Employee’s work on the grounds of Polish Copyright Law

Motivation: Employees’ works are crucial in practice. The validity and need for discussions on the rights of the employer to the employee’s work is justified by the increasing concern for the observance of copyright, and also for employee–employer relations. By entering into an employment relationship, both parties must be aware of their rights and obligations. Aim: This article presents the issue of copyright status of an employee’s work regulated in the Article 12 and 13 of the Act on copyright and related rights. The considerations focus on the legal relationship between the employer and the employee-author, and the issue of acquiring author’s economic rights to the work created by the employee within the employment relationship. The article is based on the analysis of legal regulations and judicial decisions. Results: Regulating rights to the work created by the employee is dependent on the will of the parties. It is only the absence of contractual terms in this respect that results in a reference to the statutory provisions, which define the rules of transferring copyright for the employee’s work to the employer. Article 12 of the Act on copyright and related rights specifies grounds for secondary acquisition of copyright by the employer. One should remember that this regulation concerns solely author’s economic rights because author’s moral rights, which due to their nature are non-transferable, remain with the author or employee.

Download Full-text

Parody and Moral Rights

The Parody Exception in Copyright Law ◽

10.1093/oso/9780198806936.003.0006 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 167-195 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sabine Jacques

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The Public ◽

The Relationship ◽

Personal Interests ◽

Scope Of Protection

This chapter examines the relationship between parody and an author’s moral rights. It first traces the evolution of the concept of moral rights as a means of providing protection not only of the authors’ personal interests but also the public interest before discussing the reasons why moral rights might conflict with parodies. It considers two competing theories underlying the protection of authorial interests—the ‘monist’ theory and the ‘dualist’ theory—and their implications for the parody exception. It also explains how jurisdictions differ in the nature and scope of protection afforded to moral rights, noting that the parody exception in ‘copyright’ law does not extend to moral rights. The chapter goes on to explore the author’s paternity and integrity rights as well as their right against false attribution. It shows that, in the case of parodies, an overlap exists between the regimes applied to moral and economic rights.

Download Full-text

BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK TERKAIT (NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS)

Borneo Law Review ◽

10.35334/bolrev.v3i1.1011 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 20-35

Author(s):

Zulvia Makka

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Legal Issue ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The Public ◽

The Law ◽

Neighbouring Rights ◽

Scope Of Protection

ABSTRAKHak terkait adalah hak yang berkaitan dengan hak cipta yang merupakan hak ekslusif bagi pelaku pertunjukan, producer fonogram, atau lembaga penyiaran. Berdasarkan pengertian hak terkait tersebut maka dapat dipahami bahwa yang merupakan pemilik hak terkait adalah pelaku pertunjukan, produser fonogram (lebih dikenal sebagai produser rekaman), dan lembaga penyiaran. Perlu adanya perlindungan untuk pelaku karena pelaku pertunjukan memiliki hak moral dan hak ekonomi yang terdapat pada pasal 23 UUHC. Yang memuat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilang atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun. Namun pada prakteknya seringkali hak terkait ini dikesampingkan, karena lingkup perlindungan tidak hanya mencakup hak ekonomi dan hak moral. Permasalahan diatas menimbulkan isi hukum bentuk perlindungan terhadap hak terkait menurut undang-undang Hak Cipta dan perolehan Hak Terkait dalam Hak Cipta Isu hukum ini diteliti dengan menggunakan metode dengan tipe penelitian Normatif.Bentuk pelindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Terkait menurut Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terdiri dari 2 (dua) yaitu, perlindungn hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perolehan hak terkait dalam UUHC yaitu hak moral dan hak ekonomis. Hak moral pelaku pertunjukan merupakan hak yang melekat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilangkan atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun walaupun hak terkait telah dialihkan. Hak Ekonomi Pelaku Pertunjukan adalah suatu hak yang diberikan oleh Undang-undang secara eksklusif kepada Pencipta untuk untuk memanfaatkan keuntungan suatu ciptaan yang biasanya berupa publikasi suatu salinan ciptaan atau fonogram supaya dapat tersedia untuk publik dalam jumlah tertentu. Kata Kunci : Perlindungan, Hak Terkait, Hak Moral, Hak Ekonomi AbstractRelated rights are rights relating to copyright which are exclusive rights for performers, producer phonograms, or broadcasters. Based on the understanding of related rights, it can be understood that those who are related rights holders are performers, phonogram producers (better known as record producers), and broadcasting institutions. There needs to be protection for the perpetrators because the performers have the moral rights and economic rights contained in article 23 of UUHC. Which includes the performers who cannot be lost or cannot be removed for any reason. But in practice often these related rights are ruled out, because the scope of protection does not only cover economic rights and moral rights. The above issues give rise to the contents of the law in the form of protection of related rights according to the Copyright law and the acquisition of Related Rights in Copyright This legal issue is examined using methods with normative research types.The form of legal protection against Related Rights according to the Copyright Act consists of 2 (two), namely, preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. The acquisition of related rights in the UUHC is moral rights and economic rights. The moral rights of performers are the rights inherent in the performers who cannot be removed or cannot be removed for any reason even though the related rights have been transferred. The Economic Rights of Performers is a right granted by the Law exclusively to the Creator to utilize the benefits of a work which is usually in the form of the publication of a copy of a work or phonogram so that it can be available to the public in a certain amount. Keywords: Protection, Related Rights, Moral Rights, Economic Rights

