scholarly journals The use of historical call data records as evidence in the criminal justice system – lessons learned from the Danish telecom scandal

Author(s):  
Lene Wacher Lentz ◽  
Nina Sunde

Historical call data records (HCDR) are frequently used as evidence in criminal trials. However, several inherent uncertainties are associated with HCDR data, and, additionally, errors may occur when law enforcement processes the data. In Denmark, processing errors were introduced into HCDR from 2010 until 2019. The Danish authorities are currently reviewing more than 10,000 criminal cases in order to secure a fair trial. This article conducts a socio-technical analysis of the Danish telecom scandal, which shows that, in addition to the processing errors highlighted, sources of error are related to competence, cognitive factors and inadequate quality management. Index words: Denmark; criminal law; call data records; uncertainties; prosecution processing errors

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hambali Yusuf ◽  
Saifullah Basri

Many criminal cases that are not resolved either at the level of appeal or cassation level is an indication that there are problems in law enforcement. Islamic Criminal Justice provides much alternative settlement of criminal cases by maintaining a balance of the interests of the victim, the community, the State and the offender. This research aims to analyze the model, explain the alternative settlement of criminal cases in the Islamic law; how setting the model settlement of criminal cases in the Islamic law can be used as a model settlement of criminal cases in the criminal law of Indonesia, to find a model settlement of criminal cases in the Islamic law of relevance to criminal law updates Indonesia.    This research got that setting jarimah qishas-diyat placed as a kind of private law as rights adami. Setting model jarimah-diyat can allow made a model in settlement of a criminal offence in the criminal law of Indonesia in line with developments in the modern criminal law sanctions governing sanctions fines or compensation for victims.  Setting model jarimah-diyat can allow made a model in settlement of a criminal offence in the criminal law of Indonesia in line with developments in the modern criminal law sanctions governing sanctions fines or compensation for victims.


10.12737/7595 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Сергей Андрусенко ◽  
Sergey Andrusenko

The article discusses current issues in the restoration of victim rights by applying one of the fundamental principles of criminal law: the reestablishment of social justice and the commensurability/proportionality of the criminal justice system. Study the problems in the theory of criminal punishment that justify the possibility of increasing the punishment after conviction. The author also analyzes some of the positions of modern medicine which is based on the ability to change the verdict and appointment of new criminal penalties. Insufficient developed changes that were made to the criminal procedure law, can create problems of law enforcement practices that lead to a substantial violation of the rights of victims. The article also examines conflict general principles of criminal law, namely, the restoration of social justice and proportionality of criminal punishment and principle non bis in idem. The author points out significant challenges that may arise in law enforcement and offers solutions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
Redyanto Sidi ◽  
Samuel Gunawan ◽  
Muhammad Yoga Dwi Anggara Sopiyan

Phenomenon by providing a Doctor's certificate in the criminal justice system involving a witness, a suspect, accused in corruption cases start of the examination in the Police, the Prosecutor's office, Corruption Eradication Commission, the Court, as well as in Correctional Institutions, stating that the person concerned should be treated and treated specifically and also nothing should be referred to the hospital with complete amenities, this phenomenon has been carried out since long. The utilization of a doctor's certificate is against the law in criminal cases of corruption, according to the dynamics of law enforcement in Indonesia is certainly not going to stop. If this issue continues to be adversely affects the process of law enforcement in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The source of the data obtained in this research is sourced from the material library and descriptive analytics which is intended to reveal a problem or situation or event as it is so that it can uncover the actual facts. The results in this study show that Fraud and irregularities a Doctor's certificate will easily occur. There is a strong tendency among law enforcement, that a doctor's certificate is evidence that the strong, and can not be contested. In the history of law enforcement corruption in Indonesia, law enforcement has yet to cultivate the examination and make a doctor's certificate is genuine or fake and can be justified scientifically and professionally. In addition, it is also never ask for another opinion from another doctor to check the health of a person declared sick and was unable to be present in the judicial process, from the previous doctor. Keywords: A Doctor's Certificate, Criminal Justice, Corruption.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (06) ◽  
pp. 226-235
Author(s):  
Feddy Hantyo Nugroho ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin

