scholarly journals Analysis of Antineoplastics, Immunomodulators, Antibiotics and Analgesics Adverse Drug Reactions Reports Submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Database in Jordan

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-546
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alsbou ◽  
Adel Batarseh ◽  
Nidda Bawaresh ◽  
Jaber Jaber ◽  
Gadeer Qawasmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Blood System ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Body System ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Rational Drug ◽  
Acral Erythema ◽  
Pharmacovigilance Database

ABSTRACT: A national pharmacovigilance database was created recently at the Rational Drug Use and Pharmacovigilance Department at Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA). This study was based on the analysis of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reports submitted to the national pharmacovigilance (PV) database in Jordan from 2010 to 2014.The aims of this study were to identify the most frequently body system classes and the most common ADRs for the four major classes of dugs implicated in the PV database and include: antineoplastics, immunomodulators, antibiotics and analgesics. The most affected systems by ADRs in our study were the skin and the gastrointestinal (GI) systems. The skin ADRs associated with the use of antineoplastics were skin rash, hand and foot syndrome and acral erythema, and the most frequent GI ADRs were vomiting and diarrhea. The most affected system by the use of the immunomodulators was the blood system and the most common ADRs were anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The most commonly ADRs following analgesics use were GI bleeding and duodenal ulcer and the skin reactions were rash, itching and flushing. Analysis of the national PV database provides close monitoring and more information about the safety of medicine in Jordan. All Health care provider should be aware of the importance of reporting of adverse reactions and should be encouraged to report suspected ADRs and be trained in detecting, diagnosing and treating patients with adverse effects of drugs.

scholarly journals The Wonderful DMARD with Multiple Toxicities

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. RV5-RV10
Author(s):  
Yashika Kaushal ◽  
Ratibha Kausal ◽  
Isha Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Therapy Discontinuation ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Reduce Activity ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Rheumatic Drug

Methotrexate is a type of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). It is used to reduce activity of the immune system for people who have certain conditions. Methotrexate is a chemotherapy agent and immune system suppressant. Its use may be limited by concerns regarding its adverse reactions. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions in some cases leads to the therapy discontinuation. Although adverse drug reactions (ADR) of methotrexate generally do not pose a serious threat to the health of patients and a reduction in the dose of methotrexate leads to their elimination, in some cases severe toxicities of the drug occur unpredictably. These facts explain the need for close monitoring of the patient’s condition and the identification of potential risk factors for drug toxicity on the part of different organs and functional systems. The purpose of this review is to detail about safety and tolerability of methotrexate.

scholarly journals Incidence of adverse drug reactions in patients taking anti-tuberculosis treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1732
Author(s):  
Tushar R. Gosai ◽  
Jayesh D. Balat ◽  
Hiren R. Trivedi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Loss Of Balance

Background: High incidence of infection has caused a large number of morbidity and mortality which is partly due to serious adverse reactions induced by Anti-Tuberculosis (Anti-TB) drugs. In present prospective study an attempt is made to estimate the incidence and risk factor for ADRs among patients treated for tuberculosis.Methods: All the new patients starting their treatment with selected six DOT center were enrolled in study. All patient's complete clinical history was recorded. They were followed regularly for occurrence of ADR till end of their treatment.Results: Total of 108 patients (67 male and 41 female) had taken and completed their treatment during the study period (March 2007 - April 2008) and were observed for occurrence of ADR during their treatment period. Out of total108, 28 patients (25.9%) experienced one of the ADR, out of 28 patients, 12 (42.85%) patients developed GIT intolerance, and hepatitis was seen in 8 (28.57%) patients, while 4 (14.48%) patients developed skin reactions. Only 3 (7.14%) patient developed dizziness and loss of balance, which was relieved by reduction of dose of streptomycin.Conclusions: With close monitoring and on time action, RNTCP DOTs regimens can be safely and successfully administrated.

scholarly journals Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions / Dematološka neželjena dejstva lekova