Download Full-text

PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA PERMAINAN VIDEO

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i08.p01 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (8) ◽

pp. 1129

Author(s):

Nusan Indah Permata Sari ◽

Anak Agung Gede Agung Dharma Kusuma

Keyword(s):

Video Games ◽

Scientific Journal ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Know How ◽

Commercial Activities ◽

Tujuan penulisan jurnal ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan permainan video dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pelanggaran permainan video. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekaburan norma pada Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yaitu pada ketentuan pasal 40 ayat (1) huruf r “permainan video”. Kekaburan norma ini terlihat jelas karena tidak adanya penjelasan lebih lanjut terkait dengan pengertian permainan video serta pengklasifikasiannya. Selain itu terlihat jelas pula bahwa terdapat kekosongan norma terkait dengan sanksi bagi pelanggar hak moral pencipta yang tidak dilakukan tidak untuk kegiatan komersiil. Selanjutnya kesimpulan kedua bahwa permainan video merupakan salah satu objek dari suatu ciptaan yang dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yang perlindungannya berlaku selama 50 tahun sejak permainan video tersebut dipublikasikan. Berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 95 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta atau ahli waris dari pencipta permainan video dapat mengajukan tuntutan ganti rugi ke Pengadilan Niaga kepada pelaku pelanggaran hak ekonomi pencipta permainan video. The purpose of this scientific journal is to know the rules of the video games in the Copyright law and to know how the copyright legal protection against video games violations. In this paper, the research method used is normative legal research which uses a statutory approach. The result of this journal are indicate there is a blurry norm in Article 40 paragraph letter r of Copyright law. The ambiguity of norm is cleary seen because there is no further explanation related to the understanding of video games and their classification and it is also cleary that there are void norm related to sanction for violators of the creator’s moral rights wich are not carried out not for commercial activities. Then, the second conclusions is that video games are one of the object of a creation that get protection from Copyright laws, the protection os valid for 50 years since the video games was published. Based on the Article 95 of Copyright law, the creator or copyright holder or the heirs of creator of video games can submit compensations claims to the Commersial Court to the perpretators of violations of the economic rights of the video games creator’s.

Download Full-text

LEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCYLEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCY

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.20162 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 354

Author(s):

Riska Andi Fitriono ◽

Sarwono .

