Brief cytochalasin-induced disruption of microfilaments during a critical interval in 1-cell C. elegans embryos alters the partitioning of developmental instructions to the 2-cell embryo

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Hill ◽  
S. Strome
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Critical Interval ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Correct Pattern ◽  
Cell Embryo

We are investigating the involvement of the microfilament cytoskeleton in the development of early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. We previously reported that several cytoplasmic movements in the zygote require that the microfilament cytoskeleton remain intact during a narrow time interval approximately three-quarters of the way through the first cell cycle. In this study, we analyze the developmental consequences of brief, cytochalasin D-induced microfilament disruption during the 1-cell stage. Our results indicate that during the first cell cycle microfilaments are important only during the critical time interval for the 2-cell embryo to undergo the correct pattern of subsequent divisions and to initiate the differentiation of at least 4 tissue types. Disruption of microfilaments during the critical interval results in aberrant division and P-granule segregation patterns, generating some embryos that we classify as ‘reverse polarity’, ‘anterior duplication’, and ‘posterior duplication’ embryos. These altered patterns suggest that microfilament disruption during the critical interval leads to the incorrect distribution of developmental instructions responsible for early pattern formation. The strict correlation between unequal division, unequal germ-granule partitioning, and the generation of daughter cells with different cell cycle periods observed in these embryos suggests that the three processes are coupled. We hypothesize that (1) an ‘asymmetry determinant’, normally located at the posterior end of the zygote, governs asymmetric cell division, germ-granule segregation, and the segregation of cell cycle timing elements during the first cell cycle, and (2) the integrity or placement of this asymmetry determinant is sensitive to microfilament disruption during the critical time interval.

Establishment of gut fate in the E lineage of C. elegans: the roles of lineage-dependent mechanisms and cell interactions

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 1267-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Cell Interactions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Intact Embryo ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Random Position ◽  
Recombination Experiments

The gut of C. elegans derives from all the progeny of the E blastomere, a cell of the eight cell stage. Previous work has shown that gut specification requires an induction during the four cell stage (Goldstein, B. (1992) Nature 357, 255–257). Blastomere isolation and recombination experiments were done to determine which parts of the embryo can respond to gut induction. Normally only the posterior side of the EMS blastomere contacts the inducing cell, P2. When P2 was instead placed in a random position on an isolated EMS, gut consistently differentiated from the daughter of EMS contacting P2, indicating that any side of EMS can respond to gut induction. Additionally, moving P2 around to the opposite side of EMS in an otherwise intact embryo caused EMS's two daughter cells to switch lineage timings, and gut to differentiate from the descendents of what normally would be the MS blastomere. The other cells of the four cell stage, ABa, ABp, and P2, did not form gut when placed in contact with the inducer. To determine whether any other inductions are involved in gut specification, timed blastomere isolations were done at the two and eight cell stages. In the absence of cell contact at the two cell stage, segregation of gut fate proceeded normally at both the two and four cell stages. Gut fate also segregated properly in the absence of cell contact at the eight cell stage. A model is presented for the roles of lineage-dependent mechanisms and cell interactions in establishing gut fate in the E lineage.

The C. elegans par-4 gene encodes a putative serine-threonine kinase required for establishing embryonic asymmetry

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (7) ◽  
pp. 1467-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Watts ◽  
D.G. Morton ◽  
J. Bestman ◽  
K.J. Kemphues
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Human Kinase ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Peutz Jeghers Syndrome

