Altered expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-7 and GHox-8 in the limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 1487-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.N. Coelho ◽  
K.M. Krabbenhoft ◽  
W.B. Upholt ◽  
J.F. Fallon ◽  
R.A. Kosher
Keyword(s):  
Proper Time ◽  
Blot Hybridization ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
Apical Ectodermal Ridge ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Altered Expression

It has been suggested that the reciprocal expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-8 and GHox-7 by the apical ectodermal ridge and subjacent limb mesoderm might be involved in regulating the proximodistal outgrowth of the developing chick limb bud. In the present study the expression of GHox-7 and GHox-8 has been examined by in situ and dot blot hybridization in the developing limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos. The limb buds of homozygous mutant limbless embryos form at the proper time in development (stage 17/18), but never develop an apical ectodermal ridge, fail to undergo normal elongation, and eventually degenerate. At stage 18, which is shortly following the formation of the limb bud, the expression of GHox-7 is considerably reduced (about 3-fold lower) in the mesoderm of limbless mutant limb buds compared to normal limb bud mesoderm. By stages 20 and 21, as the limb buds of limbless embryos cease outgrowth, GHox-7 expression in limbless mesoderm declines to very low levels, whereas GHox-7 expression increases in the mesoderm of normal limb buds which are undergoing outgrowth. In contrast to GHox-7, expression of GHox-8 in limbless mesoderm at stage 18 is quantitatively similar to its expression in normal limb bud mesoderm, and in limbless and normal mesoderm GHox-8 expression is highly localized in the anterior mesoderm of the limb bud. In normal limb buds, GHox-8 is also expressed in high amounts by the apical ectodermal ridge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

IGF-I, insulin and FGFs induce outgrowth of the limb buds of amelic mutant chick embryos

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 1323-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.N. Dealy ◽  
R.A. Kosher
Keyword(s):  
Proper Time ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
In Vitro Morphogenesis ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Igf I ◽  
High Level

IGF-I, insulin, FGF-2 and FGF-4 have been implicated in the reciprocal interactions between the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) and underlying mesoderm required for outgrowth and patterning of the developing limb. To study further the roles of these growth factors in limb outgrowth, we have examined their effects on the in vitro morphogenesis of limb buds of the amelic mutant chick embryos wingless (wl) and limbless (ll). Limb buds of wl and ll mutant embryos form at the proper time in development, but fail to undergo further outgrowth and subsequently degenerate. Wl and ll limb buds lack thickened AERs capable of promoting limb outgrowth, and their thin apical ectoderms fail to express the homeobox-containing gene Msx-2, which is highly expressed by normal AERs and has been implicated in regulating AER activity. Here we report that exogenous IGF-I and insulin, and, to a lesser extent, FGF-2 and FGF-4 induce the proliferation and directed outgrowth of explanted wl and ll mutant limb buds, which in vitro, like in vivo, normally fail to undergo outgrowth and degenerate. IGF-I and insulin, but not FGFs, also cause the thin apical ectoderms of wl and ll limb buds to thicken and form structures that grossly resemble normal AERs and, moreover, induce high level expression of Msx-2 in these thickened AER-like structures. Neither IGF-I, insulin nor FGFs induce expression of the homeobox-containing gene Msx-1 in the subapical mesoderm of wl or ll limb buds, although FGFs, but not IGF-I or insulin, maintain Msx-1 expression in normal (non-mutant) limb bud explants lacking an AER. The implications of these results to the relationships among the wl and ll genes, IGF-I/insulin, FGFs, Msx-2 and Msx-1 in the regulation of limb outgrowth is discussed.

