Respiratory Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

CONTEXT Respiratory dysfunction is a component of every organ failure scoring system developed, reflecting the significance of the lung in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. However, existing systems do not reflect current practice and are not consistently evidence based. OBJECTIVE We aimed to review the literature to identify the components of respiratory failure associated with outcomes in children, with the purpose of developing an operational and evidence-based definition of respiratory dysfunction. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from 1992 to January 2020 by using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words to define respiratory dysfunction, critical illness, and outcomes. STUDY SELECTION We included studies of critically ill children with respiratory dysfunction that evaluated the performance of metrics of respiratory dysfunction and their association with patient-centered outcomes. Studies in adults, studies in premature infants (≤36 weeks’ gestational age), animal studies, reviews and commentaries, case series with sample sizes ≤10, and studies not published in English in which we were unable to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted into a standard data extraction form. RESULTS We provided binary (no or yes) and graded (no, nonsevere, or severe) definitions of respiratory dysfunction, prioritizing oxygenation and respiratory support. The proposed criteria were approved by 82% of members in the first round, with a score of 8 of 9 (interquartile range 7–8). LIMITATIONS Exclusion of non-English publications, heterogeneity across the pediatric age range, small sample sizes, and incomplete handling of confounders are limitations. CONCLUSIONS We propose definitions for respiratory dysfunction in critically ill children after an exhaustive literature review.

Download Full-text

Acute Neurologic Dysfunction in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888e ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S32-S38

Author(s):

Mark S. Wainwright ◽

Kristin Guilliams ◽

Sujatha Kannan ◽

Dennis W. Simon ◽

Robert C. Tasker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Glasgow Coma Scale ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Task Force ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Adult Population ◽

Case Series ◽

Consensus Conference ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Coma Scale ◽

Neurologic Dysfunction

CONTEXT Acute neurologic dysfunction is common in critically ill children and contributes to outcomes and end of life decision-making. OBJECTIVE To develop consensus criteria for neurologic dysfunction in critically ill children by evaluating the evidence supporting such criteria and their association with outcomes. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020, by using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words to define concepts of neurologic dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes of interest. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if the researchers evaluated critically ill children with neurologic injury, evaluated the performance characteristics of assessment and scoring tools to screen for neurologic dysfunction, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies with an adult population or premature infants (≤36 weeks' gestational age), animal studies, reviews or commentaries, case series with sample size ≤10, and studies not published in English with an inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each study meeting inclusion criteria into a standard data extraction form by task force members. DATA SYNTHESIS The systematic review supported the following criteria for neurologic dysfunction as any 1 of the following: (1) Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8; (2) Glasgow Coma Scale motor score ≤4; (3) Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium score ≥9; or (4) electroencephalography revealing attenuation, suppression, or electrographic seizures. CONCLUSIONS We present consensus criteria for neurologic dysfunction in critically ill children.

Download Full-text

Hematologic Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888k ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S74-S78

Author(s):

Jennifer A. Muszynski ◽

Jill M. Cholette ◽

Marie E. Steiner ◽

Marisa Tucci ◽

Allan Doctor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Organ Dysfunction ◽

English Language ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Case Series ◽

Hemoglobin Concentration ◽

Consensus Conference ◽

Data Sources ◽

Critically Ill Children

CONTEXT Studies of organ dysfunction in children are limited by a lack of consensus around organ dysfunction criteria. OBJECTIVES To derive evidence-informed, consensus-based criteria for hematologic dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES Data sources included PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated assessment/scoring tools to screen for hematologic dysfunction and assessed outcomes of mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies of adults or premature infants, animal studies, reviews/commentaries, small case series, and non-English language studies with inability to determine eligibility were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each eligible study into a standard data extraction form along with risk of bias assessment. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies were included. The systematic review supports the following criteria for hematologic dysfunction: thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100000 cells/µL in patients without hematologic or oncologic diagnosis, platelet count <30000 cells/µL in patients with hematologic or oncologic diagnoses, or platelet count decreased ≥50% from baseline; or leukocyte count <3000 cells/µL; or hemoglobin concentration between 5 and 7 g/dL (nonsevere) or <5 g/dL (severe). LIMITATIONS Most studies evaluated pre-specified thresholds of cytopenias. No studies addressed associations between the etiology or progression of cytopenias overtime with outcomes, and no studies evaluated cellular function. CONCLUSIONS Hematologic dysfunction, as defined by cytopenia, is a risk factor for poor outcome in critically ill children, although specific threshold values associated with increased mortality are poorly defined by the current literature.

