scholarly journals Diagnostic value of mean platelet volume in neonatal sepsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-93
Author(s):  
Kristopher May Pamudji ◽  
I Made Kardana
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Platelet Volume ◽  
Good Potential ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background Neonatal sepsis is a severe disease with potentially serious impacts if not treated early. However, the symptoms and clinical signs are not specific. Several studies have been conducted to find early infection markers for detection of neonatal sepsis, but without satisfactory results. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a new marker of infection that has good potential for diagnosing neonatal sepsis. Objective To assess the diagnostic value of MPV in early detection of neonatal sepsis. Methods This retrospective study with diagnostic testing was done with data collected from medical records of neonates with neonatal sepsis who were admitted to the Neonatology Department in Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar from December 2018 to March 2019. Mean platelet volume cut-off point was determined using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MPV in neonatal sepsis were determined using a 2x2 table. Results Of 82 subjects, 55 subjects were male (67%). Positive blood culture results were found in 25 subjects (30%). Mean platelet volume with a cut-off point of 7.44 fL had 80% sensitivity, 84.2% specificity, 69% PPV, and 90.6% NPV. Conclusion Mean platelet volume with a cut-off point of 7.44 fL can be used to diagnose neonatal sepsis with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 84.2%.

scholarly journals Diagnostic value of mean platelet volume for neonatal sepsis

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (32) ◽  
pp. e21649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Zhenshuai Lou ◽  
Jiaxiang Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Platelet Volume

Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Mean Platelet Volume on Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis on Term Neonate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birol Karabulut ◽  
Silem Ozdem Alatas
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Platelet Volume ◽  
Term Neonates ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

AbstractBy setting out from increased neutrophil count, decreased lymphocyte count, and increased mean platelet volume (MPV), which is a result of the effect of inflammation on blood cells, we aimed to investigate whether neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLP) and MPV can be used as an auxiliary parameter for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS). This study was conducted by analyzing term neonates with EOS and physiological jaundice who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital. A total of 63 neonate files were examined to include 30 term neonates with EOS, and 77 neonate files were examined to include 30 term neonates with physiological jaundice as a control group. NLR had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.891 for prediction of EOS. At a cut-off level of 1.42, NLR had a likelihood ratio (LR) of 5.5, sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 84%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84.6%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. MPV had an AUC of 0.666 for the prediction of EOS and at a cut-off level of 9.3 fL, MPV had an LR of 1.23, sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 32%, a PPV of 55.2%, and an NPV of 66.6%. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that NLR and MPV can be used in addition to conventional parameters in the diagnosis of EOS.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of Immature-to-Total Neutrophil Ratio in Neonatal Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Husnain Ali ◽  
Ejaz Hussain ◽  
Imran Mahmood Khan ◽  
Iqtada Haider Shirazi ◽  
Muhammad Imran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Negative Blood Culture ◽  
Gold Standard Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Neonatal sepsis is the third most common reason of neonatal mortality in Pakistan. Blood culture, the gold standard test for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, is time consuming. Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests with good specificity and sensitivity is needed for accurate and early diagnosis of this condition. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of abnormal (≥ 0.2) immature-to-total-neutrophil ratio in neonatal sepsis.Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 288 neonates, aged 0-28 days, admitted with suspected sepsis. Detailed history of the neonates was recorded including gender, age, birth weight, maternal age, gestational age and clinical features. Blood culture and Peripheral blood films were done in each case. Differential leucocyte counts, total Polymorphoneutrophil count (PMN), immature neutrophil count, mature neutrophil count and calculation of I/T ratio was carried out in the Pathology Department of PIMS, Islamabad. The study outcome was divided into three groups on the basis of positive or negative blood culture and I/T ratio as normal, probable sepsis and proven sepsis group. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 21.0. Diagnostic value of I/T ratio was determined in NS by calculating values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) by considering the blood culture as the gold standard test of NS.Results: The mean age and weight of the neonates at the time of admission was 1.1 (± 0.6) days and 2.51 (± 0.40) kg, respectively. About 60% of the neonates were males and 118(41%) neonates had I/T ratio of ≥ 0.2. On the basis of positive or negative blood culture and I/T ratio, 82 (28.5%) neonates were diagnosed as proven sepsis, 43 (14.9%) neonates had probable sepsis and remaining 163 (56.6%) neonates were declared as normal. Out of 82 neonates with positive blood cultures, 75 (91.5%) had I/T ratio ≥ 0.2, while 7 (8.5%) had I/T ratio ≤ 0.2. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of abnormal I/T ratio to diagnose neonatal sepsis was 91%, 79%, 64%, 96% and 83%, respectively.Conclusions: Due to substantially high diagnostic accuracy of I/T ratio ≥ 0.2, we recommend it as a useful, rapid and cost-effective tool in accurate diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

