The enhancer of polycomb gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein conserved in yeast and mammals

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (20) ◽  
pp. 4055-4066 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Stankunas ◽  
J. Berger ◽  
C. Ruse ◽  
D.A. Sinclair ◽  
F. Randazzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromatin Protein ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Polycomb Group Genes ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Or Gene

The Polycomb group of genes in Drosophila are homeotic switch gene regulators that maintain homeotic gene repression through a possible chromatin regulatory mechanism. The Enhancer of Polycomb (E(Pc)) gene of Drosophila is an unusual member of the Polycomb group. Most PcG genes have homeotic phenotypes and are required for repression of homeotic loci, but mutations in E(Pc) exhibit no homeotic transformations and have only a very weak effect on expression of Abd-B. However, mutations in E(Pc) are strong enhancers of mutations in many Polycomb group genes and are also strong suppressors of position-effect variegation, suggesting that E(Pc) may have a wider role in chromatin formation or gene regulation than other Polycomb group genes. E(Pc) was cloned by transposon tagging, and encodes a novel 2023 amino acid protein with regions enriched in glutamine, alanine and asparagine. E(Pc) is expressed ubiquitously in Drosophila embryogenesis. E(Pc) is a chromatin protein, binding to polytene chromosomes at about 100 sites, including the Antennapedia but not the Bithorax complex, 29% of which are shared with Polycomb-binding sites. Surprisingly, E(Pc) was not detected in the heterochromatic chromocenter. This result suggests that E(Pc) has a functional rather than structural role in heterochromatin formation and argues against the heterochromatin model for PcG function. Using homology cloning techniques, we identified a mouse homologue of E(Pc), termed Epc1, a yeast protein that we name EPL1, and as well as additional ESTs from Caenorhabditis elegans, mice and humans. Epc1 shares a long, highly conserved domain in its amino terminus with E(Pc) that is also conserved in yeast, C. elegans and humans. The occurrence of E(Pc) across such divergent species is unusual for both PcG proteins and for suppressors of position-effect variegation, and suggests that E(Pc) has an important role in the regulation of chromatin structure in eukaryotes.

The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein that binds to shared and unique Polycomb group sites on polytene chromosomes

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 1207-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Sinclair ◽  
T.A. Milne ◽  
J.W. Hodgson ◽  
J. Shellard ◽  
C.A. Salinas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Sex Combs ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Additional Sex Combs ◽  
Site Recognition

The Additional sex combs (Asx) gene of Drosophila is a member of the Polycomb group of genes, which are required for maintenance of stable repression of homeotic and other loci. Asx is unusual among the Polycomb group because: (1) one Asx allele exhibits both anterior and posterior transformations; (2) Asx mutations enhance anterior transformations of trx mutations; (3) Asx mutations exhibit segmentation phenotypes in addition to homeotic phenotypes; (4) Asx is an Enhancer of position-effect variegation and (5) Asx displays tissue-specific derepression of target genes. Asx was cloned by transposon tagging and encodes a protein of 1668 amino acids containing an unusual cysteine cluster at the carboxy terminus. The protein is ubiquitously expressed during development. We show that Asx is required in the central nervous system to regulate Ultrabithorax. ASX binds to multiple sites on polytene chromosomes, 70% of which overlap those of Polycomb, polyhomeotic and Polycomblike, and 30% of which are unique. The differences in target site recognition may account for some of the differences in Asx phenotypes relative to other members of the Polycomb group.

Enhancer of Polycomb Is a Suppressor of Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
Donald A R Sinclair ◽  
Nigel J Clegg ◽  
Jennifer Antonchuk ◽  
Thomas A Milne ◽  
Kryn Stankunas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
P Element ◽  
Homeotic Gene ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Negative Regulators ◽  
Recombination Mapping ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Homeotic Gene Expression

Abstract Polycomb group (PcG) genes of Drosophila are negative regulators of homeotic gene expression required for maintenance of determination. Sequence similarity between Polycomb and Su(var)205 led to the suggestion that PcG genes and modifiers of position-effect variegation (PEV) might function analogously in the establishment of chromatin structure. If PcG proteins participate directly in the same process that leads to PEV, PcG mutations should suppress PEV. We show that mutations in E(Pc), an unusual member of the PcG, suppress PEV of four variegating rearrangements: In(l)wm4, BSV, T(2;3)SbV, and In(2R)bwVDe2. Using reversion of a P element insertion, deficiency mapping, and recombination mapping as criteria, homeotic effects and suppression of PEV associated with E(Pc) co-map. Asx is an enhancer of PEV, whereas nine other PcG loci do not affect PEV. These results support the conclusion that there are fewer similarities between PcG genes and modifiers of PEV than previously supposed. However, E(Pc) appears to be an important link between the two groups. We discuss why Asx might act as an enhancer of PEV.