During the first cell cycle of Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis, asymmetries are established that are essential for determining the subsequent developmental fates of the daughter cells. The maternally expressed par genes are required for establishing this polarity. The products of several of the par genes have been found to be themselves asymmetrically distributed in the first cell cycle. We have identified the par-4 gene of C. elegans, and find that it encodes a putative serine-threonine kinase with similarity to a human kinase associated with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome, LKB1 (STK11), and a Xenopus egg and embryo kinase, XEEK1. Several strong par-4 mutant alleles are missense mutations that alter conserved residues within the kinase domain, suggesting that kinase activity is essential for PAR-4 function. We find that the PAR-4 protein is present in the gonads, oocytes and early embryos of C. elegans, and is both cytoplasmically and cortically distributed. The cortical distribution begins at the late 1-cell stage, is more pronounced at the 2- and 4-cell stages and is reduced at late stages of embryonic development. We find no asymmetry in the distribution of PAR-4 protein in C. elegans embryos. The distribution of PAR-4 protein in early embryos is unaffected by mutations in the other par genes.

OOC-3, a novel putative transmembrane protein required for establishment of cortical domains and spindle orientation in the P(1) blastomere of C. elegans embryos

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (10) ◽  
pp. 2063-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pichler ◽  
P. Gonczy ◽  
H. Schnabel ◽  
A. Pozniakowski ◽  
A. Ashford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Par Proteins ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Divisions ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Membrane Compartment ◽  
Chromosome Ii

Asymmetric cell divisions require the establishment of an axis of polarity, which is subsequently communicated to downstream events. During the asymmetric cell division of the P(1) blastomere in C. elegans, establishment of polarity depends on the establishment of anterior and posterior cortical domains, defined by the localization of the PAR proteins, followed by the orientation of the mitotic spindle along the previously established axis of polarity. To identify genes required for these events, we have screened a collection of maternal-effect lethal mutations on chromosome II of C. elegans. We have identified a mutation in one gene, ooc-3, with mis-oriented division axes at the two-cell stage. Here we describe the phenotypic and molecular characterization of ooc-3. ooc-3 is required for the correct localization of PAR-2 and PAR-3 cortical domains after the first cell division. OOC-3 is a novel putative transmembrane protein, which localizes to a reticular membrane compartment, probably the endoplasmic reticulum, that spans the whole cytoplasm and is enriched on the nuclear envelope and cell-cell boundaries. Our results show that ooc-3 is required to form the cortical domains essential for polarity after cell division.

scholarly journals Probing and manipulating embryogenesis via nanoscale thermometry and temperature control

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (26) ◽  
pp. 14636-14641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonhee Choi ◽  
Hengyun Zhou ◽  
Renate Landig ◽  
Hai-Yin Wu ◽  
Xiaofei Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Local Perturbations ◽  
Cell Division Timing ◽  
Nanoscale Thermometry

Understanding the coordination of cell-division timing is one of the outstanding questions in the field of developmental biology. One active control parameter of the cell-cycle duration is temperature, as it can accelerate or decelerate the rate of biochemical reactions. However, controlled experiments at the cellular scale are challenging, due to the limited availability of biocompatible temperature sensors, as well as the lack of practical methods to systematically control local temperatures and cellular dynamics. Here, we demonstrate a method to probe and control the cell-division timing inCaenorhabditis elegansembryos using a combination of local laser heating and nanoscale thermometry. Local infrared laser illumination produces a temperature gradient across the embryo, which is precisely measured by in vivo nanoscale thermometry using quantum defects in nanodiamonds. These techniques enable selective, controlled acceleration of the cell divisions, even enabling an inversion of division order at the two-cell stage. Our data suggest that the cell-cycle timing asynchrony of the early embryonic development inC. elegansis determined independently by individual cells rather than via cell-to-cell communication. Our method can be used to control the development of multicellular organisms and to provide insights into the regulation of cell-division timings as a consequence of local perturbations.

scholarly journals The FACT complex and cell cycle progression are essential to maintain asymmetric transcription factor partitioning during cell division

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Herrero ◽  
Sonia Stinus ◽  
Eleanor Bellows ◽  
Peter H Thorpe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Reverse Genetic Screen

