scholarly journals Economic impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute care hospitals in Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244852
Author(s):  
Jung-ho Shin ◽  
Daisuke Takada ◽  
Tetsuji Morishita ◽  
Hueiru Lin ◽  
Seiko Bun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedures ◽  
Japan Surgical Society ◽  
The Impact

Background In response to the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Japanese government declared a state of emergency on April 7, 2020. Six days earlier, the Japan Surgical Society had recommended postponing elective surgical procedures. Along with the growing public fear of COVID-19, hospital visits in Japan decreased. Methods Using claims data from the Quality Indicator/Improvement Project (QIP) database, this study aimed to clarify the impact of the first wave of the pandemic, considered to be from March to May 2020, on case volume and claimed hospital charges in acute care hospitals during this period. To make year-over-year comparisons, we considered cases from July 2018 to June 2020. Results A total of 2,739,878 inpatient and 53,479,658 outpatient cases from 195 hospitals were included. In the year-over-year comparisons, total claimed hospital charges decreased in April, May, June 2020 by 7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively, compared to the same months in 2019. Our results also showed that per-case hospital charges increased during this period, possibly to compensate for the reduced case volumes. Regression results indicated that the hospital charges in April and May 2020 decreased by 6.3% for hospitals without COVID-19 patients. For hospitals with COVID-19 patients, there was an additional decrease in proportion with the length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients including suspected cases. The mean additional decrease per COVID-19 patient was estimated to 5.5 million JPY. Conclusion It is suggested that the hospitals treating COVID-19 patients were negatively incentivized.

scholarly journals Economic impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute care hospitals in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-ho Shin ◽  
Daisuke Takada ◽  
Tetsuji Morishita ◽  
Hueiru Lin ◽  
Seiko Bun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedures ◽  
Japan Surgical Society ◽  
The Impact

Background In response to the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Japanese government declared a state of emergency on April 7, 2020. Six days earlier, the Japan Surgical Society had recommended postponing elective surgical procedures. Along with the growing public fear of COVID-19, hospital visits in Japan decreased. Methods Using claims data from the Quality Indicator/Improvement Project (QIP) database, this study aimed to clarify the impact of the first wave of the pandemic, considered to be from March to May 2020, on case volume and claimed hospital charges in acute care hospitals during this period. To make year-over-year comparisons, we considered cases from July 2018 to June 2020. Results A total of 2,739,878 inpatient and 53,479,658 outpatient cases from 195 hospitals were included. In the year-over-year comparisons, total claimed hospital charges decreased in April, May, June 2020 by 7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively, compared to the same months in 2019. Our results also showed that per-case hospital charges increased during this period, possibly to compensate for the reduced case volumes. Regression results indicated that the hospital charges in April and May 2020 decreased by 6.3% for hospitals without COVID-19 patients. For hospitals with COVID-19 patients, there was an additional decrease in proportion with the length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients including suspected cases. The mean additional decrease per COVID-19 patients was estimated to 5.5 million JPY. Conclusion It is suggested that the hospitals treating COVID-19 patients were negatively incentivized.

Abstract P301: Evaluating the Impact of a Pharmacist-Managed Hypertension Collaborative Care Model in Vascular Neurology Patients in an Inpatient Acute Care Setting

