scholarly journals Skor Prediksi Kematian Pneumonia pada Anak Usia di Bawah Lima Tahun

Sari Pediatri ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
Ambarsari Latumahina ◽  
Rina Triasih ◽  
Kristia Hermawan

Latar belakang. Pneumonia merupakan penyebab utama kematian pada anak usia di bawah lima tahun di negara berkembang. Pengembangan sistem skor yang sederhana untuk memprediksi kematian pada pneumonia dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan dan menurunkan angka kematian anak akibat pneumonia.Tujuan. Menyusun skor prediksi kematian pada anak dengan pneumonia.Metode. Penelitian kohort retrospektif pada anak (umur 2 bulan sampai 5 tahun) yang dirawat di RSUP Dr. Sardjito dengan pneumonia sejak Januari 2009 sampai Desember 2014. Anak dengan rekam medis tidak lengkap atau dengan infeksi HIV dieksklusi. Digunakan metode Spiegelhalter Knill-Jones untuk penyusunan skor kematian. Prediktor kematian dengan likelihood ratio (LHR) ≤0,5 atau ≥2 dimasukkan dalam sistem skor. Cut off point dari skor total ditentukan dengan kurva receiver operating characteristic (ROC).Hasil. Di antara 225 anak yang memenuhi kriteria, 42 (18,7%) meninggal. Prediktor kematian yang memenuhi kriteria LHR adalah usia <6 bulan (LHR 2,05), takikardia (LHR 2,11), saturasi oksigen (SpO2) <92% (LHR 2,54), anemia (LHR 0,38) dan leukositosis (LHR 2,04). Skor prediksi kematian terdiri atas usia (skor=5 bila usia <6 bulan dan 0 bila >6 bulan); frekuensi nadi skor=6 bila takikardia dan -8 bila normal); saturasi oksigen (skor=3 bila SpO2 <92% dan 0 bila SpO2 >92%); hemoglobin (skor=4 bila anemia dan -6 bila normal), leukosit (skor=3 bila leukosit dan 0 bila normal). Total skor >3 Mempunyai sensitivitas dan spesifitas terbaik, yaitu 85,7% dan 72,1%.Kesimpulan. Skor prediksi kematian pneumonia >3 dapat digunakan untuk memprediksi kematian pada anak dengan pneumonia.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiajia Li ◽  
Xiaojing Zhao ◽  
Xueting Li ◽  
Meijiao Lu ◽  
Hongjie Zhang

The clinical course of ulcerative colitis (UC) is featured by remission and relapse, which remains unpredictable. Recent studies revealed that fecal calprotectin (FC) could predict clinical relapse for UC patients in remission, which has not yet been well accepted. To detect the predictive value of FC for clinical relapse in adult UC patients based on updated literature, we carried out a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies. Diagnostic accuracy including pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed by the I2 metric. Sources of heterogeneity were detected using subgroup analysis. Metaregression was used to test potential factors correlated to DOR. Publication bias was assessed using Deek’s funnel plots. In our study, 14 articles enrolling a total of 1110 participants were finally included, and all articles underwent a quality assessment. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70–0.79), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.80), 3.45 (95% CI: 2.31–5.14), and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28–0.49) respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was 0.82, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 10.54 (95% CI: 6.16–18.02). Our study suggested that FC is useful in predicting clinical relapse for adult UC patients in remission as a simple and noninvasive marker.


Author(s):  
Janet L. Peacock ◽  
Philip J. Peacock

Sensitivity and specificity 340 Calculations for sensitivity and specificity 342 Effect of prevalence 344 Likelihood ratio, pre-test odds, post-test odds 346 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves 348 Links to other statistics 350 In this chapter we describe how statistical methods are used in diagnostic testing to obtain different measures of a test’s performance. We describe how to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, and show the relevance of pre- and post-test odds and likelihood ratio in evaluating a test in a clinical situation. We also describe the receiver operating characteristic curve and show how this links with logistic regression analysis. All methods are illustrated with examples....


