Restoration of Social Justice and Imposition of Proportionate Punishment in the Context of the Principle Non Bis In Idem

10.12737/7595 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Сергей Андрусенко ◽  
Sergey Andrusenko
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
System Study ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

The article discusses current issues in the restoration of victim rights by applying one of the fundamental principles of criminal law: the reestablishment of social justice and the commensurability/proportionality of the criminal justice system. Study the problems in the theory of criminal punishment that justify the possibility of increasing the punishment after conviction. The author also analyzes some of the positions of modern medicine which is based on the ability to change the verdict and appointment of new criminal penalties. Insufficient developed changes that were made to the criminal procedure law, can create problems of law enforcement practices that lead to a substantial violation of the rights of victims. The article also examines conflict general principles of criminal law, namely, the restoration of social justice and proportionality of criminal punishment and principle non bis in idem. The author points out significant challenges that may arise in law enforcement and offers solutions.

scholarly journals Legality Letter of Statement of Khilaf in Indonesia Criminal Justice System

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System

scholarly journals RECHTERLIJK PARDON DALAM KEBIJAKAN DAN PENERAPAN PIDANA INDONESIA

PRANATA HUKUM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-142
Author(s):  
Annisa Dian Permata Herista ◽  
Aristo Evandy A. Barlian
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Law System ◽  
Current Formulation ◽  
To Come

Penal code in the formulation of criminal law is currently only fixated on the provisions of criminal acts and crimes without including the goals and principles of punishment. Therefore, criminal law is currently considered rigid and inhumane in its application in small cases that are deemed to require social justice. Formulations which do not have objectives and principles in criminal guidelines will not produce effective law, now there is an idea that is Rechterlijk Pardon as one of the concepts in criminal reform that has been used by various countries implementing civil law systems. The results of the analysis in this study found 6 (six) articles relating to the value of forgiveness in the current formulation of the Kuhp but not the pure forgiveness value and the discovery of 5 (five) criminal justice applications that already have forgiveness values but still cannot be applied properly because they are not properly applied the existence of forgiveness formulations in the current criminal. The formulation of the judge's forgiveness idea "Rechterlijk Pardon" will make the criminal law system in Indonesia to come to be more integral, flexible, humanist, progress and nationalist. The criminal justice system desperately needs significant reforms such as the inclusion of criminal law goals and principles so that an effective criminal justice system in Indonesia is realized.

scholarly journals Not Citizens, Not Real People. The Italian Way of Governing Immigration through the Criminal Justice System

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Laura Scomparin ◽  
Giovanni Torrente
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Real People ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Legislative Policy ◽  
The One ◽  
Border Controls ◽  
Double Track

The aim of this article is to describe the specious use made of the Italian criminal justice system as a device to manage the demands for security due to the general perception of increased immigration flows in Italy. In particular, the article analyses - in each stage of the penal system from substantive criminal law, through criminal procedure law, to the prison system - the connection between the processes of criminalization and the use of extrajudicial measures to control immigration flows (such as border controls and expulsions). The results suggest that this criminal ‘double track’ (Italian citizens on the one side and migrants on the other) - with the subsequent hyper-incarceration of aliens and their final deportation as a consequence of the breach of either or both administrative and criminal law -is a disguised but deliberate choice of recent Italian legislative policy regarding the justice system.

scholarly journals The Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arif Agus ◽  
Ari Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
No Value ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze (1) the role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia; and (2) the Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach. The results of the research concluded; (1) Correctional Centers in the juvenile criminal justice system and in the adult criminal justice system both have a role, but the role of Correctional Centers in the adult criminal justice system has not been optimized as in the juvenile criminal justice system, and it tends to be discriminatory. (2) The optimization of the role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia needs to be carried out, because by optimizing the role of Correctional Centers, especially Correctional Research on adult cases, it will eliminate discrimination in treatment between children and adults and Correctional Research can be used as a reference for law enforcers. As a recommendation, it is suggested that in the Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia, both related to the renewal of the Criminal Procedure Law Code (KUHAP); the Criminal Code (KUHP); as well as the Corrections Law, the discrimination in making Correctional Research on juvenile cases and adult cases should be abolished, because it has no value of justice. The equalization of treatment related to Correctional Research will optimize the role of Correctional Research and also other law enforcers in achieving the value of justice in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Psikotropika Di Kepolisian Resor Magelang

