Defined concentrations of a posteriorizing signal are critical for MafB/Kreisler segmental expression in the hindbrain

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 1173-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
M.A. Bonnin ◽  
M. Sieweke ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Environmental Signals ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Segmental Expression

It has been shown by using the quail/chick chimera system that Hox gene expression in the hindbrain is influenced by positional signals arising from the environment. In order to decipher the pathway that leads to Hox gene induction, we have investigated whether a Hox gene regulator, the leucine zipper transcription factor MafB/Kr, is itself transcriptionally regulated by the environmental signals. This gene is normally expressed in rhombomeres (r) 5 and 6 and their associated neural crest. MafB/Kr expression is maintained in r5/6 when grafted into the environment of r3/4. On the contrary, the environment of rhombomeres 7/8 represses MafB/Kr expression. Thus, as previously shown for the expression of Hox genes, MafB/Kr expression is regulated by a posterior-dominant signal, which in this case induces the loss of expression of this gene. We also show that the posterior signal can be transferred to the r5/6 neuroepithelium by posterior somites (somites 7 to 10) grafted laterally to r5/6. At the r4 level, the same somites induce MafB/Kr in r4, leading it to behave like r5/6. The posterior environment regulates MafB/Kr expression in the neural crest as it does in the corresponding hindbrain level, showing that some positional regulatory mechanisms are shared by neural tube and neural crest cells. Retinoic acid beads mimic the effect produced by the somites in repressing MafB/Kr in r5/6 and progressively inducing it more rostrally as its concentration increases. We therefore propose that the MafB/Kr expression domain is defined by a molecule unevenly distributed in the paraxial mesoderm. This molecule would allow the expression of the MafB/Kr gene in a narrow window of concentration by activating its expression at a definite threshold and repressing it at higher levels, accounting for its limited domain of expression in only two rhombomeres. It thus appears that the regulation of MafB/Kr expression in the rhombomeres could be controlled by the same posteriorizing factor(s) as Hox genes.

Negative effect of Hox gene expression on the development of the neural crest-derived facial skeleton

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 4301-4313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Creuzet ◽  
Gérard Couly ◽  
Christine Vincent ◽  
Nicole M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Distal Segment ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Hox Gene

Diencephalic, mesencephalic and metencephalic neural crest cells are skeletogenic and derive from neural folds that do not express Hox genes. In order to examine the influence of Hox gene expression on skull morphogenesis, expression of Hoxa2, Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 in conjunction with that of the green fluorescent protein has been selectively targeted to the Hox-negative neural folds of the avian embryo prior to the onset of crest cell emigration. Hoxa2 expression precludes the development of the entire facial skeleton. Transgenic Hoxa2 embryos such as those from which the Hox-negative domain of the cephalic neural crest has been removed have no upper or lower jaws and no frontonasal structures. Embryos subjected to the forced expression of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 show severe defects in the facial skeleton but not a complete absence of facial cartilage. Hoxa3 prevents the formation of the skeleton derived from the first branchial arch, but allows the development (albeit reduced) of the nasal septum. Hoxb4, by contrast, hampers the formation of the nasal bud-derived skeleton, while allowing that of a proximal (but not distal) segment of the lower jaw. The combined effect of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 prevents the formation of facial skeletal structures, comparable with Hoxa2. None of these genes impairs the formation of neural derivatives of the crest. These results suggest that over the course of evolution, the absence of Hox gene expression in the anterior part of the chordate embryo was crucial in the vertebrate phylum for the development of a face, jaws and brain case, and, hence, also for that of the forebrain.

Homeobox genes and models for patterning the hindbrain and branchial arches

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hunt ◽  
Jenny Whiting ◽  
Ian Muchamore ◽  
Heather Marshall ◽  
Robb Krumlauf
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Homeobox Genes ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
The Body ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Hox Code ◽  
Branchial Region