This research was conducted to analyze and find out how criminal law policy is in the effort to apply criminal sanctions against children facing the law in terms of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and whether the concept of Diversity can be applied in the process of law enforcement against children involved in Narcotics Crimes. This research is a normative study, to analyze the legal material related to the problem under study, the author uses the Interpretation, Subjective and Objective Interpretation instruments, after that the authors process these legal materials by deductive thinking. The results obtained from the study that the drafting of Law Number 11 of 2012 is a replacement to Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile justice conducted with the aim of establishing a judiciary that truly guarantees the best protection of the interests of children facing the law as nation's next generation. The concept of Restorative Justice is one of the important things in Law Number 11 of 2012 where restoring the situation as it used to be the main goal and also no less important is the form of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on Children where criminal sanctions that are harsh and miserable are used as ultimum Remedium is not as a premium remedium especially as a maximum remedium. The concept of diversion that should be applied in Indonesia in the future, should be a combination of the concept of diversion that is applied in Australia, namely Police Diversion which is combined with the process of handling cases with the diversion prevailing in Indonesia today.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rendy Surya Aditama ◽  
Umar Ma�ruf

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi tingginya kasus peredaran psikotropika yang dilakukan oleh anak. Berdasarkan UU SPPA, kasus anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum yang dapat diselesaikan dengan upaya diversi adalah kasus yang ancamannya dibawah tujuh tahun, tetapi temuan dilapangan, diketahui bahwa banyak kasus anak yang ancaman hukumannya di atas tujuh tahun diselesaikan melalui diversi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah merumuskan kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang.Pisau analisis dalam penelitian ini adalah teori hukum progresif, teori tujuan hukum, konsep diversi, konsep psikotropika, konsep kebijakan hukum pidana, pendekatan keadilan restoratif dan UU SPPA. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika saat ini telah menerapkan UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di Indonesia sudah dilakukan dengan baik, namun masih terlihat adanya pelanggaran terhadap UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak pada Pasal 64, yaitu di dalam persidangan maupun publikasi hasil persidangan dengan jelas menyebutkan nama anak dimuka umum, sehingga hal ini menyalahi peraturan dalam Pasal 64 huruf i. Kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang, dapat dilakukan dengan menerapkan perlindungan anak serta menerapkan sistem peradilan pidana anak, persidangan dilakukan setelah anak berusia dewasa, serta pelaksanaan hukuman pidana dilakukan setelah anak berusia 18 tahun. Saran terkait temuan penelitian ini adalah dapat menanggulangi tindak pidana psikotropika yang dilakukan oleh anak dengan menerapkan kebijakan formulasi penegakan hukum pidana Polres Magelang terhadap anak sebagai pelaku kejahatan psikotropika di masa yang akan datang.Kata kunci: kebijakan, formulasi, psikotropika, anak.ABSTRACTThis research is motivated by high psychotropic circulation cases conducted by children. Under the SPPA Act, the case of a law-facing child who can be resolved by a diversion effort is a case that threats under seven years, but findings in the field, it is known that many cases of children whose sentence threats over seven years are resolved through a diversion. The purpose of this study is to formulate policy formulation of criminal law enforcement Polres Magelang against children as perpetrators of psychotropic crime in the future.The analysis blade in this research is progressive law theory, theory of law objective, diversion concept, psychotropic concept, concept of criminal law policy, restorative justice approach and SPPA law. This research uses normative juridical method with data collection method of literature study.The results of this study indicate that policy formulation of criminal law enforcement Polres Magelang to child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime at this time have applied Law no. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of Children. Policy formulation of criminal law enforcement of Magelang Police against child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime in Indonesia has been done well, but still seen violation against Law no. 35 Year 2014 About Amendment to Law no. Law No. 23 Year 2002 on Child Protection in Article 64, namely in the hearing and publication of the proceedings clearly states the name of the child in public, so that this is contrary to the rules in Article 64 letter i. The policy of formulation of criminal law enforcement of Magelang Police against child as perpetrator of psychotropic crime in the future can be done by applying child protection as well as applying the child criminal justice system, the trial is done after the adult child, and the implementation of criminal punishment is done after the child is 18 years old. Suggestions related to the findings of this study is to cope with psychotropic crimes committed by children by applying the policy of criminal law enforcement formulation Magelang Police against children as perpetrators of psychotropic crimes in the future.Keywords: policy, formulation, psychotropic, child.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Budi Waskito