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Smith ◽  
Kathleen Bledsoe ◽  
Thomas Madden ◽  
Jamie Artale ◽  
Ted Sindlinger
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Acute Care Setting ◽  
Percentage Reduction ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The utility of pharmacist-managed collaborative practice agreements (CPA) in the management of hypertension is well established in the outpatient setting. There has been little evaluation of the use of CPAs in the inpatient acute care setting, and none described specifically in the vascular neurology population. Treatment of hypertension is a critical intervention for the secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke. This quality improvement project evaluated the implementation of a CPA for the inpatient acute care management of hypertension in vascular neurology patients at University of Virginia Health. Methods: A CPA was developed between the neurosciences clinical pharmacist group and the inpatient vascular neurology service, legally vetted, and implemented in June 2019. All vascular neurology patient charts in which an electronic CPA referral was placed from June 2019 through June 2020 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they were discharged within 24 hours of the referral being placed. The primary objective was to describe and evaluate the implementation of a pharmacist-driven hypertension management practice in the inpatient acute care setting. All patient demographic and clinical data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Secondary safety outcomes included documented hypotensive events (SBP <90) and acute kidney injury (AKI, increase in SCr by 0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours). Results: During the study period, 26 referrals were placed, and 19 patients were included for review. On average, patients were on 2 anti-hypertensive medications prior to admission. From the time of referral to discharge (mean 6 days), systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced on average by 36 mmHg (mean percentage reduction 20%) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 12 mmHg (mean percentage reduction 7%). Ten patients (53%) met the goal of SBP < 140 at discharge. There were 5 hypotensive events and 4 instances of AKI, all of which were mild and recovered prior to discharge. Conclusion: A pharmacist-managed hypertension CPA was successfully implemented in vascular neurology patients in the inpatient acute care setting. The practice demonstrated improved blood pressure control and minimal adverse outcomes.

scholarly journals The Impact of a Massachusetts State-Sponsored Educational Program on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Acute Care Hospitals

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Weston ◽  
Lauren Epstein ◽  
Lisa E. Davidson ◽  
Alfred DeMaria ◽  
Shira Doron
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Business Models ◽  
National Level ◽  
State Level ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
The State ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
The Impact

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are critically important for combating the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Despite this, there are no regulatory requirements at a national level, which makes initiatives at the state level critical. The objectives of this study were to identify existing antimicrobial stewardship practices, characterize barriers to antimicrobial stewardship implementation in acute care hospitals throughout Massachusetts, and evaluate the impact on these hospitals of a state-sponsored educational conference on antimicrobial stewardship.In September 2011, a state-sponsored educational program entitled “Building Stewardship: A Team Approach Enhancing Antibiotic Stewardship in Acute Care Hospitals” was offered to interested practitioners from throughout the state. The program consisted of 2 audio conferences, reading materials, and a 1-day conference consisting of lectures focusing on the importance of ASPs, strategies for implementation, improvement strategies for existing programs, and panel discussions highlighting successful practices. Smaller breakout sessions focused on operational issues, including understanding of pharmacodynamics, business models, and electronic surveillance.

scholarly journals P129 THORACIC VS. ABDOMINAL APPROACHES FOR DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA REPAIR: A NATIONWIDE STUDY OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Carolina Quiroga Centeno ◽  
Orlando Navas ◽  
Juan Paulo Serrano ◽  
Sergio Alejandro Gómez Ochoa
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Abdominal Repair ◽  
Lower Health ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim “To compare the outcomes of different surgical approaches for diaphragmatic hernia (DH) repair.” Material and Methods “Adult patients with a principal admitting diagnosis of uncomplicated DH registered in the National Inpatient Sample in the period 2010-2015 were included. Patients with obstruction, gangrene, or congenital hernias were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of complications, length of stay, and hospital charges. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted by age, sex, elective admission, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics was used to analyze the impact of the surgical approach on the evaluated outcomes.” Results “A total of 14910 patients with DH were included (median age 65 years, 74% women). Abdominal approaches were the most commonly performed (78.9% laparoscopy and 13.6% open). Patients that underwent open abdominal and thoracic repairs had a higher risk of complications (sepsis, pneumonia, surgical site infection, prolonged postoperative ileus, and acute myocardial infarction), longer hospital stay, higher total hospital costs, and a significantly higher risk of mortality (OR 2.62. 95% CI 1.59-4.30 and OR 4.60; 95% CI 2.37-8.91, respectively) compared to patients that underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair. Individuals whose DH repair was performed through thoracoscopy had a similar mortality risk to those who underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.11-6.43).” Conclusions “Nowadays, laparoscopy has become the most used approach for DH repair. In the present cohort, it was associated with better outcomes in terms of complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality, as well as lower health costs. Additional studies assessing hernia characteristics are required to validate this result.”