Antennapedia class homeobox genes, which in insects are involved in regional specification of the segmented central regions of the body, have been implicated in a similar role in the vertebrate hindbrain. The development of the hindbrain involves the establishment of compartments which are subsequently made distinct from each other by Hox gene expression, implying that the lineage of neural cells may be an important factor in their development. The hindbrain produces the neural crest that gives rise to the cartilages of the branchial skeleton. Lineage also seems to be important in the neural crest, as experiments have shown that the crest will form cartilages appropriate to its level of origin when grafted to a heterotopic location. We show how the Hox genes could also be involved in patterning the mesenchymal structures of the branchial skeleton. Recently it has been proposed that the rhombomererestricted expression pattern of Hox 2 genes is the result of a tight spatially localised induction from underlying head mesoderm, in which a prepattern of Hox expression is visible. We find no evidence for this model, our data being consistent with the idea that the spatially localised expression pattern is a result of segmentation processes whose final stages are intrinsic to the neural plate. We suggest the following model for patterning in the branchial region. At first a segment-restricted code of Hox gene expression becomes established in the neuroepithelium and adjacent presumptive neural crest. This expression is then maintained in the neural crest during migration, resulting in a Hox code in the cranial ganglia and branchial mesenchyme that reflects the crest's rhombomere of origin. The final stage is the establishment of Hox 2 expression in the surface ectoderm which is brought into contact with neural crest-derived branchial mesenchyme. The Hox code of the branchial ectoderm is established later in development than that of the neural plate and crest, and involves the same combination of genes as the underlying crest. Experimental observations suggest the idea of an instructive interaction between branchial crest and its overlying ectoderm, which would be consistent with our observations. The distribution of clusters of Antennapedia class genes within the animal kingdom suggests that the primitive chordates ancestral to vertebrates had at least one Hox cluster. The origin of the vertebrates is thought to have been intimately linked to the appearance of the neural crest, initially in the branchial region. Our data are consistent with the idea that the branchial region of the head arose in evolution before the more anterior parts, the development of the branchial region employing the Hox genes in a more determinate patterning system. In this scenario, the anterior parts of the head arose subsequently, which may explain the greater importance of interactions in their development, and the fact that Antennapedia class Hox genes are not expressed there.

Hox gene induction in the neural tube depends on three parameters: competence, signal supply and paralogue group

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 849-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
M.A. Bonnin ◽  
N.M. Douarin Le
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Gene Induction ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Environmental Cues ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Genomic Clusters

It has been previously shown that Hox gene expression in the rhombencephalon is controlled by environmental cues. Thus posterior transposition of anterior rhombomeres to the r7/8 level results in the activation of Hox genes of the four first paralog groups and in homeotic transformations of the neuroepithelial fate according to its position along the anteroposterior axis. We demonstrate here that although the anteroposterior levels of r2 to r6 express Hox genes they do not have inducing activity on more anterior territories. If transposed at the posterior rhombencephalon and trunk level, however, the same anterior regions are able to express Hox gene such as Hoxa-2, a-3 or b-4. We also provide evidence that these signals are transferred by two paths: one vertical, arising from the paraxial mesoderm, and one planar, travelling in the neural epithelium. The competence to express Hox genes extends up to the forebrain and midbrain but expression of Hox genes does not preclude Otx2 expression in these territories and results only in slight changes in their phenotypes. Similarly, rhombomeres transplanted to posterior truncal levels turned out to be able to express posterior genes of the first eight paralog groups to the exclusion of others located downstream in the Hox genes genomic clusters. This suggests that the neural tube is divided into large territories characterized by different Hox gene regulatory features.

Determination of the identity of the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest: incompatibility between Hox gene expression and lower jaw development

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (17) ◽  
pp. 3445-3459 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Couly ◽  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
P. Coltey ◽  
B. Ruhin ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Pigment Cells ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Jaw Apparatus

In addition to pigment cells, and neural and endocrine derivatives, the neural crest is characterized by its ability to yield mesenchymal cells. In amniotes, this property is restricted to the cephalic region from the mid-diencephalon to the end of rhombomere 8 (level of somites 4/5). The cephalic neural crest is divided into two domains: an anterior region corresponding to the diencephalon, mesencephalon and metencephalon (r1, r2) in which expression of Hox genes is never observed, and a posterior domain in which neural crest cells exhibit (with a few exceptions) the same Hox code as the rhombomeres from which they originate. By altering the normal distribution of neural crest cells in the branchial arches through appropriate embryonic manipulations, we have investigated the relationships between Hox gene expression and the level of plasticity that neural crest cells display when they are led to migrate to an ectopic environment. We made the following observations. (i) Hox gene expression is not altered in neural crest cells by their transposition to ectopic sites. (ii) Expression of Hox genes by the BA ectoderm does not depend upon an induction by the neural crest. This second finding further supports the concept of segmentation of the cephalic ectoderm into ectomeres (Couly and Le Douarin, 1990). According to this concept, metameres can be defined in large bands of ectoderm including not only the CNS and the neural crest but also the corresponding superficial ectoderm fated to cover craniofacial primordia. (iii) The construction of a lower jaw requires the environment provided by the ectomesodermal components of BA1 or BA2 associated with the Hox gene non-expressing neural crest cells. Hox gene-expressing neural crest cells are unable to yield the lower jaw apparatus including the entoglossum and basihyal even in the BA1 environment. In contrast, the posterior part of the hyoid bone can be constructed by any region of the neural crest cells whether or not they are under the regulatory control of Hox genes. Such is also the case for the neural and connective tissues (including those comprising the cardiovascular system) of neural crest origin, upon which no segmental restriction is imposed. The latter finding confirms the plasticity observed 24 years ago (Le Douarin and Teillet, 1974) for the precursors of the PNS.

Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Prince ◽  
A. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Population ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Crest Cell

In this study we have cloned the chick Hoxa-2 gene and analysed its expression during early development. We find that Hoxa-2 has a rostral limit of expression in the rhombencephalic neural tube corresponding precisely to the boundary between rhombomeres (r)1 and 2; a limit further rostral than any other Hox gene reported to date. Neural crest migrates from r2 to populate the first branchial arch, yet although Hoxa-2 is expressed down the full dorsoventral extent of r2 during the phase of neural crest emigration, there is no Hoxa-2 expression in either the emergent neural crest or in the first branchial arch. Conversely, at the level of r4, both the neural tube and the neural crest cells, which migrate out of this rhombomere to populate the second branchial arch, express Hoxa-2. Other Hox genes expressed in the rhombencephalic neural tube demonstrate a transfer of expression from neural tube to neural crest at all axial levels of expression. Hoxa-2 is thus unusual in demonstrating separate anterior expression limits in neural tube and neural crest; this allowed us to test whether Hox gene expression patterns in neural crest are determined by migratory pathways or are prespecified by the site of origin in the neuroepithelium. Grafting experiments in which pairs of rhombomeres were transplanted to ectopic sites at the time of rhombomere boundary formation reveal a prepatterning of the neural crest with respect to Hoxa-2 expression. The decision to down-regulate Hoxa-2 expression in r2-derived neural crest, but to maintain Hoxa-2 expression in r4-derived neural crest is intrinsic to the premigratory crest cell population. Thus, following grafting of r4 to the r2 site and vice-versa, Hoxa-2 expression is maintained in r4-derived neural crest, but lost in r2-derived neural crest.

Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1449-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
A.C. Burke ◽  
E. Laufer ◽  
E. DiMambro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Hind Limb ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Posterior Portion ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Hoxd Gene

The vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to be important for patterning the primary and secondary axes of the developing vertebrate embryo. The function of these genes along the primary axis of the embryo has been generally interpreted in the context of positional specification and homeotic transformation of axial structures. The way in which these genes are expressed and function during the development of the secondary axes, particularly the limb, is less clear. In order to provide a reference for understanding the role of the Hox genes in limb patterning, we isolated clones of 23 Hox genes expressed during limb development, characterized their expression patterns and analyzed their regulation by the signalling centers which pattern the limb. The expression patterns of the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes have previously been partially characterized; however, our study reveals that these genes are expressed in patterns more dynamic and complex than generally appreciated, only transiently approximating simple, concentric, nested domains. Detailed analysis of these patterns suggests that the expression of each of the Hoxa and Hoxd genes is regulated in up to three independent phases. Each of these phases appears to be associated with the specification and patterning of one of the proximodistal segments of the limb (upper arm, lower arm and hand). Interestingly, in the last of these phases, the expression of the Hoxd genes violates the general rule of spatial and temporal colinearity of Hox gene expression with gene order along the chromosome. In contrast to the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes, which are expressed in both the fore and hind limbs, different sets of Hoxc genes are expressed in the two limbs. There is a correlation between the relative position of these genes along the chromosome and the axial level of the limb bud in which they are expressed. The more 3′ genes are expressed in the fore limb bud while the 5′ genes are expressed in the hind limb bud; intermediate genes are transcribed in both limbs. However, there is no clear correlation between the relative position of the genes along the chromosome and their expression domains within the limb. With the exception of Hoxc-11, which is transcribed in a posterior portion of the hind limb, Hoxc gene expression is restricted to the anterior/proximal portion of the limb bud. Importantly, comparison of the distributions of Hoxc-6 RNA and protein products reveals posttranscriptional regulation of this gene, suggesting that caution must be exercised in interpreting the functional significance of the RNA distribution of any of the vertebrate Hox genes. To understand the genesis of the complex patterns of Hox gene expression in the limb bud, we examined the propagation of Hox gene expression relative to cell proliferation. We find that shifts in Hox gene expression cannot be attributed to passive expansion due to cell proliferation. Rather, phase-specific Hox gene expression patterns appear to result from a context-dependent response of the limb mesoderm to Sonic hedgehog. Sonic hedgehog (the patterning signal from the Zone of Polarizing Activity) is known to be able to activate Hoxd gene expression in the limb. Although we find that Sonic hedgehog is capable of initiating and polarizing Hoxd gene expression during both of the latter two phases of Hox gene expression, the specific patterns induced are not determined by the signal, but depend upon the temporal context of the mesoderm receiving the signal. Misexpression of Sonic hedgehog also reveals that Hoxb-9, which is normally excluded from the posterior mesenchyme of the leg, is negatively regulated by Sonic hedgehog and that Hoxc-11, which is expressed in the posterior portion of the leg, is not affected by Sonic hedgehog and hence is not required to pattern the skeletal elements of the lower leg.

