scholarly journals Managing unresolved issues of addiction during cancer treatment: A qualitative study about cancer care providers’ representations

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242693
Author(s):  
Elise Verot ◽  
Véronique Regnier Denois ◽  
Corinne Macron ◽  
Franck Chauvin
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Motivational Interviewing ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Addictive Disorders ◽  
Interviewing Techniques

Objective Five French oncology institutions had participated in a funded study aiming at implementing an Evidence-Based Practice tool (PAM-13), which allowed nurses to measure the level of activation of the patient to support his or her own empowerment in the cancer care pathway. The purpose of this ancillary study is to (i) describe the caregivers’ perceptions of addictions and their management concurrently with cancer treatment, (ii) explore the role that Motivational Interviewing techniques can play. Methods 15 individual semi-structured interviews of caregivers were performed, using the Theoretical Domains Framework for the interview guide. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively, in a thematic analysis. The COREQ guided the reporting of this qualitative study. Results Views on addictions influence the way caregivers manage patients suffering from unresolved issues of addiction. Care is mainly focused on the pathology (cancer-centered) and strictly curative. When practiced, Motivational Interviewing is patient-centered, fostering the patient’s empowerment on the cancer care pathway. Conclusions The dissemination of Motivational Interviewing techniques in current practices in oncology, both in terms of doctors and nursing teams, would enable improvement to the management of addictions on the cancer care pathway, by deploying a patient-centered approach. This new paradigm of care would support the empowerment of patients enrolled in the cancer care pathway and promote better communication between caregivers and patients. Hence, a paradigm shift is essential. Motivational Interviewing techniques could provide a caring approach that promotes communication between the patient and the caregiver and also supports the former’s empowerment. This research suggests the need to adapt the cancer care pathway in order to integrate the necessary care for patients who concomitantly suffer from unresolved addictive disorders. Trial registration NCT03706937

scholarly journals French Health professionals’ attitudes about patient empowerment in the cancer care pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Elise Verot ◽  
Véronique Régnier-Denois ◽  
Dominique Feld ◽  
Romain Rivoirard ◽  
Franck Chauvin
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
New Form

Objective: France is experiencing a shift in health policy. The purpose of this article is to describe how cancer care health professionals define patient empowerment, describe modalities of care of the cancer patient treated by intravenous means and identify avenues for reflection on the specific challenges facing patient-centered care, from the perspective of changes in practices in the cancer care pathway.Methods: 19 individual, semi-structured interviews with health professionals working in cancer care facilities were analyzed in a qualitative study, using the Theoretical Domain Framework linked to the COM-B model.Results: The organization of care is governed by three factors. First of all, the cancer care system focuses on the strictly curative aspect of this disease. All devices lead to management centered on the pathology, and not on the patient as a whole. Secondly, the fact that the patient suffers from cancer modifies the attitudes and representations of caregivers towards the patient. Cancer introduces a relational bias in each of the stakeholders. Thirdly, the current organization of nursing care maintains paternalistic and prescriptive care in the cancer care pathway. Only new nursing jobs (coordinating nurses or pivot nurses) suggest the possibility of switching to patient-centered care. The analysis from TDF linked to the COM-B model shows that the strategy of implementing a new tool to measure the level of patient engagement, in routine nursing care, must focus on the reflective opportunity and motivation of the stakeholders.Conclusions: Caregivers should be acculturated to patient empowerment. TDF linked to the COM-B model can make it possible to think about how to prepare and adapt this change in practice at several sites of cancer treatment. Training adapted to the context to familiarize current caregivers with this new form of care is currently being implemented. To succeed, acculturating current health care providers to this new form of care, while offering them a tool to objectively assess the level of patient empowerment would undoubtedly foster their involvement in supporting patient empowerment, while allowing them to evaluate the time required to integrate this type of care.

