The essence, problems and prospects of national education in the journal "Philosophy of education" (2006-2010)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-114
Author(s):  
I. V. Yakovleva ◽  
T. S. Kosenko
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-739
Author(s):  
G. MATTHEW ADKINS

This article considers the philosophical foundations of the French Enlightenment through a close study of the Stoic influences on the Marquis de Condorcet's education philosophy. The article argues that although Condorcet did not acknowledge any direct Stoic influence, his philosophy of education nevertheless should be understood in the eclectic idiom of eighteenth-century Stoic discourse. Furthermore, Condorcet's Stoicism was entirely compatible with Rousseau's Stoicism to the degree that one could call Condorcet a Rousseauean at least in matters of education theory—even though Condorcet, a protégé of Voltaire, is usually presented as a critic of Rousseau. Finally, the article suggests that the notion of liberty that Condorcet seeks to make flourish through his national education plan is in line with the Stoic ideal of rational autonomy, despite Condorcet's insistence that the modern idea of liberty (that is, his own idea) is fundamentally different from the ancient idea.


Author(s):  
Rina Avinash Pitale Puradkar

The greatest educationalist, those who played important roles in designing education systems have, in their quest to develop ideal processes and structure of education. The new pedagogy of national education impels a further realization of the potentialities of the child and its soul, a realisation that was explicitly stated in the writings of the nationalist leaders who inspired and led the movement of national education in India. In this paper I have tried to revisit the philosophy of education of Sri Aurobindo who tried to provide solution to the problem generated by Macaulayan education system in India during pre and post-colonial period.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwi Siswoyo

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hal-hal yang esensial dari pandangan Bung Karno tentang Pancasila dan pendidikan. Metode penelitian historis ini mengkaji karya-karya Bung Karno. Data dianalisis dengan teknik analisis menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutika dialektis untuk memperoleh fusi horison makna tentang Pancasila dan pengembangan pendidikan nasional Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini dapat memberikan gambaran pandangan tentang urgensi nasionalisme dalam membangun bangsa dan urgensi Pancasila sebagai dasar filosofi negara termasuk sebagai dasar filosofi pendidikan nasional Indonesia, serta urgensi pendidikan nasional dalam membangun kepribadian (karakter) bangsa Indonesia. Pengembangan pendidikan nasional dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan “eklektik-inkorporatif-harmonis-dinamis”.Kata Kunci: nasionalisme, pendidikan nasionalBUNG KARNO’S VIEW ON PANCASILA AND EDUCATIONAbstract: This study was aimed at finding out Bung Karno’s essential view on Pancasila and education. This historical research method examined the philosophical works of Bung Karno. The data were analyzed using the hermeneutic dialectic approach to pick out the meaning horizon fusion on Pancasila and the development of the Indonesian national education. The findings showed a snapshot view of the urgency of nationalism in building the nation and the urgency of Pancasila as the country’s basic philosophy including Indonesia's national philosophy of education, as well as the urgency of the national education in building the nation’s character. The development of the national education was carried out through the ‘eclectic-incorporative-harmonious-dynamic’ approach.Keywords: nationalism, national education


2020 ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Yulduz Namazova

The philosophy of education, which was formed in Turkestan in the late 19th - early 20th centuries, is interpreted as an area of research that analyzes the national pedagogical activity and educational foundations of these modern educators, its goals and ideals, the methodology of pedagogical knowledge, methods of creating a new Russian school system. Thus, it can be said with confidence that the philosophy of education, as an area that has a socioinstitutional form during this period, reflected the goals and objectives of the educational program of the Jadids. We know that during the formation of the Jadid Enlightenment, special studies of the philosophy of education were carried out, first in the United States and then in Europe. However, even before that, a separate philosophical system for the philosophy of education was created by such philosophers as Plato, Aristotle, Jan Amos Comenius, Locke, Herbart. In general, the philosophy of education is understood as an area of philosophical knowledge that has a subject of study. Philosophy of education as a science originated at the beginning of the 20th century. The founder of the philosophy of education in the world is the Anglo-American philosopher John Dewey. Today, in English-speaking countries, the philosophy of education has become a discipline with the status of a subject offered by individual faculties of universities. Thus, this chapter is devoted to the analysis of philosophical problems associated with the theory and practice of education of the Jadids, their approach to the problems of education, description, and reflection of the educational system of that period, its goals and levels, since the entire period of philosophical development is closely related to the ideas of the enlightenment. This chapter also presents a conceptual analysis of the educational organization and gender issues in Turkestan schools of the “new method”. For the Jadids, Islam was a way to get rid of ignorance, a means to achieve spiritual perfection. In Turkestan, the main goal is to build a secular state based on universal ideas, governed by Parlament. In particular, we see this in the process of political efforts to create a “national autonomy of Turkestan autonomy.” The changing nature of the Jadid movement is also characterized by an emphasis on education. This was due to the idea of the Jadid enlighteners to follow the Turkish, Tatar, and Azerbaijani intellectual world, as well as the desire to learn about Western European enlightenment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-34
Author(s):  
Mykhail Ivanovych Boychenko

The article analyzes the development of the education system of Ukraine from the point of view of the theory of generations by American researchers William Strauss and Neil Howe. Theoretical substantiation of the hypothesis concerning the transitional character of the whole Ukrainian society from the Soviet cycle of generational change to the national cycle of generational change is given. The subjects of education providing are the middle and older generations, while the subjects of education are mostly the younger generation – the sociological and historical definition of these generations, specifying their characteristics as stable social groups in a society should be the next step. The tasks of the philosophy of education, which for some time were devoted to reflecting on the development of the national education system in general, must now should be specified now as tasks for a certain generation of Ukrainian (and not Soviet or post-Soviet) society. In this context, it is time for both the Institute of Higher Education and the philosophy of education to summarize, revise the initial vision of institutional tasks, clarify them, expand, supplement with new tasks and in general – create a new vision of the philosophy of education and philosophy of higher education in Ukraine. Overcoming the current crisis of the education system of Ukraine is possible through a clear definition of the goals and basic values of education for specific participants of the educational process – only in this way, systemic goals and values become the values and goals of individual educational communities. Teachers, professors and other subjects of education appear then as specific pedagogical teams, united by explicit educational values and goals, which are clearly correlated, on the one hand, with the tasks of development of the national educational system, and on the other – with the motivation of educational activities of specific teachers. The inevitable competition in education, which is particularly dramatic in overcoming its systemic crisis, has positive consequences if it is carried out as a competition for the best embodiment of virtues, for excellence in the providing and gaining of education.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Agus Hermawan ◽  
Emily B. Tan

<p>‘Tut Wuri Handayani’ is the slogan of the National Education of Indonesia, written in Sanskrit. It is a Philosophy of Education which was originally promoted by Ki Hajar Dewantara. Practically, it is an accumulation of educational processes that prioritize the transformation of good character and knowledge through Organization Governance that is instigated by educational leadership. In this regard, the paper utilizes literature review method to get information from researchers published in refereed journals regarding process governance, model of organization governance in school and synthesizes the information to show how “Tut Wuri Handayani” can be promoted by the school leaders in order that it can be integrated in the school governance. This paper invites researchers to apply qualitative research designs to explore the possibility of the implementation the Philosophy Education: “Tut Wuri Handayani” in Organization Governance of Schools in Indonesia.</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bridges ◽  
Amare Asgedom ◽  
Setargew Kenaw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document