Establishment of gut fate in the E lineage of C. elegans: the roles of lineage-dependent mechanisms and cell interactions

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 1267-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Cell Interactions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Intact Embryo ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Random Position ◽  
Recombination Experiments

The gut of C. elegans derives from all the progeny of the E blastomere, a cell of the eight cell stage. Previous work has shown that gut specification requires an induction during the four cell stage (Goldstein, B. (1992) Nature 357, 255–257). Blastomere isolation and recombination experiments were done to determine which parts of the embryo can respond to gut induction. Normally only the posterior side of the EMS blastomere contacts the inducing cell, P2. When P2 was instead placed in a random position on an isolated EMS, gut consistently differentiated from the daughter of EMS contacting P2, indicating that any side of EMS can respond to gut induction. Additionally, moving P2 around to the opposite side of EMS in an otherwise intact embryo caused EMS's two daughter cells to switch lineage timings, and gut to differentiate from the descendents of what normally would be the MS blastomere. The other cells of the four cell stage, ABa, ABp, and P2, did not form gut when placed in contact with the inducer. To determine whether any other inductions are involved in gut specification, timed blastomere isolations were done at the two and eight cell stages. In the absence of cell contact at the two cell stage, segregation of gut fate proceeded normally at both the two and four cell stages. Gut fate also segregated properly in the absence of cell contact at the eight cell stage. A model is presented for the roles of lineage-dependent mechanisms and cell interactions in establishing gut fate in the E lineage.

An analysis of the response to gut induction in the C. elegans embryo

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 1227-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Body Wall ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Pharyngeal Muscle ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Sister Cell ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Cell Diversity

Establishment of the gut founder cell (E) in C. elegans involves an interaction between the P2 and the EMS cell at the four cell stage. Here I show that the fate of only one daughter of EMS, the E cell, is affected by this induction. In the absence of the P2-EMS interaction, both E and its sister cell, MS, produce pharyngeal muscle cells and body wall muscle cells, much as MS normally does. By cell manipulations and inhibitor studies, I show first that EMS loses the competence to respond before it divides even once, but P2 presents an inducing signal for at least three cell cycles. Second, induction on one side of the EMS cell usually blocks the other side from responding to a second P2-derived signal. Third, microfilaments and microtubules may be required near the time of the interaction for subsequent gut differentiation. Lastly, cell manipulations in pie-1 mutant embryos, in which the P2 cell is transformed to an EMS-like fate and produces a gut cell lineage, revealed that gut fate is segregated to one of P2's daughters cell-autonomously. The results contrast with previous results from similar experiments on the response to other inductions, and suggest that this induction may generate cell diversity by a different mechanism.

Brief cytochalasin-induced disruption of microfilaments during a critical interval in 1-cell C. elegans embryos alters the partitioning of developmental instructions to the 2-cell embryo

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Hill ◽  
S. Strome
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Critical Interval ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Correct Pattern ◽  
Cell Embryo

We are investigating the involvement of the microfilament cytoskeleton in the development of early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. We previously reported that several cytoplasmic movements in the zygote require that the microfilament cytoskeleton remain intact during a narrow time interval approximately three-quarters of the way through the first cell cycle. In this study, we analyze the developmental consequences of brief, cytochalasin D-induced microfilament disruption during the 1-cell stage. Our results indicate that during the first cell cycle microfilaments are important only during the critical time interval for the 2-cell embryo to undergo the correct pattern of subsequent divisions and to initiate the differentiation of at least 4 tissue types. Disruption of microfilaments during the critical interval results in aberrant division and P-granule segregation patterns, generating some embryos that we classify as ‘reverse polarity’, ‘anterior duplication’, and ‘posterior duplication’ embryos. These altered patterns suggest that microfilament disruption during the critical interval leads to the incorrect distribution of developmental instructions responsible for early pattern formation. The strict correlation between unequal division, unequal germ-granule partitioning, and the generation of daughter cells with different cell cycle periods observed in these embryos suggests that the three processes are coupled. We hypothesize that (1) an ‘asymmetry determinant’, normally located at the posterior end of the zygote, governs asymmetric cell division, germ-granule segregation, and the segregation of cell cycle timing elements during the first cell cycle, and (2) the integrity or placement of this asymmetry determinant is sensitive to microfilament disruption during the critical time interval.

Features of cell lineage in preimplantation mouse development

Development ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-72
Author(s):  
C. F. Graham ◽  
Z. A. Deussen
Keyword(s):  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
The Other ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Preimplantation Mouse ◽  
Peripheral Cells

The cell lineage of the mouse was studied from the 2-cell stage to the blastocyst. Lineage to the 8-cell stage was followed under the microscope. Each cell from the 2-cell stage divided to form two daughter cells which remained attached. Subsequently, these two daughters each produced two descendants; one of these descendants regularly lay deep in the structure of the embryo while the other was peripheral. Lineage to the blastocyst was followed by injecting oil drops into cells at the 8-cell stage, and then following the segregation of these drops into the inner cell mass and trophectoderm. Between the 8-cell stage and the blastocyst, the deep cells contributed more frequently to the inner cell mass than did the peripheral cells.