scholarly journals The Role of Histone Demethylases and DNA Methyltransferases in the Transcription Regulation of HOX Genes in PML-RARa+ AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3921-3921
Author(s):  
Katerina Rejlova ◽  
Alena Musilova ◽  
Martina Slamova ◽  
Karel Fiser ◽  
Karolina Skvarova Kramarzova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Dna Methyltransferases ◽  
Histone Mark ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Histone Demethylases ◽  
Atra Treatment ◽  
Hox Gene

Abstract Homeobox genes (HOX) encode transcription factors that are frequently deregulated in leukemias. Our previous results showed that HOX gene expression differs among genetically characterized subtypes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Specifically, PML-RARa positive AML patients have overall lowest HOX gene expression which positively correlates with expression of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) demethylases - JMJD3 and UTX and negatively with the expression of DNA methyltransferases - DNMT3a and DNMT3b. Interestingly, JMJD3 was already shown to be a direct target of PML-RARa protein (Martens, JH et al, 2010, Cancer Cell). From these findings we postulated a hypothesis that reduced levels of HOX genes in PML-RARa positive AML are a consequence of suppressed expression of histone demethylases resulting in increased H3K27 methylation and/or of elevated levels of DNMTs leading to de novoDNA methylation. We studied the role of histone demethylases and DNMTs in the regulation of HOX gene expression and the effect of treatment in PML-RARa positive cell lines (NB4 and ATRA-resistant clones NB4-LR2 and NB4-MR2). We treated NB4 cell line by all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA; 1uM), which was described to release the differentiation block caused by the presence of PML-RARa and to degrade the fusion protein. We observed that expression of particular HOX genes (HOXA1, HOXA3, HOXA4, HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXB4, HOXB6) measured by qPCR was significantly increased after ATRA treatment. While the level of JMJD3 was significantly increased upon ATRA treatment as well, the expression of UTX did not change. Furthermore, we detected significantly reduced expression of DNMT3b gene. To exclude a non-specific effect of ATRA, independent of PML-RARa, we used resistant clones LR2 and MR2 bearing mutations in retinoic acid-binding domain. HOX gene expression together with JMJD3, UTX and DNMT3b expression did not change upon ATRA treatment. These results confirm the PML-RARa-dependent regulation of HOX genes. To test the role of JMJD3 in the HOX gene expression regulation, we cultured NB4 cells with a specific inhibitor of histone demethylases, GSK-J4 (1 uM, 10 uM), in the presence of ATRA. The co-treatment caused significant decrease in the expression of studied HOX genes (HOXA1, HOXA3, HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXA10, HOXB4, HOXB6) in comparison to ATRA alone which supports the role of JMJD3 in the transcription regulation. Further, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to investigate if the changes of HOX gene expression upon ATRA and GSK-J4 treatment would correspond with changes of histone code on HOX gene promoter regions. ATRA treatment caused reduction of repressive histone mark (H3K27me3) on particular HOX gene promoters (HOXA1, HOXA3, HOXA5, HOXA7), by contrast, combinational treatment of ATRA and GSK-J4 reversed this effect. Accordingly, we detected that ATRA/GSK-J4 co-treatment reduced active histone mark H3K4me2. Next we were interested if JMJD3 inhibition would interfere with the differentiation effect of ATRA. As shown previously, ATRA treatment alone caused differentiation of NB4 cell line whereas the combination with GSK-J4 did not reduce the effect. Interestingly, in addition to differentiation it led cells to apoptosis. Combination of drugs (ATRA - 1uM, GSK-J4 - 1, 2, 5uM) increased significantly the percentage of dead cells in comparison to ATRA or GSK treatment alone (GSK-J4 alone vs in combination with ATRA, 1uM - 1.8 fold, 2uM - 2.2 fold, 5 uM - 2.3 fold increase). Next we measured apoptosis in resistant clones LR2 and MR2. In both cases the highest concentration used of GSK-J4 (5uM) in combination with ATRA caused significant increase of dead cells as well (LR2 - 2.1 fold, MR2 - 2.0 fold increase). Our results indicate that JMJD3 is responsible for the regulation of HOX gene expression in PML-RARa positive leukemia since changes of HOX gene expression correspond with histone modifications on the regions of HOX gene promoters. We assume that DNA methylation driven by DNMT3b can also participate in this process. Moreover, our findings demonstrate potential therapeutic implications of GSK-J4 inhibitor in combination with ATRA in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia who are not responsive to ATRA monotherapy. Supported by P304/12/2214 and GAUK 196616 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Wnt signaling pathway controls hox gene expression and neuroblast migration in C. elegans