Patient Flow or the Patient’s Journey? Exploring Health Care Providers’ Experiences and Understandings of Implementing a Care Pathway to Improve the Quality of Transitional Care for Older People

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232110038
Author(s):  
Cecilie Fromholt Olsen ◽  
Astrid Bergland ◽  
Jonas Debesay ◽  
Asta Bye ◽  
Anne Gudrun Langaas
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Older People ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Care For Older People

Internationally, the implementation of care pathways is a common strategy for making transitional care for older people more effective and patient-centered. Previous research highlights inherent tensions in care pathways, particularly in relation to their patient-centered aspects, which may cause dilemmas for health care providers. Health care providers’ understandings and experiences of this, however, remain unclear. Our aim was to explore health care providers’ experiences and understandings of implementing a care pathway to improve transitional care for older people. We conducted semistructured interviews with 20 health care providers and three key persons, along with participant observations of 22 meetings, in a Norwegian quality improvement collaborative. Through a thematic analysis, we identified an understanding of the care pathway as both patient flow and the patient’s journey and a dilemma between the two, and we discuss how the negotiation of conflicting institutional logics is a central part of care pathway implementation.

scholarly journals Developing a Shared Patient-Centered, Web-Based Medication Platform for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Their Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study on User Requirements (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerda Bernhard ◽  
Cornelia Mahler ◽  
Hanna Marita Seidling ◽  
Marion Stützle ◽  
Dominik Ose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Access Methods

BACKGROUND Information technology tools such as shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platforms hold promise to support safe medication use by strengthening patient participation, enhancing patients’ knowledge, helping patients to improve self-management of their medications, and improving communication on medications among patients and health care professionals (HCPs). However, the uptake of such platforms remains a challenge also due to inadequate user involvement in the development process. Employing a user-centered design (UCD) approach is therefore critical to ensure that user’ adoption is optimal. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify what patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their HCPs regard necessary requirements in terms of functionalities and usability of a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform for patients with T2DM. METHODS This qualitative study included focus groups with purposeful samples of patients with T2DM (n=25), general practitioners (n=13), and health care assistants (n=10) recruited from regional health care settings in southwestern Germany. In total, 8 semistructured focus groups were conducted. Sessions were audio- and video-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to a computer-aided qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Appropriate security and access methods, supported data entry, printing, and sending information electronically, and tracking medication history were perceived as the essential functionalities. Although patients wanted automatic interaction checks and safety alerts, HCPs on the contrary were concerned that unspecific alerts confuse patients and lead to nonadherence. Furthermore, HCPs were opposed to patients’ ability to withhold or restrict access to information in the platform. To optimize usability, there was consensus among participants to display information in a structured, chronological format, to provide information in lay language, to use visual aids and customize information content, and align the platform to users’ workflow. CONCLUSIONS By employing a UCD, this study provides insight into the desired functionalities and usability of patients and HCPs regarding a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform, thus increasing the likelihood to achieve a functional and useful system. Substantial and ongoing engagement by all intended user groups is necessary to reconcile differences in requirements of patients and HCPs, especially regarding medication safety alerts and access control. Moreover, effective training of patients and HCPs on medication self-management (support) and optimal use of the tool will be a prerequisite to unfold the platform’s full potential.

scholarly journals Care Pathways in Persistent Orofacial Pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Breckons ◽  
S.M. Bissett ◽  
C. Exley ◽  
V. Araujo-Soares ◽  
J. Durham
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Orofacial Pain ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
The Impact

Persistent orofacial pain is relatively common and known to have an adverse effect on quality of life. Previous studies suggest that the current care pathway may be problematic, but it is not well understood which health services patients access and what their experience is. The aim of this study was to explore care pathways and their impact from the perspective of patients. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a maximum variation sample of patients recruited from primary (community based) and secondary (specialist hospital based) care in the United Kingdom. Questions focused on the stages in their pathway and the impact of the care that they had received. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and analysis followed principles of the constant comparative method. NVivo 10 was used to help organize and analyze data. Twenty-two patients were interviewed at baseline, and 18 took part in a second interview at 12 mo. Three main themes emerged from the data: the “fluidity of the care pathway,” in which patients described moving among health care providers in attempts to have their pain diagnosed and managed, occurring alongside a “failure to progress,” where despite multiple appointments, patients described frustration at delays in obtaining a diagnosis and effective treatment for their pain. Throughout their care pathways, patients described the “effects of unmanaged pain,” where the longer the pain went unmanaged, the greater its potential to negatively affect their lives. Findings of this study suggest that the current care pathway is inefficient and fails to meet patient needs. Future work needs to focus on working with stakeholder groups to redesign patient-centered care pathways. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Data from qualitative interviews conducted with patients with persistent orofacial pain suggest significant problems with the existing care pathway, consisting of delays to diagnosis, treatment, and referral. Patients describing their struggle to progress through the current care pathway highlighted the difficulties occurring while living with orofacial pain. This study suggests a need for a revised care pathway, which better meets the needs of people with persistent orofacial pain.