The asymptotic behaviour of an invasion process

1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 584-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. P. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymptotic Behaviour ◽  
The Other ◽  
Adjacent Cell ◽  
Rectangular Lattice ◽  
Parent Cell ◽  
Invasion Process ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
A Cell

Black and white cells are positioned at the vertices of a rectangular lattice. When a cell division occurs, the daughter cells are of the same colour as the parent cell; one of them replaces an adjacent cell and the other remains in the position of the parent cell. In one variant of the model it is assumed that whenever a white cell appears at the origin it is transformed into a black cell; apart from this the black and white cells are equally competitive and in particular they divide at the same rate. Initially, only the cell at the origin is black. The asymptotic behaviour of the black clone is investigated.

scholarly journals C. elegans PlexinA PLX-1 mediates a cell contact-dependent stop signal in vulval precursor cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 282 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhicen Liu ◽  
Takashi Fujii ◽  
Akira Nukazuka ◽  
Rie Kurokawa ◽  
Motoshi Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cells ◽  
A Cell

scholarly journals Microinjection into the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo using an uncoated glass needle enables cell lineage visualization and reveals cell-non-autonomous adhesion control

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Kikuchi ◽  
Akatsuki Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Special Equipment ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Carbon Coated ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Glass Needle ◽  
Time Specific

AbstractMicroinjection is a useful method in cell biology, with which exogenous substances are introduced into a cell in a location- and time-specific manner. The Caenorhabditis elegans embryo is an important model system for cell and developmental biology. Applying microinjection to the C. elegans embryo had been difficult due to the rigid eggshell surrounding the embryo. In 2013, microinjection method using a carbon-coated quartz needle for the C. elegans embryo was reported. To prepare the needle, unfortunately, special equipment is required and thus a limited number of researchers can use this method. In this study, we established a method for the microinjection of drugs, dyes, and microbeads into the C. elegans embryo using an uncoated glass needle that can be produced in a general laboratory. This method enabled us to easily detect cell lineage up to adult stages by injecting a fluorescent dye into a blastomere. We also found a cell-non-autonomous control mechanism of cell adhesion; specifically, the injection of an actin inhibitor into one cell at the 2-cell stage enhanced adhesion between daughter cells of the other cell. Our microinjection method is expected to be used for broad studies and could facilitate various discoveries using C. elegans.

scholarly journals Protein phosphatase 1 down regulates ZYG-1 levels to limit centriole duplication

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Peel ◽  
Jyoti Iyer ◽  
Anar Naik ◽  
Michael P Dougherty ◽  
Markus Decker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Centrosome Duplication ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Hypomorphic Allele ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
A Cell

AbstractIn humans perturbations of centriole number are associated with tumorigenesis and microcephaly, therefore appropriate regulation of centriole duplication is critical. The C. elegans homolog of Plk4, ZYG-1, is required for centriole duplication, but our understanding of how ZYG-1 levels are regulated remains incomplete. We have identified the two PP1 orthologs, GSP-1 and GSP-2, and their regulators I-2szy-2 and SDS-22 as key regulators of ZYG-1 protein levels. We find that down-regulation of PP1 activity either directly, or by mutation of szy-2 or sds-22 can rescue the loss of centriole duplication associated with a zyg-1 hypomorphic allele. Suppression is achieved through an increase in ZYG-1 levels, and our data indicate that PP1 normally regulates ZYG-1 through a post-translational mechanism. While moderate inhibition of PP1 activity can restore centriole duplication to a zyg-1 mutant, strong inhibition of PP1 in a wild-type background leads to centriole amplification via the production of more than one daughter centriole. Our results thus define a new pathway that limits the number of daughter centrioles produced each cycle.Author SummaryThe centrosomes are responsible for organizing the mitotic spindle a microtubule-based structure that centers, then segregates, the chromosomes during cell division. When a cell divides it normally possesses two centrosomes, allowing it to build a bipolar spindle and accurately segregate the chromosomes to two daughter cells. Appropriate control of centrosome number is therefore crucial to maintaining genome stability. Centrosome number is largely controlled by their regulated duplication. In particular, the protein Plk4, which is essential for duplication, must be strictly limited as an overabundance leads to excess centrosome duplication. We have identified protein phosphatase 1 as a critical regulator of the C. elegans Plk4 homolog (known as ZYG-1). When protein phosphatase 1 is down-regulated, ZYG-1 levels increase leading to centrosome amplification. Thus our work identifies a novel mechanism that limits centrosome duplication.