Download Full-text

Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888h ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S53-S58

Author(s):

Katri V. Typpo ◽

Sharon Y. Irving ◽

Jose M. Prince ◽

Nazima Pathan ◽

Ann-Marie Brown

Keyword(s):

Critical Illness ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Task Force ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Case Series ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Abdominal Radiograph ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Gastrointestinal Dysfunction ◽

Plain Abdominal Radiograph

CONTEXT Prior criteria to define pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) did not include gastrointestinal dysfunction. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to evaluate current evidence and to develop consensus criteria for gastrointestinal dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020, using medical subject heading terms and text words to define gastrointestinal dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with gastrointestinal dysfunction, performance characteristics of assessment/scoring tools to screen for gastrointestinal dysfunction, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies of adults or premature infants, animal studies, reviews/commentaries, case series with sample size ≤10, and non-English language studies with inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each eligible study into a standard data extraction form along with risk of bias assessment by a task force member. RESULTS The systematic review supports the following criteria for severe gastrointestinal dysfunction: 1a) bowel perforation, 1b) pneumatosis intestinalis, or 1c) bowel ischemia, present on plain abdominal radiograph, computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or gross surgical inspection, or 2) rectal sloughing of gut mucosa. LIMITATIONS The validity of the consensus criteria for gastrointestinal dysfunction are limited by the quantity and quality of current evidence. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the role of gastrointestinal dysfunction in the pathophysiology and outcomes of MODS is important in pediatric critical illness.

Download Full-text

Scoring Systems for Organ Dysfunction and Multiple Organ Dysfunction: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888d ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S23-S31

Author(s):

Luregn J. Schlapbach ◽

Scott L. Weiss ◽

Melania M. Bembea ◽

Joseph A. Carcillo ◽

Francis Leclerc ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Critically Ill ◽

Organ Dysfunction ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Severity Of Illness ◽

Scoring Systems ◽

Multiple Organ ◽

Consensus Conference ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Multiple Organ Dysfunction ◽

Scoring Tools

CONTEXT Multiple scores exist to characterize organ dysfunction in children. OBJECTIVE To review the literature on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems to estimate severity of illness and to characterize the performance characteristics of currently used scoring tools and clinical assessments for organ dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with MOD, evaluated the performance characteristics of scoring tools for MOD, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted into a standard data extraction form by a task force member. RESULTS Of 1152 unique abstracts screened, 156 full text studies were assessed including a total of 54 eligible studies. The most commonly reported scores were the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (PELOD), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (pSOFA), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PRISM, and counts of organ dysfunction using the International Pediatric Sepsis Definition Consensus Conference. Cut-offs for specific organ dysfunction criteria, diagnostic elements included, and use of counts versus weighting varied substantially. LIMITATIONS While scores demonstrated an increase in mortality associated with the severity and number of organ dysfunctions, the performance ranged widely. CONCLUSIONS The multitude of scores on organ dysfunction to assess severity of illness indicates a need for unified and data-driven organ dysfunction criteria, derived and validated in large, heterogenous international databases of critically ill children.

Download Full-text

Renal Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888j ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S66-S73

Author(s):

Julie C. Fitzgerald ◽

Rajit K. Basu ◽

Dana Y. Fuhrman ◽

Stephen M. Gorga ◽

Amanda B. Hassinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Serum Creatinine ◽

Renal Dysfunction ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Urine Output ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Case Series ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Critically Ill Children

CONTEXT Renal dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes in critically ill children. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the current evidence for criteria defining renal dysfunction in critically ill children and association with adverse outcomes. To develop contemporary consensus criteria for renal dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Embase were searched from January 1992 to January 2020. STUDY SELECTION Included studies evaluated critically ill children with renal dysfunction, performance characteristics of assessment tools for renal dysfunction, and outcomes related to mortality, functional status, or organ-specific or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies with adults or premature infants (≤36 weeks' gestational age), animal studies, reviews, case series, and studies not published in English with inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were extracted from included studies into a standard data extraction form by task force members. RESULTS The systematic review supported the following criteria for renal dysfunction: (1) urine output <0.5 mL/kg per hour for ≥6 hours and serum creatinine increase of 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline or ≥0.3 mg/dL, or (2) urine output <0.5 mL/kg per hour for ≥12 hours, or (3) serum creatinine increase ≥2 times baseline, or (4) estimated glomerular filtration rate <35 mL/minute/1.73 m2, or (5) initiation of renal replacement therapy, or (6) fluid overload ≥20%. Data also support criteria for persistent renal dysfunction and for high risk of renal dysfunction. LIMITATIONS All included studies were observational and many were retrospective. CONCLUSIONS We present consensus criteria for renal dysfunction in critically ill children.