Predictive Value of Mean Platelet Volume for Pulmonary Embolism Recurrence

Lung ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Araz ◽  
Fadime Sultan Albez ◽  
Elif Yilmazel Ucar ◽  
Bugra Kerget ◽  
Nafiye Yılmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Platelet Volume

scholarly journals Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1128
Author(s):  
Irene K. Sigmund ◽  
Stephan E. Puchner ◽  
Reinhard Windhager
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Preoperative Diagnosis ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Volume Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Platelet Volume ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
D Dimer

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) can be very challenging, especially in patients with chronic PJI caused by low-virulence microorganisms. Serum parameters, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) or the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), are—among other diagnostic test methods—widely used to distinguish septic from aseptic failure after total hip or knee arthroplasty and are recommended by the AAOS in the preoperative setting. However, they are systemic parameters, and therefore, unspecific. Nevertheless, they may be the first and occasionally the only preoperative indication, especially when clinical symptoms are lacking. They are easy to obtain, cheap, and are available worldwide. In the last decade, different novel serum biomarkers (percentage of neutrophils, neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio, platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio, fibrinogen, D-Dimer, Il-6, PCT) were investigated to find a more specific and accurate serum parameter in the diagnosis of PJI. This article reviews the diagnostic value of established (serum CRP, ESR, WBC) and ‘novel’ serum inflammatory biomarkers (fibrinogen, D-dimer, interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin, percentage of neutrophils (%N), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV)) for the preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections.

scholarly journals Has the Pandemic Triggered a ‘Paperdemic’? Towards an Assessment of Diagnostic Indicators for COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
AISDL
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Widespread Belief ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Consistency Problem ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

This paper is a preliminary step towards the assessment of an alarming widespread belief that victims of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 include the quality and accuracy of scientific publications about it. Our initial results suggest that this belief cannot be readily ignored, denied, dismissed or refuted, since some genuine supporting evidence can be forwarded for it. This evidence includes an obvious increase in retractions of papers published about the COVID-19 pandemic plus an extra-ordinary phenomenon of inconsistency that we report herein. In fact, we provide a novel method for validating any purported set of the four most prominent indicators of diagnostic testing (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value), by observing that these indicators constitute three rather than four independent quantities. This observation has virtually been unheard of in the open medical literature, and hence researchers have not taken it into consideration. We define two functions, which serve as consistency criteria, since each of them checks consistency for any set of four numerical values (naturally belonging to the interval [0.0,1.0]) claimed to be the four basic diagnostic indicators. Most of the data we came across in various international journals met our criteria for consistency, but in a few cases, there were obvious unexplained blunders. We explored the same consistency problem for some diagnostic data published in 2020 concerning the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and observed that the afore-mentioned unexplained blunders tended to be on the rise. A systematic extensive statistical assessment of this resumed tendency is warranted.

TLR2 and TLR4 expressions in late-onset neonatal sepsis: Is it a potential novel biomarker?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
R. Rohsiswatmo ◽  
M. Azharry ◽  
T.T. Sari ◽  
Y. Bahasoan ◽  
D. Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Tlr4 Expression ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reactive Protein

BACKGROUND: Late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) detection is problematic as no single examinations (blood culture, c-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT)) are reliable. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which detect the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns is a promising novel biomarker, but less studied in LONS. This study aimed to determine neutrophils and monocytes TLR2 and TLR4 expression in LONS and their diagnostic value. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in May and June 2017 involving 52 neonates with clinical late-onset (>72 hours of age) sepsis. We examine complete blood count, I/T ratio, CRP, PCT, as well as TLR2 and TLR4 expression to compared with blood culture as the gold standard. We classified cases into proven or unproven sepsis. RESULT: The incidence of LONS was 32.6% in the subjects. The expression of TLR2 was low in LONS, while TLR4 was high. TLR4 neutrophil expression has 88.2% sensitivity, 20% specificity, 34.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 77.8% negative predictive value (NPV), and an AUC of 0.541. TLR4 monocyte expression has 92.1% sensitivity, 11.4% specificity, 34% PPV, 80% NPV, and an AUC of 0.528. The AUC of CRP is increased from 0.608 to 0.843 after combination with TLR4, comparable with CRP + PCT (AUC 0.829). CONCLUSION: The increase in TLR4 expression has good sensitivity but low specificity. TLR4 expression, in combination with CRP, could become a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of LONS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document