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rendy Surya Aditama ◽  
Umar Ma�ruf
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Adult Child ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Theory Theory ◽  
Theory Of Law

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi tingginya kasus peredaran psikotropika yang dilakukan oleh anak. Berdasarkan UU SPPA, kasus anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum yang dapat diselesaikan dengan upaya diversi adalah kasus yang ancamannya dibawah tujuh tahun, tetapi temuan dilapangan, diketahui bahwa banyak kasus anak yang ancaman hukumannya di atas tujuh tahun diselesaikan melalui diversi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah merumuskan kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang.Pisau analisis dalam penelitian ini adalah teori hukum progresif, teori tujuan hukum, konsep diversi, konsep psikotropika, konsep kebijakan hukum pidana, pendekatan keadilan restoratif dan UU SPPA. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika saat ini telah menerapkan UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di Indonesia sudah dilakukan dengan baik, namun masih terlihat adanya pelanggaran terhadap UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak pada Pasal 64, yaitu di dalam persidangan maupun publikasi hasil persidangan dengan jelas menyebutkan nama anak dimuka umum, sehingga hal ini menyalahi peraturan dalam Pasal 64 huruf i. Kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang, dapat dilakukan dengan menerapkan perlindungan anak serta menerapkan sistem peradilan pidana anak, persidangan dilakukan setelah anak berusia dewasa, serta pelaksanaan hukuman pidana dilakukan setelah anak berusia 18 tahun. Saran terkait temuan penelitian ini adalah dapat menanggulangi tindak pidana psikotropika yang dilakukan oleh anak dengan menerapkan kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang.Kata kunci: kebijakan, formulasi, psikotropika, anak.ABSTRACTThis research is motivated by high psychotropic circulation cases conducted by children. Under the SPPA Act, the case of a law-facing child who can be resolved by a diversion effort is a case that threats under seven years, but findings in the field, it is known that many cases of children whose sentence threats over seven years are resolved through a diversion. The purpose of this study is to formulate policy formulation of criminal law enforcement Polres Magelang against children as perpetrators of psychotropic crime in the future.The analysis blade in this research is progressive law theory, theory of law objective, diversion concept, psychotropic concept, concept of criminal law policy, restorative justice approach and SPPA law. This research uses normative juridical method with data collection method of literature study.The results of this study indicate that policy formulation of criminal law enforcement Polres Magelang to child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime at this time have applied Law no. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of Children. Policy formulation of criminal law enforcement of Magelang Police against child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime in Indonesia has been done well, but still seen violation against Law no. 35 Year 2014 About Amendment to Law no. Law No. 23 Year 2002 on Child Protection in Article 64, namely in the hearing and publication of the proceedings clearly states the name of the child in public, so that this is contrary to the rules in Article 64 letter i. The policy of formulation of criminal law enforcement of Magelang Police against child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime in the future can be done by applying child protection as well as applying the child criminal justice system, the trial is done after the adult child, and the implementation of criminal punishment is done after the child is 18 years old. Suggestions related to the findings of this study is to cope with psychotropic crimes committed by children by applying the policy of criminal law enforcement formulation Magelang Police against children as perpetrators of psychotropic crimes in the future.Keywords: policy, formulation, psychotropic, child.

scholarly journals Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Budi Waskito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Functional Differentiation ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
Research Show ◽  
Function Difference