Role of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-4.6 and GHox-8 in the specification of positional identities during the development of normal and polydactylous chick limb buds

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.N. Coelho ◽  
W.B. Upholt ◽  
R.A. Kosher
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Wing Bud ◽  
Coated Bead ◽  
Experimentally Induced

During early stages of normal chick limb development, the homeobox-containing (HOX) gene GHox-4.6 is expressed throughout the posterior mesoderm of the wing bud from which most of the skeletal elements including the digits will develop, whereas GHox-8 is expressed in the anterior limb bud mesoderm which will not give rise to skeletal elements. In the present study, we have examined the expression of GHox-4.6 and GHox-8 in the wing buds of two polydactylous mutant chick embryos, diplopodia-5 and talpid2, from which supernumerary digits develop from anterior limb mesoderm, and have also examined the expression of these genes in response to polarizing zone grafts and retinoic acid-coated bead implants which induce the formation of supernumerary digits from anterior limb mesoderm. We have found that the formation of supernumerary digits from the anterior mesoderm in mutant and experimentally induced polydactylous limb buds is preceded by the ectopic expression of GHox-4.6 in the anterior mesoderm and the coincident suppression of GHox-8 expression in the anterior mesoderm. These observations suggest that the anterior mesoderm of the polydactylous limb buds is “posteriorized” and support the suggestion that GHox-8 and GHox-4.6, respectively, are involved in specifying the anterior non-skeletal and posterior digit-forming regions of the limb bud. Although the anterior mesodermal domain of GHox-8 expression is severely impaired in the mutant and experimentally induced polydactylous limb buds, this gene is expressed by the prolonged, thickened apical ectodermal ridges of the polydactylous limb buds that extend along the distal anterior as well as the distal posterior mesoderm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Distribution of polarizing activity and potential for limb formation in mouse and chick embryos and possible relationships to polydactyly

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (18) ◽  
pp. 4011-4021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tanaka ◽  
M.J. Cohn ◽  
P. Ashby ◽  
M. Davey ◽  
P. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Plan ◽  
Mouse Embryos ◽  
Apical Ectodermal Ridge ◽  
Central Feature ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Induction Signal

A central feature of the tetrapod body plan is that two pairs of limbs develop at specific positions along the head-to-tail axis. However, the potential to form limbs in chick embryos is more widespread. This could have implications for understanding the basis of limb abnormalities. Here we extend the analysis to mouse embryos and examine systematically the potential of tissues in different regions outside the limbs to contribute to limb structures. We show that the ability of ectoderm to form an apical ridge in response to FGF4 in both mouse and chick embryos exists throughout the flank as does ability of mesenchyme to provide a polarizing region signal. In addition, neck tissue has weak polarizing activity. We show, in chick embryos, that polarizing activity of tissues correlates with the ability either to express Shh or to induce Shh expression. We also show that cells from chick tail can give rise to limb structures. Taken together these observations suggest that naturally occurring polydactyly could involve recruitment of cells from regions adjacent to the limb buds. We show that cells from neck, flank and tail can migrate into limb buds in response to FGF4, which mimics extension of the apical ectodermal ridge. Furthermore, when we apply simultaneously a polarizing signal and a limb induction signal to early chick flank, this leads to limb duplications.

Correlation of wing-leg identity in ectopic FGF-induced chimeric limbs with the differential expression of chick Tbx5 and Tbx4

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ohuchi ◽  
J. Takeuchi ◽  
H. Yoshioka ◽  
Y. Ishimaru ◽  
K. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Fibroblast Growth ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Specific Position

It has been reported that members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family can induce additional limb formation in the flank of chick embryos. The phenotype of the ectopic limb depends on the somite level at which it forms: limbs in the anterior flank resemble wings, whereas those in the posterior flank resemble legs. Ectopic limbs located in the mid-flank appear chimeric, possessing characteristics of both wings and legs; feather buds are present in the anterior halves with scales and claws in the posterior halves. To study the mechanisms underlying the chimerism of these additional limbs, we cloned chick Tbx5 and Tbx4 to use as forelimb and hindlimb markers and examined their expression patterns in FGF-induced limb buds. We found that Tbx5 and Tbx4 were differentially expressed in the anterior and posterior halves of additional limb buds in the mid-flank, respectively, consistent with the chimeric patterns of the integument. A boundary of Tbx5/Tbx4 exists in all ectopic limbs, indicating that the additional limbs are essentially chimeric, although the degree of chimerism is dependent on the position. The boundary of Tbx5/Tbx4 expression is not fixed at a specific position within the interlimb region, but dependent upon where FGF was applied. Since the ectopic expression patterns of Tbx5/Tbx4 in the additional limbs are closely correlated with the patterns of their chimeric phenotypes, it is likely that Tbx5 and Tbx4 expression in the limb bud is involved in determination of the forelimb and hindlimb identities, respectively, in vertebrates.

