difference was similar in females: the median CHD risk for black females was 1.6% (IQR 0.9% - 2.4%) and 0.9% for white females (IQR 0.5% - 1.5%). The disparities became larger on the high risk tail (95 th percentile of predicted risk), where black had 2.7% higher risk for male and 2.3% for female in 55-64 ages. In older age groups (65-74 ages), such difference increased to 3.5% for both male and female. Conclusions: This analysis showed a skewed 10-year CHD risk distribution in US. The racial disparities are larger in the high risk sub-groups compared to those in the center of the risk distribution, indicating that the high risk subgroups should be the target population of intervention that aims to reduce health disparities in US.


Author(s):  
Pearl A McElfish ◽  
Brett Rowland ◽  
Britni L Ayers ◽  
Gail E O'Connor ◽  
Rachel S Purvis ◽  
...  

Pacific Islanders are a growing, yet understudied population who suffer from high rates of chronic diseases such as obesity and diabetes. Given the historical trauma experienced by Pacific Islanders, community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an appropriate way to conduct research focused on reducing the health disparities observed in this population. This paper presents the process of engaging the Marshallese community to design, conduct, and evaluate a community-engaged research training program. The goal of the program was to build the capacity of both academic researchers and community stakeholders to conduct CBPR for the purpose of addressing health disparities identified and prioritized by the Marshallese community. The program included both didactic training and experiential mentored research components delivered over a period of two years. Eleven Marshallese community stakeholders and eleven academic researchers participated in the program. Results indicated that the program successfully increased participants’ knowledge regarding the CBPR process. Groups of participants have completed exploratory research projects based on the topics identified by the community. The evaluation adds important insights to the current CBPR training literature and can inform future CBPR trainings. Keywordscommunity-based participatory research, community-engaged research, Pacific Islanders, minority health, health disparities, interprofessional training


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruqaiijah Yearby

The government recognizes that social factors cause racial inequalities in access to resources and opportunities that result in racial health disparities. However, this recognition fails to acknowledge the root cause of these racial inequalities: structural racism. As a result, racial health disparities persist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document