First data from OUT: The National Cancer Survey of LGBTQ+ survivors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18544-e18544
Author(s):  
Nfn Scout ◽  
Michelle ED Veras ◽  
Bethany Andrews Rhoten ◽  
Reece ED Lyerly ◽  
Aurea ED Kasberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Coming Out ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cultural Barriers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health Crisis

e18544 Background: Cultural barriers that inhibit LGBTQ cancer care are a public health crisis. Although LGBTQ cultural competency trainings are rapidly becoming the norm, patient-centered information is lacking for healthcare professionals in cancer care. The purpose of OUT: The National Cancer Survey is to understand the experiences of LGBTQ cancer survivors in order to make cancer care a safer and more welcoming place for survivors and their support teams. Methods: Individuals age 18 or older currently living in the United States who have been previously diagnosed with cancer and who identify as LGBTQ+ were recruited via community partnerships and targeted paid social media advertisements with an oversample of media outreach to Black Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC). Participants completed a cross-sectional web-based survey of their cancer care experiences. This resulted in a final sample of [1,600+] survivors, the largest known sample of LGBTQ+ cancer survivors in the world. The sample was weighted to adjust for U.S. sex assigned at birth and racial/ethnic demographics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant responses, crosstabs were used to compare responses across demographic categories, and excerpted responses are used to highlight qualitative themes. Results: Participants ranged in age from X to X years (median X). X% of the sample identified as either gay or lesbian, X% as bi, and X% as trans or gender nonconforming. X% of the sample identified as White only, followed by X% as Latine, X% as Black and X% as other or mixed race. Most common cancer types included XYZ. When asked about welcoming care, X% of the sample reported they specifically sought an LGBTQ+ welcoming provider after diagnosis. Most common methods for finding such a provider included: X, X, and X. Most common cues that helped patients identify welcoming providers included X, X, and X. Overall X% reported receiving care in an LGBTQ+ welcoming environment but X% did not. Of those who did not receive care in a welcoming environment, they were more likely to be X, X, and X. Overall, X% of patients were out to their providers, but this varied by X, X, and X. The most common ways of coming out included X, X, and X. When asked what they wanted to tell health care providers to ensure better care, participants highlighted several themes, including: X, X, and X. These findings provide patient driven insights into how cancer care varies within the LGBTQ+ population by different demographic factors and specific strategies providers can take to enhance care for LGBTQ+ people.

scholarly journals Experience of Cancer Patients on their Visit to Cancer Outpatient Department: A Qualitative Study from a Regional Hospital in Mauritius

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Kashyap ◽  
Indrajit Banerjee ◽  
Akash Thakur ◽  
Vaishali Notwani ◽  
Mitanshi Raghuvanshi
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
State Of Mind

Introduction: Cancer care studies suggest that being diagnosed with cancer, the patients and their families face various hardships such as financial crisis, increased mental stress, difficulty in managing their relationships and routine lifestyle activities. Moreover, psycho-oncological studies also describe the intense distress and disbelief experienced by patients on their initial diagnosis. The role of cancer care needs to be understood as well as implemented in cancer treatment, thus further enriching the insights of the treating oncologist about their patient’s state of mind. This ultimately allows for the betterment of treatment compliance. Aim: To study the experience of cancer patients on their visit to the cancer clinic and the emotional turmoil after diagnosis and throughout treatment. Materials and Methods: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was designed and conducted from August to September 2019 at the Oncology Department of Victoria Hospital, Mauritius. Participation in the study was voluntary, and written consent was taken from each of the study participants. The data was collected on an in-depth one on one interview basis and was recorded, and the purposive sampling technique was used for collecting the data. Results: Out of 12 patients, the male/female ratio equated to 5:7, these patients were from the ages of 23 to 70 years and the mean age of the participants was 48.2 years. A total of 25 different codes were generated in the study, seven main themes were established there from (Motivational factors, Psychological factors, Society, Message for others, Awareness about the disease, Economic factors and Perception towards the healthcare environment). Conclusion: The main implication that emerged from this study is the notion of the lateral views of informal caregivers, family members and medical professionals, towards the patient’s feelings and emotional reactions in respect to their experience of cancer. It has been noted that the positivity of the caregiver corresponds directly to positive outcomes in the cancer treatment whilst simultaneously decreasing the psychological ramifications of the process.

