Hox genes and growth: early and late roles in limb bud morphogenesis

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1994 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Morgan ◽  
Cliff Tabin

In recent years, molecular analysis has led to the identification of some of the key genes that control the morphogenesis of the developing embryo. Detailed functional analysis of these genes is rapidly leading to a new level of understanding of how embryonic form is regulated. Understanding the roles that these genes play in development can additionally provide insights into the evolution of morphology. The 5′ genes of the vertebrate Hox clusters are expressed in complex patterns during limb morphogenesis. Various models suggest that the Hoxd genes specify positional identity along the anteroposterior (A-P) axis of the limb. Close examination of the pattern of Hoxd gene expression in the limb suggests that a distinct combination of Hoxd gene expressed in different digit primordia is unlikely to specify each digit independently. The effects of altering the pattern of expression of the Hoxd-11 gene at different times during limb development indicate that the Hoxd genes have separable early and late roles in limb morphogenesis. In their early role, the Hoxd genes are involved in regulating the growth of the undifferentiated limb mesenchyme. Restriction of the expression of successive 5′ Hoxd genes to progressively more posterior regions of the bud results in the asymmetric outgrowth of the limb mesenchyme. Later in limb development, Hoxd genes also regulate the maturation of the nascent skeletal elements. The degree of overlap in function between different Hoxd genes may be different in these early and late roles. The combined action of many Hox genes on distinct developmental processes contribute to pattern asymmetry along the A-P axis.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre J Fabre ◽  
Marion Leleu ◽  
Benedicte Mascrez ◽  
Quentin Lo Giudice ◽  
John Cobb ◽  
...  

A global analysis of gene expression during development reveals specific transcription patterns associated with the emergence of various cell types, tissues and organs. These heterogeneous patterns are instrumental to ensure the proper formation of the different parts of our body, as shown by the phenotypic effects generated by functional genetic approaches. However, variations at the cellular level can be observed within each structure or organ. In the developing mammalian limbs, expression of Hoxd genes is differentially controlled in space and time in cells that will pattern the digits and the arms. Here we analyze single-cell transcriptomes of limb bud cells and show that Hox genes are expressed in specific combinations that match particular cell types. In the presumptive digits, we find that the expression of Hoxd gene is unbalanced, despite their common genomic proximity to known global enhancers, often expressing only a subset of the five genes transcribed in these cells. We also report that combinatorial expression follows a pseudo-time sequence, suggesting that a progression in combinatorial expression may be associated with cellular diversity in developing digits.


Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Tabin

Limb development has long been a model system for studying vertebrate pattern formation. The advent of molecular biology has allowed the identification of some of the key genes that regulate limb morphogenesis. One important class of such genes are the homeobox-containing, or Hox genes. Understanding of the roles these genes play in development additionally provides insights into the evolution of limb pattern. Hox gene expression patterns divide the embryonic limb bud into five sectors along the anterior/posterior axis. The expression of specific Hox genes in each domain specifies the developmental fate of that region. Because there are only five distinct Hox-encoded domains across the limb bud there is a developmental constraint prohibiting the evolution of more than five different types of digits. The expression patterns of Hox genes in modern embryonic limb buds also gives clues to the shape of the ancestral fin field from which the limb evolved, hence elucidating the evolution of the tetrapod limb.


Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1449-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
A.C. Burke ◽  
E. Laufer ◽  
E. DiMambro ◽  
...  

The vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to be important for patterning the primary and secondary axes of the developing vertebrate embryo. The function of these genes along the primary axis of the embryo has been generally interpreted in the context of positional specification and homeotic transformation of axial structures. The way in which these genes are expressed and function during the development of the secondary axes, particularly the limb, is less clear. In order to provide a reference for understanding the role of the Hox genes in limb patterning, we isolated clones of 23 Hox genes expressed during limb development, characterized their expression patterns and analyzed their regulation by the signalling centers which pattern the limb. The expression patterns of the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes have previously been partially characterized; however, our study reveals that these genes are expressed in patterns more dynamic and complex than generally appreciated, only transiently approximating simple, concentric, nested domains. Detailed analysis of these patterns suggests that the expression of each of the Hoxa and Hoxd genes is regulated in up to three independent phases. Each of these phases appears to be associated with the specification and patterning of one of the proximodistal segments of the limb (upper arm, lower arm and hand). Interestingly, in the last of these phases, the expression of the Hoxd genes violates the general rule of spatial and temporal colinearity of Hox gene expression with gene order along the chromosome. In contrast to the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes, which are expressed in both the fore and hind limbs, different sets of Hoxc genes are expressed in the two limbs. There is a correlation between the relative position of these genes along the chromosome and the axial level of the limb bud in which they are expressed. The more 3′ genes are expressed in the fore limb bud while the 5′ genes are expressed in the hind limb bud; intermediate genes are transcribed in both limbs. However, there is no clear correlation between the relative position of the genes along the chromosome and their expression domains within the limb. With the exception of Hoxc-11, which is transcribed in a posterior portion of the hind limb, Hoxc gene expression is restricted to the anterior/proximal portion of the limb bud. Importantly, comparison of the distributions of Hoxc-6 RNA and protein products reveals posttranscriptional regulation of this gene, suggesting that caution must be exercised in interpreting the functional significance of the RNA distribution of any of the vertebrate Hox genes. To understand the genesis of the complex patterns of Hox gene expression in the limb bud, we examined the propagation of Hox gene expression relative to cell proliferation. We find that shifts in Hox gene expression cannot be attributed to passive expansion due to cell proliferation. Rather, phase-specific Hox gene expression patterns appear to result from a context-dependent response of the limb mesoderm to Sonic hedgehog. Sonic hedgehog (the patterning signal from the Zone of Polarizing Activity) is known to be able to activate Hoxd gene expression in the limb. Although we find that Sonic hedgehog is capable of initiating and polarizing Hoxd gene expression during both of the latter two phases of Hox gene expression, the specific patterns induced are not determined by the signal, but depend upon the temporal context of the mesoderm receiving the signal. Misexpression of Sonic hedgehog also reveals that Hoxb-9, which is normally excluded from the posterior mesenchyme of the leg, is negatively regulated by Sonic hedgehog and that Hoxc-11, which is expressed in the posterior portion of the leg, is not affected by Sonic hedgehog and hence is not required to pattern the skeletal elements of the lower leg.


Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1385-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Helms ◽  
C.H. Kim ◽  
G. Eichele ◽  
C. Thaller

In the chick limb bud, the zone of polarizing activity controls limb patterning along the anteroposterior and proximodistal axes. Since retinoic acid can induce ectopic polarizing activity, we examined whether this molecule plays a role in the establishment of the endogenous zone of polarizing activity. Grafts of wing bud mesenchyme treated with physiologic doses of retinoic acid had weak polarizing activity but inclusion of a retinoic acid-exposed apical ectodermal ridge or of prospective wing bud ectoderm evoked strong polarizing activity. Likewise, polarizing activity of prospective wing mesenchyme was markedly enhanced by co-grafting either a retinoic acid-exposed apical ectodermal ridge or ectoderm from the wing region. This equivalence of ectoderm-mesenchyme interactions required for the establishment of polarizing activity in retinoic acid-treated wing buds and in prospective wing tissue, suggests a role of retinoic acid in the establishment of the zone of polarizing activity. We found that prospective wing bud tissue is a high-point of retinoic acid synthesis. Furthermore, retinoid receptor-specific antagonists blocked limb morphogenesis and down-regulated a polarizing signal, sonic hedgehog. Limb agenesis was reversed when antagonist-exposed wing buds were treated with retinoic acid. Our results demonstrate a role of retinoic acid in the establishment of the endogenous zone of polarizing activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Ines Desanlis ◽  
Rachel Paul ◽  
Marie Kmita

