This book is dedicated to “all those working for the liquidation of sociolinguistics
as we know it” (p. 6). One of the dominant themes of this book is a conservative
skepticism about institutional claims to a knowledge of Indian
sociolinguistics—western scholars and their “Indian cohorts” (p. 31,
and passim) claiming to know the multilingual complexities of India. The nine
essays, most previously published, are assembled in an attempt to deconstruct some of the
established paradigms of Indian sociolinguistics, especially those that authors believe are
guided by western models. The authors' dissatisfaction with the use of western
parameters in interpreting the social realities of India is shared by most, if not all, linguists
active in research in Indian linguistics; this book presents, in one volume, critiques of the
works done in the past. After reading the book, whether or not one agrees with its stated
agenda or its reinterpretation of the data, it is a brilliantly provocative, sometimes polemic,
revisionist account of the multilingual realities of South Asia. The first nine essays offer
critiques of studies in both micro- and macro-sociolinguistic traditions. The last two essays
review two books: Gumperz's (1982) Language and social identity, and
Bhatia's (1987) A history of the Hindi grammatical tradition.