scholarly journals Biodegradable macromers for implant bulk and surface engineering

2021 ◽  
Vol 402 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357-1374
Author(s):  
Jan Krieghoff ◽  
Mathis Gronbach ◽  
Michaela Schulz-Siegmund ◽  
Michael C. Hacker
Keyword(s):  
Surface Modification ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Surface Engineering ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Reactive Groups ◽  
Application Requirements ◽  
Design Options ◽  
Linker Molecules

Abstract Macromers, polymeric molecules with at least two functional groups for cross-polymerization, are interesting materials to tailor mechanical, biochemical and degradative bulk and surface properties of implants for tissue regeneration. In this review we focus on macromers with at least one biodegradable building block. Manifold design options, such as choice of polymeric block(s), optional core molecule and reactive groups, as well as cross-co-polymerization with suitable anchor or linker molecules, allow the adaptation of macromer-based biomaterials towards specific application requirements in both hard and soft tissue regeneration. Implants can be manufactured from macromers using additive manufacturing as well as molding and templating approaches. This review summarizes and discusses the overall concept of biodegradable macromers and recent approaches for macromer processing into implants as well as techniques for surface modification directed towards bone regeneration. These aspects are reviewed including a focus on the authors’ contributions to the field through research within the collaborative research project Transregio 67.

scholarly journals 3D Printing for Soft Tissue Regeneration and Applications in Medicine

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Sven Pantermehl ◽  
Steffen Emmert ◽  
Aenne Foth ◽  
Niels Grabow ◽  
Said Alkildani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration ◽  
General Overview

The use of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies is a relatively young research area in modern medicine. This technology offers a fast and effective way of producing implants, tissues, or entire organs individually adapted to the needs of a patient. Today, a large number of different 3D printing technologies with individual application areas are available. This review is intended to provide a general overview of these various printing technologies and their function for medical use. For this purpose, the design and functionality of the different applications are presented and their individual strengths and weaknesses are explained. Where possible, previous studies using the respective technologies in the field of tissue engineering are briefly summarized.

INNOVATIVE REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SOFT TISSUE REGENERATION

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-214
Author(s):  
Roshan James ◽  
Matthew D. Harmon ◽  
Sangamesh G. Kumbar ◽  
Cato T. Laurencin
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Regenerative Engineering ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration

scholarly journals Osseointegration Improvement of Co-Cr-Mo Alloy Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Amilton Iatecola ◽  
Guilherme Arthur Longhitano ◽  
Luiz Henrique Martinez Antunes ◽  
André Luiz Jardini ◽  
Emilio de Castro Miguel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Modification ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Bone Ingrowth ◽  
Orthopedic Implants ◽  
Coated Sample ◽  
High Mechanical Strength ◽  
Coated Surface ◽  
Surface Modification Techniques ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Cobalt Base

Cobalt-base alloys (Co-Cr-Mo) are widely employed in dentistry and orthopedic implants due to their biocompatibility, high mechanical strength and wear resistance. The osseointegration of implants can be improved by surface modification techniques. However, complex geometries obtained by additive manufacturing (AM) limits the efficiency of mechanical-based surface modification techniques. Therefore, plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) is the best alternative, creating nanotopography even in complex structures. In the present study, we report the osseointegration results in three conditions of the additively manufactured Co-Cr-Mo alloy: (i) as-built, (ii) after PIII, and (iii) coated with titanium (Ti) followed by PIII. The metallic samples were designed with a solid half and a porous half to observe the bone ingrowth in different surfaces. Our results revealed that all conditions presented cortical bone formation. The titanium-coated sample exhibited the best biomechanical results, which was attributed to the higher bone ingrowth percentage with almost all medullary canals filled with neoformed bone and the pores of the implant filled and surrounded by bone ingrowth. It was concluded that the metal alloys produced for AM are biocompatible and stimulate bone neoformation, especially when the Co-28Cr-6Mo alloy with a Ti-coated surface, nanostructured and anodized by PIII is used, whose technology has been shown to increase the osseointegration capacity of this implant.

scholarly journals Promoting musculoskeletal system soft tissue regeneration by biomaterial-mediated modulation of macrophage polarization

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 4096-4109
Author(s):  
Jinchun Ye ◽  
Chang Xie ◽  
Canlong Wang ◽  
Jiayun Huang ◽  
Zi Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Musculoskeletal System ◽  
Macrophage Polarization ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration

scholarly journals Size Effects in Finite Element Modelling of 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds Using Hydroxyapatite PEOT/PBT Composites

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 1746
Author(s):  
Iñigo Calderon-Uriszar-Aldaca ◽  
Sergio Perez ◽  
Ravi Sinha ◽  
Maria Camara-Torres ◽  
Sara Villanueva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Finite Element Modelling ◽  
Bulk Material ◽  
Bone Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Design Factor ◽  
Element Modelling ◽  
Uncertainty Sources

Additive manufacturing (AM) of scaffolds enables the fabrication of customized patient-specific implants for tissue regeneration. Scaffold customization does not involve only the macroscale shape of the final implant, but also their microscopic pore geometry and material properties, which are dependent on optimizable topology. A good match between the experimental data of AM scaffolds and the models is obtained when there is just a few millimetres at least in one direction. Here, we describe a methodology to perform finite element modelling on AM scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration with clinically relevant dimensions (i.e., volume > 1 cm3). The simulation used an equivalent cubic eight node finite elements mesh, and the materials properties were derived both empirically and numerically, from bulk material direct testing and simulated tests on scaffolds. The experimental validation was performed using poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) copolymers and 45 wt% nano hydroxyapatite fillers composites. By applying this methodology on three separate scaffold architectures with volumes larger than 1 cm3, the simulations overestimated the scaffold performance, resulting in 150–290% stiffer than average values obtained in the validation tests. The results mismatch highlighted the relevance of the lack of printing accuracy that is characteristic of the additive manufacturing process. Accordingly, a sensitivity analysis was performed on nine detected uncertainty sources, studying their influence. After the definition of acceptable execution tolerances and reliability levels, a design factor was defined to calibrate the methodology under expectable and conservative scenarios.

scholarly journals Concomitant control of mechanical properties and degradation in resorbable elastomer-like materials using stereochemistry and stoichiometry for soft tissue engineering

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Wandel ◽  
Craig A. Bell ◽  
Jiayi Yu ◽  
Maria C. Arno ◽  
Nathan Z. Dreger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Drug Delivery ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Biological Tissues ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Soft Tissue Engineering ◽  
Degradation Properties ◽  
Enhance Cell Adhesion

AbstractComplex biological tissues are highly viscoelastic and dynamic. Efforts to repair or replace cartilage, tendon, muscle, and vasculature using materials that facilitate repair and regeneration have been ongoing for decades. However, materials that possess the mechanical, chemical, and resorption characteristics necessary to recapitulate these tissues have been difficult to mimic using synthetic resorbable biomaterials. Herein, we report a series of resorbable elastomer-like materials that are compositionally identical and possess varying ratios of cis:trans double bonds in the backbone. These features afford concomitant control over the mechanical and surface eroding degradation properties of these materials. We show the materials can be functionalized post-polymerization with bioactive species and enhance cell adhesion. Furthermore, an in vivo rat model demonstrates that degradation and resorption are dependent on succinate stoichiometry in the elastomers and the results show limited inflammation highlighting their potential for use in soft tissue regeneration and drug delivery.

scholarly journals Extracellular matrix‐based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue regeneration

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Tavelli ◽  
Michael K. McGuire ◽  
Giovanni Zucchelli ◽  
Giulio Rasperini ◽  
Stephen E. Feinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Soft Tissue Regeneration
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document