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Beauchet ◽  
Liam A. Cooper-Brown ◽  
Joshua Lubov ◽  
Gilles Allali ◽  
Marc Afilalo ◽  
...  

Purpose: The Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendation (ER2) is an application in the electronic medical file of patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) of the Jewish General Hospital (JGH; Montreal, Quebec, Canada). It screens for older ED visitors at high risk of undesirable events. The aim of this study is to examine the performance criteria (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], positive likelihood ratio [LR+], negative likelihood ratio [LR-] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]) of the ER2 high-risk level and its “temporal disorientation” item alone to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED visitors at the JGH.Methods: Based on a cross-sectional design, 999 older adults (age 84.9 ± 5.6, 65.1% female) visiting the ED of the JGH were selected from the ER2 database. ER2 was completed upon the patients' arrival at the ED. The outcomes were ER2's high-risk level, the answer to ER2's temporal disorientation item (present vs. absent), and the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders (yes vs. no) which was confirmed when it was present in a letter or other files signed by a physician.Results: The sensitivities of both ER2's high-risk level and temporal disorientation item were high (≥0.91). Specificity, the PPV, LR+, and AROC were higher for the temporal disorientation item compared to ER2's high-risk level, whereas a highest sensitivity, LR-, and NPV were obtained with the ER2 high-risk level. Both area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were high (0.71 for ER2's high-risk level and 0.82 for ER2 temporal disorientation item). The odds ratios (OR) of ER2's high-risk level and of temporal disorientation item for the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders were positive and significant with all OR above 18, the highest OR being reported for the temporal disorientation item in the unadjusted model [OR = 26.4 with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 17.7–39.3].Conclusion: Our results suggest that ER2 and especially its temporal disorientation item may be used to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED users.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roisin C. Vance ◽  
Dan G. Healy ◽  
Rose Galvin ◽  
Helen P. French

BackgroundFalls are a common and disabling feature of Parkinson disease (PD). Early identification of patients at greatest risk of falling is a key goal of physical therapy assessment. The Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG), a frequently used mobility assessment tool, has moderate sensitivity and specificity for identifying fall risk.ObjectiveThe study objective was to investigate whether adding a task (cognitive or manual) to the TUG (TUG-cognitive or TUG-manual, respectively) increases the utility of the test for identifying fall risk in people with PD.DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study of people with PD (N=36).MethodsParticipants were compared on the basis of self-reported fall exposure in the preceding 6 months (those who had experienced falls [“fallers”] versus those who had not [“nonfallers”]). The time taken to complete the TUG, TUG-cognitive, and TUG-manual was measured for both groups. Between-group differences were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test. The discriminative performance of the test at various cutoff values was examined, and estimates of sensitivity and specificity were based on receiver operating characteristic curve plots.ResultsFallers took significantly longer than nonfallers (n=19) to complete the TUG under all 3 conditions. The TUG-cognitive showed optimal discriminative performance (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.64, 0.92) at a cutoff of 14.7 seconds. The TUG-cognitive was more likely to correctly classify participants with a low risk of falling (positive likelihood ratio=2.9) (&lt;14.7 seconds) and had higher estimates of sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI=0.52, 0.90) than of specificity (0.73; 95% CI=0.51, 0.88) at this threshold (negative likelihood ratio=0.32).LimitationsRetrospective classification of fallers and nonfallers was used.ConclusionsThe addition of a cognitive task to the TUG enhanced the identification of fall risk in people with PD. The TUG-cognitive should be considered a component of a multifaceted fall risk assessment in people with PD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-501
Author(s):  
S Balaswamy ◽  
R V. Vardhan ◽  
G Sameera