Assessing the impact of antibiotic stewardship program elements on antibiotic use across acute-care hospitals: an observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Langford ◽  
Julie Hui-Chih Wu ◽  
Kevin A. Brown ◽  
Xuesong Wang ◽  
Valerie Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesAntibiotic use varies widely between hospitals, but the influence of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on this variability is not known. We aimed to determine the key structural and strategic aspects of ASPs associated with differences in risk-adjusted antibiotic utilization across facilities.DesignObservational study of acute-care hospitals in Ontario, CanadaMethodsA survey was sent to hospitals asking about both structural (8 elements) and strategic (32 elements) components of their ASP. Antibiotic use from hospital purchasing data was acquired for January 1 to December 31, 2014. Crude and adjusted defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days, accounting for hospital and aggregate patient characteristics, were calculated across facilities. Rate ratios (RR) of defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days were compared for hospitals with and without each antimicrobial stewardship element of interest.ResultsOf 127 eligible hospitals, 73 (57%) participated in the study. There was a 7-fold range in antibiotic use across these facilities (min, 253 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days; max, 1,872 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days). The presence of designated funding or resources for the ASP (RRadjusted, 0·87; 95% CI, 0·75–0·99), prospective audit and feedback (RRadjusted, 0·80; 95% CI, 0·67–0·96), and intravenous-to-oral conversion policies (RRadjusted, 0·79; 95% CI, 0·64–0·99) were associated with lower risk-adjusted antibiotic use.ConclusionsWide variability in antibiotic use across hospitals may be partially explained by both structural and strategic ASP elements. The presence of funding and resources, prospective audit and feedback, and intravenous-to-oral conversion should be considered priority elements of a robust ASP.

scholarly journals 566. Reduction of Hospital-Onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia in an Acute Care Hospital: Impact of Bundles and Universal Decolonization

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S268-S268
Author(s):  
Adriana Jimenez ◽  
Kathleen Sposato ◽  
Alicia de Leon-Sanchez ◽  
Regina Williams ◽  
Reynande Francois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background MRSA is a major concern for hospitalized patients in the United States. Hospital-Onset (HO) MRSA bacteremia is used as a proxy measurement of MRSA healthcare acquisition, exposure, and infection burden. HO MRSA bacteremia standardized infection ratio (SIR) is used by several national agencies as a quality report metric. Our institution had more than expected HO MRSA bacteremia cases despite several interventions. We describe the impact of a bundle of interventions aimed to decrease HO MRSA bacteremia in an acute care facility. Methods This quality improvement project was implemented in a 380-bed community hospital in Miami, FL from January 2015 to March 2019. HO MRSA bacteremia was defined as non-duplicate MRSA isolated from a blood culture collected >3 days after admission. SIR was calculated dividing the number of observed events by the number of predicted events; predicted events were obtained from the NHSN report. During baseline period (Figure1 Phase 1 January 2015–August 2016) all adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) were screened for MRSA nasal colonization on admission and weekly thereafter, ICU patients received daily Chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing, and colonized/infected patients with MRSA were placed in contact precautions. In Phase 2 (September 2016–June 2017)daily CHG bathing was switched from 2% wipes to 4% soap foam and expanded to all adult patients; ICU patients also received nasal decolonization with mupirocin. Nasal mupirocin in ICU was replaced with alcohol-based nasal sanitizer for all adult units in July 2017 (Phase 3). In April 2017 we discontinued using contact precautions for MRSA patients; nasal surveillance cultures were discontinued in October 2017. In May 2018 (Phase 4) we introduced alcohol-based wipes for patient hand hygiene at the bedside. SIR were compared by exact binomial test. Results We observed 48 HO MRSA bacteremia cases during the study period. The SIR decreased from 3.66 to 0.97 from baseline to postintervention periods (P = 0.003). The largest decrease in cases and SIR was attained using combined hospital-wide daily CHG bathing, alcohol-based nasal sanitizer, and alcohol wipes for patient hand hygiene during Phase 4 (Table 1). Conclusion Our bundle of interventions for universal decolonization was successful in decreasing HO MRSA bacteremia. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Clostridium DifficileInfection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene K. Louh ◽  
William G. Greendyke ◽  
Emilia A. Hermann ◽  
Karina W. Davidson ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Chlorhexidine Bathing ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEPrevention ofClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009.DESIGNWe searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015.SETTINGWe included studies performed in acute-care hospitals.PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTSWe included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates.INTERVENTIONSWe used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible.RESULTSOf 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates.CONCLUSIONSDaily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:476–482