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-76
Author(s):  
Lidija Kandolf-Sekulović ◽  
Tatjana Radević
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Drug Intake ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Adverse drug reactions may be defined as undesirable clinical manifestations resulting from administration of a particular drug; this includes reactions due to overdose, predictable side effects, and unanticipated adverse manifestations. Adverse drug effects on the skin are among the most frequent reactions and, according to a study, account for approximately 14% of all adverse drug reactions. However, the incidence of cutaneous adverse effects in general population is unknown. Systemic drug administration results in various cutaneous adverse reactions, and medications used in the treatment of skin diseases themselves have their own adverse effects. Adverse drug reactions include a wide range of effects, from harmless exanthema of short duration, urticaria to systemic cutaneous reactions such as drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Exanthematous eruptions and urticaria are the two most common forms of cutaneous drug reactions. Less common include fixed eruptions, lichenoid, pustular, bullous and vasculitis reactions. The most severe cutaneous and mucosal adverse drug reactions are epidermal necrolysis, which is usually drug-induced, DRESS syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Therefore, the diagnostic of adverse drug reactions requires a detailed history of drug intake and development of skin disorders, excellent knowledge of clinical presentations for a wide range of drug-induced skin reactions as well as of the very medications being taken by patients. In addition to details on drug intake, it is necessary to learn about taking herbal and alternative preparations, which may also cause adverse reactions. A drug started within 6 weeks of the development of disorders is considered the most common cause of adverse reaction, as well as drugs taken periodically but regularly. Once a reaction has occurred, it is important to prevent future similar reactions with the same drug or a cross-reacting medication. Early withdrawal of all potentially responsible drugs is essential, particularly in case of severe drug reactions.

Adverse Drug Reactions to Radiographic Contrast Media in a Teaching Hospital in North India: An Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
Deepti Chopra ◽  
Abhinav Jain ◽  
Richa Garg ◽  
Shreya Dhingra
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
North India ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Iodinated Contrast ◽  
Radiographic Contrast ◽  
Radiographic Contrast Media

Background: Radiocontrast media are used extensively nowadays to visualize internal organs. Currently, non-ionic iodinated contrast media are used which are generally considered to be safe but some adverse reactions have been reported. Thus, the present study was carried out to analyze the nature and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to radiographic contrast media in a teaching hospital. Methods:An observational study carried out for a period of six months in a teaching hospital. Contrast media induced adverse reactions were analyzed in terms of affected organs, rate, causality assessment, severity and preventability. The treatment and outcomes of adverse events were also recorded. Naranjo Probability Scale was used to evaluate the relationship between the contrast agent used and the suspected ADR. The severity of the suspected ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale and preventability was assessed using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion. Results:A total of 15 suspected ADRs occurred in 11 patients with an incidence of 1.4%. It included 5 (45.4%) males and 6 (54.5%) females (p < 05). The highest percentage (72.7 %) of ADRs was seen in adult patients, the mean age being 40.8 years. Vomiting (33.3%) was the most common ADR noted followed by severe nausea and rashes. 64.7 % of ADRs were categorized as probable and 35.3 % were possible. Adverse reactions required treatment in 46.6% patients. There was no fatality reported. Conclusion:The reactions observed were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 30 minutes of the administration of the contrast.

scholarly journals INVESTIGATION OF MEDICALLY INDUCED SKIN REACTIONS BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF REPORTS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA (FROM 2009 TO 2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Matveev ◽  
А. E. Krasheninnikov ◽  
E. A. Egorova ◽  
Е. I. Konyaeva
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
World Health ◽  
Report Cards ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
The Republic

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are among the most important problems that arise when using drugs. The occurrence of such reactions in the population is at least 7% and tends to a constant increase. The most frequent manifestations of drug hypersensitivity reactions are medically induced skin lesions.The aimof this research was to study and analyze the cases of development of skin drug reactions on the basis of the reports on the adverse reactions (ADRs) of the drugs, registered in the Republic of Crimea in the period from 2009 to 2016.Materials and methods.The objects of the research were report cards about the adverse reactions, registered in the regional base (registry) of spontaneous messages called ARCADe (Adverse Reactions in Crimea, Autonomic Database) for the period from 2009 to 2016. During the analysis of the report cards, 2,698 cases of the development of skin drug reactions arising in response to the use of drugs in patients were selected. The study of the frequency of occurrence of skin drug reactions in the application of various groups of drugs was carried out taking into account the codes of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Сlassification System of drugs of the World Health Organization (WHO).Results.Of the study showed that the development of skin drug reactions was most often associated with the use of antimicrobial agents for internal use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), drugs for the treatment of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and agents that affect the nervous system. Among the clinical manifestations of skin drug reactions, generalized and localized rashes prevailed, and itching and hyperemia of the skin were much less common in patients. The analysis of age categories showed that the most frequently medically induced reactions occurred in children from birth to 3 years, as well as in the age group of patients from 46 to 60 years. The risk factors identified in the course of the analysis, were female gender, early childhood and old age, as well as the presence of aggravated drug allergy history.Conclusion.Drug hypersensitivity reactions create certain difficulties in clinical practice related to the diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis, and may also cause danger to health or life of patients. In this connection, the study of such adverse reactions is the most important task of practical health care and requires direct participation of doctors of all specialties.