Keyword(s):

Intellectual Property ◽

Property Rights ◽

Intellectual Property Rights ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Art Conservation ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The Law ◽

The Right

This article aimed to analyze legal protection of Lurik Art Conservation Through Intellectual Property Rights in Klaten Regency. Klaten is the area that is most concerned with the survival of lurik weaving. There is someone mentioned that the Klaten Regency was the capital of lurik weaving. Because the weaving of Looms are not machines or Alat Tenun Bukan Mesin (hereinafter abbreviated to ATBM) is a mainstay of this city. There are countless villages that become centers of lurik craftsmen. This research is empirical or non-doctrinal research, which is a study that sees the law not only from the perspective of legislation, but also sees the law in its implementation. The results of the study show that the first legal protection in preserving the current lurik art in Klaten, namely the Klaten Regency Government, then stipulates the Regent's Regulation Number 53 of 2010 Article 23 Paragraph (9) on the Daily Batik and Traditional Weaving Lurik Service or ATBM Striated and the Klaten Regent's Decree Number : 065/1014/06 December 30, 2010 on Wearing Traditional Weaving, Motives, Colors and Free Models with Attributes. Furthermore, based on the Decree of the Regent of Klaten Number 050/84 of 2016 on Klaten Regency's Superior Products, batik striated is one of the superior products of Klaten Regency. With the issuance of these rules as an effort to protect and preserve lurik art in Klaten district and referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, it has regulated the forms of protection of lurik art in Klaten through Article 40 paragraph (1). The Second Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Against Lurik Art, namely Protection of lurik artworks, besides being accommodated in Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright (Copyright Law) and Trademark Law and other intellectual property right laws. Elucidation of Article 40 paragraph (1) letter j of the Copyright Law. The work is protected because it has artistic value, both in relation to the picture, style, and color composition. The Copyright Act also emphasizes that it is important to protect Copyright because every creator, in this case, the creator of the lurik motif has the right to moral rights and economic rights.

Download Full-text

Digital Curation, Copyright, and Academic Research

International Journal of Digital Curation ◽

10.2218/ijdc.v1i1.3 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 1 ◽

pp. 17-32 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Andrew Charlesworth

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Academic Research ◽

Digital Technologies ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Creative Commons ◽

Digital Curation ◽

The Impact

A defining characteristic of contemporary copyright law is the willingness of governments to accept the argument that the impact of digital technologies requires copyright owners to be given ever greater control over the use of their works, regardless of the detriment to the copyright regime's 'public interest' elements. Yet a one-size-fits-all 'all rights reserved' copyright regime clearly fails to meet the requirements of many rightsholders. One response has been the Creative Commons movement which seeks, through licences based on existing copyright laws, to provide a simple mechanism for rightsholders to disseminate their works under less restrictive conditions. The Creative Commons' initial success has led to suggestions that its principles could be equally applied to scientific research outputs, such as publications, licensing of research materials, and datasets. This article argues that the Science Commons approach, if based on the Creative Commons model, and premised at its root on utilitarian copyright law, will both fail to address contemporary policy drivers in research, or to provide researchers with the type of rights that they actually want. It suggests that constructing an appropriate set of rights for the Science Commons, particularly for datasets, will require a willingness to step outside the utilitarian model and look to the Continental copyright tradition, which sets less store in economic rights and gives greater weight to moral rights.

Download Full-text

The Sampling and Remix Dilemma: What is the Role of Moral Rights in the Encouragement and Regulation of Derivative Creativity?

Deakin Law Review ◽

10.21153/dlr2012vol17no2art83 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 335 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Elizabeth Adeney

Keyword(s):

Community Support ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Law Reform ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The borrowing and rearrangement of musical content, especially in the digital context, raises difficult questions for copyright law. There is significant community support for a loosening of the restrictions on the derivative (and particularly creative) use of copyright material. Law reform is called for. This paper discusses the possible introduction of a new exception to copyright infringement but notes that in the drafting of any such exception not only the economic rights but also the moral rights of the originating author need to be taken into account.