Sharps Injuries among Employees of Acute Care Hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002–2007

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela K. Laramie ◽  
Vivian C. Pun ◽  
Shona C. Fang ◽  
David Kriebel ◽  
Letitia Davis
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Surveillance System ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Negative Binomial Regression ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Injury Surveillance System ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Sharps Injury ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sharps Injuries

Objective.Sharps with engineered sharps injury protections (SESIPs) have been found to reduce risk of sharps injuries (Sis). We examined trends in SI rates among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, including the impact of SESIPs on SI trends during 2002-2007.Design.Prospective surveillance.Setting.Seventy-six acute care hospitals licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.Participants.Employees of acute care hospitals who reported Sis to their employers.Methods.Data on Sis in acute care hospitals collected by the Massachusetts Sharps Injury Surveillance System were used to examine trends in SI rates over time by occupation, hospital size, and device. Negative binomial regression was used to assess trends.Results.During 2002-2007, 16,158 Sis among employees of 76 acute care hospitals were reported to the surveillance system. The annual SI rate decreased by 22%, with an annual decline of 4.7% (P< .001). Rates declined significantly among nurses (—7.2% per year;P< .001) but not among physicians (—0.9% per year;P= .553). SI rates associated with winged steel needles and hypodermic needles and syringes also declined significantly as the proportion of injuries involving devices with sharps injury prevention features increased during the same time period.Conclusion.SI rates involving devices for which SESIPs are widely available and appear to be increasingly used have declined. The continued use of devices lacking SI protections for which SESIPs are available needs to be addressed. The extent to which injuries involving SESIPs are due to flaws in design or lack of experience and training must be examined.

A National Intervention to Prevent the Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Israeli Post-Acute Care Hospitals

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 802-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debby Ben-David ◽  
Samira Masarwa ◽  
Amos Adler ◽  
Hagit Mishali ◽  
Yehuda Carmeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Control Intervention ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae ◽  
Post Acute Care

ObjectivePatients hospitalized in post-acute care hospitals (PACHs) constitute an important reservoir of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. High carriage prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has been observed among patients hospitalized in PACHs. The objective of the study is to describe the impact of a national infection control intervention on the prevalence of CRE in PACHs.DesignA prospective cohort interventional study.SettingThirteen PACHs in Israel.InterventionA multifaceted intervention was initiated between 2008 and 2011 as part of a national program involving all Israeli healthcare facilities. The intervention has included (1) periodic on-site assessments of infection control policies and resources, using a score comprised of 16 elements; (2) assessment of risk factors for CRE colonization; (3) development of national guidelines for CRE control in PACHs involving active surveillance and contact isolation of carriers; and (4) 3 cross-sectional surveys of rectal carriage of CRE that were conducted in representative wards.ResultsThe infection control score increased from 6.8 to 14.0 (P < .001) over the course of the study period. A total of 3,516 patients were screened in the 3 surveys. Prevalence of carriage among those not known to be carriers decreased from 12.1% to 7.9% (P = .008). Overall carrier prevalence decreased from 16.8% to 12.5% (P = .013). Availability of alcohol-based hand rub, appropriate use of gloves, and a policy of CRE surveillance at admission to the hospital were independently associated with lower new carrier prevalence.ConclusionA nationwide infection control intervention was associated with enhanced infection control measures and a reduction in the prevalence of CRE in PACHs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document