scholarly journals Tissue-specific control of expression of the tight junction polypeptide ZO-1 in the mouse early embryo

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.P. Fleming ◽  
M.J. Hay
Keyword(s):  
Tight Junction ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Daughter Cells

The processes governing differential protein expression in preimplantation lineages were investigated using a monoclonal antibody recognising the tight junction polypeptide, ZO-1. ZO-1 localises to the maturing tight junction membrane domain in the polarised trophectoderm lineage from compaction (8-cell stage) onwards, ultimately forming a zonular belt around each trophectoderm cell of the blastocyst (32- to 64-cell stage). The protein is usually undetectable within the inner cell mass (ICM) although, in a minority of embryos, punctate ZO-1 sites are present on the surface of one or more ICM cells. Since ICM cells derive from the differentiative division of polarised 8- and 16-cell blastomeres, the distribution of ZO-1 following differentiative division in isolated, synchronised cell clusters of varying size, was examined. In contrast to the apical cytocortical pole, ZO-1 was found to be inherited by nonpolar (prospective ICM) as well as polar (prospective trophectoderm) daughter cells. Following division, polar cells adhere to and gradually envelop nonpolar cells. Prior to envelopment, ZO-1 localises to the boundary between the contact area and free membrane of daughter cells, irrespective of their phenotype. After envelopment, polar cells retain these ZO-1 contact sites whilst nonpolar cells lose them, in which case ZO-1 transiently appears as randomly-distributed punctate sites on the membrane before disappearing. Thus, symmetrical cell contact appears to initiate ZO-1 down-regulation in the ICM lineage. The biosynthetic level at which ZO-1 down-regulation occurs was investigated in immunosurgically isolated ICMs undergoing trophectoderm regeneration. By 6 h in culture, isolated ICMs generated a zonular network of ZO-1 at the contact area between outer cells, thereby demonstrating the reversibility of down-regulation. This assembly process was unaffected by alpha-amanitin treatment but was inhibited by cycloheximide. These results indicate that the ICM inherits and stabilises ZO-1 transcripts which can be utilised for rapid synthesis and assembly of the protein, a capacity that may have significance both in maintaining lineage integrity within the blastocyst and in the subsequent development of the ICM.

The influence of cell contact on the division of mouse 8-cell blastomeres

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Pickering ◽  
B. Maro ◽  
M.H. Johnson ◽  
J.N. Skepper
Keyword(s):  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Interactions ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Division Plane ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Cell Embryo ◽  
Do So

The pattern of division of polarized 8-cell blastomeres with respect to the axis of cell polarity has been compared (i) for cells dividing alone with cells dividing in pairs, and (ii) for early and late dividing cells within a pair. Cell interactions do not seem to influence significantly the overall pattern of division within the population. The only significant difference found was that the second dividing cell in a pair tended to divide in the same way as its earlier dividing companion slightly more frequently than expected. These results suggest that cell interactions immediately prior to and during division do not influence strongly the orientation and position of the division plane. In contrast, interactions between the cells within an intact early 8-cell embryo, which is subsequently disaggregated to singletons or pairs, do influence the type of progeny generated at division to the 16-cell stage, and seem to do so via an effect on the size of the microvillous region generated at the cell apex.

Cell interactions involved in development of the bilaterally symmetrical intestinal valve cells during embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1113-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bowerman ◽  
F.E. Tax ◽  
J.H. Thomas ◽  
J.R. Priess
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Interaction ◽  
Cell Interactions ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Development Potential ◽  
Symmetrical Pattern ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Symmetrical Cell

We describe two different cell interactions that appear to be required for the proper development of a pair of bilaterally symmetrical cells in Caenorhabditis elegans called the intestinal valve cells. Previous experiments have shown that at the beginning of the 4-cell stage of embryogenesis, two sister blastomeres called ABa and ABp are equivalent in development potential. We show that cell interactions between ABp and a neighboring 4-cell-stage blastomere called P2 distinguish the fates of ABa and ABp by inducing descendants of ABp to produce the intestinal valve cells, a cell type not made by ABa. A second cell interaction appears to occur later in embryogenesis when two bilaterally symmetrical descendants of ABp, which both have the potential to produce valve cells, contact each other; production of the valve cells subsequently becomes limited to only one of the two descendants. This second interaction does not occur properly if the two symmetrical descendants of ABp are prevented from contacting each other. Thus the development of the intestinal valve cells appears to require both an early cell interaction that establishes a bilaterally symmetrical pattern of cell fate and a later interaction that breaks the symmetrical cell fate pattern by restricting to only one of two cells the ability to produce a pair of valve cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document