AbstractCriminal justice system as a tool of law enforcemen didn�t work optimally, in fact criminal justice system in Indonesia be acquainted whith principle of function difference impact on law enforcemennt performance so it will be difficult to achieve its function, as a crime prevention effort. This research purpose to set system concept and ideal approaches the organization of a unified criminal justice system so as to achieve an optimal performance of the criminal justice system (CJS) in criminal law enforcement, by approachng the system and re-structural, substantial and cultural reorientation of the criminal justice system.the main object of research is againt criminal law enforcement policy, the approach used is a normative juridical and sosiological approach complemented by a historical aproach/contextual and global/comparative, by prioritizing secondary data whit qualitative analysis. The result of the research show the sub system in the criminal justice system (such as investigation, prosecution, adjudicate and execution) funcionally and institutionally has not yet shown the existence of an integrated criminal justice system when viewed partially, the components of the support component seem to separate from one another, and tend to be centric institutions. Understanding of the integrated criminal justice system is inseparable from an understanding that includes substantial meaning, but also a philosophical aspect about the meaning justice and be nefit integrated. Therefore the legal culture is an integral part. ����Keyword: implementation of the criminal justice system, functional differentiation, integrated approach.Abstrak Sistem peradilan pidana sebagai sistem penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan hukum pidana, tidak berjalan secara optimal bahkan sistem peradilan pidana di indonesia dikenal asas �differensiasi fiungsional� berdampak pada kinerja penegakkan hukum sehingga akan sulit untuk mencapai fungsinya, sebagai upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan konsep sistem dan pendekatan yang ideal penyelenggaraan sistem peradilan pidana yang integral sehingga terwujud suatu kinerja Sistem peradilan pidana (SPP) yang optimal dalam penegakan hukum pidana, dengan melakukan pendekatan sistem dan reorientasi struktural, substansial dan kultural terhadap sistem peradilan pidana. Objek utama penelitian ialah terhadap kebijakan penegakan hukum pidana, pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dilengkapi dengan pendekatan historis/kontekstual dan global/komparatif, dengan mengutamakan data sekunder dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sub-sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana (sub-sistem penyidikan, penuntutan, mengadili dan pelakasana pidana) secara fungsional dan kelembagaan belum menujukkan adanya perihal sistem peradilan pidana terpadu (SPPT) apabila dilihat secara parsial, komponen-komponen pendukung terkesan terpisah antara satu dengan yang lainnya, serta cenderung bersifat �instansi sentris�. Pemahaman mengenai sistem perdilan pidana terpadu tidak terlepas dari pemahaman yang mencakup makna substansial, tapi juga menyentuh aspek filosofis mengenai makna keadilan dan kemanfaatan secara terintegrasi. Oleh karena itu budaya hukum merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan.Kata kunci: Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, differensiasi fungsional, Pendekatan terpadu

scholarly journals Analisis Hukum Tentang Tindak Pidana Seksual Yang Terjadi Di Kota Medan (Study PutusanNomor : 1840/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mdn)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200
Author(s):  
Mhd. Hendara Adha ◽  
Edi Warman ◽  
Triono Eddy
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

This article discusses how the law arrangements in the juvenile justice in the process of resolving the case, How restorative justice restrictions in law enforcement in Indonesia and How the application of Restorative justice law in the process of settlement of criminal case in Criminal Law in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical that describes reviewing and explaining and analyzing normative provisions associated with restorative justice applicable in Indonesia. From the above discussion that restorative justice in the settlement of criminal acts committed by children is very concerned in rebuilding relations after the occurrence of criminal acts, rather than exacerbate the rift between the perpetrators, victims and the community which is the character of the current modern criminal justice system. The restorative criminal justice process holds the view that realizing justice is not only a matter of government and criminality, but more than that it must provide justice in totality that can not ignore the interests and rights of victims and society. Implementation of the principle of restorative justice and the process of diversion as an effort to solve crimes committed by children in formal juridical has been set clearly and firmly in Law Number 11 Year 2012 about kids of justice.

scholarly journals Legal Review Enforcement Repressive Legal Efforts Against Narcotics Users Of Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Alfredo Risano ◽  
Ayu Dian Ningtias
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Original State ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law

 In terms of enforcement the law. Second, legal instruments in the framework of criminal law enforcement abuse of narcotics against minors using a legal basis Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. In the the provisions of the SPPA Law, in order to prosecute children who are involved with the law, then a diversion effort is carried out, namely a restorative effort or recovery state solve the problem together, in this research is focous about How are repressive legal measures against child narcotics users in under age?. As previously explained, in act Number 11 In 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is a restorative principle (Restorative justice), which is aimed at restoring the original state, meaning efforts to restore the attitudes and mentality of children who have committed acts the crime of narcotics abuse to be as before or as a cure for the criminal act he has committed. Of course, the provisions of the Narcotics Law are not sidelined even though his repressive legal remedies are based on the provisions of law SPPA.

