Retinoic acid modifies development of the midbrain-hindbrain border and affects cranial ganglion formation in zebrafish embryos

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 1159-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Holder ◽  
J. Hill

Considerable evidence now suggests that retinoic acid (RA) is an important modulator of patterning events in early neuronal development in vertebrates. In this paper, we describe the effects of exogenously applied RA on early neural development in the zebrafish embryo. Neural anatomy is assessed by immunocytochemical and histochemical analysis of the developing embryo in whole mounts at 24 h post-fertilization. RA was applied for one hour at concentrations ranging from 10(−9) to 10(−6) M to embryos at 50% epiboly, the midgastrula stage, and at 10(−7) M to embryos at early and late gastrula stages. The neuroanatomical analysis shows that 10(−7) M RA causes a defined lesion to the developing central nervous system which corresponds to a loss of a region of the brain in the caudal midbrain-rostral hindbrain area, the precursor of the cerebellum and associated neural structures. The region that fails to develop corresponds to the cranial expression domain of the engrailed protein as assessed by the monoclonal antibody 4D9 (Patel et al. 1989: Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids and chordates. Cell 58, 955–968). Structures caudal to rhombomere 4 are unaffected by 10(−7) M RA, as are the cranial midbrain and forebrain: 10(−7) M RA also affects the development of cranial ganglia, principally the Vth, anterior lateral line and VIIIth ganglia, suggesting that RA affects normal development of the cranial neural crest. Effects of RA at stages immediately prior to and after gastrulation show some similar and some distinct features. Results are discussed in terms of the possible role of RA as an endogenous moderator of normal head development.

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1733-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Andreazzoli ◽  
M. Pannese ◽  
E. Boncinelli

Xotx1 and Xotx2 are two Xenopus homologues of the Drosophila orthodenticle gene that are specifically expressed in presumptive head regions that do not undergo convergent extension movements during gastrulation. We studied the function of Xotx1 and compared it with that of Xotx2. Ectopic expression of each of the two genes has similar effects in impairing trunk and tail development. Experimental evidence suggests that posterior deficiencies observed in microinjected embryos are due to negative interference with convergent extension movements. Transplantations of putative tail-forming regions showed that, while Xotx1 overexpression inhibits tail organizer activity, Xotx2 overexpression is able to turn a tail organizer into a head organizer. Finally, Xotx1 and Xotx2 are activated by factors involved in head formation and repressed by a posteriorizing signal like retinoic acid. Taken together, these data suggest that Xotx genes are involved in head-organizing activity. They also suggest that the head organizer may act not only stimulating the formation of anterior regions, but also repressing the formation of posterior structures.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Simone Mesman ◽  
Iris Wever ◽  
Marten P. Smidt

During development, mesodiencephalic dopaminergic (mdDA) neurons form into different molecular subsets. Knowledge of which factors contribute to the specification of these subsets is currently insufficient. In this study, we examined the role of Tcf4, a member of the E-box protein family, in mdDA neuronal development and subset specification. We show that Tcf4 is expressed throughout development, but is no longer detected in adult midbrain. Deletion of Tcf4 results in an initial increase in TH-expressing neurons at E11.5, but this normalizes at later embryonic stages. However, the caudal subset marker Nxph3 and rostral subset marker Ahd2 are affected at E14.5, indicating that Tcf4 is involved in correct differentiation of mdDA neuronal subsets. At P0, expression of these markers partially recovers, whereas expression of Th transcript and TH protein appears to be affected in lateral parts of the mdDA neuronal population. The initial increase in TH-expressing cells and delay in subset specification could be due to the increase in expression of the bHLH factor Ascl1, known for its role in mdDA neuronal differentiation, upon loss of Tcf4. Taken together, our data identified a minor role for Tcf4 in mdDA neuronal development and subset specification.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Mikdache ◽  
Marie-José Boueid ◽  
Lorijn van der Spek ◽  
Emilie Lesport ◽  
Brigitte Delespierre ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Regulator of G protein signaling 4 (Rgs4) is a member of the RGS proteins superfamily that modulates the activity of G-protein coupled receptors. It is mainly expressed in the nervous system and is linked to several neuronal signaling pathways; however, its role in neural development in vivo remains inconclusive. Here, we generated and characterized a rgs4 loss of function model (MZrgs4) in zebrafish. MZrgs4 embryos showed motility defects and presented reduced head and eye sizes, reflecting defective motoneurons axon outgrowth and a significant decrease in the number of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous system. Forcing the expression of Rgs4 specifically within motoneurons rescued their early defective outgrowth in MZrgs4 embryos, indicating an autonomous role for Rgs4 in motoneurons. We also analyzed the role of Akt, Erk and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling cascades and showed a requirement for these pathways in motoneurons axon outgrowth and neuronal development. Drawing on pharmacological and rescue experiments in MZrgs4, we provide evidence that Rgs4 facilitates signaling mediated by Akt, Erk and mTOR in order to drive axon outgrowth in motoneurons and regulate neuronal numbers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 132-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harshini Manohar ◽  
Madhavapuri Pravallika ◽  
Preeti Kandasamy ◽  
Venkatesh Chandrasekaran ◽  
Ravi Philip Rajkumar

ABSTRACTBackground: Gut microflora influences neural development through complex mechanisms. Feeding practices, especially breastfeeding influence gut microbiome and thereby play a pivotal role in immune and neural development. Current understandings of the role of healthy distal gut microflora in the development of immune and neural systems provide insights into immunological mechanisms as one of the possible etiologies in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies have shown that optimal breastfeeding is associated with lower odds of being at-risk for ASD and children with ASD are suboptimally breastfed. Methods: The feeding practices of children with ASD (n = 30) was compared to their typically developing siblings as matched controls (n = 30). Information regarding feeding practices was collected from mothers through a semi-structured questionnaire. Results: About 43.3% of children with ASD received exclusive breastfeeding, whereas 76.7% of their typically developing siblings were exclusively breastfed. Exclusive breastfeeding was associated with lower odds for ASD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.166; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.025–0.65), while early introduction of top feeds was associated with higher odds (OR = 6; 95% CI = 1.33–55.19). Difficulties in breastfeeding were attributed to child-related factors in 13.2% of the children. Conclusion: Children with ASD are suboptimally breastfed compared to their typically developing siblings. Exclusive breastfeeding may confer protection in vulnerable children. Further studies on larger prospective sample are required to establish the association.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Reczek ◽  
Jacek Ostrowski ◽  
Kuo-Long Yu ◽  
Simon Chen ◽  
Laura Hammer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Bórquez ◽  
Pamela J. Urrutia ◽  
Carlos Wilson ◽  
Brigitte van Zundert ◽  
Marco Tulio Núñez ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 167 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Gottschling ◽  
Harald Reinhard ◽  
Constanze Pagenstecher ◽  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
Jochen Raedle ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 356 (1) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Doreen D. Cunningham ◽  
Elena S. Casey

Genetics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 201 (4) ◽  
pp. 1411-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Yeon Park ◽  
Brian G. Stultz ◽  
Deborah A. Hursh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document