AbstractThe polarized partitioning of proteins in cells underlies asymmetric cell division, which is an important driver of development and cellular diversity. Like most cells, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically to give two distinct daughter cells. This asymmetry mimics that seen in metazoans and the key regulatory proteins are conserved from yeast to human. A well-known example of an asymmetric protein is the transcription factor Ace2, which localizes specifically to the daughter nucleus, where it drives a daughter-specific transcriptional network. We performed a reverse genetic screen to look for regulators of asymmetry based on the Ace2 localization phenotype. We screened a collection of essential genes in order to analyze the effect of core cellular processes in asymmetric cell division. This identified a large number of mutations that are known to affect progression through the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry. To test this model we blocked cells from progressing through mitosis and found that prolonged cell cycle arrest is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry after release. We also demonstrate that members of the evolutionary conserved FACT chromatin-remodeling complex are required for both asymmetric and cell cycle-regulated localization of Ace2.

The vegetal determinants required for the Spemann organizer move equatorially during the first cell cycle

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (7) ◽  
pp. 2207-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Formation Process ◽  
Lithium Treatment ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Spemann Organizer ◽  
Dorsal Axis ◽  
Vegetal Pole ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Cell Embryo

Embryos with no dorsal axis were obtained when more than 15% of the egg surface was deleted from the vegetal pole of the early 1-cell embryo of Xenopus laevis. The timing of the deletion in the first cell cycle was critical: dorsal-deficient embryos were obtained when the deletion began before time 0.5 (50% of the first cell cycle) whereas normal dorsal axis usually formed when the deletion was done later than time 0.8. The axis deficiency could be restored by lithium treatment and the injection of vegetal but not animal cytoplasm. Bisection of the embryo at the 2-cell stage, which is known to restore the dorsal structures in the UV-ventralized embryos, had no effect on the vegetal-deleted embryos. These results show clearly that, in Xenopus, (1) the dorsal determinants (DDs) localized in the vegetal pole region at the onset of development are necessary for dorsal axis development and (2) the DDs move from the vegetal pole to a subequatorial region where they are incorporated into gastrulating cells to form the future organizing center. A model for the early axis formation process in Xenopus is proposed.

PAR-2 is asymmetrically distributed and promotes association of P granules and PAR-1 with the cortex in C. elegans embryos

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 3075-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Boyd ◽  
S. Guo ◽  
D. Levitan ◽  
D.T. Stinchcomb ◽  
K.J. Kemphues
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Asymmetric Distribution ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Posterior Cortex ◽  
P Granules ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Cortical Localization ◽  
The One

The par genes participate in the process of establishing cellular asymmetries during the first cell cycle of Caenorhabditis elegans development. The par-2 gene is required for the unequal first cleavage and for asymmetries in cell cycle length and spindle orientation in the two resulting daughter cells. We have found that the PAR-2 protein is present in adult gonads and early embryos. In gonads, the protein is uniformly distributed at the cell cortex, and this subcellular localization depends on microfilaments. In the one-cell embryo, PAR-2 is localized to the posterior cortex and is partitioned into the posterior daughter, P1, at the first cleavage. PAR-2 exhibits a similar asymmetric cortical localization in P1, P2, and P3, the asymmetrically dividing blastomeres of germ line lineage. This distribution in embryos is very similar to that of PAR-1 protein. By analyzing the distribution of the PAR-2 protein in various par mutant backgrounds we found that proper asymmetric distribution of PAR-2 depends upon par-3 activity but not upon par-1 or par-4. par-2 activity is required for proper cortical localization of PAR-1 and this effect requires wild-type par-3 gene activity. We also find that, although par-2 activity is not required for posterior localization of P granules at the one-cell stage, it is required for proper cortical association of P granules in P1.

scholarly journals The kinases PIG-1 and PAR-1 act in redundant pathways to regulate asymmetric division in the EMS blastomere of C. elegans

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malgorzata J. Liro ◽  
Diane G. Morton ◽  
Lesilee S. Rose
Keyword(s):  
Wnt Pathway ◽  
Asymmetric Division ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Cell Embryo ◽  
The One