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.N. Maloof ◽  
J. Whangbo ◽  
J.M. Harris ◽  
G.D. Jongeward ◽  
C. Kenyon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Wnt Signaling ◽  
Wnt Pathway ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Wnt Signaling Pathway ◽  
Beta Catenin ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Neuroblast Migration ◽  
Pathway Gene

The specification of body pattern along the anteroposterior (A/P) body axis is achieved largely by the actions of conserved clusters of Hox genes. Limiting expression of these genes to localized regional domains and controlling the precise patterns of expression within those domains is critically important for normal patterning. Here we report that egl-20, a C. elegans gene required to activate expression of the Hox gene mab-5 in the migratory neuroblast QL, encodes a member of the Wnt family of secreted glycoproteins. We have found that a second Wnt pathway gene, bar-1, which encodes a beta-catenin/Armadillo-like protein, is also required for activation of mab-5 expression in QL. In addition, we describe the gene pry-1, which is required to limit expression of the Hox genes lin-39, mab-5 and egl-5 to their correct local domains. We find that egl-20, pry-1 and bar-1 all function in a linear genetic pathway with conserved Wnt signaling components, suggesting that a conserved Wnt pathway activates expression of mab-5 in the migratory neuroblast QL. Moreover, we find that members of this Wnt signaling system play a major role in both the general and fine-scale control of Hox gene expression in other cell types along the A/P axis.

Signalling by FGF8 from the isthmus patterns anterior hindbrain and establishes the anterior limit of Hox gene expression

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Irving ◽  
I. Mason
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Morphogen Gradient ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Developmental Fate ◽  
Developmental Patterning

Current evidence suggests that the anterior segment of the vertebrate hindbrain, rhombomere 1, gives rise to the entire cerebellum. It is situated where two distinct developmental patterning mechanisms converge: graded signalling from an organising centre (the isthmus) located at the midbrain/hindbrain boundary confronts segmentation of the hindbrain. The unique developmental fate of rhombomere 1 is reflected by it being the only hindbrain segment in which no Hox genes are expressed. In this study we show that ectopic FGF8 protein, a candidate for the isthmic organising activity, is able to induce and repress gene expression within the hindbrain in a manner appropriate to rhombomere 1. Using a heterotopic, heterospecific grafting strategy we demonstrate that rhombomere 1 is able to express Hox genes but that both isthmic tissue and FGF8 inhibit their expression. Inhibition of FGF8 function in vivo shows that it is responsible for defining the anterior limit of Hox gene expression within the developing brain and thereby specifies the extent of the rl territory. Previous studies have suggested that a retinoid morphogen gradient determines the axial limit of expression of individual Hox genes within the hindbrain. We propose a model whereby activation by retinoids is antagonised by inhibition by FGF8 in the anterior hindbrain to set aside the territory from which the cerebellum will develop.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document