DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT): A Bibliometric Analysis of Cited References

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
Vishal Dattatray Bapte
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Information Source ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Source Journal ◽  
Pertinent Information ◽  
Single Authorship ◽  
Conference Papers ◽  
Ranked List

<p>The paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the 4821 cited documents appended to the 295 articles published in DJLIT during 2011-15. The citation analysis is based on various strictures such as studying distribution of citations, authorship pattern, degree of collaboration, distribution of reference sources, prominent authors and ranked list of core journals. The study revealed that there is dominance of single authorship with 1912 (39.65%) citations followed by two authors with 1152 (23.89%) citations, three authors with 456 (9.45%) citations and more than three authors with 386 (8%) citations. There has been the availability of a good degree of institutional publications as well. Year-wise authorship pattern is also specified so as to see the dominance of particular authorship pattern for the period considered under the study. The degree of authors’ collaboration for the present study is 0.51 and modified collaborative coefficient is 0.3661. Dr B.M. Gupta with 52 citations is the most prolific author. Dr K.C. Garg and Dr B.S. Kademani are at the second and third position respectively.  The study further exposed the journal to be the mostly cited information source 2560 (53.10%) followed by websites (22.69%) and books (10.81%). Conference papers, reports, theses, workshop papers and seminar papers equally seem to be preferred domain with regard to using pertinent information source. Ranked list of journals denotes Scientometrics to be the most used journal (6.60%) by the authors contributing in DJLIT. The source journal is at the second position in the ranked list with 5.43%. A glance at the ranked core list of journals suggests that maximum journals are from foreign countries.</p>

The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (2008-2017): A Scientometric Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84
Author(s):  
Ghouse Modin Nabeesab Mamdapur ◽  
Manjunath B. Hadimani ◽  
K. S. Ali ◽  
Engin Senel
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Author Productivity ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Scientometric Study ◽  
Ranked List

The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology is a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor and Francis. The present bibliometric analysis depends on 1059 articles distributed from 2008 to 2017 in 60 issues of the journal. An effort has been made to consider distinctive bibliometric markers, for instance year-wise conveyance of articles, length of the articles, authorship pattern, author productivity, year-wise appearance of references, dissemination of cited references, different forms of resources used and cited by authors in their research work, ranked list of prolific authors, journals and organizations.

Genetic Diversity Research Publication Output in India: A Scientometric Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-102
Author(s):  
Jyothi G. Nair ◽  
S. Raja
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Research Publication ◽  
Citation Pattern ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Collaboration Pattern ◽  
Single Authorship ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
Diversity Research

This paper attempts a scientometric analysis of literature in the field of genetic diversity in India over 5 years (2013-2017). A total of 1417 records and 5960 unique authors are identified. The study characterizes growth output, Authorship pattern, Collaboration pattern, Citation pattern, institutional status etc. Many of the publications have received worldwide attention of various researchers, policymakers, and planners. The number of papers was maximum in the year 2016. Average publication per year is 283. Multi-authored papers dominated over single authorship. The study was analysed by using HistCite software.

scholarly journals AUTHORSHIP PATTERNS AND COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH OF ONCOLOGY RESEARCH OUTPUT IN INDIA: A SCIENTOMETRICS STUDY

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
Senthilkumar R ◽  
Muthukrishnan M
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Paper Analysis ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Single Authorship ◽  
The Mean

The paper analysis authorship patterns and collaborative research of oncology research in Indiaas reflected by the research papers listed in Web of Science database for a period of 11 years from 2005-2015. The increased trend towards multiple authorship is predominant as compare to single authorship in case ofoncology in India.In the study, the degree of collaboration was not a constant value, it reveals varies of 0.03 to 0.16 percent and the mean quality as 0.09. The analysis found that single author papers maintained a low profile among oncology research scientists and the multi authorship pattern is expanding slowly in Indian oncology research.

scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published on Antibacterial Dental Adhesive from 1996–2020

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2848
Author(s):  
Abdul Samad Khan ◽  
Shafiq Ur Rehman ◽  
Yara Khalid AlMaimouni ◽  
Shakil Ahmad ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Measurement ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Bibliometric Method ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Usa ◽  
State Of Research ◽  
Highly Cited Articles ◽  
Highly Cited

This study aimed to investigate the current state of research on antibacterial dental adhesives. The interest in this field can be drawn from an increasing number of scholarly works in this area. However, there is still a lack of quantitative measurement of this topic. The main aim of this study was to consolidate the research published on the antibacterial adhesive from 1996 to 2020 in Web of Science indexed journals. The bibliometric method, a quantitative study of investigating publishing trends and patterns, was used for this study. The result has shown that a gradual increase in research was found, whereby a substantial increase was observed from 2013. A total of 248 documents were published in 84 journals with total citations of 5107. The highly cited articles were published mainly in Q1 category journals. Most of the published articles were from the USA, China, and other developed countries; however, some developing countries contributed as well. The authorship pattern showed an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach among researchers. The thematic evaluation of keywords along with a three-factor analysis showed that ‘antibacterial adhesives’ and ‘quaternary ammonium’ have been used commonly. This bibliometric analysis can provide direction not only to researchers but also to funding organizations and policymakers.

scholarly journals Assessing the Coronavirus Research Output: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092097511
Author(s):  
Asifa Ali ◽  
Irfan Ahmad Hakak ◽  
Faseeh Amin
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Subject Field ◽  
The Subject

The aim of this article is to examine the bibliometric analysis of global publication output on coronavirus, as covered in Web of Science during the period from 2000 to 2019. A total of 10,861 documents were found during a 20-year period spanning from 2000 to 2019 published in the ISI Web of Science. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. The findings reveal that the most productive year of publication was 2004 that included 782 publications with the majority published in the Journal of Virology. The result further indicates that the USA, China and Germany are the most productive countries in the field of Coronavirus research output. In terms of institutional output, University of Hong Kong emerged as the most productive institution; Yuen KY from Hong Kong is the most prolific author. In the subject category type, the most prominent subject field is Virology, Infectious Disease and Veterinary Science. The findings of the study are limited to the data harvested from ‘Web of Science’. This study is of immense relevance to researchers and academicians who are searching for answers to this pandemic. This will provide insights to academicians to collaborate with other researchers based on the quality of the research produced by other countries and institutes. The study is useful for researchers, immunologists and epidemiologists who are interested in the field of Coronavirus and serves as a base for future research.