scholarly journals Comparative Criminal Law Policy Positives With Foreign Countries In The Criminal Law Prosecuting Perpetrators Of Criminal Acts Of A Child In Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Tutut Suciati Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Sociological Approach ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

In this study the issues to be discussed are: the policy positive criminal law in the prosecution of perpetrators of criminal acts of a child, criminal law policy of foreign countries in the prosecution of perpetrators of criminal acts of children and the barriers prosecutor in carrying out the task of prosecuting perpetrators of criminal acts of child and how the efforts countermeasures. The research method that will be used is the juridical sociological approach. In order to obtain primary data and secondary data that is accurate to the writing of this study, the data collection by means of a literature study to find materials relating to the principles and rules of law relating to criminal procedure law and the criminal justice system of children. Based on the results of this research is still fragmented between the investigator and the prosecutor so that ultimately the criminal justice system is not optimal child be a solution to cope with the child as a criminal. The issue of children as criminals not only be approached only by using purely legal approach, but also must use the instrument of social and economic approaches. That in conducting the prosecution against children, public prosecutors are often encountered problems due to its law system, the apparatus structure and legal culture. therefore it is necessary for the reconstruction of the criminal justice system of Indonesia, so it can be used as a reference for events that are special laws such as the juvenile justice system.Keywords: Comparative, Policy, Criminal Law.

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA MELALUI UPAYA DIVERSI BAGI PELAKU DEWASA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bendry Almy
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Research Goal ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation

ABSTRAKPrinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia hanya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi, namun diversi tersebut hanya ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana anak bukan untuk pelaku dewasa, peraturan perundang-perundangan pidana Indonesia belum mengatur prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa. Dalam praktik penegakan hukum, penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa sebagian telah dilaksanakan melalui diskresi, namun secara teoritis dan pratik pelaksanaan diskresi masih bermasalah karena belum memenuhi tiga nilai dasar hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan, dan diskresi juga bisa menimbulkan permasalahan ketidakadilan, karena adanya perbedaan perlakuan dalam proses penegakan hukum, sehingga asas “equality before the law” tidak dilaksanakan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia dan bagaimana penerapan diversi bagi pelaku dewasa dalam rangka mewujudkan keadilan restoratif. Jenis penelitian yaitu penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan, untuk mencari dan menemukan data yang dibutuhkan untuk menjawab permasalahan. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana Indonesia belum mengatur tentang prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa, prinsip keadilan restoratif diterapkan baru sebatas untuk pelaku anak yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi. Secara teoritis, historis, normatif dan praktik prosedural, diversi juga dapat diterapkan untuk menyelesaikan perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh orang dewasa, namun perlu adanya perubahan dan penyesuaian terutama dalam hal tujuan pelaksanaan, kwalifikasi jenis tindak pidana dan mekanisme atau prosedur pelaksanaannya.Kata kunci: kebijakan hukum pidana; anak; dewasa; diversi; keadilan restoratif.AbstractThe principle of restorative justice in criminal law regulations in force in Indonesia is only regulated in the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children (SPPA) which is applied in the form of diversion, however the diversion is only intended for child offenders not for adult offenders, Indonesian criminal laws and regulations do not regulate the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders. In law enforcement practices, the application of the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders has been partially implemented through discretion, but theoretically and practically the implementation of discretion is still problematic because it does not meet the three basic legal values, namely justice, certainty and benefit, and discretion can also cause problems of injustice, due to differences in treatment in the law enforcement process, so the principle of "equality before the law" is not implemented. The research goal is to find out how the implementation of the principles of restorative justice in criminal legislation in Indonesia, and how the application of diversion for adult offenders in order to realize restorative justice. This type of research is normative research or library research, to search and find the data needed to answer the problem. The results of the study note that Indonesian criminal law regulations do not regulate the principles of restorative justice for adult offenders, the principle of restorative justice is applied only to the child offenders which is applied in the form of diversion. Theoretically, historically, normatively and procedural practice, diversion can also be applied to resolve cases by adult offenders, but there needs to be changes and adjustments especially in terms of implementation objectives, qualification of the type of crime and the mechanism or procedure for its implementation.Keywords: criminal law policy; children; adults; diversion; restorative justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document