AbstractCriminal justice system as a tool of law enforcemen didn�t work optimally, in fact criminal justice system in Indonesia be acquainted whith principle of function difference impact on law enforcemennt performance so it will be difficult to achieve its function, as a crime prevention effort. This research purpose to set system concept and ideal approaches the organization of a unified criminal justice system so as to achieve an optimal performance of the criminal justice system (CJS) in criminal law enforcement, by approachng the system and re-structural, substantial and cultural reorientation of the criminal justice system.the main object of research is againt criminal law enforcement policy, the approach used is a normative juridical and sosiological approach complemented by a historical aproach/contextual and global/comparative, by prioritizing secondary data whit qualitative analysis. The result of the research show the sub system in the criminal justice system (such as investigation, prosecution, adjudicate and execution) funcionally and institutionally has not yet shown the existence of an integrated criminal justice system when viewed partially, the components of the support component seem to separate from one another, and tend to be centric institutions. Understanding of the integrated criminal justice system is inseparable from an understanding that includes substantial meaning, but also a philosophical aspect about the meaning justice and be nefit integrated. Therefore the legal culture is an integral part. ����Keyword: implementation of the criminal justice system, functional differentiation, integrated approach.Abstrak Sistem peradilan pidana sebagai sistem penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan hukum pidana, tidak berjalan secara optimal bahkan sistem peradilan pidana di indonesia dikenal asas �differensiasi fiungsional� berdampak pada kinerja penegakkan hukum sehingga akan sulit untuk mencapai fungsinya, sebagai upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan konsep sistem dan pendekatan yang ideal penyelenggaraan sistem peradilan pidana yang integral sehingga terwujud suatu kinerja Sistem peradilan pidana (SPP) yang optimal dalam penegakan hukum pidana, dengan melakukan pendekatan sistem dan reorientasi struktural, substansial dan kultural terhadap sistem peradilan pidana. Objek utama penelitian ialah terhadap kebijakan penegakan hukum pidana, pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dilengkapi dengan pendekatan historis/kontekstual dan global/komparatif, dengan mengutamakan data sekunder dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sub-sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana (sub-sistem penyidikan, penuntutan, mengadili dan pelakasana pidana) secara fungsional dan kelembagaan belum menujukkan adanya perihal sistem peradilan pidana terpadu (SPPT) apabila dilihat secara parsial, komponen-komponen pendukung terkesan terpisah antara satu dengan yang lainnya, serta cenderung bersifat �instansi sentris�. Pemahaman mengenai sistem perdilan pidana terpadu tidak terlepas dari pemahaman yang mencakup makna substansial, tapi juga menyentuh aspek filosofis mengenai makna keadilan dan kemanfaatan secara terintegrasi. Oleh karena itu budaya hukum merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan.Kata kunci: Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, differensiasi fungsional, Pendekatan terpadu


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200
Author(s):  
Mhd. Hendara Adha ◽  
Edi Warman ◽  
Triono Eddy

This article discusses how the law arrangements in the juvenile justice in the process of resolving the case, How restorative justice restrictions in law enforcement in Indonesia and How the application of Restorative justice law in the process of settlement of criminal case in Criminal Law in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical that describes reviewing and explaining and analyzing normative provisions associated with restorative justice applicable in Indonesia. From the above discussion that restorative justice in the settlement of criminal acts committed by children is very concerned in rebuilding relations after the occurrence of criminal acts, rather than exacerbate the rift between the perpetrators, victims and the community which is the character of the current modern criminal justice system. The restorative criminal justice process holds the view that realizing justice is not only a matter of government and criminality, but more than that it must provide justice in totality that can not ignore the interests and rights of victims and society. Implementation of the principle of restorative justice and the process of diversion as an effort to solve crimes committed by children in formal juridical has been set clearly and firmly in Law Number 11 Year 2012 about kids of justice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Alfredo Risano ◽  
Ayu Dian Ningtias

 In terms of enforcement the law. Second, legal instruments in the framework of criminal law enforcement abuse of narcotics against minors using a legal basis Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. In the the provisions of the SPPA Law, in order to prosecute children who are involved with the law, then a diversion effort is carried out, namely a restorative effort or recovery state solve the problem together, in this research is focous about How are repressive legal measures against child narcotics users in under age?. As previously explained, in act Number 11 In 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is a restorative principle (Restorative justice), which is aimed at restoring the original state, meaning efforts to restore the attitudes and mentality of children who have committed acts the crime of narcotics abuse to be as before or as a cure for the criminal act he has committed. Of course, the provisions of the Narcotics Law are not sidelined even though his repressive legal remedies are based on the provisions of law SPPA.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Wendy Martínez