Building a patient-centered model: Palliative medicine and cancer care.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
Kavitha Ramchandran ◽  
Derek Galligan ◽  
Erika L Tribett ◽  
Melissa Valentine ◽  
Meryl Selig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Patient Centered

75 Background: Palliative medicine (PM) improves outcomes for cancer patients. Still, there is limited evidence around components of an efficient, patient-centered model for integrating PM into oncologic care. While PM is committed to aligning with a patient's goals of care, very few programs incorporate their input into design or evaluation. The aim of this project is to combine best practice in PM with perspectives of patients, families and providers to develop an empathic PM service. We hypothesize that collaboration with stakeholders and user experience experts will result in a feasible, impactful and translatable model of care that aligns with patient and family goals. Methods: We are conducting semi-structured interviews with 30 patients, family members and 30 oncologists. Patient interviews assess needs and coping mechanisms. Provider interviews assess perceptions and experiences around PM. We will conduct observations to understand how patients and providers interact and how current protocols are operationalized. Data will be coded and analyzed for major themes. An expert panel of patients, family members, health care providers and design experts will assimilate the data and make recommendations for the prototype care model design. The model will be piloted and evaluated in fall 2014. Outcome metrics include patient satisfaction, symptom management, utilization, mortality, and others identified during development. Data from the pilot will inform intervention improvements in preparation for a large-scale, 12- month pilot in an outpatient PM clinic. Results: Preliminary work includes the development of a novel patient and family interview protocol that integrates cutting-edge research on PM with best practices for conducting empathic interviews. We will present initial results from these interviews at the symposium, as well as our iterative design process. Conclusions: This project integrates data on patient and family experience with known best practices to develop a patient-centered model for palliative cancer care. The development process and potential outcomes hold significant promise for the design of patient and provider-centered care models, especially those related to chronic and serious illnesses.

Understanding the patient experience of cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada: A qualitative study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Author(s):  
Erica Bridge ◽  
Lesley Gotlib Conn ◽  
Suman Dhanju ◽  
Simron Singh ◽  
Lesley Moody
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Patient Centred Care ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology

225 Background: In cancer care, patient experience is most often measured quantitatively. However, this approach has limitations in understanding the entire patient experience. Qualitative methods provide an opportunity to understand self reported and more complex issues most important to patients and their family members. This qualitative study explores the patient experience of outpatient cancer treatment throughout Ontario, Canada. Methods: Qualitative content analysis was done by two researchers using data from the annual Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) from 2013-15. The AOPSS is a retrospective, paper-based, mailed survey, designed to capture the experiences of patients who are currently receiving cancer treatment or who have received cancer treatment within the previous six months. Patients surveyed were asked “Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your cancer care services?” The National Research Corporation of Canada’s eight dimensions of patient-centred care was used to guide the analysis. Results: 5,391 patients responded to the open-ended question. Demographic information includes: gender, age, education level and disease site. 7,328 coded responses were generated, of which 3,658 (49.9%) were related to eight dimensions of patient-centred care with accompanying sub-dimensions: patients’ preferences (23.5%): dignity and respect; preferences and decision-making; care provider behaviours; emotional support (21.5%): caring, compassion and comfort; anxiety and stress; resources; and sensitive diagnosis; coordination of care (15.8%): care provider and treatment coordination; wait times; information and education (15.7%): patient-care provider communication; information needs; care provider knowledge and skills; access (9.4%): centre location; transportation and accommodation; system; parking; continuity and transition (8.1%): centre personnel; continuity between departments; continuity in the community; discharge; physical comfort (5.1%): environment; pain management and family and friends (0.8%). Conclusions: Qualitative analysis is an effective tool to capture patient experience on a population level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document