AbstractThe PAR-1 kinase of C. elegans is localized to the posterior of the one-cell embryo and its mutations affect asymmetric spindle placement and partitioning of cytoplasmic components in the first cell cycle. However, unlike mutations in the posteriorly localized PAR-2 protein, par-1 mutations do not cause failure to restrict the anterior PAR polarity complex. Further, it has been difficult to examine the role of PAR-1 in subsequent divisions due to the early defects in par-1 mutant embryos. Here we show that the PIG-1 kinase acts redundantly with PAR-1 to restrict the anterior PAR-3 protein for polarity maintenance in the one-cell embryo. By using a weak allele of par-1 that exhibits enhanced lethality when combined with a pig-1 mutation we have further explored roles for these genes in subsequent divisions. We find that both PIG-1 and PAR-1 regulate spindle orientation in the EMS blastomere of the four-cell stage embryo to ensure that it undergoes an asymmetric division. In this cell, PIG-1 and PAR-1 act in parallel pathways for spindle positioning, PIG-1 in the MES-1/SRC-1 pathway and PAR-1 in the Wnt pathway.

scholarly journals Chromosome Methylation and Measurement of Faithful, Once and Only Once per Cell Cycle Chromosome Replication inCaulobacter crescentus

1999 ◽  
Vol 181 (7) ◽  
pp. 1984-1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory T. Marczynski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Replication Origin ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Swarmer Cell

ABSTRACT Caulobacter crescentus exhibits cell-type-specific control of chromosome replication and DNA methylation. Asymmetric cell division yields a replicating stalked cell and a nonreplicating swarmer cell. The motile swarmer cell must differentiate into a sessile stalked cell in order to replicate and execute asymmetric cell division. This program of cell division implies that chromosome replication initiates in the stalked cell only once per cell cycle. DNA methylation is restricted to the predivisional cell stage, and since DNA synthesis produces an unmethylated nascent strand, late DNA methylation also implies that DNA near the replication origin remains hemimethylated longer than DNA located further away. In this report, both assumptions are tested with an engineered Tn5-based transposon, Tn5Ω-MP. This allows a sensitive Southern blot assay that measures fully methylated, hemimethylated, and unmethylated DNA duplexes. Tn5Ω-MP was placed at 11 sites around the chromosome and it was clearly demonstrated that Tn5Ω-MP DNA near the replication origin remained hemimethylated longer than DNA located further away. One Tn5Ω-MP placed near the replication origin revealed small but detectable amounts of unmethylated duplex DNA in replicating stalked cells. Extra DNA synthesis produces a second unmethylated nascent strand. Therefore, measurement of unmethylated DNA is a critical test of the “once and only once per cell cycle” rule of chromosome replication inC. crescentus. Fewer than 1 in 1,000 stalked cells prematurely initiate a second round of chromosome replication. The implications for very precise negative control of chromosome replication are discussed with respect to the bacterial cell cycle.

scholarly journals PAR-4/LKB1 regulates DNA replication during asynchronous division of the early C. elegans embryo

2014 ◽  
Vol 205 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Benkemoun ◽  
Catherine Descoteaux ◽  
Nicolas T. Chartier ◽  
Lionel Pintard ◽  
Jean-Claude Labbé
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

Regulation of cell cycle duration is critical during development, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms are still poorly understood. The two-cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo divides asynchronously and thus provides a powerful context in which to study regulation of cell cycle timing during development. Using genetic analysis and high-resolution imaging, we found that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication is asymmetrically regulated in the two-cell stage embryo and that the PAR-4 and PAR-1 polarity proteins dampen DNA replication dynamics specifically in the posterior blastomere, independently of regulators previously implicated in the control of cell cycle timing. Our results demonstrate that accurate control of DNA replication is crucial during C. elegans early embryonic development and further provide a novel mechanism by which PAR proteins control cell cycle progression during asynchronous cell division.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document