In a multivariate setup, the classification techniques have its significance in identifying the exact status of the individual/observer along with accuracy of the test. One such classification technique is the Multivariate Receiver Operating Characteristic (MROC) Curve. This technique is well known to explain the extent of correct classification with the curve above the random classifier (guessing line) when it satisfies all of its properties especially the property of increasing likelihood ratio function. However, there are circumstances where the curve violates the above property. Such a curve is termed as improper curve. This paper demonstrates the methodology of improperness of the MROC Curve and ways of measuring it. The methodology is explained using real data sets.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Mohebali ◽  
Hossein Keshavarz ◽  
Sedigheh Shirmohammad ◽  
Behnaz Akhoundi ◽  
Alireza Borjian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: agglutination test (DAT) as simple, accurate and non-expensive tool that has been used widely for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) during the last three decades. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DAT for serodiagnosis of human VL.Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, SID and Mag Iran (two Persian scientific search engines) were searched from December 2004 to April 2019.The study quality was evaluated using the QUADAS checklist. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves parameters.Results: Of the 2928 records identified in the mentioned electronic databases and through articles’ reference lists, 25 articles met inclusion criteria and enrolled into the systematic review and among them 22 records were qualified for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DAT was 96% [(95% CI, 93–98] )and 95% [(95 % CI, 88–98]), respectively. The likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) was found to be 19.8 [CI95%, 7.6–51.8] and the likelihood ratio of a negative test (LR−) was found to be 0.04 [CI95%, 0.02–0.08]. The combined estimate of the diagnostic odds ratio for DAT was high [454 )136-1561]) ].We found that the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) is positioned near the upper left corner of the curve and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97 to 0.99).Conclusion: Based on our analysis, we find DAT can be considered as valuable tool for the serodiagnosis and seroprevalence of human VL with high sensitivity and specificityrates. As DAT is simple, accurate ,non-invasive and efficient serological test, it can be used for serodiagnosis of human VL particularly in endemic areas of the disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Xue Yang ◽  
Yunxian Zhu ◽  
Yi Zhu ◽  
Jingzhe Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The computed tomography (CT) diagnostic value of COVID-19 is controversial. We summarized the value of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 through a meta-analysis based on the reference standard. Methods All Chinese and English studies related to the diagnostic value of CT for COVID-19 across multiple publication platforms, was searched for and collected. Studies quality evaluation and plotting the risk of bias were estimated. A heterogeneity test and meta-analysis, including plotting sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe) forest plots, pooled positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), dignostic odds ratio (DOR) values and 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated. If there was a threshold effect, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) was further plotted. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and 95% CI were also calculated. Results Twenty diagnostic studies that represented a total of 9004 patients were included from 20 pieces of literatures after assessing all the aggregated studies. The reason for heterogeneity was caused by the threshold effect, so the AUROC = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.94) for chest CT of COVID-19. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, +LR, -LR from 20 studies were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.94), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59–0.80), 3.1(95% CI: 2.2–4.4), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09–0.17), separately. The I2 was 85.6% (P = 0.001) by Q-test. Conclusions The results of this study showed that CT diagnosis of COVID-19 was close to the reference standard. The diagnostic value of chest CT may be further enhanced if there is a unified COVID-19 diagnostic standard. However, please pay attention to rational use of CT. Graphic Abstract


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiu Chen ◽  
Guolin Wu ◽  
Youdi Li

Aim. To explore the diagnostic efficacy of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in hepatitis B virus- (HBV-) related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods. A retrospective study of 459 cases from June 2016 to March 2018 was undertaken, and records of the DCP levels were extracted. The sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff points were calculated using SPSS 17.0 software. A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed for articles published in English from 1997 to 2017, focusing on serum DCP for HBV-related HCC. Data on sensitivity, specificity, the positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were extracted from five studies by systematic search and one study of our own. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was obtained, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated. Results. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.80), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.96), 9.5 (95% CI: 5.2, 17.5), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.46), and 30 (95% CI: 13, 72), respectively. The AUROC curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.93). Conclusions. In the diagnosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), DCP is an ideal marker that should be considered for surveillance purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document