A role for En-2 and other murine homologues of Drosophila segment polarity genes in regulating positional information in the developing cerebellum

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 3935-3945 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J. Millen ◽  
C.C. Hui ◽  
A.L. Joyner

To gain insight into the molecular genetic basis of cerebellar patterning, the expression patterns of many vertebrate homologues of Drosophila segment polarity genes were examined during normal and abnormal cerebellar development, including members of the En, Wnt, Pax, Gli and Dvl gene families. Five of these genes were found to show transient, spatially restricted patterns of expression. Strikingly, expression of En-2, En-1, Wnt-7B and Pax-2 defined eleven similar sagittal domains at 17.5 dpc, reminiscent of the transient sagittal domains of expression of Purkinje cell markers which have been implicated in cerebellar afferent patterning. Postnatally, transient anterior/posterior differences in expression were observed for En-2, En-1, Gli and Wnt-7B dividing the cerebellum into anterior and posterior regions. The expression patterns of these genes were altered in cerebella of En-2 homozygous mutant mice, which show a cerebellar foliation patterning defect. Strikingly, four of the Wnt-7B expression domains that are adjacent to the En-2 domains are lost in En-2 mutant embryonic cerebella. These studies provide the first evidence of a potential network of regulatory genes that establish spatial cues in the developing cerebellum by dividing it into a grid of positional information required for patterning foliation and afferents. Taken together with previous gene expression studies, our data suggests that eleven sagittal domains and at least two anterior/posterior compartments are the basic elements of spatial information in the cerebellum.

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Hudry ◽  
Morgane Thomas-Chollier ◽  
Yael Volovik ◽  
Marilyne Duffraisse ◽  
Amélie Dard ◽  
...  

Despite tremendous body form diversity in nature, bilaterian animals share common sets of developmental genes that display conserved expression patterns in the embryo. Among them are the Hox genes, which define different identities along the anterior–posterior axis. Hox proteins exert their function by interaction with TALE transcription factors. Hox and TALE members are also present in some but not all non-bilaterian phyla, raising the question of how Hox–TALE interactions evolved to provide positional information. By using proteins from unicellular and multicellular lineages, we showed that these networks emerged from an ancestral generic motif present in Hox and other related protein families. Interestingly, Hox-TALE networks experienced additional and extensive molecular innovations that were likely crucial for differentiating Hox functions along body plans. Together our results highlight how homeobox gene families evolved during eukaryote evolution to eventually constitute a major patterning system in Eumetazoans.


Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (17) ◽  
pp. 3253-3261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirupama Deshpande ◽  
Rainer Dittrich ◽  
Gerhard M. Technau ◽  
Joachim Urban

The Drosophila central nervous system derives from neural precursor cells, the neuroblasts (NBs), which are born from the neuroectoderm by the process of delamination. Each NB has a unique identity, which is revealed by the production of a characteristic cell lineage and a specific set of molecular markers it expresses. These NBs delaminate at different but reproducible time points during neurogenesis (S1-S5) and it has been shown for early delaminating NBs (S1/S2) that their identities depend on positional information conferred by segment polarity genes and dorsoventral patterning genes. We have studied mechanisms leading to the fate specification of a set of late delaminating neuroblasts, NB 6-4 and NB 7-3, both of which arise from the engrailed (en) expression domain, with NB 6-4 delaminating first. In contrast to former reports, we did not find any evidence for a direct role of hedgehog in the process of NB 7-3 specification. Instead, we present evidence to show that the interplay of the segmentation genes naked cuticle (nkd) and gooseberry (gsb), both of which are targets of wingless (wg) activity, leads to differential commitment to NB 6-4 and NB 7-3 cell fate. In the absence of either nkd or gsb, one NB fate is replaced by the other. However, the temporal sequence of delamination is maintained, suggesting that formation and specification of these two NBs are under independent control.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Madalena Chaves ◽  
Réka Albert

The segment polarity gene family, and its gene regulatory network, is at the basis of Drosophila embryonic development. The network's capacity for generating and robustly maintaining a specific gene expression pattern has been investigated through mathematical modelling. The models have provided several useful insights by suggesting essential network links, or uncovering the importance of the relative time scales of different biological processes in the formation of the segment polarity genes' expression patterns. But the developmental pattern formation process raises many other questions. Two of these questions are analysed here: the dependence of the signalling protein sloppy paired on the segment polarity genes and the effect of cell division on the segment polarity genes' expression patterns. This study suggests that cell division increases the robustness of the segment polarity network with respect to perturbations in biological processes.


Gigabyte ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Sherry Miller ◽  
Teresa D. Shippy ◽  
Prashant S. Hosmani ◽  
Mirella Flores-Gonzalez ◽  
Lukas A. Mueller ◽  
...  

Insects have a segmented body plan that is established during embryogenesis when the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis is divided into repeated units by a cascade of gene expression. The cascade is initiated by protein gradients created by translation of maternally provided mRNAs, localized at the anterior and posterior poles of the embryo. Combinations of these proteins activate specific gap genes to divide the embryo into distinct regions along the anterior–posterior axis. Gap genes then activate pair-rule genes, which are usually expressed in parts of every other segment. The pair-rule genes, in turn, activate expression of segment polarity genes in a portion of each segment. The segmentation genes are generally conserved among insects, although there is considerable variation in how they are deployed. We annotated 25 segmentation gene homologs in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Most of the genes expected to be present in D. citri based on their phylogenetic distribution in other insects were identified and annotated. Two exceptions were eagle and invected, which are present in at least some hemipterans, but were not found in D. citri. Many of the segmentation pathway genes are likely to be essential for D. citri development, and thus they may be useful targets for gene-based pest control methods.


Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1393-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Namba ◽  
T.M. Pazdera ◽  
R.L. Cerrone ◽  
J.S. Minden

The product of the maternal effect gene, bicoid (bcd), is a transcription factor that acts in a concentration-dependent fashion to direct the establishment of anterior fates in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Embryos laid by mothers with fewer or greater than the normal two copies of bcd show initial alterations in the expression of the gap, segmentation and segment polarity genes, as well as changes in early morphological markers. In the absence of a fate map repair system, one would predict that these initial changes would result in drastic changes in the shape and size of larval and adult structures. However, these embryos develop into relatively normal larvae and adults. This indicates that there is plasticity in Drosophila embryonic development along the anterior-posterior axis. Embryos laid by mothers with six copies of bcd have reduced viability, indicating a threshold for repairing anterior-posterior mispatterning. We show that cell death plays a major role in correcting expanded regions of the fate map. There is a concomitant decrease of cell death in compressed regions of the fate map. We also show that compression of the fate map does not appear to be repaired by the induction of new cell divisions. In addition, some tissues are more sensitive to fate map compression than others.


Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 104 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Howard

The first indication of the formation of segment primordia in Drosophila is expression of the segment-polarity genes in particular parts of each primordium. These patterns are controlled by another class of genes, the pair-rule genes, which show characteristic two-segment periodic expression. Each pair-rule gene has a unique domain of activity and in one view different combinations of pair-rule gene products directly control the expression of the segment-polarity genes. There is a hierarchy within the pair-rule class revealed by pair-rule gene interactions. It is unlikely that these interactions generate the periodicity de novo. Instead, pair-rule genes respond to positional information generated by a system involving zygotic gap and maternal coordinate genes. In this paper, I will concentrate on the problem of the mechanism that generates these pair-rule patterns, the first periodic ones seen during segmentation. I will review and discuss some of the relevant literature, illustrating certain points with data from my recent work.


Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 589-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Frohman ◽  
M. Boyle ◽  
G.R. Martin

It is rapidly becoming accepted that the vertebrate neural tube, in particular the hindbrain, develops into a segmented structure. After segment formation, cells in the neural tube do not cross segmental boundaries, and segment-specific gene expression is observed. However, it is not known what positional cues instruct the neural tube to express genes in this restricted manner. We have cloned a murine homeobox-containing gene, Hox-2.9, whose expression in the neural tube at E9.5 is restricted to a segment of the hindbrain known as rhombomere 4. A study of its expression pattern earlier in development revealed that prior to the start of neurulation (E7.5) Hox-2.9 is expressed within a posterior to the embryonic mesoderm that will participate in hindbrain formation. With the onset of neurulation, expression then becomes detectable in the neural plate as well, but only in the part that overlies the Hox-2.9-expressing mesoderm; it is not detected in the more anterior neuroectoderm that will form the future midbrain and forebrain. On the basis of these findings, we propose that the mesoderm is providing cues that serve to instruct the overlying neuroectoderm with respect to its position along the anteroposterior axis and that Hox-2.9 participates in or reflects this process. As neurulation continues and individual segments form, a second phase of expression is detected in the neural tube in which high levels of Hox-2.9 transcripts become restricted to rhombomere 4. Hox-2.9 expression is also detected in the developing branchial arch units of the hindbrain region, in a pattern that suggests to us that here, too, mesoderm is providing a localized signal that induces Hox-2.9 expression, in this case in endoderm of the pharynx and in superficial ectoderm. In general, we interpret the expression patterns of Hox-2.9 in the hindbrain region as suggesting that the specific mechanisms of pattern formation in mammals are fundamentally similar to those of amphibians and avians - i.e. anteroposterior positional information is acquired by mesoderm, mesoderm induces positional values within (neuro-) ectoderm and endoderm, and both events occur within a restricted window of time.


Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hidalgo ◽  
P. Ingham

Intrasegmental patterning in the Drosophila embryo requires the activity of the segment polarity genes. The acquisition of positional information by cells during embryogenesis is reflected in the dynamic patterns of expression of several of these genes. In the case of patched, early ubiquitous expression is followed by its repression in the anterior portion of each parasegment; subsequently each broad band of expression splits into two narrow stripes. In this study we analyse the contribution of other segment polarity gene functions to the evolution of this pattern; we find that the first step in patched regulation is under the control of engrailed whereas the second requires the activity of both cubitus interruptusD and patched itself. Furthermore, the products of engrailed, wingless and hedgehog are essential for maintaining the normal pattern of expression of patched.


Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Martinez Arias ◽  
N.E. Baker ◽  
P.W. Ingham

Segment polarity genes are expressed and required in restricted domains within each metameric unit of the Drosophila embryo. We have used the expression of two segment polarity genes engrailed (en) and wingless (wg) to monitor the effects of segment polarity mutants on the basic metameric pattern. Absence of patched (ptc) or naked (nkd) functions triggers a novel sequence of en and wg patterns. In addition, although wg and en are not expressed on the same cells absence of either one has effects on the expression of the other. These observations, together with an analysis of mutant phenotypes during development, lead us to suggest that positional information is encoded in cell states defined and maintained by the activity of segment polarity gene products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document