Human Papillomavirus DNA in Anal CarcinomasComparison of In Situ and Dot Blot Hybridization

1991 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
MÁire A. Duggan ◽  
Valerie F. Boras ◽  
Masafumi Inoue ◽  
S. Elizabeth McGregor
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Blot Hybridization ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Dot Blot Hybridization ◽  
Papillomavirus Dna

Organization of a cloned repetitive DNA fragment in mosquito genomes (Diptera: Culicidae)

Genome ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kumar ◽  
K. S. Rai
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Repetitive Dna ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Genomic Organization ◽  
Blot Hybridization ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Dot Blot Hybridization ◽  
Dna Organization ◽  
Dna Fragment

The structure and genomic organization of a cloned 5.2-kb repetitive DNA fragment, H-85, isolated from the Aedes albopictus genome have been examined. In situ hybridization of the 3H-labeled H-85 DNA to the meiotic and mitotic chromosome preparations of Ae. albopictus shows that the sequences homologous to H-85 DNA are dispersed throughout the length of all three pairs of chromosomes. A similar pattern of in situ hybridization appears in Aedes seatoi, Aedes flavopictus, and Aedes aegypti. The study shows that the arrangement of sequences in the cloned 5.2-kb fragment is rare in the Ae. albopictus genome. Dot-blot hybridization reveals that the sequences homologous to H-85 DNA are present in 12 species of mosquitoes examined, belonging to six genera in subfamilies Culicinae ad Anophelinae. The H-85 sequences are also present in the genome of Mochlonyx velutinus of the nematocerous family Chaoboridae, earlier proposed as the ancestor of the mosquito family Culicidae. Although the sequences homologous to H-85 DNA are present in different species of mosquitoes, they have diverged in their structure and organization. The cloned 5.2-kb fragment is composed of elements of different and independently evolving repetitive DNA families.Key words: repetitive DNA, organization, mosquitoes.

scholarly journals Molecular Epidemiology of Oral Treponemes Associated with Periodontal Disease

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1399-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Moter ◽  
Carina Hoenig ◽  
Bong-Kyu Choi ◽  
Birgit Riep ◽  
Ulf B. Göbel
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Blot Hybridization ◽  
Dark Field ◽  
Causative Role ◽  
Oligonucleotide Probes ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Dark Field Microscopy ◽  
Healthy Control

Periodontitis, a disease responsible for tooth loss worldwide, is characterized by chronic inflammation of the periodontium, eventually leading to destruction of periodontal ligaments and supporting alveolar bone. Spirochetes, identified by dark-field microscopy as being the most predominant bacteria in advanced lesions, are thought to play a causative role. Various spirochetal morphotypes were observed, but most of these morphotypes are as yet uncultivable. To assess the role of these organisms we designed oligonucleotide probes for the identification of both cultivable and so far uncultivable spirochetes in periodontitis patients. Subgingival plaque specimens taken from diseased sites (n = 200) and healthy control sites (n = 44) from 53 patients with rapidly progressive periodontitis (RPP) were submitted to direct in situ hybridization or dot blot hybridization after prior amplification with eubacterial primers. Spirochetes were found in all patients, but their distributions varied considerably. Parallel use of oligonucleotide probes specific for cultivable or so far uncultivable treponemes suggested the presence of novel yet unknown organisms at a high frequency. These uncultivable treponemes were visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and their morphologies, sizes, and numbers could be estimated. All RPP patients included in this study harbored oral treponemes that represent either novel species, e.g.,Treponema maltophilum, or uncultivable phylotypes. Therefore, it is necessary to include these organisms in etiologic considerations and to strengthen efforts to cultivate these as yet uncultivable treponemes.