Publication trends in library and information science

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.P. Singh ◽  
Harish Chander
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Citation Pattern ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Library Management

Purpose – The purpose of the study is to explore the publication trends of the scholarly journal Library Management, and highlight its various important aspects. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents results of bibliometric analysis of 336 articles which were published during the period 2006-2012, in the Library Management journal of Emerald. Findings – The results indicate that the majority of the contributions by single authors and most cited documents are journal articles. The study highlights the chronological distribution of articles, authorship pattern, geographical distribution of authors, institutions wise distribution, citation pattern and length of articles. Originality/value – As yet there have been no such studies conducted that investigate the various aspects of Library Management journal. It evaluates the publication trends of the journal and has important implications for scholars and researchers.

scholarly journals Mapping of Celiac Disease Research Literature: A Scientometric Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 150-160
Author(s):  
M. Mercy Clarance ◽  
S. Raja
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Disease Research ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
The Web

The study aims to evaluate the celiac disease research publications in the Web of Science database from the years 2015 to 2018. The keyword used the term "Celiac Disease" from the Web of Science database collects the records. A total of 4147 records were collected from this study of Celiac disease. The highest productive year is 2017 with 1062 records (25.61%) and the last position of papers was published 1016(24.50%) in the year is 2016. The table provides the value of the average RGR of publications, which decreased from 6.93537 in 2015 to -0.01997 in 2018. At the same time, the value of doubling time (DT) of publications increased from 0.099923 (2015) to -34.6983 (2018). It has shown that the degree of collaboration range from zero to 0.95. The most prolific author Lebwohl B occupied in first position 107(2.58%) records. The most productive country USA placed in the topmost position with 1149(27.71%) records. The authorship pattern of celiac disease research this table notes that the majority of the articles were contributed by four authors 549(13.24%). These three authors were contributed 538(12.97%) second position of papers in this study. The first position of the journal is Gastroenterology published records with 260(6.27%). The language-wise distributions of published records in Celiac disease research in this present study. The most productive language is English with 4032(97.23%), and the last productivity language is Icelandic with 1(0.02%) publications. The Study concludes that Celiac Disease Research lags in this research, so come forward with financial institutions to encourage researchers and scientists to develop celiac research.

scholarly journals Development of Indonesia Scientific Publications of Physical Education in Reputable International Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67
Author(s):  
Yulingga Nanda Hanief ◽  
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto ◽  
Mashuri Eko Winarno ◽  
Aridhotul Haqiyah
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Educational Practice ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Prolific Author

This study aimed to determine trends in scientific publications and map the scope of thematic research in the field of Physical Education, especially for articles published in reputable international journals (Scopus) writen by Indonesian authors. The research process was focused on the following questions: (1) how is the productivity of Physical Education publications developing in Indonesia?; (2) who are the main contributors (author, University, and name of publication) for the published publications?; (3) what are the thematic areas that attract the most attention of academics?; and (4) what topics are emerging in the field of publication?. It’s used the Scopus database as the source of bibliometric analysis data for the research sampling process. The samples were 55 articles found through keyword "physical education" in the "article title" published in international journals indexed by Scopus. This study applied keyword co-occurrence analysis to identify and explore the main thematic areas and topics that appeared in publications. The VOSviewer software was used to support the analysis process and visualize findings. The results of the study show that physical education is a research area that still needs to be developed, referring to the productivity of publications from 2013 to 2020, which the range of publication was still below 15 per year. The collected research results were scattered in the fields of engineering studies (21), social sciences (18), and materials science (14). The main contributor of the publication was Indonesian University of Education (24). The most prolific author was Tedi Supriyadi from the Indonesian University of Education. In the Physical Education publications, six major thematic groups were identified, namely: (1) physical activity of school pupils; (2) sports; (3) Physical Education; (4) health; (5) education; and (6) creativity. This study conveyed to public that the mapping using bibliometric analysis contributes to a better understanding of the development patterns of publications in the field of Physical Education. By finding thematic areas and topics appearing in publications, this study conveys information of important issues for further research and theory development as well as for educational practice or application.

Bibliometric Analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology

2012 ◽  
pp. 303-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thanuskodi
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Single Author ◽  
Further Development

This chapter presents a bibliometric analysis of the journal, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, for the period between 2006 and 2010. The data were downloaded from the journal’s website. The analysis covers mainly the number of articles, authorship pattern, subject, distribution of articles, average number of references per articles, forms of documents cited, year distribution of cited journals, et cetera. Findings of the studies point towards the merits and weakness of the journal which are helpful for its further development. The result showed that out of 199 articles, 116 (58.29%) articles were contributed by joint authors while the rest 83 (41.71%) articles were contributed by single author. The study reveals that most of the contributions are from India with 93.97%, and the remaining 6.03% were from foreign authors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document