scholarly journals Replication of Heterochromatin and Structure of Polytene Chromosomes

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 6308-6316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Leach ◽  
Heather L. Chotkowski ◽  
Michael G. Wotring ◽  
Robert L. Dilwith ◽  
Robert L. Glaser
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Pattern ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Parental Origin ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Satellite Sequences ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Diploid Cells

ABSTRACT Heterochromatin is characteristically the last portion of the genome to be replicated. In polytene cells, heterochromatic sequences are underreplicated because S phase ends before replication of heterochromatin is completed. Truncated heterochromatic DNAs have been identified in polytene cells of Drosophila and may be the discontinuous molecules that form between fully replicated euchromatic and underreplicated heterochromatic regions of the chromosome. In this report, we characterize the temporal pattern of heterochromatic DNA truncation during development of polytene cells. Underreplication occurred during the first polytene S phase, yet DNA truncation, which was found within heterochromatic sequences of all fourDrosophila chromosomes, did not occur until the second polytene S phase. DNA truncation was correlated with underreplication, since increasing the replication of satellite sequences with thecycE 1672 mutation caused decreased production of truncated DNAs. Finally, truncation of heterochromatic DNAs was neither quantitatively nor qualitatively affected by modifiers of position effect variegation including the Y chromosome,Su(var)2052 , parental origin, or temperature. We propose that heterochromatic satellite sequences present a barrier to DNA replication and that replication forks that transiently stall at such barriers in late S phase of diploid cells are left unresolved in the shortened S phase of polytene cells. DNA truncation then occurs in the second polytene S phase, when new replication forks extend to the position of forks left unresolved in the first polytene S phase.

Dynamics of the sub-nuclear distribution of Modulo and the regulation of position-effect variegation by nucleolus in Drosophila

1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (18) ◽  
pp. 2753-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Perrin ◽  
O. Demakova ◽  
L. Fanti ◽  
S. Kallenbach ◽  
S. Saingery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Molecular Networks ◽  
Relaxation Processes ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Cell Fractionation ◽  
Chromatin Compaction ◽  
Nuclear Distribution ◽  
Effect Variegation

modulo belongs to the class of Drosophila genes named ‘suppressor of position-effect variegation’, suggesting the involvement of the encoded protein in chromatin compaction/relaxation processes. Using complementary procedures of cell fractionation, immunolocalisation on mitotic and polytene chromosomes and cross-linking/immunoprecipitation of genomic DNA targets, we have analysed the sub-nuclear distribution of Modulo. While actually associated to condensed chromatin and heterochromatin sites, the protein is also abundantly found at nucleolus. From a comparison of Modulo pattern on chromosomes of different cell types and mutant lines, we propose a model in which the nucleolus balances the Modulo protein available for chromatin compaction and PEV modification. At a molecular level, repetitive elements instead of rDNA constitute Modulo DNA targets, indicating that the protein directly contacts DNA in heterochromatin but not at the nucleolus. Consistent with a role for Modulo in nucleolus activity and protein synthesis capacity, somatic clones homozygous for a null mutation express a cell-autonomous phenotype consisting of growth alteration and short slender bristles, characteristic traits of Minute mutations, which are known to affect ribosome biogenesis. The results provide evidence suggesting that Modulo participates in distinct molecular networks in the nucleolus and heterochromatin and has distinct functions in the two compartments.

scholarly journals The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Wang ◽  
Sarah C. R. Elgin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Inbred Lines ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Fourth Chromosome ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. Results Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. Conclusions The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.