Download Full-text

Immune System Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.2021-052888n ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S91-S98

Author(s):

Mark W. Hall ◽

Joseph A. Carcillo ◽

Timothy Cornell

Keyword(s):

Immune System ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Task Force ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Case Series ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Immune System Dysfunction

CONTEXT Immune system dysfunction is poorly represented in pediatric organ dysfunction definitions. OBJECTIVE To evaluate evidence for criteria that define immune system dysfunction in critically ill children and associations with adverse outcomes and develop consensus criteria for the diagnosis of immune system dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES We conducted electronic searches of PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020, using medical subject heading terms and text words to define immune system dysfunction and outcomes of interest. STUDY SELECTION Studies of critically ill children with an abnormality in leukocyte numbers or function that is currently measurable in the clinical laboratory in which researchers assessed patient-centered outcomes were included. Studies of adults or premature infants, animal studies, reviews and commentaries, case series (≤10 subjects), and studies not published in English with inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from eligible studies into a standard data extraction form along with risk of bias assessment by a task force member. RESULTS We identified the following criteria for immune system dysfunction: (1) peripheral absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/μL, (2) peripheral absolute lymphocyte count <1000 cells/μL, (3) reduction in CD4+ lymphocyte count or percentage of total lymphocytes below age-specific thresholds, (4) monocyte HLA-DR expression <30%, or (5) reduction in ex vivo whole blood lipopolysaccharide-induced TNFα production capacity below manufacturer-provided thresholds. LIMITATIONS Many measures of immune system function are currently limited to the research environment. CONCLUSIONS We present consensus criteria for the diagnosis of immune system dysfunction in critically ill children.

Download Full-text

In-line filtration of intravenous infusion may reduce organ dysfunction of adult critical patients

Critical Care ◽

10.1186/s13054-019-2618-z ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Elke Schmitt ◽

Patrick Meybohm ◽

Eva Herrmann ◽

Karin Ammersbach ◽

Raphaela Endres ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Organ Dysfunction ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Brain Inflammation ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Respiratory Dysfunction ◽

Time Period ◽

Fine Filter

Abstract Background The potential harmful effects of particle-contaminated infusions for critically ill adult patients are yet unclear. So far, only significant improved outcome in critically ill children and new-borns was demonstrated when using in-line filters, but for adult patients, evidence is still missing. Methods This single-centre, retrospective controlled cohort study assessed the effect of in-line filtration of intravenous fluids with finer 0.2 or 1.2 μm vs 5.0 μm filters in critically ill adult patients. From a total of n = 3215 adult patients, n = 3012 patients were selected by propensity score matching (adjusting for sex, age, and surgery group) and assigned to either a fine filter cohort (with 0.2/1.2 μm filters, n = 1506, time period from February 2013 to January 2014) or a control filter cohort (with 5.0 μm filters, n = 1506, time period from April 2014 to March 2015). The cohorts were compared regarding the occurrence of severe vasoplegia, organ dysfunctions (lung, kidney, and brain), inflammation, in-hospital complications (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, pneumonia, and sepsis), in-hospital mortality, and length of ICU and hospital stay. Results Comparing fine filter vs control filter cohort, respiratory dysfunction (Horowitz index 206 (119–290) vs 191 (104.75–280); P = 0.04), pneumonia (11.4% vs 14.4%; P = 0.02), sepsis (9.6% vs 12.2%; P = 0.03), interleukin-6 (471.5 (258.8–1062.8) ng/l vs 540.5 (284.5–1147.5) ng/l; P = 0.01), and length of ICU (1.2 (0.6–4.9) vs 1.7 (0.8–6.9) days; P < 0.01) and hospital stay (14.0 (9.2–22.2) vs 14.8 (10.0–26.8) days; P = 0.01) were reduced. Rate of severe vasoplegia (21.0% vs 19.6%; P > 0.20) and acute kidney injury (11.8% vs 13.7%; P = 0.11) was not significantly different between the cohorts. Conclusions In-line filtration with finer 0.2 and 1.2 μm filters may be associated with less organ dysfunction and less inflammation in critically ill adult patients. Trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT02281604).

Download Full-text

The impact of decision aids in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028379 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (9) ◽

pp. e028379 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Jenaya Goldwag ◽

Priscilla Marsicovetere ◽

Peter Scalia ◽

Heather A Johnson ◽

Marie-Anne Durand ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Decision Aids ◽

Case Series ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

The Impact ◽

Colorectal Cancer Treatment

ObjectivesOur aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine the impact of patient decision aids (PDA) on patients facing treatment decisions for colorectal cancer.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesSources included Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception to June, 20, 2019.Eligibility criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, mixed methods and case series in which a PDA for colorectal cancer treatment was used. Qualitative studies were excluded from our review.Data extraction and synthesisFollowing execution of the search strategy by a medical librarian, two blinded independent reviewers identified articles for inclusion. Two blinded reviewers were also responsible for data extraction, risk of bias and study quality assessments. Any conflict in article inclusion or extraction was resolved by discussion.ResultsOut of 3773 articles identified, three met our inclusion criteria: one RCT, one before-and-after study and one mixed-method study. In these studies, the use of a PDA for colorectal cancer treatment was associated with increased patient knowledge, satisfaction and preparation for making a decision. On quality assessment, two of three studies were judged to be of low quality.ConclusionA paucity of evidence exists on the effect of PDA for colorectal cancer treatment with existing evidence being largely of low quality. Further investigation is required to determine the effect of decision aids for colorectal cancer treatment as well as reasons for the lack of PDA development and implementation in this area.Prospero registration numberCRD42018095153.

Download Full-text