Limb patterning relies in large part on the function of the Hox family of developmental genes. While the differential expression of Hox genes shifts from the anterior–posterior (A–P) to the proximal–distal (P–D) axis around embryonic day 11 (E11), whether this shift coincides with a more global change of A–P to P–D patterning program remains unclear. By performing and analyzing the transcriptome of the developing limb bud from E10.5 to E12.5, at single-cell resolution, we have uncovered transcriptional trajectories that revealed a general switch from A–P to P–D genetic program between E10.5 and E11.5. Interestingly, all the transcriptional trajectories at E10.5 end with cells expressing either proximal or distal markers suggesting a progressive acquisition of P–D identity. Moreover, we identified three categories of genes expressed in the distal limb mesenchyme characterized by distinct temporal expression dynamics. Among these are Hoxa13 and Hoxd13 (Hox13 hereafter), which start to be expressed around E10.5, and importantly the binding of the HOX13 factors was observed within or in the neighborhood of several of the distal limb genes. Our data are consistent with previous evidence suggesting that the transition from the early/proximal to the late/distal transcriptome of the limb mesenchyme largely relies on HOX13 function. Based on these results and the evidence that HOX13 factors restrict Hoxa11 expression to the proximal limb, in progenitor cells of the zeugopod, we propose that HOX13 act as a key determinant of P–D patterning.


Development ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-168
Author(s):  
Jackie Duke ◽  
William A. Elmer

This study is a continuing investigation of the effect of the brachypod mouse mutation on cell interactions and chondrogenesis during early limb development. In this report, cell adhesiveness was assessed in fused fragments of brachypod and normal limb-bud mesenchyme. Examination of the interface of fused distal postaxial limb fragments show brachypod limb mesenchyme to be more adhesive than normal limb mesenchyme. Chondrogenesis within brachypod fragments is delayed and less extensive than in normal fragments. In addition, chondrogenesis within normal fragments is not affected by the juxtaposition of thebrachypod fragment, and vice versa.


Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1109-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Macias ◽  
Y. Ganan ◽  
T.K. Sampath ◽  
M.E. Piedra ◽  
M.A. Ros ◽  
...  

Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2) and Osteogenic Protein 1 (OP-1, also termed BMP-7) are members of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily. In the present study, we have analyzed the effects of administering them locally at different stages and locations of the chick limb bud using heparin beads as carriers. Our results show that these BMPs are potent apoptotic signals for the undifferentiated limb mesoderm but not for the ectoderm or the differentiating chondrogenic cells. In addition, they promote intense radial growth of the differentiating cartilages and disturb the formation of joints accompanied by alterations in the pattern of Indian hedgehog and ck-erg expression. Interestingly, the effects of these two BMPs on joint formation were found to be different. While the predominant effect of BMP-2 is alteration in joint shape, OP-1 is a potent inhibitory factor for joint formation. In situ hybridizations to check whether this finding was indicative of specific roles for these BMPs in the formation of joints revealed a distinct and complementary pattern of expression of these genes during the formation of the skeleton of the digits. While Op-1 exhibited an intense expression in the perichondrium of the developing cartilages with characteristic interruptions in the zones of joint formation, Bmp-2 expression was a positive marker for the articular interspaces. These data suggest that, in addition to the proposed role for BMP-2 and OP-1 in the establishment of the anteroposterior axis of the limb, they may also play direct roles in limb morphogenesis: (i) in regulating the amount and spatial distribution of the undifferentiated prechondrogenic mesenchyme and (ii) in controlling the location of the joints and the diaphyses of the cartilaginous primordia of the long bones once the chondrogenic aggregates are established.


Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1018
Author(s):  
Spyros Papageorgiou

In 1999 T. Kondo and D. Duboule performed excisions of posterior upstream DNA domains in mouse embryos and they observed that for an extended excision (including Evx gene) the Hox genes of the cluster were simultaneously expressed with the first Hoxd1 gene ‘as if’ Temporal Collinearity (TC) had disappeared. According to a Biophysical Model (BM) during Hox gene expression, Hox clusters behave similar toexpanding elastic springs. For the extended upstream DNA excision, BM predicts the TC disappearance and an experiment is proposed to test this BM prediction. In the chick limb bud C. Tickle et al. observed that the excision of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) caused the inhibition of HoxA13 expression. However, the implantation of FGF soaked beads at the tip of the limb could surprisingly rescue HoxA13 expression after 24 hours so that TC is restored.Brachyury transcription factor (TF) is essential in identifying the targets of this transcription and a chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray chip (ChIP-chip) was produced which can be inserted in the mouse embryonic cells. It is here proposed to insert this chip in the mutant cells where TC has disappeared and compare it to the limb bud case.Is TC restored? It is an important issue worth exploring.


Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (12) ◽  
pp. 2771-2783 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hashimoto ◽  
Y. Yokouchi ◽  
M. Yamamoto ◽  
A. Kuroiwa

The limb muscles, originating from the ventrolateral portion of the somites, exhibit position-specific morphological development through successive splitting and growth/differentiation of the muscle masses in a region-specific manner by interacting with the limb mesenchyme and the cartilage elements. The molecular mechanisms that provide positional cues to the muscle precursors are still unknown. We have shown that the expression patterns of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 are correlated with muscle patterning of the limb bud (Yamamoto et al., 1998) and demonstrated that muscular Hox genes are activated by signals from the limb mesenchyme. We dissected the regulatory mechanisms directing the unique expression patterns of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 during limb muscle development. HOXA-11 protein was detected in both the myogenic cells and the zeugopodal mesenchymal cells of the limb bud. The earlier expression of HOXA-11 in both the myogenic precursor cells and the mesenchyme was dependent on the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), but later expression was independent of the AER. HOXA-11 expression in both myogenic precursor cells and mesenchyme was induced by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signal, whereas hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) maintained HOXA-11 expression in the myogenic precursor cells, but not in the mesenchyme. The distribution of HOXA-13 protein expression in the muscle masses was restricted to the posterior region. We found that HOXA-13 expression in the autopodal mesenchyme was dependent on the AER but not on the polarizing region, whereas expression of HOXA-13 in the posterior muscle masses was dependent on the polarizing region but not on the AER. Administration of BMP-2 at the anterior margin of the limb bud induced ectopic HOXA-13 expression in the anterior region of the muscle masses followed by ectopic muscle formation close to the source of exogenous BMP-2. In addition, NOGGIN/CHORDIN, antagonists of BMP-2 and BMP-4, downregulated the expression of HOXA-13 in the posterior region of the muscle masses and inhibited posterior muscle development. These results suggested that HOXA-13 expression in the posterior muscle masses is activated by the posteriorizing signal from the posterior mesenchyme via BMP-2. On the contrary, the expression of HOXA-13 in the autopodal mesenchyme was affected by neither BMP-2 nor NOGGIN/CHORDIN. Thus, mesenchymal HOXA-13 expression was independent of BMP-2 from polarizing region, but was under the control of as yet unidentified signals from the AER. These results showed that expression of Hox genes is regulated differently in the limb muscle precursor and mesenchymal cells.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feini Qu ◽  
Ilan C. Palte ◽  
Paul M. Gontarz ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Farshid Guilak

AbstractHumans have limited regenerative potential of musculoskeletal tissues following limb or digit loss. The murine digit has been used to study mammalian regeneration, where stem/progenitor cells (the ‘blastema’) regrow the digit tip after distal, but not proximal, amputation. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for this response remain to be determined. We hypothesized that regeneration is initiated and maintained by a gene regulatory network that recapitulates aspects of limb development, whereas a non-regenerative response exhibits fibrotic wound healing and minimal bone remodeling. To test these hypotheses, we evaluated the spatiotemporal formation of bone and fibrous tissues after level-dependent amputation of the murine terminal phalanx and quantified the transcriptome of the repair tissue. We show that digit regeneration is a level-dependent and spatiotemporally controlled process, with distal and proximal amputations showing significant differences in gene expression and tissue regrowth over time. Regeneration is characterized by the transient upregulation of genes that direct skeletal system development and limb morphogenesis, including distal Hox genes. By identifying the molecular pathways regulating regeneration, this work will lead to novel therapies that restore complex tissues after injury.Summary StatementMurine digit tip regeneration after distal amputation is orchestrated through a transient, limb-specific gene network by blastema cells. Proximal amputation activates an alternate transcriptional program that results in scar formation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document