Se presenta un proyecto pedagógico sobre el aprendizaje del Derecho Penal Especial en la Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra. El punto de partida es la necesidad de dar respuesta a las múltiples inquietudes sobre las estrategias para lograr una aproximación entre la Teoría del Derecho Penal y su práctica en los tribunales. Tanto en la construcción de la pregunta como en la explicitación del contexto del estudio y en la recopilación de la información, se recurrió a la técnica de la encuesta y la entrevista a estudiantes, profesores, autoridades académicas, y actores del sistema de justicia penal, así como a la elaboración de instrumentos especiales para recopilar la evidencia e implementar las estrategias propuestas. Las conclusiones son una reflexión final sobre el estudio y sobre las lecciones aprendidas como docente investigador, cuya proximidad con el objeto analizado constituyó el más fuerte escollo en el proceso.AbstractThis article presents a study on the learning of Special Criminal Law at the Pontificia Universidad Madre y Maestra. The initial motivation to conduct this project was the need to find a solution to the numerous concerns about the strategies to overcome the gap between the Theory of Criminal Law and its practice at Court. Surveys and interviews among students, professors, academic authorities and actors of the criminal justice system were the methods employed to collect the data. The conclusion is a reflection on the study and on the lessons learned as a research professor, whose proximity to the object of analysis constituted the main limitation throughout the process.


Author(s):  
Bendry Almy

ABSTRAKPrinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia hanya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi, namun diversi tersebut hanya ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana anak bukan untuk pelaku dewasa, peraturan perundang-perundangan pidana Indonesia belum mengatur prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa. Dalam praktik penegakan hukum, penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa sebagian telah dilaksanakan melalui diskresi, namun secara teoritis dan pratik pelaksanaan diskresi masih bermasalah karena belum memenuhi tiga nilai dasar hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan, dan diskresi juga bisa menimbulkan permasalahan ketidakadilan, karena adanya perbedaan perlakuan dalam proses penegakan hukum, sehingga asas “equality before the law” tidak dilaksanakan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia dan bagaimana penerapan diversi bagi pelaku dewasa dalam rangka mewujudkan keadilan restoratif. Jenis penelitian yaitu penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan, untuk mencari dan menemukan data yang dibutuhkan untuk menjawab permasalahan. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana Indonesia belum mengatur tentang prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa, prinsip keadilan restoratif diterapkan baru sebatas untuk pelaku anak yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi. Secara teoritis, historis, normatif dan praktik prosedural, diversi juga dapat diterapkan untuk menyelesaikan perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh orang dewasa, namun perlu adanya perubahan dan penyesuaian terutama dalam hal tujuan pelaksanaan, kwalifikasi jenis tindak pidana dan mekanisme atau prosedur pelaksanaannya.Kata kunci: kebijakan hukum pidana; anak; dewasa; diversi; keadilan restoratif.AbstractThe principle of restorative justice in criminal law regulations in force in Indonesia is only regulated in the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children (SPPA) which is applied in the form of diversion, however the diversion is only intended for child offenders not for adult offenders, Indonesian criminal laws and regulations do not regulate the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders. In law enforcement practices, the application of the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders has been partially implemented through discretion, but theoretically and practically the implementation of discretion is still problematic because it does not meet the three basic legal values, namely justice, certainty and benefit, and discretion can also cause problems of injustice, due to differences in treatment in the law enforcement process, so the principle of "equality before the law" is not implemented. The research goal is to find out how the implementation of the principles of restorative justice in criminal legislation in Indonesia, and how the application of diversion for adult offenders in order to realize restorative justice. This type of research is normative research or library research, to search and find the data needed to answer the problem. The results of the study note that Indonesian criminal law regulations do not regulate the principles of restorative justice for adult offenders, the principle of restorative justice is applied only to the child offenders which is applied in the form of diversion. Theoretically, historically, normatively and procedural practice, diversion can also be applied to resolve cases by adult offenders, but there needs to be changes and adjustments especially in terms of implementation objectives, qualification of the type of crime and the mechanism or procedure for its implementation.Keywords: criminal law policy; children; adults; diversion; restorative justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document