Ghox 4.7: a chick homeobox gene expressed primarily in limb buds with limb-type differences in expression

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mackem ◽  
K.A. Mahon
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Homeobox Genes ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Limb Morphogenesis ◽  
Degenerate Oligonucleotide ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Homeobox genes play a key role in specifying the segmented body plan of Drosophila, and recent work suggests that at least several homeobox genes may play a regulatory role during vertebrate limb morphogenesis. We have used degenerate oligonucleotide primers from highly conserved domains in the homeobox motif to amplify homeobox gene segments from chick embryo limb bud cDNAs using the polymerase chain reaction. Expression of a large number of homeobox genes (at least 17) is detected using this approach. One of these genes contains a novel homeobox loosely related to the Drosophila Abdominal B class, and was further analyzed by determining its complete coding sequence and evaluating its expression during embryogenesis by in situ hybridization. Based on sequence and expression patterns, we have designated this gene as Ghox 4.7 and believe that it is the chick homologue of the murine Hox 4.7 gene (formerly Hox 5.6). Ghox 4.7 is expressed primarily in limb buds during development and shows a striking spatial restriction to the posterior zone of the limb bud, suggesting a role in specifying anterior-posterior pattern formation. In chick, this gene also displays differences in expression between wing and leg buds, raising the possibility that it may participate in specifying limb-type identity.

The chick limbless mutation causes abnormalities in limb bud dorsal-ventral patterning: implications for the mechanism of apical ridge formation

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 3851-3861 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Grieshammer ◽  
G. Minowada ◽  
J.M. Pisenti ◽  
U.K. Abbott ◽  
G.R. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Local Application ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Potential Link

In chick embryos homozygous for the limbless mutation, limb bud outgrowth is initiated, but a morphologically distinct apical ridge does not develop and limbs do not form. Here we report the results of an analysis of gene expression in limbless mutant limb buds. Fgf4, Fgf8, Bmp2 and Msx2, genes that are expressed in the apical ridge of normal limb buds, are not expressed in the mutant limb bud ectoderm, providing molecular support for the hypothesis that limb development fails in the limbless embryo because of the inability of the ectoderm to form a functional ridge. Moreover, Fgf8 expression is not detected in the ectoderm of the prospective limb territory or the early limb bud of limbless embryos. Since the early stages of limb bud outgrowth occur normally in the mutant embryos, this indicates that FGF8 is not required to promote initial limb bud outgrowth. In the absence of FGF8, Shh is also not expressed in the mutant limb buds, although its expression can be induced by application of FGF8-soaked beads. These observations support the hypothesis that Fgf8 is required for the induction of Shh expression during normal limb development. Bmp2 expression was also not detected in mutant limb mesoderm, consistent with the hypothesis that SHH induces its expression. In contrast, SHH is not required for the induction of Hoxd11 or Hoxd13 expression, since expression of both these genes was detected in the mutant limb buds. Thus, some aspects of mesoderm A-P patterning can occur in the absence of SHH and factors normally expressed in the apical ridge. Intriguingly, mutant limbs rescued by local application of FGF displayed a dorsalized feather pattern. Furthermore, the expression of Wnt7a, Lmx1 and En1, genes involved in limb D-V patterning, was found to be abnormal in mutant limb buds. These data suggest that D-V patterning and apical ridge formation are linked, since they show that the limbless mutation affects both processes. We present a model that explains the potential link between D-V positional information and apical ridge formation, and discuss the possible function of the limbless gene in terms of this model.

Molecular detection methods of human papillomavirus (HPV)

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolos Zaravinos ◽  
Ioannis N. Mammas ◽  
George Sourvinos ◽  
Demetrios A. Spandidos
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Molecular Detection ◽  
Blot Hybridization ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Moderate Sensitivity ◽  
Hybridization Assays

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can identify women at risk of cervical cancer. Currently, molecular detection methods are the gold standard for identification of HPV. The three categories of molecular assays that are available are based on the detection of HPV DNA and include (1) non-amplified hybridization assays, such as Southern transfer hybridization (STH), dot blot hybridization (DB) and in situ hybridization (ISH); (2) signal amplified hybridization assays, such as hybrid capture assays (HC2); (3) target amplification assays, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ PCR. STH requires large amounts of DNA, is laborious and not reproducible, while ISH has only moderate sensitivity for HPV. The sensitivity of the HC2 assay is similar to that of PCR-based assays, with high sensitivity being achieved by signal rather than target amplification. PCR-based detection is both highly sensitive and specific. Since PCR can be performed on very small amounts of DNA, it is ideal for use on specimens with low DNA content. In the future, with the advance of technology, viral DNA extraction and amplification systems will become more rapid, more sensitive, and more automated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document