Download Full-text

Hak Cipta Karya Seni Lukis Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.1.2963.32-36 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 32-36

Author(s):

Ni Kadek Emy Kencana Wati ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

I Ketut Sukadana

Keyword(s):

Analytical Form ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Law System ◽

Materials Used ◽

The Right

The use of copyright for painting artworks in the Intellectual Property Law system in Indonesia provides many benefits for painters as copyright owners or copyright holders. A creator or copyright holder has Economic Rights on his work which includes the right to duplicate, display, and lease his work to third parties. Copyright Law No. 28/2014 states that copyright can be used as an object of Fiduciary security. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the copyright of painting works that can be used as fiduciary guarantees to get credit in banking and to analyze the execution of copyright guarantees of painting works if the debtor defaults The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and the sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with literature collection techniques which are analyzed in descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the characteristics of copyright in painting are providing protection for works of art and providing economic rights for the creators or copyright holders and moral rights for the creators. The execution of copyright guarantees can be done by executorial method in accordance with article 29 of the Fiduciary Law.

Download Full-text

The Parody Exception in Copyright Law

10.1093/oso/9780198806936.001.0001 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sabine Jacques

Keyword(s):

Freedom Of Expression ◽

The United States ◽

Fundamental Rights ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Artistic Expression ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The United Kingdom ◽

Ultimate Objective ◽

The Right

Parodies have been created throughout times and cultures. A glimpse at the judicial latitude generally afforded to parodies, satires, caricatures, and pastiches demonstrates the social and cultural value of this particular form of artistic expression. With the advent of technologies and the evolution of copyright legislation, creative endeavours in the form of parody were rejuvenated but became unlawful. While copyright law grants exclusive rights to right-holders, these rights are not absolute. Legislation includes specific exceptions, which preclude right-holders from exercising their prerogatives in particular cases which foster creativity and cultural diversity within that society. The parody exception pertains to this ultimate objective by permitting users to reproduce copyright-protected materials for the purpose of parody. To understand the meaning and scope of the parody exception, this book examines and compares five jurisdictions which differ in their protection of parodies: France, Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It is concerned with finding an appropriate balance between the protection awarded to right-holders and the public interest. This is achieved by analysing the parody exception to the economic rights of right-holders, the preservation of moral rights, and the interaction of the parody exception with contract law. As parodies constitute an artistic expression protected under the right to freedom of expression, this book also considers the influence of freedom of expression on the interpretation of this specific copyright exception. Furthermore, this book aims at providing guidance on how to resolve disputes where fundamental rights are in conflict.

Download Full-text

Copyright

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature ◽

10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1022 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Kim Treiger-Bar-Am

Keyword(s):

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

The Public

Copyright gives an author control over the presentation of her work. Economic rights afford control over copies, and the noneconomic rights known as moral rights afford control over changes. An author’s moral rights remain with her even after she sells her economic rights in copyright. The excessive control that copyright offers to copyright owners may be limited by cementing these authorial rights, for all authors. Some elements of copyright law allow the meaning of a work as perceived by its audience to develop and evolve. The strengthening of that support by extending rights to the public will further restrict copyright’s excesses.

Download Full-text

HAK EKONOMI DAN HAK MORAL KARYA CIPTA POTRET DI SOSIAL MEDIA

VYAVAHARA DUTA ◽

10.25078/vd.v14i1.1099 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 12

Author(s):

Desyanti Suka Asih K.Tus

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Article 5 ◽

Exclusive Right

Copyright is an exclusive right which contains economic rights and moral rights. Portrait is part of a protected creation. In a portrait that is distributed offline or online through social media, namely economic rights and moral rights that must be presented and adhered to by users. Copyright infragement that still occur for portraits on social media are related to violations of economic and moral rights. The use of portraits on social media without permission for commercial purposes is a form of violation of economic rights. While the form of violations of moral rights over portraits is not to include the creator or source of portraits used in social media. The regulation and protection of economic and moral rights of portraits on social media are regulated in the Copyright Law. Economic rights are stipulated in Article 12 to Article 15. Moral rights are stipulated in Article 5 to Article 7.

Download Full-text