Mechanisms for the construction and developmental control of heterochromatin formation and imprinted chromosome domains

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 35-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Tartof ◽  
Marilyn Bremer
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Model System ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Developmental Control ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Material Basis ◽  
Chromosome Domains ◽  
Effect Variegation

The study of variegating position effects in Drosophila provides a model system to explore the mechanism and material basis for the construction and developmental control of heterochromatin domains and the imprinted genomic structures that they may create. The results of our experiments in this regard have implications for a diverse assortment of long-range chromosome phenomena related to gene and chromosome inactivation. Specifically, as a consequence of our studies on position effect variegation, we propose a simple mechanism of X-chromosome inactivation, suggest a purpose for genomic imprinting, and postulate a general means for regulating the time in development at which certain genes become heterochromatically repressed.

scholarly journals Mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster Gene Encoding S-adenosylmethionine Suppress Position-Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Larsson ◽  
Jingpu Zhang ◽  
Åsa Rasmuson-Lestander
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Sex Combs ◽  
S Alleles ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract In Drosophila melanogaster, the study of trans-acting modifier mutations of position-effect variegation and Polycomb group (Pc-G) genes have been useful tools to investigate genes involved in chromatin structure. We have cloned a modifier gene, Suppesssm of zeste 5 (Su(z)5), which encodes Sadenosylmethionine synthetase, and we present here molecular results and data concerning its expression in mutants and genetic interactions. The mutant alleles Su(z)5, l(2)R23 and l(2)M6 show suppression of wm4 and also of two white mutants induced by roo element insertions in the regulatory region i.e., wis (in combination with z  1) and wsp1. Two of the Su(z)S alleles, as well as a deletion of the gene, also act as enhancers of PoZycomb by increasing the size of sex combs on midleg. The results suggest that Su(z)5 is connected with regulation of chromatin structure. The enzyme Sadenosylmethionine synthetase is involved in the synthesis of Sadenosylmethionine, a methyl group donor and also, after decarboxylation, a propylamino group donor in the bio-synthesis of polyamines. Our results from HPLC analysis show that in ovaries from heterozygous Su(z)5 mutants the content of spermine is significantly reduced. Results presented here suggest that polyamines are an important molecule class in the regulation of chromatin structure.

scholarly journals A Drosophila Homologue of Sir2 Modifies Position-Effect Variegation but Does Not Affect Life Span

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 1675-1685
Author(s):  
Brenda L Newman ◽  
James R Lundblad ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Sarah M Smolik
Keyword(s):  
Life Span ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Creb Binding Protein ◽  
Developmentally Regulated ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Chromatin Regulator ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract Control of chromosome structure is important in the regulation of gene expression, recombination, DNA repair, and chromosome stability. In a two-hybrid screen for proteins that interact with the Drosophila CREB-binding protein (dCBP), a known histone acetyltransferase and transcriptional coactivator, we identified the Drosophila homolog of a yeast chromatin regulator, Sir2. In yeast, Sir2 silences genes via an intrinsic NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase activity. In addition, Sir2 promotes longevity in yeast and in Caenorhabditis elegans. In this report, we characterize the Drosophila Sir2 (dSir2) gene and its product and describe the generation of dSir2 amorphic alleles. We found that dSir2 expression is developmentally regulated and that dSir2 has an intrinsic NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase activity. The dSir2 mutants are viable, fertile, and recessive suppressors of position-effect variegation (PEV), indicating that, as in yeast, dSir2 is not an essential function for viability and is a regulator of heterochromatin formation and/or function. However, mutations in dSir2 do not shorten life span as predicted from studies in yeast and worms.

scholarly journals Su(z)12, a novelDrosophilaPolycomb group gene that is conserved in vertebrates and plants

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (17) ◽  
pp. 3371-3379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Birve ◽  
Aditya K. Sengupta ◽  
Dirk Beuchle ◽  
Jan Larsson ◽  
James A. Kennison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Homeotic Gene ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Regulatory Machinery ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Arabidopsis Proteins ◽  
Homeotic Gene Expression

In both Drosophila and vertebrates, spatially restricted expression of HOX genes is controlled by the Polycomb group (PcG) repressors. Here we characterize a novel Drosophila PcG gene, Suppressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12). Su(z)12 mutants exhibit very strong homeotic transformations and Su(z)12 function is required throughout development to maintain the repressed state of HOX genes. Unlike most other PcG mutations, Su(z)12 mutations are strong suppressors of position-effect variegation (PEV), suggesting that Su(z)12 also functions in heterochromatin-mediated repression. Furthermore, Su(z)12 function is required for germ cell development. The Su(z)12 protein is highly conserved in vertebrates and is related to the Arabidopsis proteins EMF2, FIS2 and VRN2. Notably, EMF2 is a repressor of floral homeotic genes. These results suggest that at least some of the regulatory machinery that controls homeotic gene expression is conserved between animals and plants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document