scholarly journals Major Aspects of Detection and Monitoring of Adverse Reactions Associated with Cephalosporin Antibiotic Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Demchenkova ◽  
G. I. Gorodetskaya ◽  
I. A. Mazerkina ◽  
M. V. Zhuravleva ◽  
A. S. Kazakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Patient Information Leaflets ◽  
Information Leaflets ◽  
Spontaneous Reports ◽  
Cephalosporin Antibiotics

Widespread use of cephalosporin antibiotics in clinical practice calls for greater attention to the risk of adverse drug reactions. Information on serious or unexpected adverse events reported during post-marketing experience is submitted to national and international pharmacovigilance databases. Analysis of these reports helps to identify new adverse drug reactions.The aim of the study was to analyse the safety profile of cephalosporin antibiotics based on spontaneous reports in the international VigiBase database.Materials and methods: the analysis of the adverse reaction profile of cephalosporin antibiotics was based on MedDRA system organ classes and included spontaneous reports submitted to VigiBase from the moment of its creation until August 2020.Results: the authors identified the most clinically significant adverse reactions for different cephalosporin generations. They compared and analysed information on adverse events in VigiBase and in patient information leaflets of medicinal products authorised in the Russian Federation. It was demonstrated that some serious events described in VigiBase spontaneous reports for V-generation cephalosporins are not included in the “Side effects” section of the patient information leaflets. According to VigiBase, the use of ceftaroline was associated with the development of generalised exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, tubulointerstitial nephritis, while the use of ceftolozane was associated with acute kidney injury, renal insufficiency, sepsis, pneumonia, and respiratory insufficiency.Conclusion: reporting of unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions to cephalosporin antibiotics is an important task of healthcare practitioners. Availability of information on class-specific and generation-specific serious adverse reactions will help predict and prevent their development.

Cutaneous reactions to drugs

2020 ◽  
pp. 5752-5760
Author(s):  
Sarah Walsh ◽  
Daniel Creamer ◽  
Haur Yueh Lee
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Eruptions ◽  
Fixed Drug ◽  
Iatrogenic Illness ◽  
Systemic Symptoms

Adverse reactions to medications are common and important cause of iatrogenic illness. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions include toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, which together constitute 2% of all adverse drug reactions and may be life-threatening. Less severe drug-induced skin reactions such as exanthems, urticaria, lichenoid drug rashes, and fixed drug eruptions are more common, sometimes termed benign cutaneous adverse reactions, and generally resolve without sequelae. Drugs may also cause adverse events due to alteration of the normal function of the skin or its appendages. This may take the form of photosensitivity, abnormal pigmentation, or disrupted growth of hair or nails.

scholarly journals Adverse Drug Reactions during Real-Life Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Italy: An Update Based on Data from the Italian National Pharmacovigilance Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Lavalle ◽  
Luca Di Lullo ◽  
Antonio Bellasi ◽  
Claudio Ronco ◽  
Stefano Radicchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Market Share ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Pharmacovigilance Database

Background: The availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in clinical practice has transformed the health care provided to patients for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. Safety and efficacy data guide clinicians in the choice of the drug used. To date, no evidence is available from head-to-head trials comparing different DOAC with regard to safety and efficacy; information is mainly derived from several meta-analyses and real-life studies. Conclusions from these studies are inconsistent and unsatisfactory. The evaluation of self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADR) available from databases of drug-regulatory agencies such as the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) pharmacovigilance database represents a novel aid to guide decision-making. Objective: To analyze potential suspected ADR of DOAC using a previously described risk index (RI) in daily clinical practice in Italy. Methods: The National Pharmacovigilance Network database (from the AIFA website) was searched in order to retrieve information on all ADR related to oral anticoagulants occurring from 2013 to 2018. The ADR RI for each drug was calculated, where an RI = 1 indicates a balance between the percentage of ADR share and the percentage of market share for each DOAC; and an RI <1 indicates a rate of ADR lower than the rate of market share (safer DOAC). The following DOAC molecules were considered: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Results: The results showed that rivaroxaban is the DOAC with the lowest RI among the 4 molecules available today in Italy. Conclusions: Based on the RI, we identified rivaroxaban as the DOAC having the best safety profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document